| 18-540 |
Leslie Rutledge, Attorney General of Arkansas v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Association |
Eighth Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
CVSGAmici (20)Relisted (2) |
circuit-split drug-reimbursement eighth-circuit erisa-preemption health-care-law pbm-regulation pharmacy-benefit-managers rate-regulation state-regulation |
Whether the Eighth Circuit erred in holding that Arkansas's statute regulating PBMs' drug-reimbursement rates, which is similar to laws enacted by a s… |
51.0 |
| 18-1140 |
Avco Corporation v. Jill Sikkelee, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of David Sikkelee, Deceased, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
CVSGAmici (8)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
aircraft-design aviation-safety design-defect federal-aviation-act federal-preemption field-preemption impossibility-preemption preemption product-liability state-law |
Whether the Federal Aviation Act preempts state-law design-defect claims. |
42.5 |
| 18-415 |
HP Inc., fka Hewlett-Packard Company v. Steven E. Berkheimer |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
CVSGAmici (7)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
35-usc-101 abstract-idea alice-framework civil-procedure claim-construction inventive-concept judicial-exception patent patent-eligibility question-of-fact question-of-law section-101 standing |
The question presented is whether patent eligibility is a question of law for the court based on the scope of the claims or a question of fact for the… |
41.5 |
| 18-926 |
Putnam Investments, LLC, et al. v. John Brotherston, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al. |
First Circuit |
Denied |
CVSGAmici (4)Relisted (2) |
active-management burden-of-proof circuit-split erisa erisa-fiduciary erisa-fiduciary-duty fiduciary-duty index-funds investment-options loss-causation |
A fiduciary of an ERISA plan is personally liable for "losses to the plan resulting from" a breach of fiduciary duty. 29 U.S.C. § 1109(a).
Fiduciarie… |
35.0 |
| 18-817 |
Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., et al. v. Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
CVSGAmici (3)Relisted (2) |
generic-drugs inventive-concept medical-patent medical-treatment method-of-treatment natural-law patent-eligibility routine-and-conventional section-101 |
Whether patents that claim a method of medically treating a patient automatically satisfy Section 101 of the Patent Act, even if they apply a natural … |
34.0 |
| 19-631 |
William P. Barr, Attorney General, et al. v. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc., et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (19) |
automated-call-restriction constitutional-remedy first-amendment free-speech government-debt-exception political-speech severability statutory-interpretation tcpa telephone-consumer-protection-act |
Whether the government-debt exception to the TCPA's automated-call restriction violates the First Amendment, and whether the proper remedy for any con… |
29.5 |
| 19-430 |
Athena Diagnostics, Inc., et al. v. Mayo Collaborative Services, LLC, dba Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (11) |
35-usc-101 chemical-process chemical-steps diagnostic-method federal-circuit medical-diagnostics medical-innovation molecular-detection novel-molecules patent-eligibility patent-protection precedent subject-matter-eligibility |
Whether a new and specific method of diagnosing a medical condition is patent-eligible subject matter, where the method detects a molecule never previ… |
21.5 |
| 19-288 |
Javier Sanchez, Gregory Casorso, and Michael Marr v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (2)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
antitrust antitrust-law criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment jury-instructions per-se-rule presumption sherman-act sixth-amendment |
The question presented is whether the operation of the per se rule in criminal antitrust cases violates the constitutional prohibition —grounded in th… |
16.0 |
| 19-386 |
Monroe County Commission v. A.A. Nettles, Sr. Properties Limited, et al. |
Alabama |
Denied |
Amici (2)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
exclusive-jurisdiction federal-preemption interim-trail-use interim-use national-trails-system-act rail-line-abandonment railroad-abandonment railroad-right-of-way surface-transportation-board trail-conversion |
Whether federal law giving the STB exclusive jurisdiction over abandonment of rail lines and expressly stating that conversion of a railroad right-of-… |
16.0 |
| 19-51 |
Ben Branch, et al. v. Massachusetts Department of Labor Relations, et al. |
Massachusetts |
Denied |
Amici (2)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
bargaining-representative civil-rights compelled-speech constitutional-rights due-process exclusive-representation first-amendment free-speech political-activity political-autonomy public-employee state-action union-representation |
When a public employee union uses its government-granted authority as employees' exclusive bargaining representative to compel employees to choose bet… |
16.0 |
| 19-409 |
City of Cleveland, Ohio, et al. v. Ricky Jackson, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
42-usc-1983 42-usc-1988 brady-disclosure brady-v-maryland circuit-split civil-rights civil-rights-42-usc-1983 federal-law municipal-liability personal-injury personal-injury-claims qualified-immunity section-1983 section-1988 state-law state-law-survival-rule survival |
1. Whether § 1988 requires the survival of § 1983 claims to be determined using the state-law survival rule for the most closely analogous state cause… |
15.0 |
| 19-329 |
Winston-Salem Industries for the Blind v. PDS Consultants, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (6)Response Waived |
ability-one agency-acquisition bid-protest bid-protest-jurisdiction court-of-federal-claims government-contracts mandatory-source-directive statutory-interpretation tucker-act veterans-preference |
Congress enacted the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act
("JWOD"), 41 U.S.C. § 8501 et seq., to increase employment for individuals who are blind and severely
dis… |
14.5 |
| 19-102 |
Leroy Baca v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
18-usc-1503 consciousness-of-wrongdoing constitutional-rights criminal-intent criminal-willfulness jury-anonymity mens-rea obstruction-of-justice public-trial specific-intent |
1. Twenty years ago, the First Circuit stated:
"The scienter element in the obstruction statute is the
subject of more confusing case law than can be … |
14.0 |
| 19-352 |
Robin Brindle, et al. v. Delta Airlines, Inc., et al. |
Rhode Island |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
airline-deregulation airline-deregulation-act civil-procedure federal-law federal-preemption labor-law local-wage-regulation preemption state-regulation state-wage-regulation transportation transportation-law wage-regulation |
Whether the preemption provision of the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978, 49 U.S.C. § 41713(b)(1), exempts airlines from state and local wage regulati… |
14.0 |
| 19-337 |
Regents of the University of Minnesota v. LSI Corporation, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
administrative-proceeding civil-procedure federal-agency federal-circuit inter-partes-review patent patent-validity sovereign-immunity state-university university |
Whether the inter partes review proceedings brought by private respondents against the University of Minnesota in this case are barred by sovereign im… |
13.5 |
| 19-361 |
Renado Smith and Richard Delancy v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
confrontation-clause criminal-evidence criminal-procedure custody-release deposition-testimony due-process good-faith-effort investigative-steps prosecutorial-misconduct prosecutorial-procedure sixth-amendment testimonial-statement unavailability witness-unavailability |
The Confrontation Clause permits prosecutors to introduce the out-of-court testimonial statements of an absent witness only if the witness is "unavail… |
13.5 |
| 19-266 |
Seantrey Morris v. Joseph Mekdessie, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (2)Response RequestedRelisted (2) |
civil-procedure civil-rights collateral-attack due-process heck-doctrine heck-v-humphrey judicial-estoppel pretrial-diversion section-1983 |
This Court held in Heck v. Humphrey that a plaintiff cannot bring a § 1983 claim based on "actions whose unlawfulness would render a [prior] convictio… |
13.0 |
| 19-577 |
Tamra L. Lamprell v. Rex E. Stuckey |
New Mexico |
Denied |
Amici (2)Relisted (2) |
best-interest-of-the-child best-interest-standard best-interests-standard child-custody due-process due-process,child-custody,parental-rights,pre-depr imminent-harm parental-rights post-deprivation-hearing pre-deprivation-hearing |
A New Mexico district court issued an interim order removing a three-year-old girl from her mother's custody without a prior hearing. The court did no… |
13.0 |
| 19-403 |
Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas v. Texas |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
agency-interpretation federal-indian-law fifth-circuit gaming gaming-prohibition gaming-regulation indian-gaming indian-gaming-regulatory-act multi-circuit-conflict national-indian-gaming-commission statutory-interpretation tribal-lands tribal-sovereignty trust-lands trust-statutes |
Whether IGRA authorizes gaming on tribal lands previously governed by trust statutes that prohibited gaming, as the National Indian Gaming Commission,… |
12.5 |
| 19-414 |
Medtronic, Inc. v. Mark A. Barry |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
burden-of-proof experimental-use federal-circuit patent-law patent-law-35-usc-102-b reduction-to-practice statutory-bar supreme-court |
35 U.S.C. § 102(b) (2011) bars the patenting of an invention that was "in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date … |
12.5 |
| 19-554 |
50 Murray Street Acquisition LLC v. John Kuzmich, et al. |
New York |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment judicial-takings lower-manhattan-revitalization-plan property-rights rent-stabilization section-421-g takings-clause |
1. Whether the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments prohibit courts, like other branches of government, from eliminating established property rights withou… |
12.5 |
| 19-400 |
Garmin USA, Inc., et al. v. Cellspin Soft, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (2) |
35-usc-101 civil-procedure claim-construction eligibility inventive-claims inventive-concept judicial-review legal-question motion-to-dismiss patent patent-eligibility patent-law pleadings question-of-law subject-matter-eligibility |
Whether patent eligibility is a question of law for the court that can be resolved on a motion to dismiss, notwithstanding allegations in a complaint … |
12.0 |
| 19-312 |
Ali Ekhlassi v. National Lloyds Insurance Company |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
administrative-law circuit-split civil-procedure exclusive-jurisdiction federal-courts federal-jurisdiction fema flood-insurance national-flood-insurance-act private-insurers statutory-construction |
Whether Section 4072's provision of "exclusive" federal jurisdiction applies to suits against private insurers. |
11.5 |
| 19-156 |
Diego Baldemar Islas v. Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (2) |
blood-seizure fourth-amendment franks-v-delaware misleading-by-commission misleading-by-omission probable-cause schmerber-v-california search-and-seizure warrant-requirements |
Does the holding of Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978) forbid misleading by omission as well as misleading by comm… |
11.0 |
| 19-43 |
Power Analytics Corporation v. Operation Technology, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (2) |
35-usc-101 alice-standard alice-v-cls-bank federal-circuit patent-eligibility patent-law patent-litigation rule-36-affirmance section-101 |
In Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International , 573 U.S. 208 (2014), this Court prescribed standards and a mode of analysis for determining patent eligibil… |
11.0 |
| 19-52 |
Alfred J. Walker v. N. C. English, Warden |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
28-usc-2241 28-usc-2255 circuit-precedent circuit-split erroneous-precedent federal-criminal-procedure federal-prisoner habeas-corpus post-conviction-relief section-2255 statutory-interpretation |
May a federal prisoner file a petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in order to raise arguments that were foreclosed by binding (but erron… |
11.0 |
| 19-64 |
Heidi C. Lilley, Kia Sinclair, and Ginger M. Pierro v. New Hampshire |
New Hampshire |
Denied |
Amici (2)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
constitutional-law equal-protection fourteenth-amendment free-speech gender-discrimination intermediate-scrutiny public-exposure public-nudity |
1. Does an ordinance expressly punishing only women, but not men, for identical conduct—being topless in public—classify on the basis of gender?
2. D… |
11.0 |
| 19-199 |
Manfredo M. Salinas v. United States Railroad Retirement Board |
Fifth Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
|
administrative-law agency-decision-making benefits-determination final-decision judicial-review railroad-retirement-act railroad-retirement-board railroad-unemployment-insurance-act statutory-interpretation |
Whether, under section 5(f) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, 45 U.S.C. § 355(f), and section 8 of the Railroad Retirement Act, 45 U.S.C. § … |
10.5 |
| 19-343 |
New York Republican State Committee v. Securities and Exchange Commission |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
|
administrative-law first-amendment free-association free-speech investment-advisers political-contributions sec sec-rule-2030 |
On August 25, 2016, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (hereinafter "Respondent" or "Commission" or "SEC") approved Rule 2030, repro… |
10.5 |
| 19-428 |
Ryan Courtade v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
|
18-usc-2252 18-usc-2256 appellate-review child-pornography child-pornography-statute circuit-split due-process lascivious-exhibition standard-of-review statutory-interpretation subjective-intent |
1. When reviewing a district court's conclusion that an image depicts a "lascivious exhibition" under 18 U.S.C. 2256(2)(A), must the appellate court r… |
10.5 |
| 19-435 |
SIH Partners LLLP, Explorer Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
|
administrative-law agency-interpretation chevron-deference circuit-split irs-regulation revenue-ruling statutory-interpretation tax-liability tax-regulation |
The Third Circuit, in conf lict with the D.C., Ninth, and Federal Circuits, deferred to an IRS regulation under step two of Chevron even though the ag… |
10.5 |
| 19-464 |
Veterans Contracting Group, Inc. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
|
unlawful act by the agency is shielded from judic administrative-law agency-action civil-procedure due-process government-contracts judicial-review service-disabled-veterans small-business small-business-set-aside standing statutory-compliance va-procurement veterans-affairs veterans-contracts |
Whether agency action based on an earlier, unlawful act by the agency is shielded from judicial correction based on an individual employee's alleged l… |
10.5 |
| 19-490 |
Jonathan S. Metcalf v. Michael Fitzgerald, et al. |
Connecticut |
Denied |
|
adversary-proceeding adversary-proceedings bankruptcy bankruptcy-code civil-procedure federalism judicial-interpretation legal-claims preemption standing state-law state-law-claims vexatious-litigation |
Does the Bankruptcy Code preempt state-law vexatious-litigation claims arising from adversary actions in bankruptcy proceedings? |
10.5 |
| 19-526 |
Dexter Edwards, dba Edwards Land and Cattle v. Genex Cooperative, Inc. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
|
cattle-reproduction choice-of-law civil-procedure contract contract-law diversity-jurisdiction erie-doctrine federalism oral-agreement state-law |
Did the court of appeals violate Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938) and the pragmatic federalism it represents by refusing to apply establish… |
10.5 |
| 19-539 |
Office of Recovery Services v. John R. Latham |
Utah |
Denied |
|
ark-dept-of-health-v-ahlborn civil-litigation future-medical-expenses liens medicaid-reimbursement medical-expenses past-medical-expenses settlement settlement-allocation state-recovery third-party-liability third-party-tort third-party-tortfeasor |
When a State incurs medical expenses because a third-party tortfeasor injures a Medicaid recipient, federal law requires the State to seek reimburseme… |
10.5 |
| 19-565 |
Antonio Passaro, Jr. v. Virginia, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure federal-court federal-jurisdiction lapides-v-board-of-regents litigation removal sovereign-immunity state-court waiver |
Whether, in the context of a federal claim brought in state court where the state would enjoy sovereign immunity, a state's voluntary removal to feder… |
10.5 |
| 19-581 |
Paul Dovin, et ux. v. Kenneth L. Sweitzer, et al. |
Pennsylvania |
Denied |
|
appeals appellate-procedure civil-procedure collateral-order-doctrine collateral-orders collateral-orders-doctrine due-process judicial-review pennsylvania-supreme-court procedural-doctrine right-to-appeal standing |
Whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court Erred in Denying Petitioners Right to Appeal Under the Collateral Orders Doctrine? |
10.5 |
| 19-583 |
Estate of Robert Cunningham, et al. v. Mark McGuire |
First Circuit |
Denied |
|
facts-underlying false-claims-act first-to-file-bar judicial-review jurisdiction jurisdictional-provision legal-standing pleadings procedural-analysis qui-tam statutory-interpretation |
The False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733, permits qui tam relators to sue on the United States' behalf to recover damages for frauds against… |
10.5 |
| 19-641 |
Colorado Department of Labor and Employment, Division of Workers' Compensation v. Dami Hospitality, LLC |
Colorado |
Denied |
|
8th-amendment ability-to-pay civil-procedure constitutional-interpretation corporate-liability corporations due-process eighth-amendment excessive-fines regulatory-enforcement state-law takings workers-compensation |
Whether the Eighth Amendment's Excessive Fines Clause applies to corporations as it does individuals and, if so, whether and to what extent it require… |
10.5 |
| 19-719 |
Dami Hospitality, LLC v. Colorado Department of Labor and Employment, Division of Workers' Compensation |
Colorado |
Denied |
|
ability-to-pay civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-fines criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process eighth-amendment excessive-fines excessive-fines-clause proportionality sentencing |
How is an offender's ability to pay relevant in determining whether a fine is unconstitutional under Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment? |
10.5 |
| 19M88 |
Eric A. Longmire v. Warshaw Burstein Cohen Schlesinger & Kuh, LLP |
New York |
Presumed Complete |
|
None |
|
10.5 |
| 19-387 |
Ambac Assurance Corporation v. Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico, et al. |
First Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
11-usc-904 11-usc-922 48-usc-2165 automatic-stay bankruptcy-code debt-enforcement municipal-bankruptcy municipal-debtors special-revenues statutory-interpretation |
1. Whether 11 U.S.C. § 904 and 48 U.S.C. § 2165 prohibit a bankruptcy court from enforcing the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code against municipal deb… |
9.5 |
| 19-391 |
Assured Guaranty Corp., et al. v. Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico, et al. |
First Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
automatic-stay bankruptcy-code bond-debt debt-enforcement municipal-bankruptcy municipal-bond-market special-revenues |
Whether 11 U.S.C. § 922(d) mandates that there is no automatic stay of debt enforcement actions with respect to pledged special revenues. |
9.5 |
| 19-589 |
Rimini Street, Inc. v. Oracle USA, Inc., et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
conscious-disregard copyright-infringement ebay-inc-v-mercexchange ebay-inc-vs-mercexchange ebay-v-mercexchange equitable-framework equitable-relief injunctive-relief jury-finding mental-state reexamination-clause seventh-amendment |
Whether courts must take into account a jury's finding of an infringer's mental state in considering injunctive relief under the Copyright Act. |
9.5 |
| 19-35 |
Brandon Lee Mojica v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
circuit-review criminal-procedure due-process evidentiary-hearing federal-statute habeas-corpus heightened-pleading post-conviction-relief sentencing standard-of-proof united-states-v-davis |
1. Whether the Court should grant, vacate, and remand this case to the Eleventh Circuit for reconsideration in light of United States v. Davis, 2019 W… |
9.0 |
| 19-44 |
Raul Molina Deocampo v. William P. Barr, Attorney General |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
None |
|
9.0 |
| 19-61 |
Maritime Life Caribbean Limited v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
appointment attorney-general attorney-general-power civil-procedure department-of-justice district-court-discretion federal-government harmless-error harmless-error-review litigation-authority representation separation-of-powers standing statutory-interpretation united-states-code |
Title 28, section 516, of the United States Code, vests the authority to litigate on behalf of the United States in the Department of Justice, under t… |
9.0 |
| 19-62 |
Michelle Carter v. Massachusetts |
Massachusetts |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
arbitrary-enforcement assisted-suicide common-law criminal-conviction due-process first-amendment free-speech involuntary-manslaughter suicide-encouragement |
Michelle Carter's conviction for involuntary manslaughter in connection with Conrad Roy III's suicide is unprecedented. Massachusetts is the only stat… |
9.0 |
| 19-630 |
Kyle Ray Hurst, Personal Representative of the Estate of Andrew James Hurst and on Behalf of the Estate of Andrew James Hurst Deceased and the Statutory Wrongful Death Survivor of Andrew James Hurst v. United States, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights commercial-area commercial-use due-process eleventh-circuit federal-jurisdiction federal-jurisprudence federal-lands-management fee-charged liability public-access standing statutory-interpretation summary-judgment takings |
Whether the Eleventh Circuit wrongfully absolved
Respondent of liability when it determined that Moore
Lake was not an "area" where a fee was charged,… |
8.5 |
| 19-742 |
James Bailey-Snyder v. United States |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response Waived |
