No. 19-6475
Burton Maurice Kahn v. Robert Ripley
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: affirmative-defense civil-procedure collateral-estoppel due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure merits res-judicata standing
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. If in the initial trial, the Court refused to hear litigation of the merits, should future Courts apply res judicata or collateral estoppel to the initial judgment when the initial trial did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue of merits?
2. Can a Court claim res judicata when the defendant did not plead an affirmative defense per Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 8, without a cite from any authority?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether res judicata or collateral estoppel should apply when the initial trial did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate the merits
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-11-27
Waiver of right of respondent Robert Ripley to respond filed.
2019-10-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 2, 2019)
Attorneys
Burton Kahn
Burton Maurice Kahn — Petitioner
Robert Ripley
E. Conry Davidson — Elizabeth Conry Davidson, Attorney at Law, Respondent