| 24-47 |
Return Mail, Inc. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2024-07-16 |
Denied |
|
35-usc-101 abstract-idea alice-corporation-v-cls-bank innovation judicial-interpretation patent patent-eligibility patent-law return-mail-inc-v-united-states-postal-service section-101 |
Whether the claimed invention is ineligible for patent protection under the abstract-idea exception to 35 U.S.C. §101. |
| 23-1298 |
United Therapeutics Corporation v. Liquidia Technologies, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2024-06-12 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
administrative-law chevron chevron-deference civil-procedure inter-partes-review judicial-review patent patent-review standing statutory-interpretation |
Under 35 U.S.C. § 312, a petition for inter partes review (IPR) of a patent must "identif[y]" "with particularity" the "srounds on which the challenge… |
| 23-7687 |
Ashley Reneé Cagle v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-06-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law civil-procedure due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 23-1231 |
Cellect, LLC v. Katherine K. Vidal, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Federal Circuit |
2024-05-22 |
Denied |
Amici (11) |
equitable-doctrine good-faith-procurement investment-backed-expectations judicial-doctrine obviousness-type-double-patenting patent patent-invalidation patent-term-adjustment statutory-interpretation statutory-provisions |
Whether a patent procured in good faith can be invalidated on the ground that statutory Patent Term Adjustment, which requires lengthening a patent's … |
| 23-7442 |
Michael P. Farley v. Anthony Wills |
Seventh Circuit |
2024-05-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 23-7337 |
In Re Lorenza Gerald Ferebee, Jr. |
|
2024-04-29 |
Dismissed |
IFP |
case-number civil-procedure civil-rights court-procedure due-process jurisdiction legal-filing patent petition standing takings transfer |
Question not identified. |
| 23-7233 |
Chikezie Ottah v. National Grid |
Federal Circuit |
2024-04-16 |
Denied |
IFP |
35-USC-101 civil-procedure constitutional-provisions court-review due-process jurisdiction legal-procedure patent standing statutory-provisions takings writ-of-certiorari |
Question not identified. |
| 23-1118 |
Ikorongo Texas LLC, et al. v. Bumble Trading LLC |
Federal Circuit |
2024-04-15 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
35-usc-251 claim-interpretation claim-limitation federal-circuit original-patent original-patent-requirement patent patent-reissue reissue statutory-construction u.s.-industrial-chemicals-inc-v-carbide-carbon-che |
Patent Owner and Petitioner obtained reissue patents with new patent claims, which broadened certain limitations and narrowed others vis-à-vis the ori… |
| 23-7219 |
Ferrill Joseph Volpicelli v. Renee Baker, Warden |
Nevada |
2024-04-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-provisions court-review due-process jurisdictional-issue legal-procedure patent standing statutory-interpretation takings |
Question not identified. |
| 23-7135 |
Antonio Benjamin Martinez, aka Muhammad Hussain v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2024-04-04 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law civil-rights compelled-testimony constitutional-law constitutional-review due-process judicial-review patent standing statutory-interpretation takings |
Question not identified. |
| 23-1001 |
Larry Golden v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2024-03-12 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
7th-amendment civil-rights due-process patent race standing |
Question not identified. |
| 23-6821 |
Enrique Zacarias Diaz v. Oregon Department of Corrections, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-02-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 23-904 |
Larry Golden v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2024-02-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
5th-amendment due-process government-appropriation just-compensation patent takings |
Question not identified. |
| 23-6729 |
Timothy Paul Bush v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2024-02-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 23-6628 |
Robert E. Sindaco v. Florida |
Florida |
2024-01-31 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings unidentified-issue |
Question not identified. |
| 23-768 |
Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2024-01-17 |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
federal-circuit innovation-standard ksr-international-co-v-teleflex KSR-precedent obviousness obviousness-standard patent patent-law predictable-results reasonable-expectation-of-success |
Whether obviousness requires a showing of "predictable" results, as this Court held in KSR, or a mere "reasonable expectation of success," as the Fede… |
| 23-6462 |
Arthur Harris v. New Rez, LLC, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-01-11 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process jurisdiction legal-procedure patent separation-of-powers standing supreme-court takings writ-of-certiorari |
Question not identified. |
| 23-740 |
Larry Golden v. Qualcomm, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2024-01-09 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
7th-amendment case-document civil-rights court-filing document-type due-process legal-document legal-proceeding patent standing takings |
Whether the Federal Circuit erred in holding that a smartphone does not infringe petitioner's patents and whether petitioner, as a Black and/or Africa… |
| 23-6231 |
Kyle Maurice Parks v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2023-12-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-document civil-procedure civil-rights court-filing due-process judicial-review legal-petition patent procedural-matter standing takings |
Jtr/usi,rir/ Jfafa ZW*'c/
7^oa> Jl**- v
ctzfa^olA^-r w*c+-*t'~ 0/ fh* ^ftputeto(^$K> A /Jti
/! cfe 'k*jC/'t'VM*
/ Yuc
f2i€ owe Lfe4t^£ O S AS 5 £)
-j… |
| 23-6222 |
Charles F. Johnson, Jr. v. Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2023-12-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 23-6198 |
William Plummer v. Wellpath, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2023-12-08 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
2nd-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process free-speech incarceration medical-parole patent prisoner-rights standing state-law |
Question not identified. |
| 23-575 |
Fleur Tehrani v. Hamilton Technologies LLC |
Federal Circuit |
2023-11-28 |
Denied |
|
35-usc-103 federal-circuit obviousness patent patent-invalidation patent-law posita prior-art |
1. Whether the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit erred by declaring a non-expert as a POSITA despite all the evidence presented to the contrary… |
| 23-498 |
Realtime Data LLC, dba IXO v. Fortinet, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2023-11-13 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
35-usc-101 abstract-idea computer-functioning data-compression federal-circuit patent patent-claims patent-eligibility section-101 standing |
Whether the claimed inventions are ineligible for patent protection under the abstract-idea exception to Section 101. |
| 23-494 |
MacNeil IP LLC v. Yita LLC |
Federal Circuit |
2023-11-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
administrative-law agency-deference appellate-procedure fact-finding judicial-review patent patent-law remand standard-of-review |
In the case below, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a Final Written Decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board b… |
| 23-5878 |
Andrew J. Johnston v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
2023-10-25 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 23-421 |
Alfonso Cioffi, et al. v. Google LLC |
Federal Circuit |
2023-10-20 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
35-usc-251 embodiment-standard federal-circuit original-patent patent patent-disclosure patent-law patent-reissue reissue statutory-interpretation u.s.-industrial-chemicals |
1. Should the Antares Pharma, Inc. v. Medac Pharma Inc., 771 F.3d 1354, 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2014) "exact embodiment" standard for "original patent" disclo… |
| 23-5705 |
Michael Sampson v. United States, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-10-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
administrative-law civil-rights due-process electric-vehicle federal-action government-misconduct patent patent-pending standing takings technology-dispute USPTO |
1.) Will the court seek truth for the states authorities and counsel the U.S.C.Q.E.O. (left TEXAS) v6 made plaintiff he papers of Serio, 6^-C^V? (?) 4… |
| 23-299 |
ATM Shafiqul Khalid v. Citrix Systems, Inc. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-09-26 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
civil-rights constitutional-interpretation copyright due-process exclusive-right inventor-protection patent patent-rights standing state-action statutory-interpretation takings |
1. Whether "the exclusive Right" in inventions as written in the Constitution is a fundamental Right or Constitutional privilege separate from common … |
| 23-5612 |
Festus Okwudili Ohan v. North Atlantic Treaty Organization, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-09-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-law copyright due-process judicial-review legal-precedent patent property-rights statutory-interpretation trademark |
I am he Ory hare And Man AGC of .
tp everything un He World and Letp
aL dA Ew
2) LT oined ah Pakerts Ard (beyvignes
that BVI Finale ny Shoe lev A Ar… |
| 23-241 |
Joe Salazar v. AT&T Mobility LLC, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2023-09-13 |
Denied |
|
claim-construction due-process fifth-amendment investment-backed-expectations judicial-taking patent patent-rights property-rights takings takings-clause |
Where the Federal Circuit Panel's construction of petitioner's patent claim was unforesee able and unjustifiable under the circuit's prior decisions, … |
| 23-230 |
Personalized Media Communication, LLC v. Apple Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2023-09-12 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
docket-management due-process equitable-doctrine patent patent-infringement patent-office patent-prosecution patent-validity prosecution-laches statutory-deadlines |
1. Whether prosecution laches can be based on an applicant's prosecution of a patent application in compliance with the PTO's docket-management decisi… |
| 23-185 |
HIP, Inc. v. Hormel Foods Corporation |
Federal Circuit |
2023-08-29 |
Denied |
|
35-usc-116 conception-standard federal-circuit federal-circuit-interpretation joint-invention joint-inventorship patent patent-claim patent-inventorship patent-specification statutory-construction |
1. Whether joint inventorship requires anything more than a contribution to conception that is stated in a patent claim.
2. Whether, under Section 11… |
| 23-190 |
Probir K. Bondyopadhyay v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2023-08-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (3) |
civil-rights due-process fifth-amendment government-liability jurisdictional-conflict patent patent-claim perjury sovereign-immunity statutory-interpretation takings |
A serious legal conflict has developed between the
USCFC and U.S. District Court involving Title 28
U.S.C. Section 1338(a) and Title 28 U.S.C. Section… |
| 23-5408 |
James Lee Ballard v. Florida |
Eleventh Circuit |
2023-08-21 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights due-process free-speech patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 23-135 |
Intel Corporation, et al. v. Katherine K. Vidal, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Federal Circuit |
2023-08-15 |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
administrative-procedure-act agency-rulemaking inter-partes-review judicial-review patent patent-and-trademark-office patent-review statutory-interpretation |
Whether 35 U.S.C. § 314(d), which bars judicial review of "[t]he determination ... whether to institute an inter partes review," applies even when no … |
| 23-141 |
Rowland J. Martin, Jr., Individually and as Administrator to the Estate of Johnnie Mae King v. Bexar County, Texas, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2023-08-15 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure federal-circuit jurisdiction patent patent-jurisdiction remand removal removal-action statute-of-limitations subject-matter-jurisdiction |
Before the Court is a novel case and controversy involving a patent related conflict of laws. The case was removed from state court after the expirati… |
| 23-5327 |
In Re Titus Lee Radcliff |
|
2023-08-10 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction free-speech judicial-review patent standing statutory-interpretation takings |
Question not identified. |
| 22-7746 |
Gary Leon Webster v. Institute of Virology |
Eighth Circuit |
2023-06-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 22-7388 |
Chandel S. Dirkans v. Illinois |
Illinois |
2023-04-27 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 22-7365 |
Gina Russomanno v. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2023-04-25 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
amendment-rights civil-procedure due-process federal-circuit frcp-rule-60 judicial-review patent phillips-v-county-of-allegheny pro-se rule-60 standing |
Whether, the Supreme Court will consider the merits
of the decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
FEDERAL Circuit, pursuant to Pro Se plaintiff… |
| 22-7044 |
In Re Jordan Powell |
|
2023-03-21 |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-law antitrust disaster-loan due-process economic-injury eidl loan-calculation patent sba sba-authority |
1. Under the 5th Amendment Due Process clause, does the Small Business Administration (SBA) have the authority to apply an earlier loan calculation me… |
| 22-919 |
Stephen Thaler v. Katherine K. Vidal, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2023-03-21 |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response Waived |
artificial-intelligence innovation-rights invention inventor inventor-definition patent patent-act patent-eligibility patent-law standing statutory-interpretation |
Does the Patent Act categorically restrict the statutory term "inventor" to human beings alone? |
| 22-819 |
Franz Wakefield, dba CoolTVNetwork.com v. Blackboard, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2023-02-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
7th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process evidence-standard magistrate-judge markman-test patent patent-validity standing statutory-interpretation |
35 U.S.C. § 282(a) provides that "[a] patent shall be presumed valid." This Court has ruled that when a court reviews validity of a patent, the presum… |
| 22-803 |
Virentem Ventures, LLC v. Google LLC |
Federal Circuit |
2023-02-24 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
claim-construction due-process federal-circuit patent patent-invalidity ptab ptab-determination rule-36 |
1. Does the Federal Circuit's use of Rule 36 to affirm without opinion PTAB invalidity determinations that are challenged based on pure questions of l… |
| 22-784 |
Aaron G. Filler v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-02-21 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
amendment-rights casualty-loss civil-rights constitutional-taking due-process patent patent-protection patent-seizure standing state-liability takings tax-deduction |
When a State (herein California) knowingly intentionally and with malice aforethought seizes and commences producing goods clearly protected by a U.S.… |
| 22-6679 |
Debra Sauer v. City of Chicago, Illinois, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2023-02-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-court civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process judicial-dismissal legal-claims ninth-circuit patent standing takings |
Ay€. c^ncf ard CTlrcuii"
decisions \v\ron-Pl \ el~ -Yhe.