arrest-definition civil-rights criminal-investigation criminal-procedure due-process liberty-restriction prisoner-rights prosecutorial-discretion solitary-confinement speedy-trial wilkinson-v-austin |
Does imposing solitary confinement on a prisoner while police and prosecutors investigate and consider new criminal charges amount to an "arrest" givi… |
6.5 |
| 19-166 |
Matthew J. Rosenwasser v. Fordham University, et al. |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
civil-rights due-process federal-funding statute-of-limitations title-ix university university-liability |
When a federally-funded university consistently, deliberately and intentionally denies a Title IX investigation, the Statute of Limitations for Title … |
6.0 |
| 19-25 |
Irma Rosas v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Chicago |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
accepted-and-usual-course certiorari civil-procedure civil-rights due-process erickson-v-pardus judicial-proceedings legal-standard pro-se pro-se-litigant procedural-error standing supreme-court-review |
WHETHER THE LOWER COURT, IN CONFLICT WITH THIS COURT'S HOLDING IN ERICKSON V. PARDUS, 551 U.S. 89 (2007), SO FAR DEPARTED FROM THE ACCEPTED AND USUAL … |
6.0 |
| 19-252 |
Michael Adam Booth v. Nissan North America, Inc. |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
ada-amendments ada-amendments-act-of-2008 americans-with-disabilities-act disability-definition judicial-precedent legislative-intent major-life-activity reasonable-accommodation rules-of-construction statutory-construction sutton-v-united-air-lines toyota-v-williams work-restrictions workplace-accommodation |
Whether the 2008 Amendment to the Americans Disability Act extends the definition of disability to permanent work restrictions precluding manual tasks… |
6.0 |
| 18-1222 |
Christopher Andre Vialva v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
|
capital-case certificate-of-appealability due-process federal-habeas federal-habeas-proceedings federal-procedure habeas-corpus integrity-of-proceedings judicial-misconduct rule-60(b) rule-60(b)(6) rule-60b successive-habeas-petition successive-petition |
After the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit resolved Petitioner's motion under § 2255 seeking habeas relief from his death sentence… |
5.5 |
| 19-208 |
Mark A. Beckham v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
|
appellate-review constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process harmless-error jury-instruction jury-instructions reasonable-doubt standard-of-review |
Because only a jury, acting on proof beyond a
reasonable doubt, may take a person's liberty, when,
if ever, is it constitutionally permissible for a… |
5.5 |
| 19-268 |
Park Properties Associates, L.P., et al. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
|
breach-of-contract contract-administration contract-jurisdiction court-of-federal-claims federal-circuit federal-claims-court government-contracts privity privity-doctrine third-party-administrator tucker-act |
The question presented is whether the Court of Federal Claims has jurisdiction over a breach-of-contract claim against the government, where the gover… |
5.5 |
| 19-331 |
Sequoia Capital Operations, LLC v. Jessica Gingras, et al. |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
|
arbitrability arbitration arbitration-agreement civil-procedure contract contract-interpretation contract-law court-jurisdiction delegation-provision federal-arbitration-act jurisdiction |
Where an arbitration agreement contains a separate "delegation provision" that reserves for an arbitrator the authority to decide any disputes concern… |
5.5 |
| 19-358 |
Lesbia Nineth Perez-Cazun, et al. v. William P. Barr, Attorney General |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 19-376 |
Dennis Thomas Thompson v. Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 19-385 |
Abdifatah Gaas Qorane v. William P. Barr, Attorney General |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 19-502 |
Richard Baatz, et al. v. Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
|
certificate-of-public-convenience due-process eminent-domain federal-energy-regulatory-commission land-use natural-gas-act property-rights regulatory-authority takings |
Whether the Natural Gas Act requires the holder of a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to obtain by easement, contract, or eminent domai… |
5.5 |
| 19-503 |
Apache Corporation v. Bigie Lee Rhea |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
|
administrative-feasibility ascertainability class-action class-actions class-certification class-membership class-notice due-process rule-23 |
Three circuits have held that Rule 23(b)(3) requires proponents of class certification to show an administratively feasible method for identifying cla… |
5.5 |
| 19-516 |
Nolan Espinda, Director, Hawaii Department of Public Safety, et al. v. Royce C. Gouveia |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
|
appellate-deference appellate-jurisdiction appellate-review custody federal-district-court-jurisdiction federal-jurisdiction federal-review habeas-corpus Hawai'i-sovereign-right manifest-necessity mistrial-declaration rooker-feldman-doctrine state-court-judgments |
This case presents clear and intractable conflicts
regarding: 1) the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and the
limitations it imposes on the jurisdiction of low… |
5.5 |
| 19-537 |
Jeffrey G. Thomas v. Norman Solomon, et al. |
California |
Denied |
|
501(c)(3)-preemption bankruptcy-automatic-stay bankruptcy-stay civil-procedure collateral-estoppel due-process frivolous-appeal monetary-sanctions new-york-times-v-sullivan public-interest standing state-court-judgment |
(1) Whether a Judgment of a State Court Violates the Automatic Stay in Bankruptcy Because the Judgment Was Because of Collateral Estoppel to Attack A … |
5.5 |
| 19-543 |
Jeffrey Wills Lusk, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Dorothy Jean Ross Lusk, Deceased v. Crown Pointe Care Center, et al. |
Ohio |
Denied |
|
beneficiary beneficiary-status civil-procedure creditors estate estate-representation executor executor-rights legal-standing pro-se pro-se-representation probate-law standing |
May the executor and sole beneficiary of an estate without creditors represent the estate pro se? |
5.5 |
| 19-544 |
In Re Todd C. Bank |
|
Denied |
|
affidavit affidavit-requirement article-iii-court bar-admission civil-procedure civil-procedure-28-usc-1746 due-process federal-courts legal-procedure standing statutory-interpretation unsworn-declaration |
28 U.S.C. Section 1746 states that, "[w]herever, under any law of the United States or under any rule, regulation, order, or requirement made pursuant… |
5.5 |
| 19-548 |
Joseph R. Mullins v. Joseph E. Corcoran, et al. |
Massachusetts |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure civil-rights commercial-dispute first-amendment minority-shareholder-rights noerr-pennington noerr-pennington-doctrine petition right-to-petition sham-litigation |
Whether, under the First Amendment, a court may award damages against a party for the act of filing suit in a commercial dispute without finding that … |
5.5 |
| 19-556 |
Lucas Allen Newnam v. Pennsylvania |
Pennsylvania |
Denied |
|
bad-faith-inquiry bright-line-test continuance continuance-request counsel-of-choice criminal-defendant criminal-procedure due-process right-to-counsel sixth-amendment trial-delay |
In every jurisdiction in the United States- both federal and state- there is a balancing test for deciding whether a court's decision to deny a contin… |
5.5 |
| 19-558 |
Montville Township Board of Education v. Zurich American Insurance Company |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure coverage-evaluation diversity-action duty-to-defend four-corners-rule insurance insurance-coverage new-jersey-law sl-industries state-law third-circuit |
Although the law of the State of New Jersey, which applies to this diversity action, removed from State Court on that basis, imposes a broad duty on a… |
5.5 |
| 19-559 |
John E. Reardon v. Noel Hillman, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
|
absolute-immunity administrative-acts civil-procedure civil-rights due-process judicial-immunity notice notice-and-hearing notice-of-hearing right-to-be-heard standing standing-order void-judgment |
1. Contrary to all 12 circuits, Is the court's failure to set aside a Void judgment that is due to the failure to give prior notice and right to be he… |
5.5 |
| 19-590 |
Michael Anthony Deem v. John P. Colangelo, et al. |
New York |
Denied |
|
child-custody child-custody-rights custody-dispute due-process equal-protection family-law first-amendment forensic-evaluator free-speech parental-rights right-to-privacy |
1. Whether a court appointed FE's examination of a fit parent's children over that fit parent's objection violates that fit parent's right to control … |
5.5 |
| 19-593 |
City of Camden, New Jersey v. Alanda Forrest |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
|
civil-rights constitutional-violations due-process legal-standard monell-doctrine monell-liability monell-v-department-of-social-services municipal-liability policy-custom policy-or-custom policymaker-notice untrained-or-unsupervised-employees |
What, under Monell v. Dep't of Soc. Serus., 436 U.S. 658 (1978), and its progeny, constitutes a pattern of similar constitutional violations by untrai… |
5.5 |
| 19-598 |
Joy Spurr v. Melissa L. Pope, Chief Judge, Tribal Court of the Nottawaseppi Huron Band of Potawatomi, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction jurisdiction non-tribal-member personal-protection-order sovereign-immunity tribal-sovereignty violence-against-women violence-against-women-act |
1. Suppose a nontribal member is sued in a court of an Indian Tribe, and later sues in federal court claiming that the tribal court lacked jurisdictio… |
5.5 |
| 19-606 |
Ukraine v. Pao Tatneft |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
|
arbitration-agreement arbitration-enforcement arbitration-exception foreign-sovereign-immunity international-arbitration new-york-convention sovereign-immunity subject-matter-jurisdiction waiver-exception |
Whether the D.C. Circuit correctly held that: (1) all 160 signatories to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards … |
5.5 |
| 19-634 |
Republic of Sudan, et al. v. James Owens, et al. |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
|
chevron-oil circuit-court due-process foreign-sovereigns foreign-sovereigns-immunity,terrorism-exception,su landgraf retroactive-application sovereign-immunity substantive-liability terrorism-exception |
Whether the D.C. Circuit applied an unconstitutional rule of substantive liability created by the D.C. Court of Appeals — the highest local court of t… |
5.5 |
| 19M81 |
Russell J. Fenstermaker v. Kathy Halvorson, Warden |
Eighth Circuit |
Presumed Complete |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 19M82 |
DeAnna Morrow v. West Central Georgia Workforce Development Corporation |
Eleventh Circuit |
Presumed Complete |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 19M83 |
John Edward Roach, Jr. v. Washington |
Ninth Circuit |
Presumed Complete |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 19M84 |
Vernell Harris v. Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas, Health & Welfare Pension Funds |
Seventh Circuit |
Presumed Complete |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 19M85 |
Arthur Conner v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
Presumed Complete |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 19M86 |
Timothy Alan Marr v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections |
Eleventh Circuit |
Presumed Complete |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 19M87 |
Donna Montgomery v. Walgreen Co. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Presumed Complete |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 19M89 |
Dolores Lloyd v. Presby's Inspired Life, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Presumed Complete |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 18-9325 |
Davion L. Jefferson v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
GVR |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
18-usc-924c constitutional-rights crime-of-violence directed-verdict due-process jury-trial jury-trial-clause sentencing-enhancement sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation |
I. Did the district court violate the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause and the Sixth Amendment's Jury Trial Clause when it directed a verdict on 1… |
4.0 |
| 19-332 |
Steven E. Davis, et al. v. Bank of America Corporation, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
28-usc-1915 civil-litigation civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process forma-pauperis judicial-access legal-costs pro-se pro-se-litigants standing |
The Pro Se Petitioners were unequivocally deprived of all their "Constitutional Rights". Seven Petitioners were wrongfully denied the right to file fo… |
4.0 |
| 19-479 |
Carol M. Kam v. John B. Peyton, Jr. |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
associate-judge judicial-authority judicial-misconduct probate-court probate-law rooker-feldman-doctrine state-court-jurisdiction state-court-rulings state-law void-orders |
Does the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine apply to two Void [not voidable but, void] "proposed " State Court Rulings produced by a former Associate Judge, who … |
4.0 |
| 19-509 |
Jane Doe v. Dardanelle School District |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-rights damages-liability deliberate-indifference due-process educational-discrimination educational-opportunities federal-funding sexual-harassment student-harassment student-on-student-harassment title-ix |
1. Whether a recipient of federal funding may be held liable where it takes any action in response to complaints of sexual harassment.
2. Whether a v… |
4.0 |
| 19-5154 |
James Wardell Quary v. N. C. English, Warden |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
28-usc-2241 28-usc-2255 appellate-review circuit-precedent circuit-split detention-challenge erroneous-precedent federal-criminal-defendants federal-criminal-procedure federal-statute habeas-corpus post-conviction-relief |
May a federal prisoner file a petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in order to raise arugments that were foreclosed by binding (but erron… |
4.0 |
| 19-5315 |
Raymond Aguilar v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
28-U.S.C-§-2244 28-U.S.C-§-2255 28-usc-2244 28-usc-2255 court-of-appeals district-court habeas-corpus johnson-rule residual-clause section-2244 section-2255 successive-motion successive-petitions void-for-vagueness |
I. When a court of appeals grants authorization to file a successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h)(2), does 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(4) permit a distric… |
4.0 |
| 19-5316 |
Abelee Bronson v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
28-usc-2255 criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing criminal-sentencing-guidelines-mandatory habeas-corpus johnson-v-united-states mandatory-guidelines residual-clause retroactivity sentencing-guidelines sessions-v-dimaya void-for-vagueness |
I. Whether, for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(3), the new rule announced in Johnson applies to the analogous residual clause in the mandatory guidel… |
4.0 |
| 19-553 |
Moussa Diarra v. City of New York, New York |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
42-usc-1983 civil-rights due-process judicial-bias monell-claim monell-liability police-procedure probable-cause substantive-due-process summary-judgment |
1. For a summary judgment to be granted, the Circuits must determine that the movant is entitled to "judgment as a matter of law", Miller . New York C… |
4.0 |
| 19-5697 |
Felipe Vinagre-Hernandez v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
criminal-procedure detention detention-motion federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure indictment judicial-interpretation jurisdiction legal-timing pretrial-motion speedy-trial-act |
Whether a motion for detention filed before an indictment or information charging a person has been obtained is a pretrial motion within the meaning o… |
4.0 |
| 19-5924 |
James Hennessee v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
apprendi-doctrine armed-career-criminal-act circuit-court constitutional-interpretation conviction-records criminal-procedure jury predicate-convictions sentencing sentencing-enhancement sixth-amendment |
The Armed Career Criminal Act enhances the statutory penalty for a firearms offense when the offender has three predicate convictions for crimes that … |
4.0 |
| 19-665 |
John Doe v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
18-usc-3553 18-usc-3553a criminal-procedure district-court district-court-discretion federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure rule-35 rule-35b sentence-reduction sentencing sentencing-factors substantial-assistance |
1. May a district court deny a government's Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) motion for reduction of sentence based on substantial assistance … |
4.0 |
| 19-83 |
Veronica W. Ogunsula v. Staffing Now, Inc. |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
adea employment-discrimination mcdonnell-douglas prima-facie prima-facie-case staffing-agency temporary-employment title-vii |
1. How does the framework and prima facie prongs of the Supreme Court's precedent setting employment case, McDonnell Douglas vs. Green, apply in a Tit… |
4.0 |
| 19-505 |
William Rupert v. Susan Bond, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
antitrust circuit-split civil-procedure civil-rights due-process frcp-12b6 judicial-expediency noerr-pennington personal-jurisdiction rico rico-statute sham-litigation standing |
(1) Should the circuit splits over the use of FRCP 12(b)(6) motions (prior to discovery or an evidentiary hearing), to rule upon a disputed issue of f… |
3.5 |
| 19-523 |
Victor Bernard Williams v. Baptist Health, dba Baptist Health Medical Center, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
2014 revocation of a medical license by the Arkan adverse-negative-reports adverse-reports civil-action civil-rights federal-cause-of-action federal-claims medical-license medical-license-revocation qualified-immunity res-judicata state-board |
1. Whether the April 3, 2014 revocation of Plaintiff's Arkansas medical license by the Arkansas State Board of Medical Examiners ("Medical Board") gav… |
3.5 |
| 19-525 |
Steve Cooley, et al. v. National Abortion Federation |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-jurisdiction civil-rights contempt contempt-sanction criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel effective-counsel preliminary-injunction sanctions sixth-amendment younger-abstention |
How can a state court criminal defendant enjoy his Sixth Amendment right to effective counsel when his state court criminal counsel have been held in … |
3.5 |
| 19-529 |
Robert Sanchez Turner v. Al Thomas, Jr., et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
actual-knowledge-of-danger affirmative-act civil-rights constitutional-rights cut-off-all-avenues-of-recourse due-process law-enforcement public-safety qualified-immunity racial-violence shock-the-conscience specific-individual-or-public state-created-danger |
The following questions stem from the Fourth
Circuit's Published Opinion regarding claims asserted
by Mr. Turner:
1. What analytical framework appl… |
3.5 |
| 19-531 |
Ofra Levin v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al. |
New York |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-review case-merits civil-procedure due-process injury judicial-review legal-standing merits procedural-timing standing |
1. Whether a party who lacks standing at the com
mencement of the action can obtain, or be granted,
standing, four and a half years after the action … |
3.5 |
| 19-542 |
Robert L. Jarrett, Jr. v. State Bar of California |
California |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-jurisdiction attorney-misconduct civil-procedure due-process judicial-precedent jurisdiction legislative-intent precedent recusal-standards standing supreme-court-review vexatious-litigant |
QUESTION NUMBER ONE
How does this Court resolve the absence of appellate
jurisdiction in the proceedings in which the attorney
misconduct is alleged… |
3.5 |
| 19-555 |
R. Ray Fulmer, II v. Fifth Third Equipment Finance Company, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
asset-valuation bankruptcy-auction bankruptcy-code-section-363 bankruptcy-sale chapter-7 collateral-attack creditor-rights fiduciary-duties fiduciary-duty jurisdictional-error non-jurisdictional-error priority-distribution priority-violation priority-violations |
11 U.S.C. §363(m) moots claims against good faith purchasers at bankruptcy auctions if the claims invalidate the sale. In this case, the court's nonap… |
3.5 |
| 19-561 |
Gail Rosier v. Jeffrey Strobel |
Arizona |
Denied |
Response Waived |
child-support contempt contempt-proceedings due-process imprisonment incarcerated-obligors indigent-obligors interstate-enforcement procedural-safeguards uniform-interstate-family-support-act |
1. In light of Turner v. Rogers , 564 U.S. 431 (U.S. 2011), what minimum procedural safeguards are required to ensure due process for incarcerated and… |
3.5 |
| 19-562 |
Brian Burke v. New York City Transit Authority, et al. |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
42-usc-1983 ada civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation defamation due-process fair-labor-standards-act first-amendment leave-to-amend pleading-standards pro-se pro-se-litigation standing state-statute title-vii unconstitutionality |
Pleading standards generally and/or for Title VII and/or 42 U.S.C. 1983 and/or ADA, with regards to pro se parties
If a Defamation per se claim is bl… |
3.5 |
| 19-567 |
Gertrude J. Pierre v. Macy's, Inc., et al. |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
None |
|
3.5 |
| 19-570 |
Greg Steven Elofson v. Stephanie Bivens, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
circuit-split clayton-act judicial-economy nationwide-service nationwide-service-of-process process rico rico-statute rico-venue-process standard-oil standard-oil-co venue venue-process |
1. Does the RICO venue and process statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1965, provide for nationwide service of process under § 1965(d), consistent with the Clayton A… |
3.5 |
| 19-578 |
Sandra G. Hale v. United States, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-law chemical-burns chemical-exposure expert-testimony federal-tort-claims-act medical-malpractice pesticide-regulations pesticide-usage veterans-affairs |
