No. 19-400
Garmin USA, Inc., et al. v. Cellspin Soft, Inc.
Tags: 35-usc-101 civil-procedure claim-construction eligibility inventive-claims inventive-concept judicial-review legal-question motion-to-dismiss patent patent-eligibility patent-law pleadings question-of-law subject-matter-eligibility
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether patent eligibility is a question of law for the court that can be resolved on a motion to dismiss, notwithstanding allegations in a complaint that the asserted claims are inventive.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether patent eligibility is a question of law for the court that can be resolved on a motion to dismiss, notwithstanding allegations in a complaint that the asserted claims are inventive
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-23
Supplemental brief of petitioner Garmin USA, Inc. and Garmin International, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
2019-11-14
Rescheduled.
2019-11-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2019.
2019-11-06
Reply of petitioners Garmin USA, Inc. and Garmin International, Inc. filed.
2019-10-25
Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Computer & Communications Industry Association.
2019-10-23
Brief of respondent Cellspin Soft, Inc. in opposition filed.
2019-09-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 25, 2019)
Attorneys
Cellspin Soft, Inc.
John Joseph Edmonds — Edmonds & Schlather PLLC, Respondent
Computer & Communications Industry Association
Garmin USA, Inc. and Garmin International, Inc.
Neal Kumar Katyal — Hogan Lovells US LLP, Petitioner