wVcYv dismissed7"Ct~ oiec\S\oov'f
prev se - K\
■Tlicr 6v/ifk
•f <4e.c\Sior^ (ajKicU dIHeJ lau… |
| 22-6594 |
James Michael Fayed v. Oak Smith, Acting Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-01-23 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 22-544 |
Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2022-12-14 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
35-usc-102 anticipation anticipatory-reference clear-and-convincing clear-and-convincing-evidence invention patent patent-infringement patent-invalidity prior-art |
In Washburn & Moen Mfg. Co. v. Beat 'Em All Barbed-Wire Co., 143 U.S. 275 (1892) (also known as "Barbed Wire Patent"), the Court found the burden to e… |
| 22-5945 |
Alex Adams v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-10-28 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights due-process free-speech patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 22-381 |
Ashot Yegiazaryan, aka Ashot Egiazaryan v. Vitaly Ivanovich Smagin, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-10-24 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (1)Relisted (2) |
business-reputation civil-rico court-judgment domestic-injury foreign-injury foreign-plaintiff intangible-property legal-test patent |
In RJR Nabisco, this Court, applying the presumption against extraterritoriality, held that a civil RICO plaintiff states a cognizable claim under RIC… |
| 22-203 |
Apple Inc., et al. v. California Institute of Technology |
Federal Circuit |
2022-09-07 |
Denied |
CVSGAmici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
administrative-procedure administrative-process civil-procedure federal-circuit inter-partes-review patent patent-law patent-validity standing statutory-interpretation |
Whether the Federal Circuit erroneously extended
IPR estoppel under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) to all grounds
that reasonably could have been raised in the… |
| 22-5382 |
Tyrone Hurt v. Alexander Williams, Jr. |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-08-18 |
Denied |
IFP |
35-usc-101 civil-procedure due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 22-5323 |
Douglas Stephenson v. Michael Zaken, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Greene, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2022-08-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-law civil-rights patent procedural-due-process standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 22-5299 |
Michael G. Peters v. Andrew S. Hanen |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-08-05 |
Dismissed |
IFP |
35-usc-101 civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 22-5222 |
Travis Lee Combs v. Washington |
Washington |
2022-07-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process individual-rights judicial-review legal-standard patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 22-5179 |
Jon Christopher Stoune v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-07-25 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance patent section-2255 standing takings |
1) Should the U.S. Supreme Court grant a Certificate of Appealability in light of this Court's decisions and the Petitioner's three §2255 application … |
| 22-53 |
Aaron G. Filler, et al. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2022-07-20 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
assignment-of-claims assignment-of-claims-act civil-procedure fifth-amendment government-taking just-compensation patent patent-infringement patent-rights takings |
For a Patent infringed by the United States, where Patent rights are divided between two related parties – one having the right to sue and the other h… |
| 22-11 |
SawStop Holding LLC v. United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2022-07-05 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
35-usc-101 35-usc-102 35-usc-103 judicial-authority non-statutory-double-patenting patent patent-eligibility patent-law statutory-interpretation ultra-vires |
The Patent Act adopted by Congress provides that a person shall be entitled to a patent if an invention meets three conditions: the eligibility condit… |
| 21-8185 |
Michael Andrew Johnson v. Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2022-06-17 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 21-1566 |
Juno Therapeutics, Inc., et al. v. Kite Pharma, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2022-06-15 |
Denied |
Amici (5)Relisted (6) |
35-usc-112(a) enablement federal-circuit invention-scope inventor-possession patent patent-law patent-specification statutory-interpretation written-description |
Section 112(a) of Title 35, United States Code, requires that a patent include a "specification," which "shall contain a written description of the in… |
| 21-1567 |
Biogen International GmbH, et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2022-06-15 |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
35-usc-112 effective-dose efficacy-requirement federal-circuit multiple-sclerosis patent patent-law patent-specification statutory-interpretation written-description |
Is 35 U.S.C. § 112's requirement that a patent specification "contain a written description of the invention" met when the specification describes the… |
| 21-1526 |
Gilbert P. Hyatt v. United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2022-06-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
administrative-law administrative-procedure-act agency-action civil-procedure federal-circuit judicial-review mandamus-standard patent patent-office-rule standing summary-judgment |
1. Whether the ordinary summary judgment
standard of Rule 56 applies to review of agency action,
as held by the First, Fifth, Ninth, and District of C… |
| 21-1527 |
CustomPlay, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2022-06-06 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-procedure america-invents-act due-process inter-partes-review patent patent-law patent-rights patent-trial-and-appeal-board statutory-interpretation trademark |
1. Whether the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) violated the statutory text and legislative intent of the America Invents Act (AIA) by delegating the… |
| 21-7789 |
Angel Osornio v. Arizona |
Arizona |
2022-05-05 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 21-7564 |
Armstead Kieffer v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-04-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-vagueness due-process federal-jurisdiction fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment free-speech patent sixth-amendment standing takings |
(1) Does the Unconstitutionally Vague language, Struck down by the Court in 185 O.G.), apply to 18USC F22¢gyG)?
(2) May a Stipulation Suffice To Conv… |
| 21-1267 |
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. SRI International, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2022-03-18 |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response Waived |
civil-procedure damages egregious-conduct federal-circuit halo-electronics judicial-discretion patent patent-damages statutory-interpretation willful-infringement |
(1) Whether enhanced damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 may be awarded absent a finding of egregious infringement behavior; and
(2) Whether the court of a… |
| 21-7337 |
In Re Aurlieas D. McClarty |
|
2022-03-11 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 21-7340 |
Joseph Louis Hall v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2022-03-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure constitutional-challenge criminal-law due-process judicial-review legislative-intent patent sentencing standing state-court-procedure statutory-interpretation |
1. WHETHER A DISTRICT COURT CAN RELY SOLELY ON A DEFENDANT'S ORIGINAL SENTENCING FACTORS SET FORTH IN 18 U.S.C.3553(A) AND WHETHER A DEFENDANT'S POST-… |
| 21-7010 |
Jabari J. Johnson v. James Johnson |
Tenth Circuit |
2022-01-31 |
Denied |
IFP |
35-usc-112 federal-circuit patent patent-act standing written-description |
/. P/tf/hZ/tf /JfA'-Z/ie S/z^/cwe ZZ///Z r//A -f/te AA/ie
/Zfz/r z/zscAz/zok / y?#z/ /fs/ye J ?
tfp' tf/tfj //fz A/'A'ff'Z Ayi/y/ r/fAf-/5Z
/. A/a/m-… |
| 21-6892 |
Jabari J. Johnson v. Janet Smith, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2022-01-18 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Their descietion rEIardiNg ISSUE / and ISSUp2
Or was the District folrt Clearly erroneons?
Couln have been takeh renndins Issue Iand??
3. Planlit, … |
| 21-1005 |
Heat On-The-Fly, LLC, et al. v. Energy Heating, LLC, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2022-01-14 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
35-usc-285 attorney-fees civil-procedure district-court-discretion exceptional-case litigation-misconduct patent patent-litigation |
Must a district court consider litigation misconduct, or lack thereof, in determining whether a case is exceptional under 35 U.S.C. § 285? |
| 21-893 |
Apotex Inc., et al. v. Cephalon, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-12-16 |
Denied |
|
35-usc-103 drug-reformulation inventive-process ksr-v-teleflex motivation motivation-to-combine obviousness obviousness-standard patent patent-law person-of-ordinary-skill prior-art |
Whether claimed inventions involving reformulating and administering an old drug in ways that are no better than prior techniques, and which had been … |
| 21-888 |
Intel Corporation v. VLSI Technology LLC, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-12-15 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
administrative-law agency-rule agency-rulemaking arbitrary-or-capricious federal-circuit inter-partes-review leahy-smith-act leahy-smith-america-invents-act notice-and-comment-rulemaking patent patent-review |
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit may review, by appeal or mandamus, a decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office denyin… |
| 21-819 |
Baxter Corporation Englewood v. Becton, Dickinson and Company |
Federal Circuit |
2021-12-02 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
administrative-procedure administrative-procedure-act expert-testimony inter-partes-review ordinary-remand-rule patent patent-challenge prior-art remand-rule statutory-interpretation |
A petitioner may challenge an issued patent in an inter partes review (IPR) before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, an agency tribunal, but "only on… |
| 21-757 |
Amgen Inc., et al. v. Sanofi, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-11-22 |
Judgment Issued |
CVSGAmici (33)Response RequestedRelisted (4) |
35-usc-112 claim-construction claim-scope enablement enablement-requirement invention-disclosure judicial-review patent patent-law statutory-interpretation undue-experimentation written-description |
1. Whether enablement is "a question of fact to be determined by the jury," Wood v. Underhill, 46 U.S. (5 How.) 1, 4 (1846), as this Court has held, o… |
| 21-746 |
Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated |
Federal Circuit |
2021-11-19 |
Denied |
CVSGAmici (5)Relisted (2) |
article-iii civil-procedure civil-rights due-process inter-partes-review license-agreement patent patent-challenge patent-validity standing takings |
Whether a licensee has Article III standing to challenge the validity of a patent covered by a license agreement that covers multiple patents. |
| 21-691 |
FG SRC LLC v. Microsoft Corporation |
Federal Circuit |
2021-11-10 |
Denied |
|
appellate-review arthrex-ruling civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-violation due-process federal-circuit gvr-order patent standing summary-decision takings |
This petition seeks only a Grant, Vacate, and Remand (GVR) Order.
This petition seeks a GVR Order regarding two judgments by the Court of Appeals for… |
| 21-6040 |
Louis Holger v. State of Alaska, Inc., et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-10-21 |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-law civil-procedure due-process patent standing takings |