1. Whether an expert Toxicologist can testify regarding chemical burns.
2. Whether cleaning dentures is practicing dentistry and therefore a dental t… |
3.5 |
| 19-584 |
Nuvo Pharmaceuticals (Ireland) Designated Activity Company, et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
35-usc-112 enablement federal-circuit innovation patent patent-law pharmaceutical pharmaceutical-composition prior-art written-description |
Whether the Federal Circuit erred by holding that, whenever the prior art teaches away from a pharmaceutical composition, the written description of a… |
3.5 |
| 19-588 |
Lori Madden-Grammer v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, et al. |
Colorado |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-procedure administrative-review colorado-revised-statutes due-process fourteenth-amendment medical-utilization-review property-interest statutory-rights workers-compensation |
Whether Colorado's Medical Utilization Review process set forth in Section 8-43-501, et seq. of the Colorado Revised Statutes deprives claimants of th… |
3.5 |
| 19-591 |
Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-procedure due-process equal-protection judicial-transparency patent reasoned-opinions rule-of-law summary-affirmation summary-affirmations |
1. Can a court ever choose to write reasoned opinions for one class of losing appellants and not another under the Due Process and Equal Protection Cl… |
3.5 |
| 19-596 |
Sandra G. Hale v. United States, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-claim civil-procedure continuing-tort-doctrine dismissal-with-prejudice federal-tort-claims-act medical-malpractice standing statute-of-limitations |
Petitioner and veteran Ms. Hale, sued under 28 U.S.C. § 1346, Federal Tort Claims Act for injuries caused by Veteran's Administration x-ray technician… |
3.5 |
| 19-602 |
Chesley Eugene Saunders v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
attorney-client-relationship confidential-information criminal-trial due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel fair-trial fundamental-fairness judicial-bias judicial-recusal professional-misconduct recusal sixth-amendment |
1. Whether the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution and the Constitutional Guarantees of a Fundamentally Fair Trial permit a criminal … |
3.5 |
| 19-610 |
Mushkin, Inc. v. Anza Technology, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
amendment appellate-review civil-procedure civil-procedure-15c-relation-back clear-error conduct-transaction-occurrence federal-circuit federal-rules-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure notice relation-back standard-of-review |
Whether the appropriate standard of review for a "relation back" determination under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(c) is: (1) the de novo standard of review appl… |
3.5 |
| 19-615 |
Elaine Ward v. City of New York, New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
42-usc-1983 constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection municipal-liability service-of-process state-court-proceedings transparency |
1. Is there a violation of due process and equal protection under the 5th and 14th amendments as related to 42 U.S.C. 1983, when a municipality, fails… |
3.5 |
| 19-620 |
Christian K. Narkiewicz-Laine v. Kevin C. Doyle, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure common-law copyright criminal-conviction damages prejudice prejudicial-evidence prior-criminal-conviction state-common-law statutory-damages visual-artists-rights-act |
Is a plaintiff prevented from collecting statutory damages under the Visual Artists Rights Act as well as under state common-law for damages to the sa… |
3.5 |
| 19-625 |
Rita Guerrero, Individually and as the Special Administrator of the Estate of Celso N. Guerrero v. BNSF Railway Company |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
federal-employers-liability-act interstate-commerce interstate-rail-service jury-trial negligence scope-of-employment seventh-amendment summary-judgment |
1. Whether the decision by the Seventh Circuit panel conflicts with provisions of the Federal Employers' Liability Act, and the uniform precedents of … |
3.5 |
| 19-628 |
Michael Cetta, Inc., dba Sparks Restaurant v. National Labor Relations Board |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-law civil-rights discharge due-process employee-discharge employer-statements employment labor-dispute labor-relations mutual-understanding national-labor-relations-act permanent-employment prudent-employee prudent-employee-standard replacement-workers standing unconditional-offer-to-return |
1. Whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding striking employees had been discharged in violation of the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA"), eve… |
3.5 |
| 19-647 |
Jonathan Corbett v. Transportation Security Administration |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
article-iii article-iii-standing certainly-impending chain-of-events constitutional-challenge eleventh-circuit future-injury speculative speculative-harm speculative-injury standing standing-article-iii substantial-likelihood supreme-court |
1) Does the Eleventh Circuit's "substantial likelihood" test for Article III standing relating to future injuries comport with this Court's "certainly… |
3.5 |
| 19-652 |
Norman D. Cox, Jr. v. The Money Source, Inc. |
New Jersey |
Denied |
Response Waived |
abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure civil-procedure-default-judgment default-judgment due-process excusable-neglect newly-discovered-evidence r-4-50-1-a service-of-process traverse-hearing |
1. Did the Trial Court err in or abuse it's discretion by entering default judgment against Petitioner based upon the Respondent's defective Service o… |
3.5 |
| 19-653 |
Theresa Ortloff v. Dave Trimmer, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
connick-v-myers due-process first-amendment first-amendment-speech-public-interest-connick-v-m free-speech procedural-due-process public-employee public-employee-speech public-interest speech whistleblower-protection |
1. Must the entire record, including motives, main thrust of the speech, and all instances of speech be reviewed under Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138 … |
3.5 |
| 19-657 |
Virgil Brewer v. Kristina Myers |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights clearly-established-law constitutional-rights due-process excessive-force graham-factors law-enforcement police-use-of-force qualified-immunity summary-judgment use-of-force |
While conducting a house-to-house search for a suspect who had threatened people in a bar with a shotgun after being thrown out of that bar for fighti… |
3.5 |
| 19-662 |
Thomas Sander v. City of Dickinson, North Dakota, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights de-novo-review district-court due-process evidence seventh-amendment summary-judgment trial-by-jury |
1. Whether a civil litigant's right to trial by jury under the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution of the United States is violated when a United St… |
3.5 |
| 19-663 |
Robert J. Wilson v. State Bar of Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
Response Waived |
access-to-courts constitutional-rights dent-v-west-virginia disbarment disciplinary-procedure due-process governmental-immunity in-re-ruffalo legal-ethics state-bar |
Introduction:
Petitioner contends he was disbarred without notice or opportunity to defend himself by his state bar and then denied access to the Cour… |
3.5 |
| 19-664 |
Eugene H. Williams, Jr. v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
28-usc-2255 actual-innocence coram-nobis criminal-conviction criminal-procedure destructive-devices firearms firearms-violations ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel mens-rea statutory-interpretation writ-of-coram-nobis |
1. Whether Petitioner is innocent of the charges resulting from a complete miscarriage of justice based upon the facts herein and is therefore qualifi… |
3.5 |
| 19-668 |
Courtney Bird v. Hawaii, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
child-abuse-registry constitutional-challenge continuing-violation continuing-violations due-process erroneous-listing liberty-interest procedural-safeguards statute-of-limitations |
Courtney Bird alleges the State of Hawai'i systematically violates the due process rights of parents by reporting them as confirmed child abusers on t… |
3.5 |
| 19-671 |
Daniel A. Grover v. Office of Personnel Management |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-deference administrative-law administrative-procedure agency-deference agency-interpretation civil-procedure civil-service due-process federal-regulations regulatory-compliance statutory-interpretation ultra-vires |
Whether the deference standard regarding federal agencies interpretation of their own regulations must continue in the light of the admission by the O… |
3.5 |
| 19-686 |
Snodgrass-King Pediatric Dental Associates, P.C., et al. v. DentaQuest USA Insurance Co., Inc. |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
1st-amendment 42-usc-1983 blum-v-yaretsky civil-rights first-amendment government-contractor government-directive private-contractor section-1983 significant-encouragement state-action |
1. Whether a government directive made to a private contractor while the contractor is bidding on a lucrative and admittedly important government cont… |
3.5 |
| 19-709 |
Mako One Corporation, et al. v. Cedar Rapids Bank and Trust Company |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
circuit-split civil-procedure civil-rights conflict-of-interest due-process evidentiary-hearing judicial-remedy remand reversal structural-error |
1. When a Circuit Court finds opposing counsel has an actual and serious conflict of interest in a civil case, should the Court view the conflict as a… |
3.5 |
| 19-727 |
Keepers, Inc. v. City of Milford, Connecticut |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights content-based content-based-speech first-amendment free-speech reed-v-gilbert reed-v-town-of-gilbert rule-60(b) rule-60b strict-scrutiny summary-judgment |
Whether the district court erred in refusing to grant Petitioner relief from summary judgment based on the Supreme Court's superseding decision in Ree… |
3.5 |
| 19-733 |
Metro-North Commuter Railroad Co. v. Jamey Murphy |
Connecticut |
Denied |
Response Waived |
federal-railroad-safety-act passenger-platform preemption state-law-claim state-law-claims track-conditions track-safety train-speed transportation-regulation |
Does the Federal Railroad Safety Act preempt a state-law claim that a train may not travel on a track next to a passenger platform at the operating sp… |
3.5 |
| 19-776 |
James Wesley Amonett, Jr. v. Virginia |
Virginia |
Denied |
Response Waived |
contract-enforcement contract-law criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-contract-enforcement due-process jury-trial law-enforcement plea-bargaining police-authority police-promises right-to-jury-trial sixth-amendment |
Issue 1. There is an important, recurring issue on which the Federal circuits and the states' highest courts are split, i.e. whether the police can pr… |
3.5 |
| 18-9736 |
Darius Kinney v. Ohio |
Ohio |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (3)IFP |
4th-amendment 6th-amendment constitutional-law criminal-procedure fourth-amendment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel motion-to-suppress search-and-seizure sixth-amendment warrant warrantless-search |
Were Petitioner's Sixth Amendment rights violated where counsel did not file a motion to suppress although the record indicates that police violated p… |
1.5 |
| 18-9495 |
Jason Jones v. Martha Underwood, Warden |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
28-usc-2241 28-usc-2255 federal-habeas-corpus federal-jurisdiction federal-statute habeas-corpus ineffective-remedy intervening-decision mandatory-minimum mandatory-minimum-sentence post-conviction-relief retroactive-application retroactivity sentencing statutory-construction |
Whether petitioner is entitled to seek federal habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on the ground that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is "inadequate or ineff… |
1.0 |
| 19-5384 |
David Rothenberg v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
causal-process child-pornography circuit-split criminal-restitution disaggregation paroline-v-united-states victim-losses |
When calculating restitution for a mere possessor of child pornography, must the victim's losses caused by the initial abuse be disaggregated from the… |
0.5 |
| 19-6039 |
Camilo Andres Landazuri Vargas v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
congress-powers-limits congressional-power criminal-law due-process fifth-amendment foreign-national international-law international-waters jurisdiction jurisdictional-element maritime-drug-law maritime-drug-law-enforcement-act maritime-law sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation united-states-constitution |
WHETHER THE PROSECUTION OF MR. VARGAS - AN
ECUADORIAN NATIONAL WITH NO TIES TO THE UNITED
STATES — FOR TRAFFICKING CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES IN
INTERNATIO… |
0.5 |
| 19-6054 |
John Hemby v. United States |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
armed-career-criminal-act collateral-review constitutional-vagueness criminal-sentencing johnson-ruling mandatory-sentencing new-right retroactivity sentencing-guidelines vagueness vagueness-doctrine welch-precedent |
1. Whether this Court's rulings in Johnson and Welch , retroactively invalidating the residual clause of the ACCA because it was unconstitutionally va… |
0.5 |
| 19-6336 |
Eddie Jennings v. United States |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
armed-career-criminal-act collateral-review criminal-law johnson-ruling mandatory-sentencing new-right retroactive-application retroactivity sentencing sentencing-guidelines vagueness vagueness-doctrine |
1. Whether this Court's rulings in Johnson and Welch , retroactively invalidating the residual clause of the ACCA because it was unconstitutionally va… |
0.5 |
| 19-6472 |
Arthur Lopez v. California |
California |
Denied |
IFP |
child-custody civil-rights criminal-procedure criminal-protective-orders due-process equal-protection family-law latino-fathers parental-rights |
Latino (nexiem teritae).
thould
Mabe Fathers, ineledi
Q
he
Protection
Catholia-Chistian
plovided
qual
lnde Law
guaranteed
Due
Prozess
and
a
Itates Co… |
0.5 |
| 19-6510 |
Timothy L. Douglas v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-2255f3 career-offender criminal-law criminal-sentencing-guidelines-4b1.1-4b1.2 due-process guidelines johnson-rule johnson-v-united-states mandatory-guidelines residual-clause retroactivity section-2255 sentencing sentencing-guidelines vagueness void-for-vagueness |
I. Whether, for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(3), the new rule announced in Johnson applies to the identical residual clause in the mandatory guidel… |
0.5 |
| 19-6521 |
Marcus T. Simmons v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
career-offender criminal-justice criminal-procedure-28-usc-2255 guidelines johnson-rule johnson-v-united-states mandatory-guidelines residual-clause retroactivity sentencing sentencing-enhancement sentencing-guidelines vagueness void-for-vagueness |
I. Whether, for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(3), the new rule announced in Johnson applies to the identical residual clause in the mandatory guidel… |
0.5 |
| 19-6558 |
Antonio Lebaron Melton v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
due-process federal-court-review federal-courts habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-findings state-court state-court-deference strickland-v-washington trial-strategy wilson-v-sellers witness-investigation |
1. Whether Wilson v. Sellers requires faithful adherence to the last reasoned decision of a state court, or may federal courts bolster such a decision… |
0.5 |
| 18-8818 |
Cornell D. Reynolds v. Randall Hepp, Warden |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3)IFP |
appeal appellate-rights appointed-counsel attorney-client attorney-compensation conflict-of-interest due-process indigent-defendant indigent-defense statutory-provisions |
Should the conflict of interest doctrine be extended to include financial conflicts between attorney and client; and/or
Whether a state creates a fat… |
-0.5 |
| 18-9506 |
Kenyon Raheen Gadsden v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
28-usc-2255 career-offender constitutional-vagueness criminal-procedure due-process johnson-ruling johnson-v-united-states mandatory-guidelines residual-clause section-2255 sentencing sentencing-guidelines vagueness |
1. Whether a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, filed within one year of, Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015) and claiming that Johnson inval… |
-1.0 |
| 18-9807 |
Robert Wilson, Jr. v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
28-usc-2255 acca-enumerated-offense-clause acca-statute criminal-procedure-28-usc-2255 due-process habeas-corpus johnson-relief johnson-v-united-states procedural-default residual-clause sentencing sentencing-court sentencing-guidelines violent-felonies violent-felony |
(1) Whether, where the record is unclear, a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petitioner should be required to "affirmatively prove" that the sentencing court relied o… |
-1.0 |
| 19-5129 |
Kendell Lee Starks v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
28-usc-2255 burden-of-proof criminal-defendant criminal-defendant-relief-28-usc-2255,retroactive- florida-conviction-resisting-with-violence,violent retroactive-constitutional-decision sentencing statutory-maximum Whether a Florida conviction for resisting with vi |
Whether a criminal defendant moving for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, based on a retroactive constitutional decision invalidating a federal statutory… |
-1.0 |
| 19-5219 |
Bobby G. Pullen v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
28-usc-2255 circuit-split criminal-procedure-28-usc-2255 criminal-sentencing guidelines-interpretation habeas-corpus johnson-v-united-states mandatory-guidelines residual-clause retroactivity sentencing-guidelines successive-habeas-petitions successive-motion vagueness-doctrine void-for-vagueness |
I. When a court of appeals grants authorization to file a successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h)(2), does 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(4) permit a distric… |
-1.0 |
| 19-5241 |
Zack Zafer Dyab v. Nicole English, Warden |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
2241-petition 2255-motion 28-usc-2241 28-usc-2255 abuse-of-discretion circuit-court-discretion circuit-split detention-challenge foreclosure habeas-corpus judicial-review saving-clause section-2241 section-2255 united-states-v-wheeler |
Does the Petitioner have to test the legality of his detention in the initial 2255 motion, even though the argument would have been rejected on the me… |
-1.0 |
| 19-5307 |
James D. Brigman v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
criminal-justice criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process johnson-rule johnson-v-united-states mandatory-guidelines residual-clause retroactivity sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation vagueness void-for-vagueness |
I.
Whether, for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(3), the new rule announced in
Johnson applies to the identical residual clause in the mandatory guidel… |
-1.0 |
| 19-5458 |
Samantha Winter v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
4th-amendment 5th-amendment criminal-procedure custodial-interrogation evidence evidence-admission harmless-error miranda-warnings motion-to-suppress rule-404b search-and-seizure warrantless-search |
QUESTION 1: WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRONEOUSLY DENIED MS. WINTER'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS HER STATEMENTS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, WHERE ATF AGENTS… |
-1.0 |
| 19-5490 |
Dario Miguel Aceituno v. William P. Barr, Attorney General |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
None |
|
-1.0 |
| 19-5633 |
James F. Johnson v. Richard S. Tischner, Director, Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency, et al. |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure custodial-authority due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review parole public-records sex-offender-registration standing |
1.
DID THE COURT BELOW WAIVE IT'S POLICY OF NOT TO REVIEW OR OVERTURN ANY
DECISION RENDERED BY AND FROM THE APPEALS COURT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN … |
-1.0 |
| 19-5806 |
John Bradham v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
confidential-informant confrontation-clause criminal-procedure drug-transaction due-process evidence evidence-admission sixth-amendment |
WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT'S ERRONEOUS ADMISSION OF A VIDEO OF AN ALLEGED DRUG AND FIREARM TRANSACTION BETWEEN THE CI AND THE DEFENDANT VIOLATED THE C… |
-1.0 |
| 19-5817 |
Kendrick Taylor v. Louisiana |
Louisiana |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
apodaca-v-oregon criminal-procedure criminal-trial fourteenth-amendment incorporation-doctrine johnson-v-louisiana jury-trial jury-unanimity sixth-amendment supreme-court-precedent unanimous-verdict |
The issue presented is whether the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial requires an unanimous jury verdict and, if so, would that unanimity requireme… |
-1.0 |
| 19-5848 |
Saquawn Harris v. United States |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
court-of-appeals due-process en-banc-review federal-rule-35 federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure federal-statute judicial-procedure majority-vote recusal statutory-interpretation |
I. Whether the federal statute providing that en banc rehearing is granted upon the vote of "a majority of judges of the court in regular active servi… |
-1.0 |
| 19-5936 |
Cesar Rosario Lopez-Ramos v. Minnesota |
Minnesota |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
confrontation-clause criminal-procedure cross-examination foreign-language-interpreter police-interrogation sixth-amendment testimonial-statements translation-evidence |
Whether the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause permits the prosecution to introduce testimonial statements in the form of an unidentified foreign … |
-1.0 |
| 19-5948 |
Maria Margarita Valdez-Araiza v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appellate-review conflicting-evidence criminal-procedure-review evidence evidentiary-error harmless-error harmless-error-review judicial-precedent jury-factfinding sixth-amendment standard-of-review witness-credibility |
In conducting harmless-error review, an appellate court may not resolve conflicting evidence, assess the credibility of witnesses, or view the evidenc… |
-1.0 |
| 19-6056 |
Michael Renee Hernandez v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
§-2255 28-U.S.C-2244(b)(4) 28-U.S.C-2255(h) 28-usc-2244b4 28-usc-2255h armed-career-criminal-act federal-prisoner gatekeeping-standard johnson-ruling johnson-v-united-states jurisdictional-hurdle sentencing successive-motion |
(1) Once a federal prisoner secures appellate-court authorization to file a successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h), must the prisoner satisfy a s… |
-1.0 |
| 19-6100 |
Melvyn Perry Sprowson, Jr. v. Nevada |
Nevada |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
ashcroft-v-free-speech-coalition child-pornography constitutional-limits facial-challenge first-amendment free-speech new-york-v-ferber obscenity obscenity-standards overbreadth sexual-abuse state-regulation |
Nevada defines "child pornography" to include any depiction of a minor that "appeals to a shameful or morbid interest in the sexuality of the minor an… |
-1.0 |
| 19-6321 |
Michael J. Prance v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel plea-withdrawal right-to-counsel sixth-amendment |
Whether there is a Sixth Amendment right to counsel during plea withdrawal proceedings? |
-1.5 |
| 19-6430 |
Harold Blake v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability civil-rights constitutional-claims due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus judicial-review standard-of-review standing |
Whether the petitioner has demonstrated that jurists of reason could disagree with the federal courts' resolution of his constitutional claims or that… |
-1.5 |
| 19-6617 |
Melissa Morton v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeal appellate-review circuit-split criminal-procedure-waiver due-process inter-circuit-conflict intra-circuit-conflict jury-instruction jury-instructions legal-procedure right-relinquishment right-to-appeal waiver |
Whether a defendant waives his right to challenge a jury instruction on appeal if he proposed the instruction below, even if the record contains no ev… |
-1.5 |
| 19-6653 |
Quinton Omar Jackson v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-law criminal-statutes federal-criminal-law force force-and-violence intimidation legislative-intent mens-rea physical-force statutory-interpretation violence |
Whether Congress intended the phrase "by force and violence, or by intimidation," that appears in multiple federal criminal statutes to include the us… |
-1.5 |
| 19-6656 |
Fernando Quintela-Galindo v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review chapter-7-policy chapter-7-policy-statements criminal-procedure due-process presumption-of-reasonableness revocation-sentence sentencing-guidelines |
Whether a presumption of reasonableness should be applied to a revocation sentence produced by Chapter 7 policy statements. |
-1.5 |
| 19-6663 |
Jose Hernandez-Martinez, et al. v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-3553a 18-usc-3582c2 28-usc-991b 28-usc-994 due-process equal-protection guidelines-policy rational-basis-scrutiny retroactive-amendment retroactive-sentence-reduction sentence-reduction sentencing-commission sentencing-commission-authority sentencing-reform-act |
Is the Sentencing Commission's delegated authority over retroactive sentence reduction proceedings constrained by the general purposes of the Commissi… |
-1.5 |
| 19-6669 |
Donnie Berry v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
affidavit-or-declaration appeals civil-rights costs due-process habeas in-forma-pauperis ineffective-assistance-of-counsel poverty redress security sixth-amendment |
Question not identified. |
-1.5 |
| 19-6674 |
Margarita Mora v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review circuit-court-conflict circuit-split criminal-procedure discretionary-review due-process federal-rules-criminal-procedure federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure rule-11 supervisory-powers |
Whether the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ("Fifth Cireuit")-which held Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal… |
-1.5 |
| 19-6711 |
Luciano Diaz-Contreras v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
commerce-clause congressional-power constitutional-limits criminal-law criminal-statute federal-jurisdiction federal-power felon-in-possession firearms firearms-possession statutory-interpretation united-states-constitution |
Does 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), which criminalizes possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, exceed Congress's power under the Commerce Clause? |
-1.5 |
| 19-6712 |
Adam Scott Caward v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure appellate-waiver circuit-split civil-procedure criminal-procedure due-process judicial-discretion legal-interpretation miscarriage-of-justice sentencing standing |
Whether the Court should adopt the rule espoused in the First, Third, Fourth, Tenth, and D.C. Circuits, which hold that an appellate court can decline… |
-1.5 |
| 19-6718 |
James Douglas Pridgen v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
bank-robbery carjacking certificate-of-appealability crime-of-violence crimes-of-violence criminal-procedure due-process johnson-ruling johnson-v-united-states ninth-circuit section-924(c) section-924c unanimous-jury |
1. Whether the Ninth Circuit wrongly denied the request for a certificate of appealability where the Section 924(c) conviction was charged as to two d… |
-1.5 |
| 19-6721 |
Christopher Ray Parrish v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-law criminal-conduct double-jeopardy federal-court federal-government punishment sentencing supervised-release |
Whether the Double Jeopardy Clause prohibits a federal court from revoking
supervised release and sentencing someone based on criminal conduct for whi… |
-1.5 |
| 19-6752 |
Jemone Lawrence Walker v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
armed-career-criminal-act constitutional-vagueness curtis-johnson curtis-johnson-v-united-states elements-clause physical-force samuel-johnson-v-united-states sentencing-enhancement stokeling stokeling-v-united-states violent-felony |
The Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) imposes a 15–year mandatory minimum sentence on any § 922(g) offender convicted of at least three qualifying pred… |
-1.5 |
| 19-6784 |
Jermaine Whyte v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
age-of-victim criminal-law criminal-statute due-process mens-rea reasonable-opportunity sex-trafficking statutory-interpretation strict-liability |
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 1591(c) creates a self-standing strict liability offense with regard to the age of the victim that removes the mens rea element in… |
-1.5 |
| 19-6797 |
Hal Mark Kreitman v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
business-expenses business-services criminal-activity criminal-liability criminal-offense criminal-procedure employee-liability employee-services employment federal-jurisdiction legal-culpability money-laundering payment-structure |
Does an employee's facilitation of a criminal offense, by providing services to a business engaged in criminal activity, make the employee guilty not … |
-1.5 |
| 19-6809 |
Jason Michael Strubberg v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
6th-amendment criminal-procedure due-process entrapment jury-instructions sentencing sixth-amendment undercover-operations |
1. Whether the Sixth Amendment and Due Process Clause allow a court to instruct the jury, over objection, that "Undercover agents may properly make us… |
-1.5 |
| 19-6840 |
Manuel Antonio Severino v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-split criminal-law criminal-prosecution legal-duty mens-rea statutory-interpretation tax-fraud willfulness |
Whether, in a prosecution for aiding and assisting in the preparation or filing of false tax returns under 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2), the government is requ… |
-1.5 |
| 19-6881 |
April Torres v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abuse-of-discretion appellate-review criminal-procedure district-court due-process judicial-discretion parole probation reasonableness revocation sentencing supervised-release |
I. Did the district court impose a plainly unreasonable revocation sentence upon Ms. Torres? |
-1.5 |
| 19-6884 |
Glen B. Clay, aka Glenn B. Clay v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2255 armed-career-criminal-act district-court-review due-process johnson-v-united-states procedural-default residual-clause sentencing sentencing-enhancement standard-of-proof successive-motion |
Whether the court of appeals erred in affirming the district court's decision that it could not consider on the merits Mr. Clay's successive motion ba… |
-1.5 |
| 19-6885 |
Antonio Escobar v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
alleyne-v-united-states criminal-law criminal-procedure drug-offenses drug-statute due-process flores-figueroa-v-united-states fourth-amendment mens-rea statutory-interpretation traffic-stop |
1. Whether, in light of Flores-Figueroa v. United States, 556 U.S. 646 (2009),
Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019), and Alleyne v. United … |
-1.5 |
| 18-6992 |
Brandon Bernard v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)IFP |
certificate-of-appealability civil-rights death-penalty due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-bias judicial-misconduct judicial-misconduct-allegations standing |
1. Did the Fifth Circuit err in its reading of Gonzalez , given that five other
Circuits read Gonzalez to allow Rule 60(b) motions to remedy a wide r… |
-3.5 |
| 19-5684 |
In Re Kendall Dean Mitchell |
|
Pending |
Relisted (3)IFP |
aedpa aedpa-limitations anti-terrorism-effective-death-penalty-act criminal-procedure habeas-corpus indian-law subject-matter-jurisdiction supremacy-clause treaties treaty-jurisdiction treaty-with-indians |
(1) Whether the filing limitations AEDPA apply to claims that state courts lacked of
subject matter jurisdiction in criminal cases due to provisions i… |
-3.5 |
| 18-7571 |
Gabriel Cervantes Valencia v. Dave Davey, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
14th-amendment 5th-amendment 6th-amendment brady-violation constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence jurisdiction |
Process Rights Guaranteed hin by the United states
Constitution Sth 6th and 14th Amendments.
