No. 19-606

Ukraine v. Pao Tatneft

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2019-11-12
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: arbitration-agreement arbitration-enforcement arbitration-exception foreign-sovereign-immunity international-arbitration new-york-convention sovereign-immunity subject-matter-jurisdiction waiver-exception
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the D.C. Circuit correctly held that: (1) all 160 signatories to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (i.e., the New York Convention) waived their sovereign immunity because they "must have contemplated arbitration-enforcement actions in other signatory countries"; and (2) a petitioner enforcing an arbitral award may invoke the waiver exception without making the more specific showings required by the arbitration exception.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the D.C. Circuit correctly held that: (1) all 160 signatories to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (i.e., the New York Convention) waived their sovereign immunity because they 'must have contemplated arbitration-enforcement actions in other signatory countries; and (2) a petitioner enforcing an arbitral award may invoke the waiver exception without making the more specific showings required by the arbitration exception

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-11
Reply of petitioner Ukraine filed.
2019-11-26
Brief of respondent Pao Tatneft in opposition filed.
2019-11-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 12, 2019)

Attorneys

Pao Tatneft
Jonathan I. BlackmanCleary, Gottlieb et. al., Respondent
Ukraine
Maria KostytskaWinston & Strawn, LLP, Petitioner