1. Is the constitution For the unitedstates of America the Supreme law of the lad?
2. Areallf sudicial offices, bothof the united of afFirMation to s… |
| 21-5927 |
In Re Lindsey Orr |
|
2021-10-07 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights congressional-authorization detention-authority due-process federal-law first-time-offender legislative-intent patent standing statutory-interpretation takings |
I. TVa Following &uUtUnIs Based UP5n THt Fait [ Hat Fxuptional
ti U'umshrun Vlarrant TKt txmiH Of The tourU Biuret unary Powers
Baud Upon ThU*Extrcw… |
| 21-457 |
ENCO Systems, Inc. v. DaVincia, LLC |
Federal Circuit |
2021-09-27 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
35-usc-101 abstract-idea federal-circuit patent patent-claim patent-eligibility patent-protection patent-system section-101 |
What is the appropriate standard for determining whether a patent claim is directed to a patent-ineligible concept when determining whether an inventi… |
| 21-438 |
Olaf Sööt Design, LLC v. Daktronics, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-09-22 |
Denied |
CVSGAmici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
appellate-review claim-construction infringement jury-trial jury-verdict patent patent-law seventh-amendment sua-sponte |
Whether the Seventh Amendment allows the Federal Circuit to reverse a jury verdict based on a sua sponte new claim construction of a term the district… |
| 21-406 |
Impax Laboratories, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-09-15 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
antitrust antitrust-law competition-law patent patent-infringement patent-litigation patent-settlement patent-strength patent-validity reverse-payment |
Because settlement agreements that permit a "generic manufacturer to enter [a] patentee's market prior to the patent's expiration" increase competitio… |
| 21-413 |
Infinity Computer Products, Inc. v. Oki Data Americas, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-09-15 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
35-usc-112 claim-construction claim-interpretation definiteness-standard expert-testimony indefiniteness patent patent-law patent-specification person-skilled-in-the-art prosecution-history |
Whether a patent claim is indefinite under § 112, ¶ 2, if conflicting positions about a claim term arise during the patent prosecution process, even i… |
| 21-364 |
Sarada Mohapatra v. Drew Hirshfeld, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Federal Circuit |
2021-09-08 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
35-usc-101 alice-doctrine alice-mayo citizen-inventors computer-implemented-invention mayo-framework non-preemptive-solution patent patent-eligibility practical-solutions preemption process-improvement |
Whether computer-based process improvement by Citizen patent applications for inventions Inventors - characterized by narrow and well-defined practica… |
| 21-5619 |
Jaime Luevano v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-09-08 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 21-5585 |
Willie Lee Davis v. United States |
Third Circuit |
2021-09-07 |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedIFP |
35-usc-101 civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing |
I oWtr rhs ■fhe Vvllnefker
misin+erpre4ed
Amended
1$ (J.S,C.CQU
*Hie. m*/
T'+le of \ZersTon
1771 (f) !5 |
| 21-5520 |
Brunson Roberts v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2021-08-31 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
35-usc-101 civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process individual-liberty judicial-review legal-precedent patent standing statutory-interpretation |
Question not identified. |
| 21-249 |
Probir Kumar Bondyopadhyay v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2021-08-20 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights constitutional-claim due-process federal-claims government-taking invention-compensation national-defense patent patent-rights standing takings |
The question before the Honorable U.S. Supreme Court is on the recognition and affirmation of the Jeffersonian claim of an original creature of the U.… |
| 21-193 |
Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-08-11 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
accessibility patent patent-publication patent-statute printed-publication prior-art public-accessibility software software-disclosure trade-secret |
Can a document qualify as a printed publication if it is stored on a password-protected website, not accessible to the public, and available only to c… |
| 21-170 |
Rain Computing, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-08-05 |
Denied |
|
35-usc-112 35-usc-112f claim-construction federal-circuit indefiniteness nautilus-standard nautilus-v-biosig patent patent-law statutory-interpretation |
Whether a patent claim may be invalidated for indefiniteness only if, under 35 U.S.C. § 112, para. 2 (now subsection 112(b)) as construed by Nautilus,… |
| 21-118 |
Apple Inc. v. Optis Cellular Technology, LLC, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-07-28 |
Denied |
Amici (5)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
administrative-law agency-rulemaking federal-circuit inter-partes-review judicial-review leahy-smith-america-invents-act mandamus-petition patent patent-review uspto |
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit may review, by appeal or mandamus, a decision of the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office denying … |
| 21-5199 |
Vincent Johnson v. Tim Shoop, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2021-07-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights due-process free-speech patent standing takings |
What is the correct vehicle and avenue inwhich a petitioner may challange a COA violation by a circuit court pursuant to Buck v. Davis 13? S. Ct. 759 … |
| 21-5033 |
Relonzo Phillips v. Melody M. Maddox, Sheriff, Dekalb County, Georgia |
Georgia |
2021-07-08 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process judicial-economy malicious-prosecution patent pendent-jurisdiction qualified-immunity standing state-law-claims summary-judgment takings |
Question not identified. |
| 20-8456 |
In Re Michael Alonza Rufus |
|
2021-06-30 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 20-8464 |
Alberto Solar-Somohano v. The Coca-Cola Company, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-06-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appointment-clause article-i congressional-intent constitutional constitutional-challenge enrolled-bill enrolled-bill-doctrine field-v-clark judicial-review patent patent-trademark-judges |
Whether Arthrex a hoax does not control be foreclosed from deciding appointment clause problem instead is Field v. Clark 143 US 649 (1892) that contro… |
| 20-8406 |
Michael Geoffrey Peters v. Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-06-23 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 20-1760 |
iLife Technologies, Inc. v. Nintendo of America, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-06-17 |
Denied |
|
35-usc-101 claim-interpretation judicial-framework legal-standard patent patent-claim patent-eligibility question-of-fact question-of-law section-101 standard |
The questions presented are the same as those presented in the petition for a writ of certiorari filed in connection with American Axle & Manufacturin… |
| 20-1700 |
Ultratec, Inc. v. CaptionCall, LLC, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-06-08 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
5th-amendment constitutional-challenge due-process federal-circuit federal-circuit-rule-36 inter-partes-review patent patent-review patent-validity retroactivity |
1. Does retroactive application of the inter partes review process violate the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitu… |
| 20-1612 |
Monib Zirvi, et al. v. Jay T. Flatley, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2021-05-19 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
constructive-notice fraudulent-concealment inquiry-notice intellectual-property misappropriation patent pleading-stage standing storm-warnings trade-secret trade-secret-misappropriation |
1. Did the Second Circuit err in holding, in contrast to the Federal Circuit, that under the "inquiry notice" standard applicable to trade secret misa… |
| 20-1604 |
Biogen MA Inc. v. EMD Serono, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-05-18 |
Denied |
|
anticipation claim-construction incentives medical-treatment method-of-treatment novelty patent patent-law patent-validity prior-art recombinant-protein |
Whether courts may disregard the express claim term "recombinant" so as to render a method-of-treatment patent anticipated—and thus invalid—in light o… |
| 20-8022 |
Tillman T. Henderson v. Scott R. Frakes, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2021-05-14 |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-law civil-procedure due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 20-1545 |
TCL Communication Technology Holdings Limited, et al. v. Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 |
Federal Circuit |
2021-05-05 |
Denied |
|
35-usc-271 claim-construction industry-standard infringement judicial-precedent literal-infringement patent patent-infringement statutory-interpretation |
This Court's precedent in Markman requires that the construction of a patent "is exclusively within the province of the court." Markman v. Westview In… |
| 20-7815 |
Sylvester O. Barbee v. Jason Boyd, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2021-04-21 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
1). Does 21 U.S.C. § 331 (U) (3A) Of Prohibited Act(s) Pertain to Violation(s) Of Administrative Regulations 407 & 600 by Respondent(s), as Well as Th… |
| 20-7807 |
Woodrow Andrew Clark v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-04-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure claims-assessment constitutional-law district-court due-process judicial-review legal-standard patent procedural-merit reasonable-jurists standing takings |
Whether reasonable jurists would find the District Court's assessment of Claims one and two debatable or wrong? Or that the issues presented are adequ… |
| 20-1412 |
NetSoc, LLC v. Match Group, LLC, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-04-08 |
Denied |
|
abstract-idea civil-rights computer-implemented-invention due-process free-speech patent patent-eligibility rating-system social-network standing takings technological-innovation |
1. Is the addition of a network computer implemented social network, with a novel and unconventional rating system, to a method of organizing human ac… |
| 20-1396 |
Walter A. Tormasi v. Western Digital Corporation |
Federal Circuit |
2021-04-06 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights due-process equal-protection inmate-access patent patent-rights property-rights standing state-agencies takings |
Does imprisonment (1) forfeit a patent owner's right not to be deprived of personal property without due process of law and (2) render a person wholly… |
| 20-1380 |
Security People, Inc. v. Drew Hirshfeld, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-04-01 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
constitutional-challenge due-process federal-circuit fifth-amendment inter-partes-review jurisdiction patent patent-law retroactive-application vested-property |
Whether the retroactive application of inter partes review under the Leahy–Smith America Invents Act, Pub. L. No. 112-29, 125 Stat. 284 (2011), the "A… |
| 20-1363 |
Merit Medical Systems, Inc. v. Nazir Khan, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-03-30 |
Denied |
|
35-usc-285 attorney-fees civil-procedure district-court federal-circuit patent patent-infringement rule-11 rule-11-sanctions sanctions section-285 |
If this Court determines in Case No. 20-773 that the Federal Circuit erred in affirming the award of attorney fees as sanctions under Rule 11, should … |
| 20-1339 |
Richard Sowinski v. California Air Resources Board |
Federal Circuit |
2021-03-24 |
Dismissed |
|
civil-procedure claim-preclusion federal-circuit infringement-suit issue-preclusion patent patent-preclusion preclusion res-judicata |
Whether the Federal Circuit erred in creating and applying a patent-specific preclusion doctrine that bars new issues and new claims that would surviv… |
| 20-1342 |
In Re Titus L. Radcliff |
|
2021-03-24 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
(SIMULTANEDUS CONTTESTED CLAETM)
LABELED B)CASE 13-5186
WAS THIS
1-9-2OIS LETEL SUPPOSE TO BE THE AASWEL FROM THE FIFUG
PASD FEE FU WHIEH MY CASE WITS… |
| 20-7519 |
Angadbir Singh Salwan v. Drew Hirshfeld, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Federal Circuit |
2021-03-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abstract-idea administrative-law civil-rights due-process intellectual-property judicial-corruption patent patent-law standing supreme-court-precedent takings |
(1) The US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) judge Ms. Leonie
Brinkema, the clerks of CAFC, and the CAFC panel of judges O'Ma… |
| 20-7403 |
Richard Luna v. Texas |
Texas |
2021-03-11 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 20-1261 |
Wi-LAN, Inc., et al. v. Drew Hirshfeld, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Federal Circuit |
2021-03-11 |
Denied |
|
administrative-law appointments-clause constitutional-law inferior-officer judicial-review patent patent-office principal-officer separation-of-powers statutory-interpretation uspto |
1. Whether, for purposes of the Appointments Clause, U.S. Const. Art. II, § 2, Cl. 2, administrative patent judges of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Of… |
| 20-7375 |
Christopher Wooten v. Stan Parker, Sheriff, Howard County, Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-03-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
7th-amendment civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
WHy
84e
Te 1OSDC.AB1/ane,Tα.,
THe
CReuiT.C.O.A.NeW.ORleansLA.
G
$x\r}$
#G00k L0uT Fls.
knD
#f
WITHort
Giung
en
UncounselleD
"P70se
PRoleTaRIa
like
PeT… |
| 20-7398 |
Khemall Jokhoo v. Lola Velaquez-Aguilu, Assistant United States Attorney |
Fourth Circuit |
2021-03-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
ID C. IACK CONSNTUKOAI AUthORIY tO AD JUDICATE PIAiNLiFF /PELTIONER EWFED SUi'F AT COMMON LAW ACHON ? (DUE PROCESS OF IAW V.DLASON APliUDiKD GUDMT of … |
| 20-1232 |
IBSA Institut Biochimique, S. A., et al. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-03-08 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
foreign-inventors foreign-language indefiniteness national-treatment patent patent-indefiniteness patent-priority patent-prosecution priority-date trips-agreement |
Whether, pursuant to the United States' obligations under the TRIPS Agreement, codified at 19 U.S.C. § 3511, a court construing the claims of a U.S. p… |
| 20-1211 |
SynKloud Technologies, LLC v. Adobe, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-03-02 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
1404(a) civil-procedure discovery district-court-discretion federal-circuit-review mandamus patent patent-litigation transfer venue venue-transfer |
1. Whether the Federal Circuit wrongly overruled a district court judge's discretionary 1404(a) transfer decision when rational basis exists for all o… |
| 20-7267 |
Kevin L. Martin v. Cathleen Capron, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2021-03-01 |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedIFP |
35-usc-112 court-of-appeals enablement invention patent prior-art |
whether thE couat of Arpeal
G-)
Follew
stventh circuit
oF
constitutional
1bf42ubpend u42ow
4420m Lo4310n Li29
2r6y
452
beFore
+yb2
te notice
A
deal wi… |
| 20-1145 |
In Re Lakshmi Arunachalam |
|
2021-02-22 |
Denied |
|
appointments-clause constitutional-violations contract-clause due-process federal-circuit-court judicial-inquiry patent patent-rights separation-of-powers supreme-court-jurisdiction |
1. Whether Justice Barrett, as the last standing
Justice with original jurisdiction, with the same
duty and oath as the lower courts to enforce the … |
| 20-1119 |
Amarin Pharma, Inc., et al. v. Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-02-16 |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
35-usc-103 graham-factors graham-v-john-deere hindsight-bias innovation innovation-protection nonobviousness-indicia objective-indicia obviousness-standard patent patent-law |
Whether a court must consider objective indicia of nonobviousness together with the other factors bearing on an obviousness challenge before making an… |
| 20-1110 |
Sandoz Inc., et al. v. Immunex Corporation, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-02-12 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
biosimilar-product double-patenting exclusivity federal-circuit invention obviousness obviousness-type-double-patenting patent patent-exclusivity patent-ownership substantial-rights |
Under federal patent law, a patent owner may receive only one period of exclusivity for its invention and may not obtain a second patent on the same i… |
| 20-1112 |
In Re Lakshmi Arunachalam |
|
2021-02-12 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-law appointments-clause constitutional-law contract-clause due-process equal-protection government-contracts patent patent-law separation-of-powers stare-decisis |
1. Whether Justice Barrett, as the last standing
Justice with original jurisdiction, with the same
duty and oath as the lower courts to enforce the … |
| 20-6961 |
Christopher Scott Pfoff v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2021-01-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
1. Can criminal proceedings be brought on an indictment if the indictment on Court record is not signed by an attorney for the government?
2. Can a p… |
| 20-1003 |
Christy, Inc. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2021-01-26 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
compensation government-fees inter-partes-review patent patent-exaction patent-invalidation post-grant-review private-property property-rights takings-clause |
1) When a duly-issued patent is invalidated through a post-grant review process (such as an IPR), must compensation be paid under the Takings Clause?
… |
| 20-932 |
Bobby L. Franklin v. D. J. Laughlin, et al. |
Nevada |
2021-01-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
14th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process judicial-fraud patent patent-rights quiet-title standing stare-decisis takings |
Has Petitioner Franklin's existing stare decisis patent rights that is published in his certified First Title on the described 80 acres ever been addr… |
| 20-934 |
Haritha Samaranayake, et al. v. Andrei Iancu, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Federal Circuit |
2021-01-11 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-procedure administrative-procedure-act due-process evidentiary-record federal-circuit patent separation-of-powers standing statutory-jurisdiction |
Whether, in creating the required evidentiary record de novo rather than merely reviewing the agency Record below, the Court of Appeals for the Federa… |
| 20-892 |
Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc., et al. v. Illumina, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-01-05 |
Dismissed |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
and analyzing the separated DNA for diagnostic pu using well-known laboratory techniques is unpaten 35-usc-101 abstract-ideas diagnostic diagnostic-method dna dna-analysis dna-fragments laboratory-techniques myriad-decision myriad-doctrine natural-phenomena patent patent-eligibility section-101 |
Whether a patent that claims nothing more than a method for separating smaller DNA fragments from larger ones, and analyzing the separated DNA for dia… |
| 20-6747 |
Gregory K. Clinton v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2020-12-31 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
1) Did the Secoud Amended Pefition contnin counts 1s
2 S 3s 4s and 55 ?
2) Where couuts 15 2535, 4s nnd 5s Dismissed oN 8/27/2018?