ageney. Prejudicing Petitioners defence.
B.Whether Petiti… |
-4.0 |
| 18-9153 |
Albert Randolph v. Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
appeals constitutional-law constitutional-provisions criminal-appeals criminal-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus legal-review prosecutorial-misconduct standing statutory-provisions supreme-court writ-of-certiorari |
The Court of Criminal Appeals erred, denying Petitioner a new trial?
Distric+ Attorney (prosccution)violated +he Due Process Clause , Fourteenth Amen… |
-4.0 |
| 18-9203 |
Leslie E. Thomas v. Court of Common Pleas of Pennsylvania, Union County |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
appeals appeals-court appellate-review civil-procedure court-authority court-hierarchy district-court due-process federal-courts jurisdiction legal-jurisdiction procedural-standing standing state-court |
(1) Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit have Jurdiction?
Did the United States District Court have Jurdiction?
Did the Penn… |
-4.0 |
| 18-9285 |
Dean A. Schwartzmiller v. California |
California |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment free-speech overbreadth penal-code sixth-amendment vagueness void-for-vagueness |
Is California Penal Code § 288 void for vagueness and over-breadth and contrary to the First, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Con… |
-4.0 |
| 18-9338 |
Noah F. Corbitt v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process exhaustion-of-remedies exhaustion-of-state-remedies habeas-corpus standing state-remedies time-limits |
No
DECISION
JUDGE.
STATE OR FEDERAL, HAS MADE A
THE
CONSTITUTION ISUBMITTEL
ON
THE
VIOLA TIONS OF
JUDGE WOOD,
COURT,
DID
NOT
BRUNSWICK DISTRICT
TOLL
T… |
-4.0 |
| 18-9441 |
Regina Lewis v. Newburgh Housing Authority, et al. |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
accommodation accommodation-rights ada americans-with-disabilities-act civil-rights due-process housing-authority judicial-improvement-act judicial-procedure notice rehabilitation-act standing |
Did the Newburgh Housing Authority violate the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 § 112 CAP?
Did the Newburgh Housing Authority violate the Americans with Di… |
-4.0 |
| 18-9447 |
QuintIn Irving Brown v. Virginia |
Virginia |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
appeal conviction criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process judicial-boundaries jurisdiction jurisdictional-overreach procedural-error reversal state-law territorial-jurisdiction venue |
I. WHEN A CONVICTION OCCURS IN ANY STATE OF THE UNITED STATES WHERE A COUNTY'S JURISDICTION OCCURS OVER 2,200 YARDS BEYOND ITS 300-YARD PERMISSIBLE JU… |
-4.0 |
| 18-9455 |
Scott William Dummert v. Renee Ngo |
Nevada |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process expert-affidavit financial-hardship medical-expert medical-malpractice reasons-for-granting standing statement-of-case statutory-provisions |
Motion to Sequester due to Financial Hardship Expert Medical Affidavit |
-4.0 |
| 18-9751 |
Thomas Edward Nesbitt v. Scott R. Frakes, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services |
Eighth Circuit |
Dismissed |
Relisted (2)IFP |
actual-innocence aedpa brady-violation castro-v-us constitutional-rights due-process habeas habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance non-successiveness panetti-v-quarterman |
I-A-l) First Question ; Does the Appellate Court's obsecure Panel Denials, violate the 1996 A.E.D.P.A. Constitutional Due Prosess Question in Conflict… |
-4.0 |
| 18-9814 |
Robert Wazney v. Sharon Wazney |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process government-action jurisdiction standing takings |
HAS GOVERNMENT ACTION RESTRICTED THE CONTENT OF MY SPEECH IN VIOLATION OF THE U.S. CONST. AMEND. 1?
HAS GOVERNMENT ACTION RESTRICTED MY RIGHT TO PETI… |
-4.0 |
| 19-5174 |
William C. Lewis, Sr., et al. v. Estate of Robert A. Lewis, et al. |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
7th-amendment asset-transfer civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights court-of-appeals due-process jury-trial seventh-amendment standing takings |
1. Whether the decision affirming the denial of a trial by jury on Petitioners' claims violated their 7th Amendment to the US Constitution.
2. Whethe… |
-4.0 |
| 19-5226 |
Patrick Demon Caldwell, II v. Arizona Department of Public Safety, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
arizona-court-system civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-violation criminal-procedure due-process judicial-misconduct post-conviction-relief rule-of-law standing |
Cose Not be Reconigzed
Ho
Can my
W
Proven Evidence is Persented
if
How
Reconsidersation be
Can
denied
TW
when
to
the
best of my
knowledge
The
court
Of… |
-4.0 |
| 19-5248 |
Garry Randall West v. Jason Bryant, Warden |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
child-pornography double-jeopardy due-process fourth-amendment free-speech miranda-rights miranda-warnings right-to-privacy search-and-seizure suppression-of-evidence |
1. IN RE: PORNGRAPHIC MATERIAL: PORN. PORNGRAPHIC PICTURES AND IMAGES:
A) Can a pornographic conviction of Possession of Child Pornography stand where… |
-4.0 |
| 19-5461 |
Anthony L. Pierce v. Lisa Garrett, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
appeal civil-procedure civil-rights conclusion constitutional-provisions dismissal due-process frivolous jurisdiction magistrate opinions-below reasons-for-writ standing statement-of-case |
Did the court err in allowing the magistrate house non-meritus issue's twice", dismiss petitioner's action without prejudice, barring appeal; the oner… |
-4.0 |
| 19-5475 |
Mitchell Taebel v. Maricopa County Attorney's Office, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
4th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process excessive-force fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment law-enforcement police-misconduct qualified-immunity standing unreasonable-seizure |
Whether a Defendant has a primary Right of Self Representation and to Disclosure, by ithe Sat also Farottav California, Usi975)
whther plainif ha all… |
-4.0 |
| 19-5488 |
Loretta Jackson v. Joseph Barla, et al. |
Delaware |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
14th-amendment 4th-amendment animal-rights civil-rights due-process excessive-force fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment property-rights state-action state-actor |
Whether The Supreme Court of the State of Delaware deprived Loretta Jackson of her Due Process rights under the 4th and 14th Amendment of the United S… |
-4.0 |
| 19-5590 |
Levar Lee Anthony Spence v. Tom McGinley, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Coal Township, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process equal-protection federal-courts legal-document petition pro-se standing supreme-court writ-of-certiorari |
an attorney, denied due process and equal protection of the law when the federal courts refused (mandatory) de novo review? |
-4.0 |
| 19-5692 |
Larry Dean Cochrun v. Bob Dooley, Warden |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
brady-violation civil-rights constitutional-violation court-flexibility criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection error-correction habeas-corpus innocence judicial-review miscarriage-of-justice standing statutory-authority wrongful-conviction |
Congress conshained orgivenflexibility
Has U.S.ofA'S
for U.S.A Judges or Courts to deny or delay a miscarriage of
juicesurfd wtnts reac to be codanexa… |
-4.0 |
| 19-5708 |
Relonzo Phillips v. DeKalb County Assistant Public Defenders, et al. |
Georgia |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-provisions due-process federal-question-jurisdiction prison-litigation-reform-act prisoner property-rights standing takings |
COMES NOW Petitioner Relonzo Phillips, Pro Se, ("Petitioner") and files this Petition for Writ of Certiorari requesting that this Honorable Court gran… |
-4.0 |
| 19-5725 |
Charles Rochester v. The Fortune Society |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
anti-injunction-act civil-procedure civil-rights conflict-of-interest document-tampering due-process eeoc-review equal-employment fraud-upon-the-court jurisdictional-challenge obstruction-of-justice professional-responsibility retaliation tampering-with-documents whistleblower |
1. Did the United State District Court as well as the United States Second Circuit of Appeals erred for not doing their duty to hold a hearing on juri… |
-4.0 |
| 19-5896 |
Mitchell Dinnerstein v. Burlington County College |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process first-amendment judicial-misconduct seventh-amendment summary-judgment trial |
The question's I am presenting to the court are, If the application of rule 56(d) is unreasonably used to quickly end a proceedings and denies a petit… |
-4.0 |
| 19-5899 |
Willie Harold House, et ux. v. Eileen Egland, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights district-court due-process federal-rules-civil-procedure fraud-upon-the-court judicial-procedure misprision-of-felony misprision-of-treason oath-of-office treason void-ruling |
1. Did the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ('Ninth Circuit "), by overlooking potential indication of treasonable actions in the Honorable Distric… |
-4.0 |
| 19-5967 |
Cameron Thomas v. Nevada |
Nevada |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
constitutional-amendments due-process fair-trial fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment fundamental-fairness sixth-amendment trial-court-narrative |
1. Whether the Nevada Supreme Court committed error when it failed to address Thomas' contention that his right to fundamental fairness was violated w… |
-4.0 |
| 19-6003 |
Patrick Christian v. William H. Dadmun, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights conspiracy constitutional-law due-process legal-procedure pro-se-litigation property-deprivation property-rights standing |
In accordance to Constitutional Law any Property Deprivation is a violation; therefore, why was this complaint dismissed and affirmed?
What constitut… |
-4.0 |
| 19-6190 |
Jermaine Gerald Cook, et al. v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
batson-challenge batson-v-kentucky equal-protection jury-selection peremptory-challenges peremptory-strikes racial-discrimination racial-quotas sixth-amendment |
Did the Ninth Circuit's disposition of Petitioners' Batson claim, which minimized the constitutional import of the government prosecutor's offer to em… |
-4.0 |
| 19-5582 |
Tuan Duc Lam v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
circuit-split custodial-detention fourth-amendment knowles-v-iowa ninth-circuit probable-cause search-incident-to-arrest terry-stop terry-v-ohio warrantless-search |
Once a police officer makes a formal custodial arrest, the Fourth Amendment permits a warrantless search incident to that arrest. See, e.g., Riley v. … |
-4.5 |
| 19-5653 |
Edward Lee Busby v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-2254 adjudication-on-the-merits atkins-claim due-process due-process-clause eighth-amendment federal-constitutional-claim federal-law habeas-corpus intellectual-disability standard-of-review state-court state-court-review |
1. When a state habeas court denies a petitioner relief on a federal constitutional claim his claim by imposing a higher burden than is required by fe… |
-4.5 |
| 19-5671 |
James Lyle v. United States |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
byrd-v-united-states community-caretaking driver's-license exclusive-possession exclusive-possession-and-control fourth-amendment fourth-amendment-search-and-seizure non-criminal-control reasonable-expectation-of-privacy rental-vehicle trunk-access vehicle-search warrant-exception |
Under the Fourth Amendment and Byrd v. United States, 584 U.S. (2018), may a person who operates a rental vehicle without a valid driver's license nev… |
-4.5 |
| 19-5719 |
Robert Keith Ray v. Colorado |
Colorado |
Denied |
IFP |
6th-amendment appellate-review apprendi apprendi-v-new-jersey boyde-standard boyde-v-california capital-case due-process jury jury-instructions sixth-amendment |
In light of this Court's recent Sixth-Amendment jurisprudence emphasizing the constitutional primacy of the role of the jury, should this Court revisi… |
-4.5 |
| 19-5820 |
Charles D. Raby v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-2244 circuit-court-jurisdiction circuit-split habeas-corpus newly-discovered-evidence prima-facie-showing reasonable-juror standard-of-review statutory-interpretation successive-petition |
1. Whether 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(C) permits a court of appeals, when ruling on a motion for authorization to file a successive habeas petition based … |
-4.5 |
| 19-5929 |
Abisai Ramirez-Anguiano v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
circuit-split criminal-law criminal-procedure drug-offense drug-offenses mens-rea methamphetamine scienter sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation |
Section 2D1.1(b)(5) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines provides that "[i]f (A) the offense involved the importation of ... methamphetamine or … |
-4.5 |
| 19-5949 |
Marcelino Martinez v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-rule-11 district-court federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure guilty-plea plain-error plea-bargaining plea-negotiations rule-11 substantial-rights |
1) When a district court violates Rule 11(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of
Criminal Procedure by interfering in plea negotiations, can a
defendant ordina… |
-4.5 |
| 19-5968 |
Carlos Cuesta-Rodriguez v. Mike Carpenter, Warden |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
capital-case capital-defendants direct-appeal ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel martinez-rule martinez-v-ryan post-conviction procedural-bar public-defender trevino-v-thaler |
1. By operation of Oklahoma law, indigent defendants in Tulsa and Oklahoma Counties (the State's two most populous counties) are required to be repres… |
-4.5 |
| 19-5998 |
Eric Matthew Frein v. Pennsylvania |
Pennsylvania |
Denied |
IFP |
criminal-procedure harmless-error police-misconduct prosecutorial-misconduct right-to-counsel sixth-amendment structural-error trial-integrity |
When the Sixth Amendment right to counsel has attached, do efforts by police and prosecutors -- the victims of one or more of the defendant's charges … |
-4.5 |
| 19-6076 |
Tamela M. Lee v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
constituent-contacts constitutional-limits criminal-conviction federal-officials government-contact hobbs-act honest-services mcdonnell-v-united-states municipal-officials official-act |
After McDonnell v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2355, 2372 (2016), can a county official constitutionally be convicted of Honest Services and Hobbs Act v… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6108 |
Corey Kidd v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
18-usc-924 aiding-and-abetting controlled-substances crime-of-violence criminal-law physical-force robbery statutory-interpretation |
I. Did the court below err in finding that the offense of aiding and abetting robbery of controlled substances qualifies as a crime of violence under … |
-4.5 |
| 19-6120 |
Raul Rodriguez v. United States |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
18-usc-924(c) categorical-approach circuit-precedent crime-of-violence criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process gvr sentencing statutory-interpretation supreme-court-ruling third-circuit vagueness vagueness-doctrine |
Whether this petition should be granted, the judgment of the Third Circuit vacated, and the case remanded (GVR) to the court of appeals for a determin… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6125 |
Francis G. Hernandez v. Ronald Davis, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review child-abuse criminal-procedure diminished-capacity habeas-corpus head-injuries ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel mental-illness ninth-circuit prejudice-analysis strickland-standard strickland-v-washington |
1. Counsel admitted that he did not know that his chosen defense, diminished capacity, could be based upon mental illness. As a result, counsel never … |
-4.5 |
| 19-6195 |
Alejandro Martinez v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
18-usc-924c3b civil-rights collateral-review constitutional-law criminal-procedure equal-protection federal-appeals pro-se-petition retroactive-application retroactivity supreme-court-review unconstitutionally-vague united-states-courts united-states-v-davis vagueness |
(1) DOES THIS COURTS DECISION IN UNITED STATES V. DAVIS 588 U.S. 139 S.Ct.2319 (2019) HOLDING THAT 18.U.S.C S 924()(3)(B) IS ALSO UNCONSTITUTIONALLY V… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6233 |
Alshaqah Tariq Powell v. United States |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
4th-amendment civil-procedure consent consent-search consent-to-search constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process expectation-of-privacy fourth-amendment involuntary-consent traffic-stop vague-consent-form vagueness |
The questions important to this case are:
I. Whether Petitioner had the Fourth Amendment rights as a United States Citizen to be advised of his right… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6271 |
Gary Patrick Lewis v. Michigan |
Michigan |
Denied |
IFP |
affidavit-of-indigency appointed-counsel arson-conviction criminal-appeal criminal-procedure due-process in-forma-pauperis indigency indigent-defendant michigan-court right-to-counsel state-appellate-defender state-court-appeal |
Question not identified. |
-4.5 |
| 19-6285 |
Linh Thi Minh Tran v. Stan the Hot Water Man |
Oregon |
Dismissed |
IFP |
civil-procedure employer-liability intentional-torts material-fact material-facts property-damage respondeat-superior scope-of-employment summary-judgment tortious-conduct |
1. Did the trial court Multnomah County Circuit Court State of Oregon error in ruling that as a matter of law when there exists disputed genuine issue… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6287 |
Seferino Martinez v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-2255 armed-career-criminal-act career-offender criminal-sentencing-guidelines johnson-v-united-states residual-clause section-2255 sentencing-guidelines void-for-vagueness |
I. Whether, for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(3), the new rule announced in Johnson applies to the analogous residual clause in the mandatory guidel… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6291 |
Josephat Mua v. The O'Neal Firm, LLP |
District of Columbia |
Dismissed |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process employment-discrimination retaliation standing summary-judgment title-vii tortious-interference |
1. Whether District of Columbia court of Appeals can ignore instances of retaliation under
Title VII and other serious violations in dismissing a cas… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6298 |
John Steven Gardner v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-2254 certificate-of-appealability federal-court-review federal-habeas-proceedings fifth-circuit habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel miller-el-standard state-court-deference state-habeas strickland-v-washington wilson-v-sellers |
In Wilson v. Sellers, this Court instructed that a federal court should train its attention on the particular legal and factual reasons of the state-c… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6300 |
John Patrick Stokes, et ux. v. LSF 8 Master Participation Trust |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process jurisdiction mortgage-foreclosure standing statement-of-reasons statutory-provisions takings |
Question not identified. |
-4.5 |
| 19-6304 |
Martin Nava Lara v. Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-protections due-process federal-supremacy foreign-national miranda-rights self-incrimination state-law supremacy-clause treaty-rights |
1. Whether State law supercedes the Supreme Law of the Land in regards to
the rights, of a foreign national, established by the treaties between
two… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6319 |
Antonio Bogan v. Jeffrey German, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
4th-amendment civil-rights due-process fourth-amendment law-enforcement owner-knowledge probable-cause stare-decisis vehicle-seizure warrantless-search |
Whether probable Cause to effect a laarrantless Seizure, of a vehicle is equivalent to officers Wnaoledge of an arrestee, being its Oujner ?Respondent… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6324 |
Taeng Yang v. Michael McNeill, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
42-usc-1983 civil-procedure civil-rights conviction-vacatur due-process heck-doctrine heck-v-humphrey leave-to-amend section-1983 statute-of-limitations wallace-v-kato |
1. "Whether Yang's § 1983 claims begins to accrue on the date his conviction was "vacated and overturned" in light of Heck U. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, … |
-4.5 |
| 19-6325 |
Dewayne Barnes v. Sentry Management, Inc., et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure conflict-of-interest discovery dismissal-order due-process in-forma-pauperis res-judicata speedy-trial standing trial-court |
titlevll of
civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 0.sC, because they do
though they
meet the nomber ofempbyees Rolegeven
give andhad soe hirig ndt
2.Cantwo
co… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6327 |
Lorenzo Lorta v. Stuart Sherman, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
amendments california-penal-code circumstances civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-review legal-precedent modification-of-sentence parole sentencing statutory-interpretation |
Refexto All attachmentoregarding
questions of Las
V
E an Modification of Sentence and Re-sentence Lnder
5
Y6 positibn 57 Also, Under ColiForriaPenal C… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6330 |
Vicki Corona v. Mariyam Gasparyan |
California |
Denied |
IFP |
1st-amendment appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights due-process fair-trial first-amendment judicial-misconduct legal-remedy malice petition-clause remedy standing |
Where actors of a Superior Court, including the Judge, defense attorney, and clerks, violate the rule of law as announced in the Due Process Clause, a… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6346 |
Paul Malone v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
14th-amendment aedpa aedpa-deference attorney-perjury due-process guilty-plea ineffective-assistance-of-counsel mental-disorders perjury plea-voluntariness strickland-v-washington trial-attorney-perjury |
1. Does deference provided from AEDPA and Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 (1984) apply when there is evidence of trial attorney perjury before the… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6349 |
Jarvas Jovon Brinkley v. Randee Rewerts, Warden |
Michigan |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review constitutional-rights due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel lafler-v-cooper michigan-law sixth-amendment strickland-standard strickland-v-washington |
DECISIONS BELOW CONFLICT WITH THE DECISIONS OF OTHER U.S. CIRCUIT COURTS OF APPEALS AND STATE APPELLATE COURTS, AND MISAPPLY THIS COURT'S DECISIONS IN… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6359 |
Stephen Nivens v. Maryland |
Maryland |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-hearing administrative-law correctional-services double-jeopardy due-process judicial-review sentencing-credits special-project-credits standing statutory-interpretation venue |
1.) Whether Judge Daniel P. Dwyer as the Administrative Judge was to preside over and hear Petitioner's hearing for Judicial Review instead of Judge B… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6365 |
Deontae Travohn Davis v. Duncan MacLaren, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights confrontation-clause criminal-procedure cross-examination due-process expert-witness handwriting-expert perjury preliminary-examination |
CAN THIS COURT EXTEND EXPERT WITNESS NEEDED BEYOND PSYCHIATRIST SPECIALIST BECAUSE COURTS REFUSED OFFER HANDWRITING EXPERT TO ASSIST PETITIONER DEFENS… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6369 |
Kelly Dutton v. American Bankers Insurance Company |
Pennsylvania |
Denied |
IFP |
bad-faith bad-faith-claim breach-of-contract civil-procedure insurance insurance-contract jurisdiction municipal-court statute-of-limitations summary-judgment |
UNDER 42 PA. C. S. A. 5524, does this rule exclude municipal court from statute of limitation?