3. Dors the US Dist… |
| 20-769 |
GS Cleantech Corporation, et al. v. Adkins Energy LLC, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-12-04 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
appellate-review civil-procedure de-novo-review federal-circuit patent patent-act patent-law standard-of-review summary-judgment |
Until the Federal Circuit's decision in this patent case, every Circuit had held that an issue resolved on partial summary judgment, and not reopened … |
| 20-6470 |
Frederick Demond Wilson v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2020-12-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 20-6441 |
David O. Keel v. Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Veterans Affairs |
Federal Circuit |
2020-11-25 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Lowyers
Ua Claimed I Could Not
7.
For
appeal
Case
From Board of Uetronls
appeal,
BUa
REFOSEd TUrN OvEr
ReCords
TraNsaNipe
aσ
BUo
2
.t
What
Righer
lidi… |
| 20-623 |
Amy R. Gurvey v. Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-11-10 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
all-writs-act appellate-jurisdiction civil-rights due-process jurisdictional-dispute patent patent-infringement pro-se-litigant standing takings writ-of-certiorari |
1. Question #1: In this US patent litigation,
whether Petitioner, a Pro Se patentee who is
sole named inventor of valuable US ticketing
method, appara… |
| 20-624 |
Larry Golden v. Apple Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-11-10 |
Denied |
|
7th-amendment civil-rights due-process intellectual-property patent patent-rights pleading-standards pro-se-litigant procedural-due-process seventh-amendment standing |
Is it a question of law, for the District Court and/or the Appeals Court judges to unjustly violate a Pro Se litigant's procedural due process, or vio… |
| 20-6126 |
Edward Jones v. Candace Edward, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2020-10-23 |
Denied |
IFP |
35-usc-101 civil-procedure due-process patent standing takings |
The United States Court of Appeals do have jurisdiction to make judgment of on Appeals from the Craighead County Circuit Court. |
| 20-532 |
Xiaohua Huang v. Huawei Technology Co., Ltd. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-10-21 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
claim-preclusion federal-circuit fraud-on-court fraud-on-the-court judicial-misconduct judicial-proceedings patent patent-infringement perjury pro-se-plaintiff sanctions |
U.S. court of appeals for the Federal Circuit has entered a decision in this case in conflict with the decision of U.S. Court of appeals for the Feder… |
| 20-6011 |
Randy Williams v. American International Group, Inc., et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2020-10-14 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 20-5982 |
Elmo Fortenberry v. Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-10-13 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
For which Relief Can Be granted.
IS Fraud A Tort When Donwilfully is FTA Crime.
Knoutrghy And inTenToNAly WillFolly iSAFdoNY: is Fraud Any FAlse STA… |
| 20-440 |
Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-10-06 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (12)Relisted (2) |
35-usc-282 assignor-estoppel due-process judicial-doctrine patent patent-infringement patent-invalidity patent-law statutory-interpretation |
In the Patent Act, Congress established that invalidity is a "defense[] in any action involving the validity or infringement of a patent." 35 U.S.C. §… |
| 20-424 |
IYM Technologies LLC v. RPX Corporation, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-10-02 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appointments-clause arthrex constitutional-claim federal-circuit forfeiture inter-partes-review patent patent-law standing |
Whether a court of appeals can invoke forfeiture to refuse to address a constitutional claim in a pending appeal despite an intervening change in law. |
| 20-414 |
Rovi Guides, Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-09-30 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
administrative-law administrative-patent-judges appointments-clause civil-procedure constitutional-interpretation due-process executive-officers patent separation-of-powers tenure-protections |
1. Whether the severance and invalidation of administrative patent judges' tenure protections is consistent with congressional intent.
2. Whether inv… |
| 20-5769 |
Bradley Beauchamp v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2020-09-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Childhood Asthme,
The
COVID 19 Pandemic, a history
and
Current Diagnosis of Asthmo
Qudifies os exceptional
THhe Dofendonts rade Beawhop to be
redsons
… |
| 20-386 |
Joseph D. Gilberti v. Federal Reserve System, Board of Governors, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2020-09-25 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-reserve government-concealment judicial-misconduct national-defense-resource pandemic-conspiracy patent resource-suppression standing takings |
Why did the lower Court hide an endless underground Water Supply and Medicine resource and call it latently Insubstantial " that has been verified by … |
| 20-380 |
Idenix Pharmaceuticals LLC, et al. v. Gilead Sciences, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-09-24 |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
35-usc-112a enablement genus-claim genus-claims patent patent-law pharmaceutical-innovation pharmaceuticals statutory-interpretation written-description |
The Patent Act provides that patents must "contain a written description of the invention" in "such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable… |
| 20-364 |
Thomas Wilkins v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Federal Circuit |
2020-09-18 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
administrative-procedure article-iii-jurisdiction civil-rights due-process federal-circuit inventor-correction inventorship jurisdiction patent patent-law standing uspto-procedure |
Question not identified. |
| 20-333 |
Bozeman Financial LLC v. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-09-14 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
america-invents-act federal-government federal-reserve-banks federal-reserve-system government-entity patent patent-review post-issuance-review return-mail-decision return-mail-v-usps standing |
Whether the regional Federal Reserve Banks — the "operating arms" of the Federal Reserve System, which is the central bank of the United States — are … |
| 20-314 |
RPM International Inc., et al. v. Alan Stuart, Trustee for the Cecil G. Stuart and Donna M. Stuart Revocable Living Trust Agreement, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-09-10 |
GVR |
Response RequestedRelisted (3) |
administrative-law administrative-patent-judges appointments-clause constitutional-law judicial-procedure officer-status patent patent-trial-and-appeal-board standing us-constitution-article-ii |
1. Whether the court of appeals erred by vacating and remanding the case based on an Appointments Clause, U.S. Const. Art. II, § 2, Cl. 2, challenge r… |
| 20-5634 |
Stephen F. Snow v. California |
California |
2020-09-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 20-5547 |
Roger Lee Baker, Jr. v. Magistrate Court of Georgia, Talbot County |
Georgia |
2020-08-31 |
Denied |
IFP |
35-usc-101 civil-procedure due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 20-228 |
ESIP Series 2, LLC v. Puzhen Life USA, LLC |
Federal Circuit |
2020-08-28 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-patent-judges appointments-clause arbitrary-and-capricious art-iii-court due-process inter-partes-review patent statutory-jurisdiction thryv-precedent |
1. Whether Board decisions that are arbitrary
and capricious, exceed the Board's statutory
jurisdiction from the start, and are made by
administrative… |
| 20-230 |
Donald L. Baker v. Andrei Iancu, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2020-08-27 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-law agency-misconduct civil-rights due-process judicial-notice judicial-review patent patent-law pro-se-litigation retaliation |
1. Whether U.S. Agencies, in particular the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), may under law render shoddy, arbitrary, capricious and dishonest… |
| 20-5503 |
Kevin L. Martin v. Christopher Nicholson |
Seventh Circuit |
2020-08-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 20-5414 |
Aimee Lewis v. Seventh Circuit Court, South Dakota Unified Judicial System, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2020-08-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights due-process jurisdiction patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 20-5306 |
Phillip L. Horrell v. David Gomez, Warden |
Seventh Circuit |
2020-08-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 20-5198 |
Franklin C. Smith v. Nurse Mayfield, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2020-07-29 |
Dismissed |
IFP |
administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process judicial-review legal-procedure patent standing statutory-interpretation takings |
ated intrinc os extsinsic missepsesentaion, ar othes tiscondnat of an adresce pasy
nch as, Cpi Fay pesinsed Limse eile sondes Dath tesif depition that… |
| 20-88 |
HZNP Finance Limited, et al. v. Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-07-29 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
35-usc-112 claim-construction consisting-essentially-of nautilus-v-biosig patent patent-act patent-claim patent-validity reasonable-certainty statutory-interpretation transitional-phrase |
Whether the "basic and novel properties" identified in connection with a patent claim's transitional phrase "consisting essentially of" must independe… |
| 20-68 |
Cheetah Omni LLC v. AT&T Services, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-07-24 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
contract-interpretation contract-law federal-circuit federal-common-law implied-license license-continuation patent patent-law rodriguez-v-fdic uniquely-federal-interests |
Did the Federal Circuit violate Rodriguez when it invoked its own federal common law rule, superseding controlling state contract law, to hold that a … |
| 20-32 |
Steve Morsa v. Andre Iancu, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Federal Circuit |
2020-07-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
35-usc-101 abstract-idea claims-analysis federal-circuit patent patent-eligibility patent-office preemption section-101 undue-preemption |
This Court has held that any machine or process is eligible for patent protection under 35 U.S.C. § 101, subject only to narrow exceptions where the p… |
| 19-1475 |
Duke University v. Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-07-08 |
Denied |
|
35-usc-314 administrative-law administrative-patent-judges appointments-clause due-process forfeiture inter-partes-review patent patent-law standing statutory-interpretation |
1. Whether a court of appeals can invoke forfeiture to refuse to address an Appointments Clause violation in a pending appeal despite an intervening c… |
| 19-1458 |
Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-07-06 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (2)Relisted (2) |
administrative-judges administrative-law administrative-patent-judges appointments-clause congress due-process executive-review independence judicial-remedy patent separation-of-powers severance tenure tenure-protection |
The Appointments Clause requires principal officers
to be appointed by the President with the advice and
consent of the Senate, but permits inferior o… |
| 19-1434 |
United States v. Arthrex, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-06-29 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (2)Relisted (2) |
administrative-patent-judges appointments-clause constitutional-law inferior-officer inferior-officers patent patent-and-trademark-office principal-officer principal-officers standing uspto |
1. Whether, for purposes of the Appointments Clause, U.S. Const. Art. II, § 2, Cl. 2, administrative patent judges of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Of… |
| 19-8844 |
Louis A. Piccone v. United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Federal Circuit |
2020-06-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
bar-disciplinary-proceedings brady-v-maryland delegated-authority due-process federal-regulations government-investigation material-exculpatory-information patent patent-and-trademark-office professional-conduct |
I. Are Attorneys undergoing bar disciplinary
proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office to determine whether they may continue to
prac… |
| 19-1381 |
BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc. v. Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., fka MonoSol RX, LLC |
Federal Circuit |
2020-06-16 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
administrative-law administrative-law-review agency-discretion appellate-jurisdiction due-process federal-circuit inter-partes-review judicial-review mandate-implementation patent patent-office sas-institute |
1. The Federal Circuit vacated three inadequate final written decisions and remanded the inter partes reviews (IPRs) with the order to implement this … |
| 19-8707 |
Lakshmi Arunachalam v. Apple, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-06-15 |
Dismissed |
IFP |
america-invents-act constitution-clause constitutional-prohibition contract-clause due-process government-grants patent patent-rights separation-of-powers standing supreme-court-precedent |
Whether the USPTO/PTAB (the "Agency ") and Federal Circuit were aware of
the prohibition of the Constitution mandated by this Court 1 against
repudi… |
| 19-8708 |
Lakshmi Arunachalam v. Presidio Bank |
Federal Circuit |
2020-06-15 |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedIFP |
2nd-amendment brown-vs-board civil-rights due-process equal-protection free-speech judicial-ethics patent patent-rights stare-decisis supreme-court-precedent |
1. Whether this Court's duty to enforce its Governing Precedents as declared by Chief Justice J. Marshall in Fletcher v. Peck (1810) and Trustees of D… |
| 19-1351 |
Ameranth, Inc. v. Domino's Pizza, LLC, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-06-09 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure due-process federal-rules-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure judicial-resolution patent pretrial-order property-rights summary-judgment |
1. Does the sua sponte judicial resolution on summary judgment of issues expressly excluded by pretrial order, and on which the moving party submitted… |
| 19-1299 |
The Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. Techtronic Industries Co., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-05-19 |
Denied |
Amici (2)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
35-usc-101 abstract-idea alice-v-cls claim-construction federal-circuit machine-invention machine-or-transformation patent patent-claims patent-eligibility preemption section-101 |
Whether the Federal Circuit improperly expanded § 101's narrow implicit exceptions by failing to properly assess Chamberlain's claims "as a whole," wh… |
| 19-1269 |
TCL Communication Technology Holdings Limited, et al. v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-05-06 |
Denied |
Amici (5) |
antitrust equitable-relief frand frand-commitment jury-trial patent patent-infringement patent-licensing seventh-amendment specific-performance standard-essential-patents standard-setting-organizations |
Whether a patent owner required to license its standard-essential patents on fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory terms has a Seventh Amendment rig… |
| 19-1228 |
Kaneka Corporation v. Xiamen Kingdomway Group Company, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-04-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
5th-amendment 7th-amendment appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure claim-construction due-process federal-circuit fifth-amendment patent patent-infringement patent-infringement-non-infringement rule-36 seventh-amendment standing summary-judgment |
1. Whether under Rule 36 of the Federal Circuit's Rules of Procedure the Federal Circuit may affirm a judgment of non-infringement without opinion and… |
| 19-8167 |
Charles Talbert v. Blanche Carney, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2020-04-02 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
due-process federal-circuit fifth-amendment just-compensation patent takings-clause |
(1) Did the Appeals Court abuse its discretion when denying Petitioner's...
(2) Did the Appeals Court, when applying the "three strikes" provision of… |
| 19-8059 |
Lakshmi Arunachalam v. Uber Technologies, Incorporated |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-03-23 |
Dismissed |
Relisted (2)IFP |
constitutional-breach contract-clause due-process judicial-misconduct patent patent-contract separation-of-powers supremacy-clause takings-clause |
1. Whether collateral attack on the Contract between the inventor and the
United States Patent and Trademark Office in bad faith by the entire
Judic… |
| 19-8029 |
Lakshmi Arunachalam v. Lyft, Inc. |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-03-18 |
Dismissed |
Relisted (2)IFP |
conflict-of-interest constitutional-emergency contract-clause corporate-infringement due-process government-contracts judicial-misconduct mutiny national-security patent patent-rights sedition separation-of-powers supreme-court supreme-court-precedent takings |
1. Whether it is Sedition that Chief Justice Roberts engaged in conflict of interest against inventors as a member of the Knights of Malta with fealty… |
| 19-7953 |
Arthur Lopez v. Cheryl Lopez |
California |
2020-03-11 |
Dismissed |
IFP |
access-to-courts civil-procedure civil-rights costs due-process patent standing takings waiver-of-fees |
Question not identified. |
| 19-1103 |
INO Therapeutics LLC, et al. v. Praxair Distribution Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-03-10 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
35-usc-101 drug-administration due-process eligibility innovation medical-research medical-treatment method-of-treatment patent patent-eligibility patient-outcomes personalized-medicine section-101 selective-treatment |
Whether a method of treatment that requires doctors to selectively administer a drug to certain patients and not others to enhance patient outcomes is… |
| 19-7805 |
Shavis Holloman v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections |
Fourth Circuit |
2020-03-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech jurisdiction patent standing takings |
1. timmury fell Belo Au obyectve Staward of ReasonableNess of a Competent A ttorney ou felony Cases?
2.s M TO HIS CONa RTS Ke HE as bECt T No BeNet O… |
| 19-7905 |
Lakshmi Arunachalam v. Exxon Mobil Corporation |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-03-09 |
Dismissed |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-emergency constitutional-interpretation contract-clause due-process government-grants judicial-misconduct judicial-precedent martial-law patent patent-law patent-rights separation-of-powers treason |
1. Whether the concerted wanton breach of solemn Oaths collectively failing to
enforce the Laws of the Land and Stare Decisis Laws of the Case specif… |
| 19-7910 |
Lakshmi Arunachalam v. Intuit, Inc. |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-03-09 |
Dismissed |
Relisted (2)IFP |
constitutional-law contract contract-rights due-process government-contract government-contracts government-grants judicial-misconduct jurisdiction patent patent-contract patent-rights standing takings |
PREAMBLE # I: JURISDICTION
I, Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam, a Woman, one of We, The People, of the State of California and of the United States of America… |
| 19-1097 |
Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Company, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-03-06 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
aia burden-of-proof due-process inter-partes-review patent patent-validity retroactive-legislation retroactivity takings vested-rights |
Does the application of inter partes review to a patent that issued before the enactment of the AIA violate the Due Process Clause because it retroact… |
| 19-7863 |
Delores L. Knight v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2020-03-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
35-usc-101 civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-statute due-process federal-appellate-review judicial-review ninth-circuit patent sentencing-guidelines standing statutory-interpretation takings |
Question not identified. |
| 19-7822 |
Harry J. Williby v. Mark Zuckerberg, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-02-28 |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection patent standing statutory-interpretation takings |
A. Is Facebook subject to suit under the Civil Rights law(s) based upon the conduct |
| 19-7784 |
Darren Lee Jenkins v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections |
Florida |
2020-02-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 19-7691 |
In Re Wilbert Norwood Starks |
|
2020-02-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure-standing civil-rights constitutional-law due-process equal-protection free-speech patent standing statutory-interpretation takings |
1. WHETHER the County Court abused its Discretion and violated Due Process Under the
Fourteenth Amendment and Rule 13, Tex. Rule of Civil Procedure; … |
| 19-1012 |
General Electric Company v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation, fka United Technologies Corporation |
Federal Circuit |
2020-02-14 |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
article-iii article-iii-standing civil-procedure civil-rights competition competitive-harm competitor-standing due-process inter-partes-review judicial-precedent patent patent-infringement patent-law standing |
Whether competitive harm alone suffices to confer Article III standing to appeal an IPR determination, or whether an appellant must also show concrete… |
| 19-7629 |
Carolyn Hill-Lomax v. David Vittetoe, et al. |
Iowa |
2020-02-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure-standing-due-process-equal-protec civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 19-966 |
Emerson Electric Co. v. SIPCO, LLC |
Federal Circuit |
2020-02-03 |
GVR |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
35-usc-101 35-usc-103 35-usc-324 administrative-law america-invents-act cbm-patent covered-business-method judicial-review patent patent-review patent-trial-and-appeal-board statutory-interpretation |
In the America Invents Act, Congress authorized the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to review whether certain patents, called Covered Business Method (C… |
| 19-7510 |
Francis Damien Block v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2020-01-31 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 19-7482 |
Victor Nunez v. Sean Bowerman, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2020-01-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection patent standing takings |
I. QUESTION NUMBER ONE
Is it acceptable for a federal district court judge to deny a
pro se prisoner's motion for a reasonable extension of time to f… |
| 19-7465 |
Jose Antonio Contreras v. Washington |
Washington |
2020-01-28 |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-law agency-deference civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process equal-protection judicial-review patent procedural-rights racial-discrimination standing statutory-interpretation takings |
Question not identified. |
| 19-7391 |
Larry David Davis v. Larry Tegley, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2020-01-23 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
administrative-law appellate-standard civil-procedure civil-rights due-process insufficient-evidence judicial-review legal-sufficiency patent record-review standing takings trial-court |
THE EVIDENCE IS INSUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT THE JUDGMENT OF MY TRIAL?
WHETHER RIGHT TO A SPEEDY TRIAL HAVE BEEN VIOLATED?
WHETHER A AFFIDAVIT IS NEEDED … |
| 19-7358 |
Joshua Neil Harrell v. Fairfield Police Department, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-01-22 |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
The OCR text provided is too degraded and illegible to accurately extract the "Question(s) Presented" section. While a "QUESTION(S) PRESENTED" header … |
| 19-7226 |
Tony Robinson v. Illinois |
Illinois |
2020-01-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
35-usc-101 civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection first-amendment patent qualified-immunity standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 19-7250 |
Thomas Kevin Jenkins v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2020-01-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process jurisdiction patent standing takings |
Medientiun urce Frtvolons no Muetnienl ? dne to Rnling Done Jndge collnsion Thesdure D. Chnons and fourtn circnit Seewri UD Back side |
| 19-7210 |
Calvin Ray Cash v. John Rupert, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-01-08 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 19-7169 |
Daniel Eric Cobble v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-01-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights commercial-value due-process fifth-amendment just-compensation patent physical-appropriation public-use standing takings takings-clause |
Question not identified. |
| 19-829 |
Chrimar Systems, Inc. v. Juniper Networks, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2019-12-31 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-procedure burden-of-proof due-process evidence inter-partes-review patent patent-challenge patent-law reply reply-evidence |
When a party files a petition for Inter Partes Review, the petition "must identify 'each claim challenged,' the grounds for the challenge, and the evi… |
| 19-7032 |
Kevin Dion Gaddis v. Michigan |
Michigan |
2019-12-20 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights court-forms due-process habeas-corpus indigent-petitioner patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 19-7017 |
Lana K. Williams v. Taco Bell |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-12-19 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
administrative-law administrative-proceedings agency-action civil-procedure civil-rights due-process judicial-review patent standing statutory-interpretation takings |
1. NH4 NO LIABILI7Y INSUNANCE ON BUSiNESSGS
2. WNY IS A CALiFONIA AUOWED TO STRING Ou7 Er CASE. AND NUMEnOUS EXNENSES - DECIDE (ONENHAT THAY PRo-SEL … |
| 19-6893 |
Michael Wayne Nelson v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-12-10 |
Denied |
IFP |
8th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process patent prison-conditions retaliation standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 19-6883 |
Donald Brian Winberg, et ux. v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2019-12-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process patent standing statutory-interpretation takings |
1. Is a farmer committing' 'fraud"(l8 U.S.C. §1343) when he sells
his "future goods" crop (UCC §2-105) on a '.'future goods" contract,
and accepts a… |
| 19-6807 |
Marcus Robinson v. Les Parish, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-12-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review legal-procedure patent standing statutory-interpretation supreme-court takings |
Could the District Court or the State Court make a decision to deny the Petitioner's Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claim based on U.S. Supreme Cou… |
| 19-6787 |
Robert Lee Mitchell v. Miller, Magistrate Judge, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-11-27 |
Denied |
IFP |
appeals civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-provisions district-court due-process jurisdiction patent standing statutory-provisions takings |
Is the order of the U.S. district court dated 8-7-19 vol
Is the order of the U.S. court oF Appeals For the Fouvth 6P(on b1-81-01 P2+p +0A |
| 19-6762 |
Fred Martin Wimberley v. Rachel M. Sacramento |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-11-26 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
appeal civil-procedure civil-rights court due-process patent standing takings |
No-f-<3 wi-e -c
3 J us'fv &zs o-f ■f/i-c Uhi'fcccl Sfcrhzs Ci h cui'f
ls~, 'tV/ri'-J' a Cfeab cof Co(Jb-\r Of-Apjo
Caye qsW a|/. 2 s^c h-c<x
a v-e.