UNDER 42 PA. C. S. A. 5525. does this rule apply only … |
-4.5 |
| 19-6374 |
Kim Moss v. Michigan |
Michigan |
Denied |
IFP |
appeal appeal-of-right appellate-procedure consolidation constitutional-rights constitutional-rights-to-appeal constitutional-violation due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel procedural-delay right-to-appeal state-court-procedures state-procedures trial-court-error |
This case arise where Petitioner lost his Appeal 0^ Right do to Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel and once it was determine by the State Cou… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6379 |
Timothy Edward Holz v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
career-offender collateral-review crime-of-violence johnson-decision johnson-v-united-states mandatory-sentence-enhancement mandatory-sentencing pre-booker pre-booker-mandatory residual-clause section-2255 sentencing-guidelines sentencing-guidelines-4b1.2a |
Whether Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), invalidated U.S. Sentencing Guidelines § 4B1.2(a)---the career offender guideline's residual… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6388 |
Cary VanDerMeulen v. Charles L. Ryan, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-claim due-process equal-protection judicial-access judicial-review legal-standing procedural-due-process remedies rights-enforcement standing |
Why is a citizen not allowed to bring a valid claim (claims) for civil rights violations before the court and have them heard?
When one cannot exerci… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6395 |
V. A. C. v. J. L. W. |
Texas |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure confrontation-clause constitutional-challenge direct-appeal due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-assistance parental-rights prejudice termination-of-parental-rights trial-court-discretion |
1) If it can be proven, leaving absolutely 'No-Doubt', that the relied upon convi
ctions, in regard to a Termination of Parental Rights action, is un… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6396 |
Charles Jordan v. John H. Magill, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-forfeiture civil-rights constitutional-provisions criminal-law-enforcement due-process equal-protection jurisdiction just-compensation standing takings-clause |
O^oRc' ^>^ 0^ce. oSP <^C
^0^
C^A Cow^ v>Aer>o
f» |
-4.5 |
| 19-6403 |
Davin D. Crenshaw, aka Davon D. Crenshaw v. Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence expert-testimony hearsay mental-health sexual-assault victim-impact |
Is it reasonably pertinent to diagnosisd or treat(mend)" when the stade ments made are clearly beyond the Scope of a SANE examination& Would this be h… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6406 |
Clifford L. Rush v. Nebraska |
Nebraska |
Denied |
IFP |
conflicts-of-interest constitutional-rights counsel-of-choice criminal-procedure due-process judicial-discretion nebraska-supreme-court pro-se pro-se-representation right-to-counsel self-representation sixth-amendment withdrawal-of-counsel |
I.
WHETHER OR NOT THE NEBRASKA SUPREME COURT OPINION IN AFFIRMING
THE NEBRASKA LOWER COURT'S JUDGMENT DENYING PETITIONER THE SIXTH
AMENDMENT RIGHT TO … |
-4.5 |
| 19-6407 |
Derran Smiley v. California |
California |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-violation criminal-procedure due-process ex-post-facto federal-review habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance penal-code post-conviction retroactive-application retroactivity sentencing state-court-ruling |
1) APPELLANT OFFENSES WERE COMMITTED IN 2004, BUT, IN 2006 PENAL CODE § 667.6(d) WAS AMENDED AND INCREASED THE PUNISHMENT WHILE CHANGING THE VIOLATING… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6412 |
Dennis Jones v. Arizona |
Arizona |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review civil-procedure conflict-with-precedent constitutional-interpretation due-process essential-elements-of-crime federal-jurisdiction federal-question judicial-review precedent-conflict right-to-counsel standing state-court-decision supreme-court supreme-court-procedure |
The State's Court of last resort decided an important Federal Question in a way that conflicts with the right to counsel in a criminal case, where (a)… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6417 |
Doran Wilburn Walker v. Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-rights criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-sentencing cumulative-sentences double-jeopardy due-process oral-pronouncement-of-sentence presence-of-defendant sentencing statutory-authority trial-court-authority written-judgment |
1. If a trial court wishes to cumulate sentences, must it so order at the time and place that sentence is orally pronounced? See Grays v State, 291 S.… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6422 |
Calvin Dunell Burns v. Florida |
Florida |
Denied |
IFP |
appeal appellate-review civil-rights competency constitutional-violations due-process evidence legal-procedure mental-competency mental-health standing trial-counsel trial-procedure |
1). why didn't the First District Court oF Appeals,
State of Florida, rule fairly in the Petitioner's Direct Appeal
on the merits of the issues in the… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6425 |
Andres Santana v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, et al. |
California |
Denied |
IFP |
14th-amendment discovery due-process fourteenth-amendment innocence liberty-interest post-conviction post-conviction-discovery procedural-rights substantive-rights |
1. What amount of due process is owed to a Defendant who is seeking post conviction discovery to prove himself innocent of the charges a jury found hi… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6435 |
Iyang Peter Oduok v. Fulton DeKalb Hospital Authority, dba Grady Memorial Hospital, et al. |
Georgia |
Dismissed |
IFP |
appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-procedure-preemption constitutional-violation due-process federal-law georgia-supreme-court judicial-procedure preemption rule-13 rule-38 writ-of-certiorari |
1. Does Georgia Supreme Court Rule 38 Requirement that a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari be filed within twenty (20) days of disposition of a motion… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6437 |
Lee E. Peyton v. California |
California |
Denied |
IFP |
confrontation-clause courtroom-protocol criminal-procedure due-process due-process-clause farretta-v-california fourteenth-amendment judicial-discretion pro-se pro-se-representation sixth-amendment |
This Petition presents an issue of fundamental importance to all defendants facing criminal prosecution in California: whether the Sixth and Fourteent… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6443 |
Amro A. Elansari v. University of Pennsylvania |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-funding informed-consent research-ethics research-experiments standing |
Whether the University of Pennsylvania, federally funded, is subject to federal jurisdiction for funding that using human research experiments without… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6446 |
William L. Edwards v. Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence exculpatory-evidence ineffective-assistance-of-counsel |
Why was William Edwards never allowed to present the 911 evidence that exonerates him to a jury. Why was William Edwards scheduled for four trials dur… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6449 |
Antwoine Marquise Bealer v. Kern Valley State Prison |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
8th-amendment administrative-decision administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-violations due-process in-forma-pauperis judicial-screening PLRA prison prisoner-rights standing |
DOES THE PLRA REQUIRE THE COURT TO
LOOK BEYOND AN PRIMA FACIE SHOWING
WHEN SCREENING PRISONER IN FORMA
PAUPERIS COMPLAINTS.
DOES DOUBLE JEOPARDY P… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6453 |
James E. Lang v. Florida |
Florida |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-challenge criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process fiore-v-white judicial-review pipeline-law precedent-interpretation retroactivity statutory-interpretation |
When a state's highest court corrects an erroneous interpretation of it's statutory law committed by it's lower appellate Court, that has affirmed a c… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6454 |
Corey Morris v. Steven Johnson, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
6th-amendment constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel extended-sentences federal-review multiple-indictments plea-bargaining post-conviction-relief sentencing sentencing-guidelines |
Whether defendants have a Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of Counsel when Contemplating Plea offers. Morris was charged at multiple indi… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6459 |
Kenneth K. DuVall v. Carlos Hernandez, Superintendent, Avery Mitchell Correctional Institution |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
14th-amendment 1st-amendment 5th-amendment access-to-courts constitutional-challenge criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process federal-standards judicial-relief judicial-review state-imprisonment |
1. Did Judge Whitney's failure to rule on Petitioner's newly discovered evidence of Double Jeopardy issues deny Petitioner his 1st and 14th Amendment … |
-4.5 |
| 19-6462 |
Stephen L. Bush v. David W. Gray, Warden, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection patent standing statutory-interpretation takings |
Question not identified. |
-4.5 |
| 19-6467 |
Robert G. Pulley v. Daniel Paramo, Warden, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
actual-innocence due-process federal-court federal-habeas habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel miscarriage-of-justice procedural-default state-court |
Question number one of five
Question number two of five
Question number three of five
Question number four of five
Question number five of five |
-4.5 |
| 19-6480 |
Dario Rodriguez v. Rick Scott, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection federal-jurisdiction free-speech judicial-review legal-dismissal procedural-fairness qualified-immunity retaliation standing |
1.) This Country built on Free speech and A55was ates Corstitution 15t, 4t2, 8114th. Anerchent.The right to protection against crnel & uushal paurshme… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6488 |
Javier Yebra v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability constitutional-review due-process fifth-circuit habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel merits-review standard-of-review supreme-court-precedent trial-counsel |
Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit continue to impose an improper Certificate of Appealability (COA) standard that contraven… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6492 |
Tylan Tremaine Autrey v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-2255 career-offender career-offender-guideline constitutional-vagueness johnson-retroactivity johnson-v-united-states residual-clause retroactivity section-2255 sentencing-guidelines vagueness |
Petitioner was convicted of federal kidnapping and sentenced as a career offender in 2000, under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, when the Gu… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6499 |
John Berman v. David Modell |
California |
Denied |
IFP |
benefit-analysis civil-procedure due-process forum-state intentional-tort long-arm-jurisdiction personal-jurisdiction specific-jurisdiction |
1. In a case of long-arm specific jurisdiction where an intentional tort is alleged to have been directed into the forum state, does a court err by re… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6507 |
Kenneth Michael Smith v. Melissa Sue Smith, nka Melissa Sue Graham |
Montana |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights disability-law domestic-relations due-process family-law guardian-ad-litem guardianship mental-capacity standing |
Question not identified. |
-4.5 |
| 19-6512 |
Michael Allen Channel, Sr. v. John Brinker, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
4th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process excessive-force judicial-review legal-precedent qualified-immunity search-and-seizure standing statutory-interpretation |
Whether The Defcndant's Knwingly with willful Misconduct
1.7
Dut due process of Law.
Yes s NO.
2.)
Whether The DeFendant's Volated A.R.s.4. b) MEMoRAu… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6520 |
Pasqual Andres McMurry v. Nevada |
Nevada |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel standing wrongful-conviction |
Why is a Police Officer's record of misconduct not considered as peremptory evidence, when doubt cast upon the credibility of the officer?
A Fourth A… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6522 |
William Smith v. Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
IFP |
blood-draw constitutional-challenge criminal-procedure fourth-amendment fourth-amendment-interpretation mandatory-blood-draw missouri-v-mcneely probable-cause public-safety search-and-seizure texas-transportation-code warrantless-search |
1.Is Texas Transportation Code Sect. 724.012 (b.) (3.)(B). (Texas'mandatory blood draw statute) Constitutional as applied, under the Fourth Amendment … |
-4.5 |
| 19-6523 |
Pasqual Andres McMurry v. Nevada |
Nevada |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process eighth-amendment equal-protection excessive-fines fourteenth-amendment incorporation standing takings |
Why was Counsel for the Petitioner allowed to withdraw prematurely when a request to the filing advocate for a Writ of Justiciare was made? |
-4.5 |
| 19-6526 |
In Re David Paul Worthington |
|
Denied |
IFP |
18-usc-1151-1153 aedpa aedpa-limitations article-1 article-6 criminal-procedure indian-law indian-treaties state-court-jurisdiction subject-matter-jurisdiction supremacy-clause treaties treaties-with-indians |
(1) Whether the filing limitations AEDPA apply to claims that state courts lacked of
subject matter jurisdiction in criminal cases due to provisions … |
-4.5 |
| 19-6528 |
Royce C. Gouveia v. Nolan Espinda, Director, Hawaii Department of Public Safety, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
acquittal constitutional-law criminal-procedure double-jeopardy double-jeopardy,criminal-procedure,jury,verdict,ac jury jury-verdict retrial verdict |
Does a jury's execution of a verdict form acquitting the defendant, and announcement that it has reached a verdict, suffice to erect a double jeopardy… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6535 |
Clarence Fry v. Ohio |
Ohio |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-right criminal-defendant due-process fair-trial fourteenth-amendment right-to-testify rock-v-arkansas self-representation sixth-amendment trial-counsel |
Is it unconstitutional for any Court to deny the Constitutional right to testify in one's own defense by placing the burden of making such desire know… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6545 |
Bradly M. Cunningham v. Washington County, Oregon, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Dismissed |
IFP |
14th-amendment 8th-amendment civil-rights civil-rights-violation cruel-and-unusual-punishment cruel-unusual-punishment due-process habeas-corpus illegal-sentence parole-board section-1983 sentencing torture |
1. Am I able to pursue relief under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 against the Defendants/Respondents for pre-trial Torture?
2. Am I able to pursue relief under … |
-4.5 |
| 19-6553 |
Vicki Corona v. City of Los Angeles, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights court-filing deprivation-of-rights due-process filing-procedures in-forma-pauperis judicial-conduct judicial-discretion judicial-misconduct Question not identified. standing takings |
These questions significantly impact the administration of Civil and Constitutional violations by the Mayor of Los Angeles and the justice system in C… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6556 |
In Re Therian Wimbush, et vir |
|
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts appeals civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus joint-petition judicial-review petition-denial procedural-barriers standing |
1. Can co-convicted, co-freed, co-convicted and sentenced, even if by the same, codefendant husband and wife file a joint federal §2254 habeas corpus … |
-4.5 |
| 19-6561 |
Maurice D. Joseph v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
14th-amendment 4th-amendment 5th-amendment 6th-amendment constitutional-rights due-process fifth-amendment fourth-amendment illegal-interrogation right-to-privacy secret-recording self-incrimination unlawful-interrogation warrantless-recording |
The Appellant alleged that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate illegal acts by Detective Burkett, which violated the Appellant'… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6566 |
Alexander Kates v. New York |
New York |
Denied |
IFP |
2nd-amendment actual-innocence civil-rights criminal-possession-of-a-weapon criminal-possession-of-weapon criminal-procedure due-process home-exception ineffective-assistance-of-counsel loaded-firearm penal-law penal-law-265.15(4) standing void-for-vagueness |
1. tether New York State residents are always actually innocent of felony and attsipted felony criminal possession of a weapon offenses if they posses… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6567 |
Danny Lee Hill v. Ohio |
Ohio |
Denied |
IFP |
bite-mark-evidence constitutional-rights conviction death-penalty death-sentence due-process expert-testimony fair-trial habeas-corpus scientific-evidence |
Bite-mark comparison evidence was the foundation of the State's case that convicted Petitioner Danny Lee Hill of murder and sentenced him to death. Th… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6568 |
Kenisha S. Boyd v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
acceptance attorney-authority bona-fide-settlement conflict-of-interest contingent-contract contract-formation contract-rejection judicial-discretion mediation mediation-procedure rejection settlement-agreement |
1. Whether a bona fide settlement between the parties exists when the agreement is contingent in nature, and one party has the right to reject the off… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6592 |
Monir George v. Dana Metzger, Warden |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-procedure civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prosecutorial-misconduct right-to-a-fair-trial right-to-counsel sixth-amendment |
Crtifhed Mentil I Defendanis e o
ONE: whither a
wive is Right Fo Jy Tral
Tw who Cn Ao Fo The ert I nt To
T
Reqes Tr he Dee I
THeir pleas.
T
Constttn… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6595 |
Raymond Tavelle Holmes v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
cell-phone civil-procedure civil-procedure-28-usc-636 due-process fair-trial florida-statute-934.23 fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment ineffective-counsel inevitable-discovery magistrate-judge objection procedural-error report-and-recommendation search-and-seizure severance similar-fact-evidence sixth-amendment standing third-party warrantless-search Whether the failure to sever counts deprived the P Whether the warrantless search and seizure of text williams-rule |
(1). Whether this Court should exercise its discretionary certiorari jurisdiction and grant certiorari, vacate the judgment below, and remand the case… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6599 |
Walter D. Fairley v. Jason Kent, Warden |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
certificate-of-appealability civil-rights comity comity-and-finality due-process finality fundamental-fairness habeas-corpus incarceration standing statute-of-limitations time-barred |
1.) Whether the Magistrate for the U.S. Eastern District Court of Louisiana erred when they issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the p… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6831 |
In Re Fredrick Wroten |
|
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial first-amendment judicial-obligation petition petition-for-redress redress unilateral-contract |
When the State and Federal appellate courts ignore and/ or refuse to respond to a denial of a fair trial claim/ does it violate and/ or abridge the Ap… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6889 |
In Re Joel Law |
|
Denied |
IFP |
18-usc-2422b 6th-amendment confrontation-clause confrontation-clause-6th-amendment,false-imprisonm constitutional-rights false-imprisonment habeas-corpus immediate-relief judicial-review section-2255 sixth-amendment |
1) Am I entitled to immediate relief from this Court, to
protect myself and others similarily situated ,. from being falsely
imprisoned pursuant to 1… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6946 |
In Re Michael Curtis Reynolds |
|
Dismissed |
IFP |
actual-innocence appeal civil-rights civil-rights,due-process,criminal-procedure,senten constitutional-void criminal-appeal due-process federal-procedure habeas-corpus remand statutory-interpretation vagueness void-for-vagueness |
1) DOES Diruaya , 138 S.Ct. 1204 (2018), when the Petitioner was on Direct appeal of his
18 U.S.C. §I6(b) Unconstitutional and void argument under Vi… |
-4.5 |
| 19-6993 |
In Re Augustus Larry Lundy |
|
Denied |
IFP |
constructive-denial-of-counsel due-process fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus personal-jurisdiction sixth-amendment |
Did the trial court divest itseld of personal jurisdiction of Lundy when it Administered the Law in an improper and unconstitutional manner?