V'… |
| 19-6728 |
Jose Anthony Heredia v. Florida |
Florida |
2019-11-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 19-6697 |
Michael Lawrence Pack v. Donald J. Trump, President of the United States |
District of Columbia |
2019-11-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process jurisdiction patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 19-619 |
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. SRI International, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2019-11-14 |
Denied |
|
35-usc-101 abstract-idea computer-automated-method computer-automation computer-network data-analysis data-collection patent patent-eligibility patent-law standing statutory-interpretation |
Whether patent claims that recite only the abstract idea of collecting and analyzing data are patent-ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and Alice. |
| 19-6622 |
Helene Tonique Williams v. Toni Preckwinkle, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-11-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-review due-process federal-jurisdiction free-speech judicial-discretion patent procedural-dismissal standing state-court-procedure takings |
Helene Tonique Williams warld like to qustion, why the Dorthern District of Illinors Eastern son ned y conial t to livil action or file lawuts withs t… |
| 19-601 |
Collabo Innovations, Inc. v. Sony Corporation, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2019-11-07 |
Denied |
Relisted (4) |
5th-amendment america-invents-act due-process inter-partes-review leahy-smith-america-invents-act patent retroactive-application retroactivity takings-clause |
1. Does the retroactive application of inter partes review to a patent that issued before the passage of the Leahy–Smith America Invents Act, Pub. L. … |
| 19-591 |
Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2019-11-06 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-procedure due-process equal-protection judicial-transparency patent reasoned-opinions rule-of-law summary-affirmation summary-affirmations |
1. Can a court ever choose to write reasoned opinions for one class of losing appellants and not another under the Due Process and Equal Protection Cl… |
| 19-584 |
Nuvo Pharmaceuticals (Ireland) Designated Activity Company, et al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2019-11-04 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
35-usc-112 enablement federal-circuit innovation patent patent-law pharmaceutical pharmaceutical-composition prior-art written-description |
Whether the Federal Circuit erred by holding that, whenever the prior art teaches away from a pharmaceutical composition, the written description of a… |
| 19-571 |
Intel Corporation, et al. v. Continental Circuits LLC |
Federal Circuit |
2019-10-31 |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response Waived |
claim-construction claim-interpretation claim-scope disclaimer disclaimer-doctrine federal-circuit ordinary-meaning patent patent-construction specification specification-analysis written-description |
Whether courts should construe a patent's claims in light of the written description of the invention disclosed in the patent's specification, or whet… |
| 19-6462 |
Stephen L. Bush v. David W. Gray, Warden, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-10-31 |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection patent standing statutory-interpretation takings |
Question not identified. |
| 19-6347 |
Rafael Alvarado v. Frank Lawrence, Warden |
Illinois |
2019-10-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 19-6326 |
Michael K. Verble v. City of San Diego, California |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-10-21 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
antitrust civil-procedure civil-rights computer-software constitutional-rights copyright discretionary-process due-process employment-discrimination equal-protection patent patent-infringement standing state-review takings trade-secret volunteer-firefighter |
Pub L 100-352 102.5 Public Safety Threat to the $ Cmeut With Computerization Analysis Cincuits Built with cincutry 9 inthe A5 a volume tegnety Propert… |
| 19-6184 |
Chavalier Dwayne Johnson, Sr. v. Lars Severson, Warden, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-10-08 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process jurisdiction patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 19-6170 |
Lyndal D. Ritterbush v. Larry Benzon |
Tenth Circuit |
2019-10-04 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection patent standing takings |
1. DIO THE STATE ULOCETE THE EX NOST fOCTO COUSE BU AEROUETING. PETTLOMEL'S OHfONDE BADEO SOEr ON A PRiON COMUICTiON
2). DiD TtE "AlelrCNeTEO" "EEMEN… |
| 19-445 |
Neology, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2019-10-03 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
clear-and-convincing-evidence due-process federal-circuit filing-date notice patent patent-claim patent-validity procedural-due-process validity written-description |
Whether, as a matter of law and procedural due process, a patent can be invalidated without notifying the patent owner about the specific invalidity c… |
| 19-6075 |
Anthony Q. Kelly v. Frank B. Bishop, Jr., Warden, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-09-26 |
Denied |
IFP |
14th-amendment. 1st-amendment civil-procedure due-process equal-protection standing civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 19-400 |
Garmin USA, Inc., et al. v. Cellspin Soft, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2019-09-25 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (2) |
35-usc-101 civil-procedure claim-construction eligibility inventive-claims inventive-concept judicial-review legal-question motion-to-dismiss patent patent-eligibility patent-law pleadings question-of-law subject-matter-eligibility |
Whether patent eligibility is a question of law for the court that can be resolved on a motion to dismiss, notwithstanding allegations in a complaint … |
| 19-6041 |
Ronald Thompson, Jr. v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-09-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
HAS ENTERRO G OECISION IN CONFICT WIN NIS COURTS
PRRViOUS ROliNGS AND RELEVENT DECISIONS.
yun s1oaddv
AND
AN
EXCERCISE OF THIS COUITS
SupERViSORY POW… |
| 19-5981 |
William James Truesdale v. Florida |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-09-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process jurisdictional-issue legal-standard patent procedural-question standing statutory-interpretation three-strikes-rule transfer |
Whether the united states Distriet court Middle District of Florido Tompo Division deliberately OF OBJEETIONS" U.S. DiSTrIET JUdYe ORDER DENYFNG MOTEO… |
| 19-5937 |
Raymond Johnson v. Credit One Bank, et al. |
Maryland |
2019-09-13 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection evidence-admissibility free-speech judicial-discretion patent standing takings trial-procedure |
Did the trial court wrongfully deny Johnson's Fourth Amendment rights when the trial court failed to allow Johnson to present his motions to enforce S… |
| 19-337 |
Regents of the University of Minnesota v. LSI Corporation, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2019-09-12 |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
administrative-proceeding civil-procedure federal-agency federal-circuit inter-partes-review patent patent-validity sovereign-immunity state-university university |
Whether the inter partes review proceedings brought by private respondents against the University of Minnesota in this case are barred by sovereign im… |
| 19-5906 |
Mitchell Taebel v. Douglas A. Ducey, Governor of Arizona, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-09-11 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 19-5916 |
Juan Matias Torres v. Ralph M. Diaz, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-09-11 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights cruel-and-unusual-punishment death-penalty due-process free-speech habeas-corpus intellectual-disability patent standing takings |
1. IS PETITIONER ENTITLED TO A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY ON ALL HIS AMENDED CLAIMS AND ORIGINAL CLAIMS?
a. Did The Court Violate Defendant's 5th, … |
| 19-324 |
Technology Properties Limited LLC, et al. v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2019-09-10 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure due-process standing supreme-court-precedent the-patent-act federal-circuit patent patent-act patent-law prosecution-history-disclaimer separation-of-powers supreme-court-precedent |
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's development and application of the doctrine of "prosecution history disclaimer" i… |
| 19-5826 |
Jerry Perez, Jr. v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-09-05 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech jurisdiction patent standing takings |
What is Dre Standared of proot Applicable to Habeas petitiones Seeking equitable tolling
What extnt ae e eftt ofa petiine's fa |
| 19-5828 |
Dennis Andrew Ball v. City of Marion, Illinois |
Illinois |
2019-09-05 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 19-5803 |
Robert H. Johnson v. Drew Stanley, Superintendent, Warren Correctional Institution |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-09-04 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech jurisdiction patent standing takings |
WHI I HAD INEFFECTUE COUNSE COERSCO FALSE CONFESSTONS WH ANO WAAT CAMUSOD A
WHY I WASNT ALLOWEO T RESONT WITNESSES AND EVIOENCE. ETC,
WHY I CANT GET… |
| 19-253 |
Straight Path IP Group, LLC v. Apple Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2019-08-27 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
appellate-review civil-procedure due-process federal-circuit fifth-amendment patent patent-infringement patent-law procedural-due-process summary-judgment |
Whether Rule 36(e) of the Federal Circuit's Rules of Procedure violates the Fifth Amendment by authorizing panels of the Federal Circuit to affirm, wi… |
| 19-5626 |
In Re Vinodh Raghubir |
|
2019-08-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection free-speech patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 19-5627 |
In Re Vinodh Raghubir |
|
2019-08-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 19-5637 |
Karen Sue Wilson v. Marion Police Department, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-08-19 |
Denied |
IFP |
1st-amendment civil-rights due-process equal-protection standing takings civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
① Why was I arrested and the
Peson I
was arguing with not.
② why was I aggressvely
jerked arouad
after the Law enforcemect
was told I was
irijured.
… |
| 19-5496 |
Salvatore Moretti v. Michael Mordaga |
Third Circuit |
2019-08-08 |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process high-profile-case monell-liability patent standing takings |
1. Has Appellant Moretti Proven Monell Liability in the Respondent, Michael Mordaga, Given the High-Profile Case Which Was Briefed by Deborah Poritz, … |
| 19-5366 |
Robert Curry v. Illinois |
Illinois |
2019-07-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
35-usc-101 civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights counsel discovery due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel interrogatory patent post-conviction standing |
Question not identified. |
| 19-5349 |
Andrew Condon v. Illinois |
Illinois |
2019-07-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process jurisdiction patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 19-5342 |
L. T. Tucker, Jr. v. Corizon Correctional Health Care, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-07-25 |
Dismissed |
IFP |
14th-amendment 5th-amendment civil-procedure due-process standing takings civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
DID THE
WhEN IT
DisTnieT
ERK
CeunT
FOUND SKE PETTIEN
PR-CEEdINS
IN For
PAUPENL, hAD NeTAlEGEO
AN AdEQUATE
dANGEn
C/Ain
OF
OF
ZMMINEHT
SENIUS
UNdEA
28
… |
| 19-5299 |
Samuel Rivera Rosado v. Lucid Energy, Inc. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-07-24 |
Dismissed |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights copyright-infringement copyright-ownership copyright-protection design-theft due-process intellectual-property patent patent-infringement patent-registration standing takings |
FIRST QUESTION
Whether in respect of the Court Justices, the U.S. Supreme Court cannot allow a
company to steal a person's copyright ownership, desig… |
| 19-5273 |
Wendolyn Lee v. Amy P. Weirich, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-07-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeals civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process free-speech patent sentencing standing takings |
SHeLby counTy CRIMINAL COURT LACKS VueisdicTon inTHS CASe AgAInST THis PeTiTioner, WHere THe ViETiM TATyAnA MCgeR Testifiedhopen COURT And UNSER OAT P… |
| 19-113 |
William F. Holdner v. Katy Coba, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-07-23 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
agricultural-operation agriculture-operation-permit civil-rights due-process environmental-law environmental-regulation federal-environmental-regulations habeas-corpus patent patent-rights property-rights stormwater-permit water-pollution water-rights |
Whether a person engaged in an agricultural operation can be charged and convicted for failure to possess a stormwater permit under Oregon State Statu… |
| 19-5237 |
Felix Lyle Cowan v. Eli Lilly, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2019-07-18 |
Denied |
IFP |
antitrust bad-faith civil-procedure class-action patent settlement antitrust appellate-jurisdiction bad-faith civil-procedure constitutional-law due-process judicial-review legal-standing patent standing statutory-interpretation |
Bad Faith
Eli Lilly et al
Zyprexa
Tort
In C.
Much
Agreed
As
Settle
To
Wanted. I ContrActuel Agreed
As
I
#8000 clients
IN 'joo
$700 mill… |
| 19-5173 |
Johnny Kirkland v. Huntington Ingalls, Incorporated |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-07-15 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights digital-privacy due-process electronic-device fourth-amendment patent probable-cause standing takings unreasonable-search warrantless-search |
Incorporation INaS
(12 Whetther Huntington
Ingalls
Negligence under Vessel
owner
Underage Employment in 1971
2.)Nhether
Ny
can be
pulled up in Ingall… |
| 19-5158 |
John Higgins, Jr. v. Federal National Mortgage Association |
First Circuit |
2019-07-12 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process free-speech jurisdiction patent standing statement-of-case statutory-provisions takings |
Question not identified. |
| 19-5140 |
Vinodh Raghubir v. United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-07-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 19-58 |
Xitronix Corporation v. KLA-Tencor Corporation, dba KLA-Tencor, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2019-07-10 |
Denied |
|
antitrust-law appellate-jurisdiction circuit-split federal-circuit fifth-circuit jurisdiction patent patent-fraud summary-judgment walker-process |
Does appellate jurisdiction over Walker Process claims lie in the regional circuits, or in the Federal Circuit? |
| 19-5121 |
Ricky Daniel Wagoner v. North Carolina |
North Carolina |
2019-07-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech jurisdiction patent standing takings |
I. Does Due Process require that a waiver of a state constitutionally protected right to a jury trial must be perfected knowingly and voluntarily with… |
| 19-48 |
B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc. |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-07-08 |
Denied |
|
bose disgorgement federal-circuit fraud fraud-standard lanham-act lanham-act-fraud patent rule-59-motion standard-of-review therasense trademark trademark-law uspto willfulness |
Under Section 14(3) of the Lanham Act an allegation of fraud on the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) can arise in multiple contexts. A fraudul… |
| 19-5091 |
Orrin Tyler Colbourn v. California |
California |
2019-07-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process jurisdiction patent standing statement-of-case statutory-provisions takings |
Is this case eligible for Prop 47? |
| 19-5033 |
Lakshmi Arunachalam v. International Business Machines Corporation, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2019-07-02 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
antitrust antitrust-violation bias civil-procedure-jurisdiction collateral-estoppel constitutional-challenge corporate-infringement due-process jurisdiction jurisdiction-challenge patent patent-rights rico standing |
Whether due process requires jurisdiction must be proven when challenged, when none existed to begin with.
Whether adjudicating collateral estoppel f… |
| 18-9813 |
Levar Brown v. California |
California |
2019-06-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights conspiracy discovery due-process forma-pauperis free-speech indigency legal-correspondence patent petition standing supreme-court writ-of-certiorari |
Question not identified. |
| 18-1574 |
William Henry Starrett v. Department of Defense, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-06-25 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
12(b)(6) appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights due-process factual-allegations federal-jurisdiction federal-rules-of-civil-procedure motion-to-dismiss patent pleading pleading-standards standard-of-review standing takings technology-law |
Where all court filing fees have been paid to initiate pursuit, what is the appropriate inquiry for determining when only a litigant's factual allegat… |
| 18-9671 |
In Re Frank J. Ashley |
|
2019-06-14 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection free-speech patent standing takings |
Did Ashley receive a fair trial, based on the South Dakota Supreme Court's decision - In Re Formal Inquiry Concerning Fuller 2011 SD 22? |
| 18-9638 |
Jose Luis Barboza, Jr. v. Texas |
Texas |
2019-06-12 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process evidence-tampering free-speech gang-membership patent prosecutorial-misconduct sentencing-guidelines standing trial-fairness |
for a new judge in the trial do to the fact that there was no proff ot that Statment from defendant.
also defendant was charged in a dubble jeopardy … |
| 18-9624 |
Robert William Wazney v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-06-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process federal-courts federal-jurisdiction jurisdiction patent standing takings |
1.) HAS THE GOVERNMENT'S SERVICE OF ENTRY JUDGMENT NOTICE REVOKING PERFORMANCE ON ITS APPEAL IMPOSSIBLE, PREJUDICED THE PETITIONER?
2.) HAS PETITIONE… |
| 18-9585 |
Roy Williams v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-06-07 |
Dismissed |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process jurisdiction patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 18-9542 |
In Re David Roland Hinkson |
|
2019-06-04 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
I. Whether Hinkson is entitled to habeas corpus relief where he "asserted"a valid claim of a under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 new rule of constitutional law [Se… |
| 18-9473 |
Jose Antonio Contreras v. Washington |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-05-30 |
Denied |
IFP |
14th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 18-9374 |
Bruce Duane Walton v. Tracy Ray, Warden |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-05-21 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech patent standing takings |
a rasnalhe juror could hore frd walton
by withholding Exculpatory Inomation
Krown and unkroon - What Remedy is
available to plaintite when all testimo… |
| 18-9346 |
Lakshmi Arunachalam v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-05-20 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
bias civil-procedure collateral-estoppel constitutional-rights due-process judicial-jurisdiction jurisdiction patent patent-prosecution procedural-fairness |
PREAMBLE # I.
Collateral Estoppel Effect Must Be Denied In Cases of
Particularized Unfairness to the Precluded Party,
Where the Overriding Concern of … |
| 18-9312 |
Travis Jermaine Wright v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-05-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 18-9282 |
William Kimble v. Erik A. Hooks, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Public Safety |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-05-15 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question: would my case hd turned out aot dierentf my counel would had presented to the count records of my Address History" and Address Verification … |
| 18-9142 |
Joshua Neil Harrell v. California |
California |
2019-05-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection jurisdiction patent standing statutory-interpretation takings |
1. Did the insefient ecod fal to stalish a Kowing, whiver of attelhints to Amerament right and Voluntaly andVor was Structural revessible enor coussel… |
| 18-9125 |
Luzetha Wardrick v. Brooks Benton, Warden, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-05-03 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-procedure circuit-court-decision civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-circuit-court federal-court legal-dispute patent procedural-irregularities standing supreme-court-review takings |
Does federal equitable tolling apply while there is a claim pending in state court to be reopened/refiled under OCGA case law, where the Northern Dist… |
| 18-9083 |
Ken Gryder v. Laura Rudy, et al. |
Virginia |
2019-05-02 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights county-taxation defamation-claim dmv-registration due-process employment-damages free-speech malicious-prosecution patent prosecutorial-misconduct sovereign-immunity standing takings unlawful-eviction |
Does a county have the right to collect taxes with no court judgment using the DMV to stop tag renewal and registration after having knowingly engaged… |
| 18-8908 |
Preston G. Demouchet, Jr. v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-04-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech jurisdiction patent standing takings |
WHE THER, THE LOUISIANA- COURT'S, LACKED-SUBJECT
MATTER- JURISDICTION;"BecAUSE OF An, "InKaLidrreST;"(THAT
WAS NOT SUPPORTED By A, FederaLGrand-
Jury-… |
| 18-8906 |
De'Angelo Wilson v. Marilyn Russell, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-04-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process patent standing takings |
1. why was the petitioner not Appointed Counsel?
2. Enough fo deliberate indifference Unnecessary and hanton infhitio of pain?
3. there not Enough m… |
| 18-1309 |
Booking.com B.V. v. United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-04-16 |
GVR |
Amici (4)Relisted (3) |
administrative-law american-rule attorneys-fees civil-procedure civil-procedure-costs first-amendment government-fees government-litigation patent statutory-interpretation trademark trademark-registration |
Applicants for trademark registration dissatisfied with a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board can commence a civil action seeking de novo… |
| 18-8745 |
Louis Alfred Piccone v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania |
Pennsylvania |
2019-04-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
administrative-law civil-procedure pa-rde-216 patent selling-v-radford administrative-law civil-procedure due-process federal-procedure patent patent-attorney-discipline professional-discipline reciprocal-discipline statutory-interpretation |
When underlying USPTO disciplinary proceedings are conducted according to regulations which abolish both 35 U.S.C. § 24's mandated discovery under the… |
| 18-1280 |
Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. v. Roxane Laboratories, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2019-04-08 |
Denied |
Amici (5) |
blocking-patent-doctrine blocking-patents burden-of-proof graham-v-john-deere nonobviousness objective-indicia obviousness patent patent-law patent-obviousness pharmaceutical-innovation prior-art |
Under 35 U.S.C. § 103, a patent "may not be obtained . .. if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed… |
| 18-1275 |
Xiaohua Huang v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. |
Federal Circuit |
2019-04-05 |
Rehearing |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-procedure-fraud-on-the-court civil-rights discovery due-process fraud-on-court fraud-on-the-court hearsay-evidence judicial-misconduct patent patent-infringement sanctions standing summary-judgment |
As pointed out by District Judge J. Owen Forrester in Sklar v. Clough, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49248 (N.D. Ga. July 6, 2007), "a district court may cons… |
| 18-8706 |
Donn Deveral Martin v. Texas |
Texas |
2019-04-04 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process judicial-review jurisdiction legal-procedure patent scotus-rules standing statutory-interpretation supreme-court-rules takings |
MUST BE SETASIDE?
conviction oftthined from an perury
Question daro. toes the scotus precednt still hold that aftaaid fom a warrntless pristected se… |
| 18-8622 |
In Re Mark Garrett |
|
2019-03-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights court-jurisdiction due-process free-speech judicial-review legal-remedy mandamus-petition opinions-below patent reason-for-granting-the-petition rules-involved standing takings writ-of-certiorari |
Question not identified. |
| 18-8613 |
Quincy Magee v. The Walt Disney Company, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2019-03-28 |
Denied |
IFP |
antitrust business-disputes civil-procedure civil-rights copyright copyright-infringement copyright-protection corporate-infringement due-process employment-rights fraud intellectual-property licensing patent patent-infringement patent-ownership standing trade-secret |
Legislative Goals
Quincy Magee has ownership of Quincy Magee's Companies Properties and Names Renaissance Media Productions - Aesthetic Media Product… |
| 18-8532 |
Terrence L. Wright v. North Carolina |
North Carolina |
2019-03-22 |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 18-1170 |
Xitronix Corporation v. KLA-Tencor Corporation, dba KLA-Tencor, Incorporated |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-03-08 |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (3) |
antitrust antitrust-law appellate-jurisdiction circuit-split federal-circuit jurisdiction patent patent-fraud regional-circuits sherman-act subject-matter-jurisdiction walker-process |
Does appellate jurisdiction over Walker Process claims lie in the regional circuits, or in the Federal Circuit? |
| 18-8204 |
Eduardo Molina Bracero v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-02-28 |
Denied |
IFP |
8th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection exhaustion-of-remedies patent qualified-immunity standing takings |
any statutoriol or constitutional obligation related tothe protec2. it isnot the obligation of Dept. of corrections officials to vespond grievances an… |
| 18-8084 |
Warren Scott Taylor v. Virginia |
Virginia |
2019-02-22 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 18-8071 |
Stephen Silas Thomas v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-02-21 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 18-8080 |
In Re Charlette Dufray Johnson |
|
2019-02-21 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech patent standing takings |
question 1s Is
CAROL ANn BOND VUNiHEOSTATES(AOLD
GinsbERg BREYER COnCURRIAg
77135
GOOD LOWD
questional since No
QGoRUn Exisi
FOR
HR3190
7791
CONSICERE… |
| 18-8018 |
Michael Anthony Kendrick v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-02-19 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process jurisdiction patent standing statutory-provisions takings |
1. CAN A FEDERAL HABEAS GOURT dISREGARD MY
PRESUME To bE
CORRELT28 USLS 225HLE) CLAYM AND DENS TO EXDIAIN WHY?
2I CAN A FEDERAL COURT DENY A PETITION… |
| 18-1072 |
James J. Macor v. United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Federal Circuit |
2019-02-15 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
35-usc-102 35-usc-103 administrative-law analogous-art obviousness obviousness-standard patent patent-examination patent-law prior-art statutory-interpretation |
In making rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious, what standard should be applied in determining whether prior art is "analogous," and, if the… |
| 18-7939 |
In Re Daniel Eric Salley |
|
2019-02-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus patent standing statutory-interpretation supervisory-powers |
Whether the district court failed to
Perform it's ministerial duties pursuant to 28
U.S. C. 3636()()(Band(), and Fed,R. Civ. P 6(a)
by not Computing
T… |
| 18-7775 |
Joseph F. Olivares v. Michigan Workers' Compensation Agency, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-02-05 |
Denied |
IFP |
14th-amendment 42-usc-1983 civil-rights due-process free-speech patent standing statute-of-limitations takings workers-compensation |
Question not identified. |
| 18-7728 |
Alphonso Haynesworth v. South Carolina Department of Mental Health, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-02-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment administrative-law civil-procedure-rules due-process equal-protection standing civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 18-7691 |
Lakshmi Arunachalam v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-01-31 |
Denied |
IFP |
america-invents-act civil-procedure civil-rights contract contract-grants due-process judicial-review patent patent-prosecution-history-estoppel patent-reexamination standing takings |
Whether the District Court and Circuit Court Judges have a duty to abide by the Constitution and rule per the Law of the Case and Law of the Land.