Was Lund… |
-4.5 |
| 18-9582 |
In Re E. Edward Zimmermann |
|
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (3)IFP |
civil-rights due-process employment-conditions federal-preemption federalism government-regulation labor-law labor-relations labor-rights national-labor-relations-act statutory-interpretation workplace-governance |
Are "terms and conditions of employment and working conditions" as defined by The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), subject matter left to free peo… |
-5.5 |
| 18-9750 |
John G. Curry v. Mark Joseph Lopez, Associate Judge, Circuit Court of Illinois, Cook County, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (3)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights civil-rights-act civil-rights-violations constitutional-deprivation due-process federal-forum federal-jurisdiction judicial-immunity mandamus mandamus-relief rooker-feldman-doctrine standing |
Whether John G. Curry or someone similarly situated can be denied a federal forum, contrary to standards, by misapplication of doctrines, such as Rook… |
-5.5 |
| 19-5206 |
Christine Sawicky v. AMC Networks Inc. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (3)IFP |
14th-amendment appellate-courts appellate-procedure circuit-split constitutional-rights copyright-law due-process pro-se pro-se-litigant |
How can a plaintiff win a copyright lawsuit when circuit splits exist throughout the 13 appellate courts? Additionally, how can a circuit split exist … |
-5.5 |
| 18-9247 |
Hitoshi Ombe v. Susana Martinez, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
autism-disability civil-rights cognitive-ability competency competency-ability disability due-process emotional-damages executive-function instrumental-aggression knowledge-of-disability legal-competency pro-se pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigation standing |
Question 1: Does the depressed autism minority have adequate competency or ability to litigate on his own (pro se) without any help or support? The co… |
-6.0 |
| 18-9269 |
Darrell Reynolds v. Circuit Court of Kentucky, Laurel County |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
None |
|
-6.0 |
| 18-9308 |
Clarence Scranage, Jr. v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
5th-amendment 6th-amendment constitutional-rights counsel-waiver criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment pro-se pro-se-representation right-to-counsel self-representation sixth-amendment |
Whether Petitioner waived his Fifth and Sixth Amendment Rights to Counsel, by being forced to represent himself by the lower Court, pro-se, without th… |
-6.0 |
| 18-9317 |
Lena Lasher v. Naomi Reice Buchwald, Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
administrative-law civil-procedure code-of-federal-regulations due-process federal-appeals-court federal-courts injunctive-relief judicial-bias judicial-recusal recusal subject-matter-jurisdiction |
Should an injuctive relief be granted to address a federal appeals court's violation of the Code of Federal Regulations of Reconsideration Panel, 38 C… |
-6.0 |
| 18-9345 |
Billy Gene Drake v. Les Parish, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appeals appellate-review civil-procedure constitutional-law constitutional-provisions court-of-appeals due-process findings findings-of-fact judicial-review lower-court lower-court-decisions procedural-rights standing |
WAS THE PETITIONER'S PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS VIOLATED BY THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION TO ADOPT THE LOWER COURTS FINDINGS? |
-6.0 |
| 18-9439 |
Danea M. Addison v. Indiana, dba Family and Social Services Administration |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
ada civil-rights constitutional-law due-process equal-protection jurisdiction medicaid standing statutory-interpretation |
Question not identified. |
-6.0 |
| 18-9443 |
Arthur L. Campbell v. Sherman Campbell, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
buck-v-davis certificate-of-appealability district-court due-process habeas-corpus jurisdiction miller-el-v-cockrell procedural-error sixth-circuit standard-of-review statute-of-limitations |
I.
The Sixth Circuit conmitted plain error, contrary to Buck v. Davis,
137 S.Ct. 759 (2017) and Miller-E1 v.
v
Cockre11, 537 U.S. 322 (2003).
because … |
-6.0 |
| 18-9486 |
Clifford Abshire v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections |
Louisiana |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment fourteenth-amendment liberty-interest property-interest sandin-v-conner |
Are prison disciplinary hearings considered "communicative acts," entitled to the protections of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution… |
-6.0 |
| 18-9491 |
William A. Trudeau, Jr. v. United States |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
acquitted-conduct article-iii constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process further-review procedural-default sentencing |
WHETHER PETITIONER RAISED SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF DENIAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT ON ISSUE OF WHETHER THE LOWER COURT'S CORRECTLY CONCLUDED THAT HIS ROs… |
-6.0 |
| 18-9508 |
Floyd Dewaine Scott v. I. Jimenez |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
8th-amendment appeals civil-rights deliberate-indifference due-process internal-bleeding medical-care medical-indifference ninth-circuit qualified-immunity summary-judgment triable-issues |
Reason number one is that the Petitioner did present a Medical Deliberate Indifference cause against the Respondent. Is it contrary to clearly establi… |
-6.0 |
| 18-9516 |
Starquineshia Palmer v. Florida |
Florida |
Rehearing |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
12-person-jury 6-person-jury constitutional-rights criminal-procedure criminal-trial due-process jury-size sixth-amendment trial-by-jury williams-v-florida |
Was Petitioner denied her right to a trial by jury as contemplated by the Sixth Amendment because of the decision in Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78,… |
-6.0 |
| 18-9623 |
Robert William Wazney v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
14th-amendment appellate-procedure appellate-relief asset-freezing constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection evidence indigent-defendant |
PREFACE: In tFis case Defendant argues tFe Plaintiff refused mortgage payments from Defendants wife tFen came after tFe Defendant for tFe Money. TFe D… |
-6.0 |
| 18-9624 |
Robert William Wazney v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process federal-courts federal-jurisdiction jurisdiction patent standing takings |
1.) HAS THE GOVERNMENT'S SERVICE OF ENTRY JUDGMENT NOTICE REVOKING PERFORMANCE ON ITS APPEAL IMPOSSIBLE, PREJUDICED THE PETITIONER?
2.) HAS PETITIONE… |
-6.0 |
| 18-9715 |
Johnny Curtis Bedgood v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
criminal-procedure critical-stage evidentiary-hearing fourth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-bargaining pre-trial-counsel section-2255 sentencing sentencing-enhancements |
WHETHER THE US DISTRICT COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION FOR FAILURE TO CONDUCT [A]N EVIDENTIARY HEARING PURSUANT TO 28 SECTION 2255(b) IN LIGHT OF A FACTU… |
-6.0 |
| 18-9741 |
Quintin Irving Brown v. City of Richmond, Virginia |
Virginia |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-misconduct misdemeanor-reduction probation-violation prosecutorial-misconduct speedy-trial void-judgment |
I. WHEN A TRIAL OCCURS OVER A DEFENDANT'S EXPRESSED OBJECTIONS TO A VIOLATION OF THAT STATE'S STATUTORY RIGHT TO SPEEDY TRIAL—WITH THAT CONVICTION BE … |
-6.0 |
| 18-9766 |
Raymond Tyrone Lewis v. William O. Farmer, Sheriff, Sumter County, Florida, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process eleventh-circuit essential-requirements-of-law motion-for-reconsideration standing statute-of-limitations |
WHETHER THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL ABUSED ITS DISCRETION AND DEVIATED FROM THE ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF LAW WHEN THEY DENIED PLAINTIFFS MOT… |
-6.0 |
| 19-5016 |
Michael A. Salazar v. HEB Grocery Company, LP, et al. |
Texas |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
14th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights conspiracy constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment fraud judicial-procedure petition-clause right-to-petition right-to-sue standing |
In this case the Texas Supreme Court did not reject, but accepted the decision of the Fourth Court of Appeals in affirming the judgement of the Judge … |
-6.0 |
| 19-5109 |
Wayne English v. Roadhouse Holding Inc., et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appeal bankruptcy bankruptcy-procedure constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection federal-rules-of-bankruptcy-procedure first-amendment-rights mail-delivery notice notice-of-appeal usps |
Thousands of individuals, both debtors and creditors, are having their due process rights violated by the Delaware Bankruptcy Court. The Court, withou… |
-6.0 |
| 19-5117 |
Antonio Hudson v. Denise Page Hood, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
None |
|
-6.0 |
| 19-5140 |
Vinodh Raghubir v. United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
-6.0 |
| 19-5148 |
Vinodh Raghubir v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
access-to-courts civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-violations dismissal due-process equal-protection judicial-review legal-standing procedural-irregularities standing takings |
Question not identified. |
-6.0 |
| 19-5229 |
Saldy Marzan v. CoreCivic Correctional Center, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-review dismissal documentary-evidence due-process federal-courts frivolous habeas-corpus ninth-circuit procedural-default standing |
Can the hinth circuit court of Appeals dismissed Frivolous with out having given My Case as present's documentary to oppornutety nne that my Case IS e… |
-6.0 |
| 19-5276 |
Marvin F. Taylor v. Ron Neal, Superintendent, Indiana State Prison |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
14th-amendment civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection standing |
Under My current clatm of vindictiveness against Myself, the Deferdant, by judidal and prose cntortal figures, I an questtoning volated my Indiana Con… |
-6.0 |
| 19-5337 |
Arthur Shermaine Bussey v. Marty Allen, Warden |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sentencing standing statutory-interpretation supreme-court-procedure |
Question not identified. |
-6.0 |
| 19-5463 |
Jesse Dean v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
actual-innocence aedpa-restrictions anti-terrorism-and-effective-death-penalty-act brady-v-maryland criminal-jurisdiction criminal-offense due-process federal-procedure fraud habeas-corpus jurisdiction kyles-v-whitley |
Whether the District Court had jurisdiction where Petitioner was indicted for acts which do not constitute a criminal offense?
Whether Petitioner's c… |
-6.0 |
| 19-5556 |
Regina Lewis v. United States |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure criminal-procedure criminal-prosecution due-process federal-jurisdiction federal-magistrate federal-state-balance procedural-violation rule-of-lenity standing statutory-interpretation title-18-usc-115 |
Did United States Magistrate Gabriel Gorenstein violate the Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 4 (b)
Did my arrest and prosecution violate the narrow federal-state… |
-6.0 |
| 19-5606 |
Ndokley Peter Enow v. Ricky Foxwell, Warden, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
4th-amendment 5th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment plea-bargaining probable-cause search-and-seizure sentencing standing |
Did the trial court erred by admitting into evidence of the illegally obtained wiretapped tape recording of the defendant's oral conversations with th… |
-6.0 |
| 19-5616 |
Russell Rope v. Facebook, Inc., et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights discrimination due-process equal-protection fraud judicial-integrity legal-standing pro-se-litigation standing |
Whether The Law Extends to All Citizens & Corporations in Modern Times?
How can an unwritten, nonexistent, and unified appeal be labeled or described… |
-6.0 |
| 19-5626 |
In Re Vinodh Raghubir |
|
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection free-speech patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
-6.0 |
| 19-5627 |
In Re Vinodh Raghubir |
|
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
-6.0 |
| 19-5662 |
Carter Stephens v. Marcelo Britto Gomez, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
attorney-misconduct civil-procedure civil-rights dismissal due-process henderson-factors judicial-intervention legal-ethics legal-malpractice sanctions standing state-bar state-bar-regulation |
1. The plaintiff Carter Stephens was not informed by the State Bar of the abhorrent record of the neglectful attorney he subsequently retained. This a… |
-6.0 |
| 19-5748 |
Seth Mitchell v. Macy's, Inc., et al. |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights denial-of-motion disability-accommodation due-process employment-discrimination erisa federal-rules-of-civil-procedure first-amendment hipaa magistrate-judge motion-to-amend timeliness title-vii |
1. When, if ever, can a magistrate judge assigned to handle nondispositive matters in a Federal lawsuit intentionally violate Federal Rule of Civil Pr… |
-6.0 |
| 19-5759 |
Travis Lavoy Jenkins v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
actual-innocence civil-rights conviction due-process habeas-corpus jurisdiction standing |
and convicting District Court that cheried
a constitutional right to trial, to a
district to entertain/address,
foreign
the legal sufficieney of the c… |
-6.0 |
| 19-5850 |
Yurie Yamano v. Hawaii State Judiciary, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
article-vi civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law court-rules due-process judicial-misconduct procedural-irregularity rules-of-court separation-of-powers standing stare-decisis |
1. Whether the Court should resolve the
following questions for which the five judges on the State of Hawaii Supreme Court
bench are exhibiting and c… |
-6.0 |
| 19-5880 |
Andrew Joseph Larson v. Michael Pacheco, Warden |
Wyoming |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure conflict-of-interest constitutional-rights constructive-denial-of-counsel criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus jurisdiction name-change personal-jurisdiction presumption-of-guilt presumption-of-innocence standing state-department subject-matter trial-jurisdiction |
Q1) What are the necessary components for the trial court to be complete and hold jurisdiction over a case and was Avitabile's trial court complete?
… |
-6.0 |
| 19-5898 |
Danny Howell v. Duane Southerland, et al. |
Tennessee |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
14th-amendment civil-rights cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus prison-conditions racial-discrimination standing |
Question not identified. |
-6.0 |
| 19-5935 |
Rachel C. Brown v. Civil Service Commission |
Michigan |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
administrative-law appeals civil-rights civil-service civil-service-commission due-process hearing long-term-disability procedural-rights property-interest |
Is Petitioner, and All Others Similarly Situated, entitled to a hearing and due process in long-term disability (LTD) appeals? Subsidiary Questions: I… |
-6.0 |
| 19-5958 |
Thomas Ritter Helm v. Lisa Lorraine Hauser |
Texas |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
divorce-decree divorce-decree-amendment-state-laws-disregard-stat federal-regulations federal-regulations-disregard-state-court-systems- judicial-discretion precedent-setting precedent-setting-cases precedent-setting-cases-disregard-state-court-syst property-division qualified-domestic-relations-order qualified-domestic-relations-order-disregard-state texas-court-system |
Because a Texas court has awarded the former spouse of a federal employee's annuity retroactive pay which violates federal directives, and supported b… |
-6.0 |
| 19-5973 |
Wilfred Warren Sheppard v. Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
5th-amendment 6th-amendment constitutional-rights criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process fifth-amendment habeas-corpus jury-trial sixth-amendment supreme-court-precedent united-states-constitution |
(1.)
Whether the Texas Criminal Court of Appeals has ruled in a manner
which conflicts with the Fifth and Sixth Amendment of the U.S.
Constitution.
(… |
-6.0 |
| 19-6045 |
Scott H. Summerhays v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appellate-counsel change-of-plea criminal-procedure critical-stage effective-assistance-of-counsel faretta faretta-waiver ineffective-assistance right-to-counsel sixth-amendment waiver |
1. Does a criminal defendant have a right under the Sixth Amendment to reassert his right to counsel at a critical stage (a change of plea hearing) af… |
-6.0 |
| 19-6127 |
Steven Justin Villalona v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
certificate-of-appealability conflict-of-interest counsel-concession ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-proceedings law-of-the-case mootness plain-error presumption-of-prejudice substantial-rights |
(1) What effect, if any, does a concession made by the U.S. on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim have on the court's ability to ajudicate the… |
-6.0 |
| 19-6150 |
Chad M. Cutler v. Illinois |
Illinois |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidentiary-rules expert-testimony hearsay hearsay-statements prosecutorial-misconduct standards-of-review supreme-court-conflict |
1. WILL THIS COURT ADDRESS THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT AND BOTH THE ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT AND APPELLATE COURT OVER ILLINOIS RUL… |
-6.0 |
| 19-6284 |
Jose L. Cabrera-Cosme v. United States |
First Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
acquitted-conduct due-process jury-trial mcmillin-v-pennsylvania sentencing sixth-amendment uncharged-conduct united-states-v-watts |
1. Whetehr a reasonable jurist could find debatable Petitioner s Sixth Amendment was violated when the district court sentenced him to life without an… |
-6.0 |
| 19-6338 |
Gerald Nelson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
arbitration arbitration-award back-pay back-pay-settlement civil-rights due-process gross-income gross-income-taxation section-1983 tax tax-law tax-liability unemployment unemployment-benefits |
1. 26 U.S.C 61 (a) , defines Gross income means all income from whatever source derived. Question: If gross income ,includes back pay settlements that… |
-6.0 |
| 19-6286 |
Vara Birapaka v. United States Army Research Laboratory, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-conflict civil-procedure due-process fraud impartiality judicial-review plausibility prima-facie procedural-fairness professional-conduct rights rule-60-motion standing |
1) Whether a federal court adjudicating a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60 may simply write off Petitioner's motion without any analysi… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6326 |
Michael K. Verble v. City of San Diego, California |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
antitrust civil-procedure civil-rights computer-software constitutional-rights copyright discretionary-process due-process employment-discrimination equal-protection patent patent-infringement standing state-review takings trade-secret volunteer-firefighter |
Pub L 100-352 102.5 Public Safety Threat to the $ Cmeut With Computerization Analysis Cincuits Built with cincutry 9 inthe A5 a volume tegnety Propert… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6339 |
Jackson Miles v. Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process healthcare-law informed-consent national-childhood-vaccine-injury-act-of-1986 regulatory-oversight regulatory-policy vaccine-injury-compensation vaccine-injury-compensation-program |
Where the special master of the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)
(hereafter noted as "the Program ") violates the 2017 Secretary of Health a… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6342 |
Michael Shavers v. Lavern Sharp, Deputy Warden, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeal appeals civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-claims due-process excessive-force excessive-use-of-force prisoner-rights standing summary-judgment |
WHETHER PLAINTIFF IS ENTITLED TO RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT IN LAWSUIT SHAVERS V. BERGH (EXCESSIVE USE OF FORCE CLAIMS IS DISMISSED ON THE NATURE OF THE SUS… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6398 |
Aretha Townsend v. National Labor Relations Board |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
all-writs-act article-iii case-dismissal civil-procedure civil-rights compliance contempt due-process frivolous judicial-discretion jurisdiction procedural-jurisdiction standing |
1. Whether "District Judge " [Leigh Martin May] violated "Petitioner —
Townsends "rights of Due Process > when failing to allow [her] (case action — … |
-6.5 |
| 19-6399 |
Carmen A. Zammiello v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
certificate-of-appealability eleventh-circuit habeas-corpus in-forma-pauperis jones-v-bock jurisdictional-grounds procedural-grounds |
WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT RENDERED A DECISION IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT ANNOUNCED IN COPPEDGE -V-… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6409 |
Sean Reilly v. Florida |
Florida |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-duty contract-law criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel misunderstanding plea-bargaining sixth-amendment written-plea-offers |
Whether counsel for the accused has a constitutional duty under the Sixth Amendment to document and present the client plea offers (contracts) in writ… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6416 |
Jurijus Kadamovas v. John F. Caraway, Warden, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
8th-amendment administrative-discretion administrative-law bureau-of-prisons civil-rights cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process medical-care medical-conditions prison-conditions prisoner-rights standing torture-prevention |
1) WHETHER THE FEDERAL AGENT ROW (PARTY WHO HAS BEEN DIAGNOSED WITH ASTHMA CAN BE TORTURED IN CUSTODY OF THE BUREAU OF PRISONS BY EXPOSURE TO OLEORESI… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6434 |
Lawrence T. Tyler v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al. |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-procedure administrative-procedures-act adverse-determination agency bureau-of-prisons civil-rights due-process human-trafficking national-origin-discrimination privacy-act record-accuracy standing |
1, Whether the challenged records used to make an adverse determination against me are indeed
inaccurate and/or incomplete as a matter of this U.S. Su… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6440 |
Mitchell Lavern Ludy v. James W. Mills, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-law due-process liberty-interest parole state-regulations state-requirements |
Question not identified. |
-6.5 |
| 19-6447 |
Charles Donelson v. Darrise Hardy, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure-review-standard due-process hearing-requirement standing summary-judgment appellate-review circuit-court civil-procedure civil-rights due-process judicial-review jurisdiction legal-standard ninth-circuit standing statutory-interpretation zipursky |
WhEther The power appiled in this case to assert Judiciol authority
wos Contrary to this and other circutr in light of thcwhole
record.
WhEther the I… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6451 |
Lori Zarlenga v. Rhode Island Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals |
Rhode Island |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure capable-of-repetition-yet-evading-review civil-procedure civil-rights collateral-consequences constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection first-impression mootness mootness-doctrine public-interest public-interest-exception |
The Rhode Island Supreme Court erred by not allowing Petitioner's appeal to proceed on the merits. The Rhode Island Supreme Court erred by dismissing … |
-6.5 |
| 19-6452 |
David P. Moran v. Florida |
Florida |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure discovery mandamus pro-se pro-se-litigant records standing subpoena subpoena-enforcement trial-court writ-of-court |
1. Should a writ of mandamus compelling the Court to issue a subpoena be automatically granted when the defendant has adequately shown an entity viola… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6458 |
Torrence E. Davis v. Arizona |
Arizona |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
conditional-demand constitutional-rights criminal-procedure equivocal-invocation equivocal-request faretta-right faretta-v-california judicial-discretion new-counsel pro-per right-to-counsel self-representation self-representation-right trial-court-advisement waiver-of-counsel |
In Faretta v. California, this Court held that criminal defendants have the right to represent themselves in criminal prosecutions. Faretta v. Califor… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6460 |
Daniel Paul Copple v. Pelicia Hall, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-standards discovery discovery-limitations dismissal-standards due-process evidence-preservation evidentiary-hearing habeas-corpus institutional-mental-health-records judicial-discretion mental-competency pro-se-defendant state-records |
I.
When a defendant claims mental impairments had prevented him from timely filing his habeas petition, under Schrire v. Landrigan, should the distric… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6463 |
Michael A. Albert v. New York |
New York |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment 5th-amendment due-process fair-trial fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment outrageous-conduct police-agent right-to-present-defense sexual-inducement voluntariness |
Question 1: In the Appellate Division, Fourth Department's order, both the decent and majority agreed that Ms. Sheritta Jefferson was an agent of the … |
-6.5 |
| 19-6468 |
Glenn Olson v. Shannon McCloud |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
None |
|
-6.5 |
| 19-6469 |
Kenneth N. McFall v. Indiana |
Indiana |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
and sole defense witness to testify at trial for appeal evidence sixth-amendment state-court-decision testimony abuse-of-discretion accomplice-testimony constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-seizure fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment sixth-amendment state-bypass-sixth-amendment |
Whether trial courts abuse of discretion in not allowing an alleged accomplice, and sole defense witness to testify at trial for the defense violated … |
-6.5 |
| 19-6473 |
Gelu Topa v. Teofilo Melendez, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights conciseness criminal-procedure due-process exigent-circumstances facts fourth-amendment police-report relevance scotus-petition warrantless-search writ-of-certiorari |
Question not identified. |
-6.5 |
| 19-6475 |
Burton Maurice Kahn v. Robert Ripley |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
affirmative-defense civil-procedure collateral-estoppel due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure merits res-judicata standing |
1. If in the initial trial, the Court refused to hear litigation of the merits, should future Courts apply res judicata or collateral estoppel to the … |
-6.5 |
| 19-6493 |
Theresa Gail Scanlan v. Washington |
Washington |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
accuser confrontation-clause criminal-procedure medical-evidence medical-personnel police-interrogation police-involvement prosecutorial-purpose prosecutorial-use sixth-amendment testimonial testimonial-statements |
When police officers repeatedly inform an accuser that his statements to medical personnel will be given to the police and prosecuting authorities for… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6506 |
Joshua Jake White v. Mark Nooth, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
credibility credibility-contest criminal-procedure expert-testimony habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel post-conviction-relief prevailing-professional-norm professional-norm sixth-amendment |
Counsel failed to object to prejudicial testimony.
Specifically, the State's expert's testimony vouched for the alleged
victim's allegations of abuse … |
-6.5 |
| 19-6513 |
Deyoe R. Harris v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
2nd-amendment civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-review controlled-substances criminal-justice drug-policy due-process federal-law federalism free-speech sentencing-disparity standing takings |
①Is it clear that like one hondred years ago with
esulted in
ALL
Americans?
or
2sayt x0t pvo apogba hds o4 t2g SI②
ubstances because
people will use t… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6514 |
Alan M. Leschyshyn v. Dineshkumar Patel, et al. |
Arizona |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process genuine-issue-for-trial judicial-review legal-theory plausible-ground seventh-amendment statute-of-limitations summary-judgment trial-by-jury |
1. With respect to the Petitioner's Seventh Amendment rights, does the judge(s) have to be convinced about legal theory which remains viable under the… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6518 |
Eric Burgie v. Arkansas |
Arkansas |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
aggravated-robbery civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process jurisdiction mental-fitness mental-health parole parole-eligibility sentencing sentencing-scheme |
Mr. Bugie filed a section lugo-ill ca petition to corfense and ane appled Miller to an 18-year old. Mr. Burgse sk this court to anwer whether or not t… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6519 |
Charles M. Ray v. Florida |
Florida |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-statement civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process equal-protection jurisdiction legal-conclusion standing statutory-provisions takings writ-reasons |
Why pursuant to the provisions of sec. 5 amend. by to the U.S. Const. the deprivation of any right, privileges or immunities secured by the constituti… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6524 |
Franklin Elliott Benson v. Aimee Smith, Warden |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
actus-reus civil-rights constitutional-rights corpus-delicti criminal-murder criminal-procedure due-process evidence ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-instructions standing venue venue-challenge |
Whether, for the element of "causing the death" an essential element of malice murder in Georgia O.C.G.A. 16-5-1(a), the indictment which accused the … |
-6.5 |
| 19-6534 |
Saad Bahoda v. Sherman Campbell, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure Bunkley-v-Florida conflict-of-interest effective-assistance-of-counsel evidentiary-hearing forged-affidavits ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-instructions michigan-law People-v-Triplett plain-error self-defense sixth-amendment witness-conflict |
I. Petitioner was denied his Sixth Amendment Right to the effective assistance of counsel at trial due to counsel's failure to request a self-defense … |
-6.5 |
| 19-6543 |
Peter Gakuba v. Michelle Neese |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-conviction due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sentencing structural-error structural-errors |
Question not identified. |
-6.5 |
| 19-6544 |
Bradly M. Cunningham v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedIFP |
actual-knowledge anti-SLAPP civil-rights civil-rights-violation defamation defamation-statute discovery due-process false-light media-liability state-actor-doctrine statute-of-limitations |
1. Can the Court stay of this matter until final resolution of a related and dependant money damages case, Cunningham v. Washington County et al., 9th… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6548 |
Julian Marcus Raven v. United States, et al. |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights corporate-disclosure due-process equal-protection jurisdiction parties standing |
Question not identified. |
-6.5 |
| 19-6565 |
Steven Talbert Williams v. United States District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-exhaustion civil-procedure clerical-error constitutional-rights due-process estoppel exhaustion exhaustion-doctrine judicial-review sanctions work-product work-product-protection |
1. U.S. Cont. Agni 5, 10 (recordkeeping), 14 §1; Fed. R. Evid. 501, 502; 18 U.S.C. 1001(a):
a. Under the "Fairness," "Extrajudicial Partial Disclosure… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6574 |
Marco Gonzalez v. Panda Restaurant Group, Inc. |
California |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights conflicting-rulings constitutional-rights due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment legal-procedure res-judicata standing vexatious-litigant |
1) Why doesn't there exist Vexatious Litigant laws or procedure that addresses Multiplicity of California's §391 Motion with Conflicting Rulings based… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6580 |
In Re Marcus Simpson |
|
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure court-system due-process judicial-power judicial-usurpation legal-remedy mandamus perjury power-abuse standing usurpation-of-power |
Whether perjury amounts to a judicial usurpation of power, therefore mandamus (Lie). |
-6.5 |
| 19-6603 |
Dijon Rasheed Brown v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
4th-amendment anticipatory-warrant controlled-delivery drug-possession fourth-amendment jury-selection probable-cause search-and-seizure standing |
The Eighth Circuit Court Of Appeals does not require that the conditions governing an anticipatory warrant be explicit, clear, and narrowly drawn. Doe… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6605 |
Sean M. Donahue v. Pennsylvania |
Pennsylvania |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-infirmity due-process first-amendment fourteenth-amendment post-conviction-relief short-sentence standing state-courts statutory-construction |
Q1. ARE THE FOLLOWING PENNSYLVANIA STATUTES CONSTITUTIONALLY
18 Pa. C.S. §2709(a)(4);
42 Pa C,S. §9542;
42 Pa. C.S. §9543(a)(l)(i);
42 Pa. C.S. §9545(… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6608 |
Steve Romero v. Mike McDonald, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
de-novo-review fair-trial habeas habeas-corpus impartial-jury ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-bias procedural-history sixth-amendment strickland-standard strickland-v-washington |
This non-capital habeas case arises out of Steve Romero's 2006 conviction in the state court of California for attempted murder and the Ninth Circuit'… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6611 |
William Severs v. Gurbir Grewal, Attorney General of New Jersey, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2254 civil-procedure district-court due-process federal-courts federal-statute habeas-corpus petition section-2254 statute-of-limitations time-bar |
1. Was the District Court's decision to dismiss Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as untimely correct? |
-6.5 |
| 19-6612 |
Jerome Small v. Pennsylvania |
Pennsylvania |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abuse-of-discretion brady-claim constitutional-procedure due-diligence judicial-discretion pcra-court-discretion plea-agreement prosecutorial-disclosure prosecutorial-misconduct timeliness |
Is their four (4) prongs to establishing a Brady claim ?
Is the burden on the defense to scavage for Brady material to
show due diligence ?
Is a Br… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6613 |
Jaime Rodriguez, et al. v. United States |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review counsel-performance deliberate-misrepresentations due-process factual-predicates false-positions false-positions-and-deliberate-misrepresentations ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel mandate-rule newly-raised-claims sixth-amendment |
Whether the mandate rule bars consideration and adjudication of newly raised claims, under a Sixth Amendment ineffective assistance of counsel claim, … |
-6.5 |
| 19-6614 |
Jerome Marshall v. John E. Wetzel, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
actual-innocence constitutional-rights criminal-procedure habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel mental-health miranda-rights miranda-warnings post-conviction-relief procedural-default witness-credibility |
Whether the Third Circuit Court of Appeals erred by denying Petitioner's request for a certificate of appealability after Petitioner made a substantia… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6622 |
Helene Tonique Williams v. Toni Preckwinkle, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-review due-process federal-jurisdiction free-speech judicial-discretion patent procedural-dismissal standing state-court-procedure takings |
Helene Tonique Williams warld like to qustion, why the Dorthern District of Illinors Eastern son ned y conial t to livil action or file lawuts withs t… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6624 |
Andre D. Lee v. Louisiana |
Louisiana |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
burden-of-proof constitutional-rights conviction criminal-procedure due-process hearing right-to-counsel sentence state-trial-court void waiver |
1. Did the petitioner's right to counsel violated by the state trial court, thereby making the conviction and sentence completely void?
2. Did the st… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6628 |
Sean M. Donahue v. Pennsylvania |
Pennsylvania |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-infirmity due-process first-amendment fourteenth-amendment ineffective-counsel post-conviction post-conviction-relief short-sentence statutory-construction |
Q1. ARE THE FOLLOWING INFIRM? 18 Pa. C.S. §2709(a)(4):
42 Pa G.S. §0542;
42. Pa. C.S. §9543(a)(l)(i);
42 Pa. C.S. §9545 (b)(4);
42 Pa. C.S. §9545(a);… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6629 |
Jacqueline M. King v. District of Columbia, et al. |
District of Columbia |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-charges driver's-license drivers-license due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment notice notice-requirement parking-tickets suspension |
Whether the District of Columbia violated Petitioners due process rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution by suspend… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6631 |
Tatyana E. Drevaleva v. Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California, San Mateo County, et al. |
California |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedIFP |
anti-SLAPP civil-procedure civil-rights first-amendment free-speech limited-civil-case standing tenant-rights unlawful-detainer |
1) Can a Tenant who was being evicted by a Landlord for expressing a
First Amendment right for a free speech file an anti-SLAPP Motion
pursuant to the… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6632 |
Samier Patrick Clark v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
adam-walsh-act civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-counsel prosecutorial-misconduct sentencing-guidelines |
Was petitioner subjective to violations of his Constitutional rights throughout the course of his criminal prosecution?
Was petitioner subjective to … |
-6.5 |
| 19-6634 |
Kathryn Woodin Markle v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review burden-of-production burden-of-proof criminal-procedure defendant-rights due-process evidence government-burden pre-sentence-report sentencing sentencing-guidelines sentencing-objection |
Does the defendant bear the burden of production to rebut information found in a pre-sentence report after objecting to that information, or instead, … |
-6.5 |
| 19-6636 |
Gregory Williams v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circumstantial-evidence constitutional-rights due-process fair-trial jury-bias jury-instructions prosecutorial-misconduct sentencing sentencing-reasonableness |
I. WHETHER THE GOVERNMENT VIOLATED MR. WILLIAMS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL, IN IT'S IMPROPER DIRECT QUESTIONING AND ILL-ADVISED POINTING OF … |
-6.5 |
| 19-6637 |
Gregory Cooper v. Katy Poole, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
5th-amendment 6th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights counsel criminal-procedure cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process effective-counsel judicial-discretion right-to-counsel self-incrimination sixth-amendment subject-matter-jurisdiction takings |
Can a defendant be stoped from Confronting his
accusers and witnesses with o ther testimony
when the sth Amendment to the li.s. Const. Provides
for Du… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6638 |
Yannier Arias v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
acceptance-of-responsibility criminal-procedure due-process evidentiary-hearing ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-agreement plea-bargaining sentencing sentencing-enhancement trial-counsel |
1. Whether conflicting affidavits require an evidentiary hearing for ineffective assistance of counsel.
2. Counsel was ineffective for not objecting … |
-6.5 |
| 19-6644 |
Darrell Freeze v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
5th-amendment 6th-amendment criminal-procedure due-process federal-courts federal-sentencing fifth-amendment judicial-fact-finding sentencing sixth-amendment substantive-reasonableness |
Whether the Fifth and Sixth Amendments permit judges to find the facts necessary to support an otherwise substantively unreasonable federal sentence. |
-6.5 |
| 19-6649 |
Alfred L. Brooks v. Dean Borders, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
cruel-and-unusual-punishment cruel-punishment dismissed-allegations double-jeopardy due-process extrajudicial-proceeding extrajudicial-proceedings parole parole-hearing plea-agreement |
1) Can state District Attorney 's Office and/or California Board of Parole Hearings utilize
Parole Consideration Hearings as extrajudicial proceeding… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6650 |
Fidel Rios, Jr. v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-3553a 8th-circuit criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing district-court downward-variance guidelines judicial-discretion life-circumstances sentencing sentencing-factors sentencing-guidelines u-s-code |
Whether the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals and District Court for the Southern District of Iowa failed to adequately consider the sentencing factors set… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6654 |
Tremaine Bernard Johnson v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-provisions criminal-extradition due-process federal-authority federalism government-action interstate-jurisdiction jurisdiction jurisdictional-dispute legal-procedure reasons-for-granting-writ state-authority statement-of-case statutory-provisions uniform-criminal-extradition-act uniform-law |
Where NO Cece IW ELS! OF AUIWocitY
What is the coorsé of ACHON When
dhe unilorm criminal exdradean
ACY IS violated, betwee al Government
And state? |
-6.5 |
| 19-6659 |
In Re Arturo Rodriguez Ornalez |
|
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-violations criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-bargaining plea-negotiations rule-11 sentencing structural-error |
WHETHER CONSTITUTION AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS AND RULE 11 VIOLATIONS MAY HAVE RENDERED ARTURO RODRIGUEZ ORNALEZ'S SENTENCE AND CONVICTION CONSTITUTION… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6661 |
Jean Bernier, aka Charles Watson v. United States |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
congressional-encroachment congressional-intent general-savings-clause habeas-corpus judicial-interpretation judicial-powers mandate-recall sentencing-enhancement separation-of-powers statutory-clarification statutory-interpretation |
A.
IS THE PRINCIPLE OF SEPARATION-OF-POWERS , WHICH PROHIBITS
WJUDTGIAL ENCROACHMENT ON THE EXCLUSIVE POWER OF CONGRESS
TO MAKE LAWS, VIOLATED, WHEN… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6664 |
Steven Klikno v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
armed-career-criminal-act illinois-robbery sentencing sentencing-enhancement seventh-circuit seventh-circuit-interpretation stokeling-precedent stokeling-v-united-states violent-felony |
Is Illinois robbery an ACCA violent felony after this Court's decision in Stokeling v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 544 (2019)? |
-6.5 |
| 19-6666 |
Christopher Thornton v. Patricia Anne Coyne-Fague, Director, Rhode Island Department of Corrections |
First Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment 5th-amendment civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process federal-court filing-fees habeas-corpus return-of-fees rule-60 |
the filing of a State prisoner writ of habeas corpus 1. does prohibit the federal court from returning a filing fees.
2. does the Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 6… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6667 |
James Anthony Brown v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-rights criminal-sentencing due-process equal-protection gender-discrimination habeas-corpus statutory-interpretation |
I. WHETHER A UNITED STATES CITIZEN SHALL BE HELD IN PRISON FOR AN |
-6.5 |
| 19-6673 |
Lashon Browning v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
armed-career-criminal-act illinois-armed-robbery illinois-robbery sentencing sentencing-enhancement seventh-circuit seventh-circuit-interpretation stokeling-precedent stokeling-v-united-states violent-felony |
Is Illinois armed robbery an ACCA violent felony after this Court's decision in Stokeling v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 544 (2019)? |
-6.5 |
| 19-6676 |
Christopher G. Waguespack v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
child-pornography computer-evidence computer-forensics confrontation-clause criminal-procedure cross-examination evidence law-enforcement sixth-amendment software-reliability |
I. Whether failing to call the law enforcement agent responsible for generating a computer report in the Government's case-in-chief implicates the Six… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6678 |
Joseph Van Sach v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
armed-career-criminal-act armed-career-criminal-act-acca circuit-split criminal-law illinois-armed-robbery sentencing sentencing-enhancement seventh-circuit statutory-interpretation stokeling-v-united-states violent-felony |
Is Illinois armed robbery an ACCA violent felony after this Court's decision in Stokeling v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 544 (2019)? |
-6.5 |
| 19-6680 |
Tony Lipscomb v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
armed-career-criminal-act armed-career-criminal-act-acca illinois-armed-robbery illinois-robbery sentencing sentencing-enhancement seventh-circuit statutory-interpretation stokeling-v-united-states supreme-court-review violent-felony |
Is Illinois armed robbery an ACCA violent felony after this Court's decision in Stokeling v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 544 (2019)? |
-6.5 |
| 19-6682 |
Zhaopeng Chen v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circumstantial-evidence criminal-law criminal-procedure deliberate-ignorance due-process evidence farmer-v-brennan jury-instructions knowledge-element legal-standard mens-rea |
Whether the rule of Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825 (1994), should be extended to criminal cases, in which the defendant's knowledge of a certain fact… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6692 |
Kenneth Robert Simpson v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-interpretation constitutional-rights double-jeopardy due-process fifth-amendment habeas-corpus judicial-discretion parole revocation sentencing-guidelines statutory-construction supervised-release |
Question not identified. |
-6.5 |
| 19-6700 |
Abid Naseer v. United States |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
advisement appellate-review district-court right-to-counsel self-representation sixth-amendment standard-of-review waiver |
1. Whether the Second Circuit Court of Appeals applied an incorrect standard in concluding that Petitioner knowingly and intelligently waived his Sixt… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6703 |
Shondor Janell Arceneaux v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
2113(a) 924(c) aiding-abetting aiding-and-abetting bank-robbery civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction firearm-offense generic-crime-definition generic-definition remand sentencing sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation |
I.
If §924(c) applies to predicate crimes, 1 whose Elements are
no Broader than a Federal Generic Definition of that crime , is...
remand required i… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6704 |
JB Foster McAfee v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-court circuit-court-rejection civil-procedure-mail-box-rule due-process federal-rules-appellate-procedure federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure habeas-corpus houston-v-lack mail-box-rule obstruction-of-justice prison-mail prisoner-appeals prisoner-petition sentencing-guidelines timeliness timely-filing |
Whether a prisoner's petition for rehearing of his appeal decision that is due in 14 days, is considered timely filed under the "mail box rule" and Ho… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6706 |
Ramsin Jonathan Malek v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
armed-robbery categorical-approach crime-of-violence criminal-law federal-bank-robbery federal-crimes federal-criminal-procedure force-clause ninth-circuit sentencing statutory-interpretation violent-crime |
Whether this Court should grant certiorari to review the Ninth Circuit's decision because armed robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(d) does not categorical… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6707 |
Ricky Lee Tyndall v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
crime-of-violence criminal-law due-process element-of-force federal-criminal-law force-clause hobbs-act physical-force property-damage property-rights sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation vagueness |
18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)'s FORCE CLAUSE requires the use of "physical force" (i.e: "violence force" meaning "force capable of causing PHYsICAL in Dima… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6708 |
Daniel Wert v. Ronnie R. Holt, Warden |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2241 actual-innocence administrative-remedy atypical-and-significant-hardship atypical-hardship civil-procedure civil-rights district-court-jurisdiction due-process habeas-corpus jurisdiction sandin-v-conners section-2241 standing |
A Writ of Certiorari should be granted to address the important and novel question of whether the district court had jurisdiction over the actual-inno… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6709 |
Adam L. Acosta v. Colorado |
Colorado |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-provisions criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-rule-35 disclosure ineffective-assistance-of-counsel motion-for-new-trial new-trial prosecution rule-16 rule-16-disclosure rule-33 rule-33-motion-for-new-trial rule-35 |
Whether the Court of Appeals misconstrued Rule 35(c)(3)(VII), Colorado Rules of Criminal Procedure, in declining to consider a claim of ineffective as… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6715 |
Brandon Lashon Ingram v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
confrontation-clause evidentiary-hearing habeas-corpus habeas-corpus-review harmless-error harmless-error-analysis ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment strickland-standard strickland-v-washington |
Does Title 28 U.S.C. § 2255(b) automatically require an evidentiary hearing when an affidavit presented by a defendant alleging a breakdown in communi… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6716 |
Israel C. Isbell v. Steven Merlak, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law administrative-mistake civil-rights consecutive-sentence due-process federal-government federal-jurisdiction interstate-transfer jurisdiction pardon primary-jurisdiction prisoner-custody prisoner-transfer sentencing-procedure sixth-circuit-precedent sovereign-immunity state-custody |
Does one sovereign - specifically the federal government - lose or surrender its primary jurisdiction when they release an inmate who is serving their… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6717 |
Jess Lee Green v. Mississippi |
Mississippi |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-right constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fundamental-rights guilty-plea plea-bargaining plea-proceedings trial trial-procedure trial-rights |
I. Is the right to due process at trial and/or during guilty plea process a fundamental constitutional right ? |
-6.5 |
| 19-6719 |
Mauro Castaneda Palacio v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
8th-amendment civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction federal-supervised-release sentencing standing supervised-release vagueness |
whether the U.S. Fifth Circuit supports the conflicting
whether the U.S. Fifth Circuit supports some unconstitutional and vague special conditions un… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6723 |
T. B. v. Colorado |
Colorado |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
child-pornography due-process first-amendment free-speech sexting sexual-exploitation teen-sexting teenager-rights |
This case involves teen "sexting" or, more specifically, the exchange of nude and partially nude "selfies" between consenting teenagers. Petitioner T.… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6725 |
Richard A. Wellbeloved-Stone v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
19-usc-1509 agency-authority agency-procedure civil-procedure criminal-procedure criminal-proceeding customs-summons exclusionary-rule federal-law federal-policy ice non-customs-information |
Whether information having nothing to do with customs, obtained by an agency pursuant to a customs summons under 19 U.S.C. § 1509, should be suppresse… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6729 |
Cedric Gray v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
5th-amendment civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-suppression ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-discretion legal-standard mental-competency miranda-rights procedural-error sentencing suppression-hearing trial-rights |
1. Did the District Court violate my Fifth Amendment rights to remain silent?
2. Could the District Court use my 19% year old priors as proof of show… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6735 |
Kwok Cheung Chow, aka Raymond Chow, aka Ha Jai v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-principles counsel-of-choice courtroom-closure government-interest governmental-interest harmless-error overriding-interest public-trial right-to-counsel sixth-amendment |
1. In Presley v. Georgia, 558 U.S. 209 (2010), this Court held the right to a public trial in criminal cases extends to the entire trial, and any clos… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6739 |
Marshon Simon v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
armed-career-criminal-act armed-career-criminal-act,violent-felony,elements- attempted-offense canine-search criminal-procedure Does an attempted offense meet the requirements of florida-v-harris fourth-amendment fourth-amendment-protections fourth-amendment,narcotics-detection,canine-search narcotics-detection residual-odor |
1. Does Florida v. Harris stand for the proposition that narcotics sniffing canines may be trained to alert to residual odor, i.e. the absence of narc… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6746 |
Michael Anthony Mitchell v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review due-process equal-protection fair-hearing ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sentencing sentencing-disparities sentencing-disparity sentencing-review unwarranted-sentence waiver-of-rights |
Does a waiver of direct appeal rights and collateral rights excepting claims premised on ineffective assistance of counsel violate a defendant's "due … |
-6.5 |
| 19-6748 |
Steven A. Adams v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
aiding-and-abetting ambiguity attempt conspiracy controlled-substance controlled-substance-offense criminal-law deference deference-doctrine sentencing-enhancement sentencing-guidelines sentencing-guidelines-manual-4b1.2b statutory-interpretation |
1. Whether the term "controlled substance offense" defined by UNITED STATES SENTENCING GUIDELINES MANUAL § 4B1.2(b) to mean "an offense under federal … |
-6.5 |
| 19-6753 |
Benitez Auguarius Moody v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
affidavit-challenge deliberate-falsehood due-process fourth-amendment franks-v-delaware intentional-falsehoods intentional-falsity probable-cause search-warrant |
Whether the characterization of deliberate falsehoods in a search warrant affidavit as mere imprecision eviscerates the right of a defendant as enunci… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6756 |
Rene Torres v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellant-notification appellate-procedure civil-procedure counsel-notification dismissal due-process federal-rules federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure legal-procedure notice rule-42(b) rule-42b standing |
[1] Does the plain language of Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of
Appellate Procedure require counsel, when retained, to notify
Appellant of dismiss… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6758 |
Michael Tryance Anderson v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment appellate-standard booker-standard circuit-court civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection federal-sentencing sentencing-review standing substantive-reasonableness |
Whether the Eighth Circuit's substantive reasonableness review satisfies the standards set forth in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), Gall… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6760 |
Ijaz Khan v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-procedure-act constructive-amendment criminal-procedure double-jeopardy federal-rules-of-civil-procedure fifth-amendment indictment indictment-modification polygamy polygamy-charge |
THE INDICTMENT, AND WHETHER THIS CONSTITUTES A DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLATION N AS THE GOVERNMENT CAN LATER BRING A NEW CHARGE FOR POLYGAMY. |
-6.5 |
| 19-6761 |
Younes Kabbaj v. United States |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-115 18-usc-875 apprendi-v-new-jersey constitutional-vagueness crime-of-violence elonis-v-united-states first-amendment first-amendment-free-speech sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation subjective-intent true-threat true-threats |
It is a federal crime under both 18 U.S.C. §875 and §115 to threaten to injure the person (\.e.
physical body) of another, yet not legally settled as… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6764 |
Nicole Rena McCrea v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighter's Retirement and Relief Board |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-hearing administrative-procedure civil-rights constitutional-challenge disability disability-benefits disability-provisions due-process employment police-firefighters property-interest property-rights takings takings-clause |
1. Are the provisions of the United States Constitution, Amendment 5. Due Process Clause .
compelled and/or implied as pertains to the expressed statu… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6766 |
Miles Barton Nichols v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
fourth-amendment fourth-amendment-search-and-seizure franks-hearing franks-v-delaware informant-credibility law-enforcement-procedure material-omissions probable-cause recklessness search-warrant |
1. Whether a finding of recklessness, entitling a defendant to a hearing pursuant to Franks v. Delaware, should be inferred where the omissions are cl… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6774 |
Albert Allen, Jr. v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
certificate-of-appealability criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-appeal due-process fair-sentencing-act ineffective-assistance-of-counsel mandatory-minimum mens-rea prosecutorial-misconduct sentencing sentencing-guidelines |
Whether the Court of Appeals Erred in Denying Petitioner's Application for a Certificate of Appealability to Appeal the District Court's Denial of His… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6775 |
James Marione Butchee v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
career-offender controlled-substance criminal-history due-process federal-sentencing ineffective-counsel sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation violent-felony |
The Federal Minimum Mandatory sentence for Career offender clause [21 USC 841(b)] is at question in this petition, Do having one violent felony and on… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6778 |
Michael Daemon Blackburn v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-law constitutional-waiver criminal-procedure custodial-interrogation due-process fifth-amendment interrogation-rights miranda-rights self-incrimination waiver |
Is a written-only advisement of Miranda rights - without time or silence to read it - a sufficient advisal allowing a knowing, intelligent and volunta… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6790 |
Mark Gerth v. Warden, Allen Oakwood Correctional Institution |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure constitutional-rights direct-appeal due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel reopened-appeal right-to-counsel |
Whether Petitioner had a constitutional right to counsel, and thus the right to effective counsel, after the Court of Appeals for the First Appellate … |
-6.5 |
| 19-6791 |
Bryan Lamon Burnett v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
6th-circuit 8th-circuit appellate-review circuit-court-conflict circuit-split criminal-law criminal-sentencing felon-in-possession firearm-possession firearms sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation united-states-sentencing-guidelines |
SHOULD THE COURT GRANT CERTIORARI TO RESOLVE THE CONFLICT BETWEEN CIRCUIT COURTS OF APPEAL IN THE APPLICATION OF UNITED STATES SENTENCING GUIDELINE SE… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6793 |
Quentin Herndon v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
crime-of-violence criminal-law criminal-statute federal-court federal-courts physical-force sentencing-guidelines state-court state-court-interpretation state-courts statutory-interpretation USSG-4B1.2(a) |
Whether a federal court must defer to a state court's interpretation of the elements of a state criminal statute to determine if that offense requires… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6798 |
Corey Eugene Gill v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
career-offender criminal-procedure habeas-corpus mathis-v-united-states retroactivity sentencing statutory-interpretation |
Question not identified. |
-6.5 |
| 19-6799 |
Aamir A. Hafiz-Thompson v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
acca appeal certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel precedent sentencing supreme-court-precedent |
1. Nationally, where counsel admittingly is inaccurate, misinforms and fails, to. make specific inquiry regarding Petitioner's prior predicates (ACCA)… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6802 |
Gary Jackson v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeal civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process identification identification-process judicial-circuit jurisdiction precedent sentencing standing supreme-court supreme-court-precedent |
1) Did the State of Florida within the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Court in and Broward County, Florida and the Fourth District Court of Appeal as we… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6806 |
Anthony J. Stokes v. Florida |
Florida |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeal civil-rights constitutional-review criminal-procedure criminal-prosecution double-jeopardy due-process felony jurisdictional-conflict military-law predicate-felony sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation trial-modification |
I.
WHETHER A CONVICTION ON A CHARGE CONTAINING AN ESSENTIAL ELEMENT NOT CHARGED IN THE INFORMATION IS A "DUE PROCESS" VIOLATION.
II.
WHETHER THE DOUB… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6813 |
Lenore Luann Albert v. State Bar of California |
California |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-law due-process eighth-amendment equal-protection excessive-fines legal-costs license license-suspension reinstatement state-bar state-bar-costs |
Whether the California State Bar's conditional suspension that conditions the time suspended to payment of State Bar costs and other amounts ordered d… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6819 |
Frankie Ovies v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
cell-phone-evidence cell-phones circuit-split criminal-procedure digital-evidence digital-forensics expert-testimony federal-rules-of-evidence forensic-technology lay-testimony |
1. Whether using Cellebrite technology to download forensic digital evidence from a cell phone requires specialized or technical knowledge so that the… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6820 |
Rafael Leoner-Aguirre v. United States |
First Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-court civil-procedure criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-jurisdiction first-circuit jury-instructions predicate-acts racketeering rico rico-conspiracy salinas-v-united-states statutory-interpretation statutory-provisions supreme-court united-states-code |
In Salinas v. United States, 522 U.S. 52 (1997), this Court held that the RICO conspiracy does not require proof that a defendant himself committed or… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6824 |
Thomas Abdul Holcombe v. United States |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-split circuit-splits ex-post-facto non-delegation-doctrine right-to-travel SORNA-prosecution sorna-violations venue venue-issue |
1. Whether the Court must resolve splits among and within the circuits because across the country there is no uniformity of prosecution of alleged SOR… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6826 |
Jennifer Castro v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
affirmative-defenses age-of-consent criminal-law criminal-statute human-trafficking mens-rea minor minor-victims prostitution prostitution-law reasonable-belief sex-trafficking statutory-interpretation strict-liability |
Is 18 U.S.C. § 1591(a), which bars employing a minor to engage in prostitution, a strict liability offense requiring no proof of the defendant's knowl… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6828 |
Reginald Jerry Shaw v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review application-notes certificate-of-appealability commentary district-court-discretion ineffective-assistance legal-interpretation sentencing-guidelines strickland-standard strickland-v-washington |
1. Are the commentary and application notes in the Sentencing Guideline manual authoritative or left to the District Court's discretion.
2. Can the i… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6830 |
Don Emmery Wilson v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
6th-amendment ambiguous-plea constitutional-rights criminal-matter cruel-and-unusual-punishment cruel-unusual-punishment due-process habeas-corpus hearsay illegal-sentence ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel obstruction-of-justice plea-bargaining post-conviction-relief profiling sentencing-guidelines |
Was petitioner subjective to ineffective or deficient assistance of counsel
in a criminal matter?1)
Was petitioner subjective to cruel and unusual p… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6834 |
Lee Hope v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-922g3 constitutional-vagueness controlled-substance criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-due-process-rehaif-v-united-sta due-process federal-statute judgment-of-acquittal rehaif-v-united-states unlawful-user vagueness |
1.) Whether the Circuit Court of Appeals erred in holding that defendant's
motion for judgment of acquittal was properly denied by the District Court
… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6837 |
Anzara Brown v. Dana Metzger, Warden, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
brady-v-maryland chain-of-custody civil-rights confidential-informant constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-disclosure exculpatory-evidence forensic-evidence medical-examiners witness-testimony |
I.
WHETHER THE STATE OF DELAWARE
CAN WITHOLD EXCUIPATORY EVIDENCE
RELATING TO THE STATES OFFICE
OF MEDICAL EXATMINERS OFFICIALS
i
STEALING DRUG EVIDEN… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6838 |
Joshua Smith v. Sandra Butler, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2241 28-usc-2255 appellate-review caselaw federal-procedure guideline-range habeas-corpus incorrect-guideline-range mandatory-guidelines savings-clause sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation |
Whether the Courts of Appeals have incorrectly interpreted the 'savings clause', found in 28 USC 2255(e), to require that a defendant be sentenced und… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6841 |
Adam Scott v. United States |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure delayed-sealing evidence-suppression exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment sealing statutory-compliance suppression surveillance-law title-iii title-iii-intercept unforeseen-emergency wiretap wiretap-procedure wiretap-suppression |
1. Should a wiretap that was not sealed until 30days after inter
ception ended, and 21days after the order expired, be suppressed
where that delay w… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6842 |
Vivek Shah v. Marcus Holmes |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2241 28-usc-2255 circuit-court-of-conviction collateral-review extortion factual-innocence habeas-corpus habeas-corpus-petition plea-agreement retroactive-statutory-interpretation section-2255 statutory-interpretation |
(1) Whether a federal prisoner claiming factual innocence as a result of a
new, retroactively applicable statutory interpretation by the circuit
court… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6843 |
James Rice v. Wanza Jackson-Mitchell, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
6th-amendment barker-factors barker-v-wingo constitutional-rights habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance prejudice sixth-amendment speedy-trial unreasonable-application |
1. Was Petitioner James Rice denied the right to a speedy trial in the state courts? The Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States guar… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6848 |
Robert Matthew Wittal v. Montana |
Montana |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
co-defendant-testimony credibility criminal-procedure criminal-trial ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-instruction jury-instructions legal-objection sixth-amendment witness-credibility |
The states key witnesses at a homicide trial were three charged
co-defendants. Petitioner's defense rested upon undermining
the credibility of the c… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6849 |
Cedric Sharrod Williams v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-court-review controlled-substance criminal-law drug-crimes due-process firearm-proximity firearms fourth-circuit sentencing sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation |
Whether the fourth circuit court of appeals erred in concluding that, despite the controlled substance [heroin] in this matter having been locked in a… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6850 |
Ledell Tyler v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights commerce-clause criminal-law criminal-statute due-process force-definition hobbs-act home-invasion interstate-commerce jurisdiction non-violent-conduct statutory-interpretation violent-conduct |
1. Whether The Meaning of The Word "Force" Under The Hobbs Act Provision Encompassass Both Violent and Non-Violent Conduct:
2. Whether The Hobbs Act … |
-6.5 |
| 19-6854 |
In Re Alexander Palomarez |
|
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts civil-procedure civil-rights coercive-interrogation constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fourth-amendment habeas-corpus miranda-rights prisoner-rights standing state-court-review suppression-of-evidence |
1. Can the "Prison Mailbox Rule" announced in Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 101 L. Ed. 2d 245, 108 S.Ct. 2379 (1988), be applied to this case to excu… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6859 |
Michael A. Green v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
4th-amendment abandoned-vehicle community-caretaking criminal-procedure fourth-amendment inventory-search investigatory-motive law-enforcement-motive pretext search-and-seizure tow-policy vehicle-impoundment vehicle-search |
This case involves the impoundment and inventory search of a disabled vehicle by a law enforcement officer with an explicitly stated investigatory mot… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6864 |
Cedis R. Martin v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
categorical-approach categorical-review crime-of-violence criminal-procedure due-process offense-of-violence sentencing-guidelines sentencing-predicate state-court-conviction statutory-interpretation u.s.s.g.-§4a1.1(e) vagueness vagueness-analysis vagueness-doctrine |
Does a state court conviction qualify as an "offense of violence" for the purpose of the sentencing predicate pursuant to U.S.S.G.§4A1.1(e), if the st… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6865 |
Delante L. Lunn v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
but-for-causation but-for-test causation criminal-law criminal-sentencing drug-distribution drug-offenses drug-overdose mandatory-minimum overdose-causation sentencing statutory-interpretation |
Whether this Honorable Court should re-evaluate the but-for test established by Burrage v. United States, 571 U.S. 204 (2014) for mixed drug overdoses… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6868 |
Leigh Laz LePon v. Iowa |
Iowa |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
claims-processing due-process fair-and-impartial-tribunal fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment judicial-impartiality partisan-advocacy privileges-and-immunities subject-matter-jurisdiction |
I. WHETHER THE STATE DISTRICT-COURT JUDGE VIOLATED
THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT 'S PRIVILEGES AND
IMMUNITIES CLAUSE AS WELL AS THE FIFTH AND
FOURTEENTH… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6880 |
Gregory Bartunek v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
collateral-relief constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process exceptional-circumstances habeas-corpus prejudice prejudice-standard speedy-trial |
IS AN AFFIRMATIVE DEMONSTRATION OF PREJUDICE TO THE ACCUSED'S ABILITY TO DEFEND HIMSELF ESSENTIAL TO PROVE THE DENIAL OF HIS RIGHT TO A SPEEDY TRIAL?
… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6883 |
Donald Brian Winberg, et ux. v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process patent standing statutory-interpretation takings |
1. Is a farmer committing' 'fraud"(l8 U.S.C. §1343) when he sells
his "future goods" crop (UCC §2-105) on a '.'future goods" contract,
and accepts a… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6896 |
Jeffrey Antonio v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
congressional-action criminal-jurisdiction criminal-procedure due-process federal-criminal-jurisdiction federal-jurisdiction jurisdictional-element jury-determination land-claims preliminary-finding pueblo-lands pueblo-lands-act statutory-interpretation sufficiency-of-the-evidence |
I. Whether, when Congress relinquished all federal claims and extinguished all interest of the Pueblo of Sandia in privately held lands within pueblo … |
-6.5 |
| 19-6898 |
Demicko Billie Thomas v. Maggie Miller-Stout, Warden, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-jurisdiction burden-of-proof criminal-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment musacchio-precedent musacchio-v-united-states ninth-circuit reasonable-doubt supreme-court-review washington-state-supreme-court |
WHETHER THE WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT'S
DISAPPROVING OF THIS COURT'S DECISION IN
MUSACCHIO V. UNITED STATES,
136 S.Ct. 709 (2016), IS BINDING ON … |
-6.5 |
| 19-6899 |
Jose Luis Meza-Lopez v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
concealment constitutional-rights criminal-law criminal-procedure cuellar-v-united-states due-process guilty-plea ineffective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-counsel money-laundering transportation |
Does the Court's holding in Cuellar v. United States, Require more than a finding of concealing something for transportation to show money laundering;… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6902 |
Samir Benamor v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
antique-firearm burden-of-proof criminal-intent criminal-law due-process felon-in-possession firearm-possession firearms mens-rea statutory-definition statutory-interpretation |
Whether, in a 922(g)(1) prosecution, the Government bears the burden of proving that the defendant knew the charged firearm has the characteristics th… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6907 |
Robert Hendricks v. United States |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-error constitutional-rights criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-error criminal-trial due-process equal-protection evidence evidence-admission harmless-error racial-bias structural-error |
The Court of Appeals agreed that the District Court erred when at petitioner's trial for credit union robbery it permitted over objection one of the c… |
-6.5 |
| 19-6921 |
Brian H. Jones, Sr. v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-vagueness criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process inherent-power legal-definition prosecution-standards same-transaction sovereignty sovereignty-doctrine tribal-sovereignty vagueness |
1. Is the term "same transaction" unconstitutionally vague?
2. How would two incidents separated by four months constitute the "same transaction"?
3… |
-6.5 |