I.… |
| 18-999 |
Atlanta Gas Light Company v. Bennett Regulator Guards, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2019-01-31 |
GVR |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
35-usc-314 35-usc-315 administrative-procedure administrative-review america-invents-act dismissal-without-prejudice federal-circuit-jurisdiction inter-partes-review jurisdiction patent patent-law patent-review-procedure-35-usc-314-315 patent-trial-and-appeal-board standing time-bar |
The 2011 America Invents Act provides for inter partes review (IPR), an administrative procedure designed to streamline patentability challenges. Cong… |
| 18-7684 |
Raynard Reginald Brown v. Virginia |
Virginia |
2019-01-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeals civil-procedure civil-rights court-of-appeals due-process patent standing takings |
Did the court of Appeals of Virginia error on
the court refusing the
petition for appeal? |
| 18-7629 |
Calvin E. Barnett v. Joe M. Allbaugh, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2019-01-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
5th-amendment civil-procedure due-process property-rights standing takings civil-rights due-process free-speech patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 18-7598 |
Carol J. Morris v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-01-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-compensation patent standing statutory-construction takings |
Question not identified. |
| 18-961 |
Mitchell R. Swartz v. United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2019-01-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
35-usc-145 35-usc-section-145 administrative-law civil-rights due-process evidence evidence-review judicial-procedure patent patent-application patent-law-35-usc-145 patent-office standing takings |
Has The Court Erred by not being consistent with Decisions of this court Regarding The Requirement of 35 U.S.C. §145 Claims (Count 1) to Address the N… |
| 18-7483 |
Robert John Frank v. Florida |
Florida |
2019-01-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
2nd-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process jurisdiction patent standing takings |
1. DUAL CONVICTIONS FOR FAILING TO MEET A MINOR FOR UNLAWFUL SEX AND SOLICITATION AND USE OF COMPUTER FOR CHILD EXPLOITATION AND UNLAWFUL USE OF A TWO… |
| 18-7435 |
James Arthur Biggins v. Carl C. Danberg, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2019-01-15 |
Denied |
IFP |
35-usc-101 civil-procedure damages due-process jurisdiction patent patent-eligibility patent-infringement patent-law standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 18-7334 |
Jesse R. Perez v. Illinois |
Illinois |
2019-01-10 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 18-7341 |
Roderick V. Burton v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-01-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure-standing-due-process-takings-juri civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 18-7343 |
Alberic Israel, on Behalf of Minor Children A. I. and E. I. v. City of North Miami, Florida, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-01-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process patent standing takings |
WHETHER MANIFEST MJESTICE has OcCURRED
IN COURTS MIS-CONSTROING OF ApPiAbE
STATOTE
OF LiMTFATIONS BAR ON TiME LIMiFATIONS OF
PREVOUS E ON E)
CLiNS DE… |
| 18-880 |
SureShot Golf Ventures, Inc. v. Topgolf International, Inc. |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-01-09 |
Denied |
|
antitrust antitrust-claims article-iii article-iii-ripeness civil-procedure competitor-rights essential-technology market-foreclosure monopolist monopoly patent patent-technology ripeness-doctrine standing |
1. Whether the Article III ripeness doctrine bars a competitor's antitrust claims against a monopolist who acquired essential and patented technology … |
| 18-7288 |
Jamie Rozelle Harrison v. California |
California |
2019-01-08 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing statutory-provisions takings |
HAVE SERIOUS DIFFEBENCES RAISEO INTHIER SOUBTOE LAU QUESTIONS WERE BAISED INREGARD TO BOTH COUBT OELAW. HE TBIALCOURT RETAINS THEDISCRETIOH 1 To DiSMi… |
| 18-7296 |
Demetrio Cisneros v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-01-08 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-split civil-procedure civil-rights deliberate-actions due-process global-tech investigative-duty knowledge knowledge-standard patent standing willful-blindness |
Can failure to investigate suspicious circumstances, without more, constitute knowledge of the specific contraband being imported? |
| 18-823 |
ZUP, LLC v. Nash Manufacturing, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2018-12-28 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
invention invention-evaluation legal-analysis long-felt-need non-obviousness obviousness obviousness-standard patent patent-invalidity patent-law prima-facie prior-art rebuttal secondary-considerations |
Whether evidence of "secondary considerations"
(e.g., a long-felt, but unresolved, need for the patented
invention) is less important, functioning at … |
| 18-801 |
Laura Peter, Deputy Director, Patent and Trademark Office v. NantKwest, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2018-12-21 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (11)Relisted (2) |
35-usc-145 administrative-law civil-action civil-procedure due-process federal-circuit judicial-review patent patent-act patent-application patent-law personnel-expenses standing statutory-interpretation uspto USPTO-litigation |
Whether the phrase "[a]ll the expenses of the proceedings" in 35 U.S.C. 145 encompasses the personnel expenses the USPTO incurs when its employees, in… |
| 18-770 |
Webtrends, Inc. v. Andrei Iancu, Director, Patent and Trademark Office |
Federal Circuit |
2018-12-18 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
35-usc-101 abstract-idea alice-test claim-rejection federal-court patent patent-claims prior-art standing uspto |
Whether the USPTO or a Federal Court can declare 20 patent claims to be directed to an unpatentable abstract idea without carrying out the Alice two-p… |
| 18-750 |
JTEKT Corporation v. GKN Automotive Ltd. |
Federal Circuit |
2018-12-12 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (2) |
article-iii article-iii-standing estoppel injury-in-fact inter-partes-review patent patent-office-appeal patent-standing standing standing-article-iii-injury-in-fact-patent-office- statutory-interpretation statutory-rights |
Can the Federal Circuit refuse to hear an appeal by a petitioner from an adverse final decision in a Patent Office inter partes review on the basis of… |
| 18-6931 |
Asia Johnson v. Rothschild |
Third Circuit |
2018-12-06 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 18-712 |
Jerry Artrip v. Ball Corporation, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2018-12-03 |
Denied |
|
amendment civil-procedure claim-dismissal complaint-amendment district-court federal-circuit judicial-review patent patent-infringement standing |
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit erred in affirming the district court's dismissal of Petitioner's patent infringeme… |
| 18-6825 |
In Re Alonzo Dean Shephard |
|
2018-11-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 18-6710 |
Myra Tyler v. Main Industries, Inc., et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2018-11-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
35-usc-101 civil-procedure due-process patent standing takings civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 18-607 |
Jon Roozbeh Vazeen, aka Hassan Vazin v. Michelle Smith Vazin |
Tennessee |
2018-11-08 |
Denied |
|
asset-dissipation civil-rights due-process evidence-tampering fair-trial free-speech galileo-style-prosecution national-science-foundation patent property-rights scientific-prosecution standing takings trial-court-overreach |
Does a trial court have any rights to prosecute a scientist, in reminiscence of Galileo's prosecution, for his/her forward-thinking science when the s… |
| 18-600 |
Texas Advanced Optoelectronic Solutions, Inc. v. Renesas Electronics America, Inc., fka Intersil Corporation |
Federal Circuit |
2018-11-07 |
Denied |
CVSGAmici (3)Relisted (2) |
35-usc-271 commercial-transactions extraterritoriality federal-circuit infringement international-relations offer-to-sell patent patent-infringement patent-law statutory-interpretation united-states-code venue |
Under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), a person directly infringes a patent whenever she "offers to sell" a patented invention "within the United States." The ques… |
| 18-6602 |
Darnell Nolley v. Gregory McLaughlin, Warden, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-11-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law civil-rights due-process equal-protection standing takings civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
1. WCo CE
ORdiMazy inCidants of PRison IfE.
2. WthE PRi Et he TET P onE Ci
C E
imposed by the Count
WEE asiEt E TERI P ConES punisMENt beyond
Me CA… |
| 18-6603 |
David Johnson v. Indiana |
Indiana |
2018-11-07 |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection free-speech patent standing takings voting-rights |
Question not identified. |
| 18-6508 |
Duan Leonard Williams v. Virginia |
Virginia |
2018-10-30 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent question-not-identified standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 18-6439 |
Juan Ortega Lara v. Raymond Madden, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-10-26 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process jurisdiction patent standing takings |
Whethen Aetithonith missed the Strtate
OF LiMNtAtonk becauSE oF PisoN MeStrictionis Dn Other Ditside imfediMenlts which macke it
IMPOSSIblE FOR
Petist… |
| 18-6456 |
William J. O'Brien, III v. United States |
Third Circuit |
2018-10-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process jurisdiction patent standing takings |
1. SAFEGUARD TO AN ACCUSED WHO FACES INCARCERATION; HE RIGHT TO COUNSEL AT A CRITICAL STAGE OF THE CRIMINAL PROCESS AND THE CASES THAT IT IS BASED ON:… |
| 18-6443 |
Bobbie Lee Adams, III v. Netflix, Inc. |
Second Circuit |
2018-10-25 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 18-495 |
Morris & Associates, Inc. v. John Bean Technologies Corporation |
Federal Circuit |
2018-10-17 |
Denied |
|
claim-construction due-process equitable-estoppel federal-circuit implied-license judicial-procedure patent patent-claims patent-infringement patent-law reexamination scotus-precedent waiver |
In Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Meyer, Inc., 134 S.Ct. 1962 (2014), and SCA Hygiene Prods. Aktiebolag v. First Quality Baby Prods., LLC, 137 S.Ct. 954 (2… |
| 18-441 |
Accord Healthcare, Inc., et al. v. UCB, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2018-10-09 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
35-usc-103 lead-compound obviousness patent patent-invalidation patent-law pharmaceutical pharmaceutical-compound prior-art |
Did the Federal Circuit commit error in holding that a patent claim to an obvious modification of a prior art compound was not invalid as obvious unde… |
| 18-415 |
HP Inc., fka Hewlett-Packard Company v. Steven E. Berkheimer |
Federal Circuit |
2018-10-03 |
Denied |
CVSGAmici (7)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
35-usc-101 abstract-idea alice-framework civil-procedure claim-construction inventive-concept judicial-exception patent patent-eligibility question-of-fact question-of-law section-101 standing |
The question presented is whether patent eligibility is a question of law for the court based on the scope of the claims or a question of fact for the… |
| 18-6195 |
Marlon L. Watford v. Natasha Doe, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2018-10-03 |
Dismissed |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process jurisdiction patent standing statutory-interpretation takings |
da the Po 28 U.S. C.$1915 (b)(4) noh not
to e od o n n to
in
a
mit Cot (28U.S.C.1915(a)(3)apnt
ten i o d oA
For The h
etlied of n avo f the
ot
(viz… |
| 18-6170 |
Tommie Lee Henderson v. VIP Taxi LLC, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-10-02 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech patent standing takings |
WHEHAN THE FEDANAL DiSTRICT COUT ERRED iN
holding the Ptitiontn to highen Plnding stanchad in CoUNT
Complaint ton Using thE wond"maNdate" insthAd
ONTE… |
| 18-6127 |
Timothy Warren Vallier v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2018-09-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
anonymous-speech civil-procedure civil-rights due-process first-amendment free-speech jurisdiction online-speech patent standing takings |
The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals issued it's opinion on February 20, 2018, and on June 18, 2018 this Honorable Court entered it's judgement in Rosales… |
| 18-388 |
Nigel Parker, et al. v. Andrei Iancu, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, Patent and Trademark Office |
Federal Circuit |
2018-09-26 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
5-usc-706(2)(e) administrative-law administrative-procedure agency-action agency-overreach arbitrary-and-capricious patent patent-law patent-office patent-office-rejection publication publication-standard publication-under-35-usc-102(b) record-evidence substantial-evidence |
In Dickinson v. Zurko, 527 U.S. 150 (1999), this Court held that The United States Patent Office must support rejection with substantial evidence. See… |
| 18-378 |
Merck & Co., Inc., et al. v. Gilead Sciences, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2018-09-24 |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
civil-procedure damages equitable-defense jury-verdict legal-relief patent separation-of-powers seventh-amendment unclean-hands |
Whether the equitable defense of unclean hands precludes legal relief in the form of damages. |
| 18-303 |
Henryk Oleksy v. General Electric Company |
Federal Circuit |
2018-09-12 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-procedure civil-procedure counterclaim-dismissal court-precedent due-process federal-circuit finality finality-of-judgment judgment-finality patent patent-law precedent supervisory-power |
1. Whether this Court should exercise its supervisory power to assure that precedents are followed and reverse a decision that the district court judg… |
| 18-5955 |
In Re Steven D. Turner, Jr. |
|
2018-09-12 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech patent standing takings |
WHEATHER THIS COURT WILL REQUIRE THE CIRPORFTE XESPONOENTCO IN TH/S LECAL ACTION TO PROVE ITS IN NEMAND, OR,/N PERSONAM CRIMINAL JUR/S5 DICTION OVER T… |
| 18-5956 |
James E. Whitney v. Arkansas |
Arkansas |
2018-09-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeal civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence patent search-and-seizure standing takings |
1) Coran Vobis vs. Coram Nobis - Civil vs. Criminal
2) Is The Originating Court Ever Divested Of Jurisdiction To Review its Own Judgments For Abuse A… |
| 18-5906 |
Gregory D. Kilpatrick v. David Weiss |
Second Circuit |
2018-09-07 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech medical-records patent standing subpoena takings |
IDN T PRESCRIATION 4 FOR SQVAMOVS ERiLITHAL AND VUINE MVEUSTHE H3C BELATEL ACCID NENTE INTO FROM 174036 YSm A PLAINTIFFS MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS NOVEMBE M6 … |
| 18-5919 |
Lance R. Martin v. Edmund Gerald Brown, Jr., et al. |
California |
2018-09-07 |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-courts judicial-review patent standing statutory-interpretation takings |
Question not identified. |
| 18-5851 |
Martin Salinas v. Texas |
Texas |
2018-08-31 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech patent standing takings |
IS IT ABUSE OF DISCRETEON WHEN PLEA OFFER IS NOT AUTHORIZED BY LAW.
IS IT ABUSE OF DISCRETON WHEN HABEAS TREAL COURT DOES NOT FOLLOW APPELL ATE PROCE… |
| 18-5818 |
Gregory D. Kilpatrick v. Harika Kondaveeti |
Second Circuit |
2018-08-30 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection free-speech patent standing takings |
WHY DID 1T4O21 REFUSE TO CAVE PRO-SE PHAINTIFF THE PRESCRIPTFONS CON SISTINE OF LIQVID VIAL MEDICINE AND DISPOSABLE HYPO DERMIC NEEDIE SYRINGES
WHH S… |
| 18-5819 |
Gregory D. Kilpatrick v. Jessie Fields |
Second Circuit |
2018-08-30 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights diagnostic-procedure due-process free-speech infectious-disease laboratory-methods lysate-contamination medical-device medical-testing patent sample-analysis standing takings |
WHH CEFUSE fRO-SEPLAIN DID 174031 TO GNE TIFF THE PRES CPIPTTON'S CON SISTINE OF DIS POSABLE HIPODERMIC NEEDLE SYCINOES AND LIQUID VIAL MEDICINE TO CU… |
| 18-5833 |
Gregory D. Kilpatrick v. Fabio Volterra |
Second Circuit |
2018-08-30 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process jurisdiction patent standing takings |
INFORM FEO-SEFLAINTIFF UOHEN SE RETURNED TO HIS CHNIC-JANUMY 1Z, JOMO THAT WA'S INFECTED WITHHSVH, HSVZ, SQUAMOUS EPITHECONTAMINATIONS?PAINTIFF AND UC… |
| 18-5834 |
Gregory D. Kilpatrick v. Keith Robinson |
Second Circuit |
2018-08-30 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
8th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection jurisdiction medical-treatment patent prison-conditions standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 18-5820 |
Augustus Hebrew Evans, Jr. v. Delaware |
Delaware |
2018-08-29 |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
' 'civil-rights" ' 'due-process" ' 'freedom-of-information" ' 'public-records" ' 'standing" ' 'state-government' civil-procedure due-process jurisdiction patent standing takings |
Whether dismissal of an meritorious criminal action one because petitioner poverty makes it impossible to pay filing fees is constitutional permissibl… |
| 18-5825 |
Eric Lamont Johnson v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2018-08-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law administrative-procedure civil-procedure due-process federal-circuit international-trade-commission judicial-review patent patent-infringement standing |
counsel forfeifed My Meritoriols clain that wauld havk guaranteed
reliet when. he placed it in the Foot note and not in the body of
the Motion. He als… |
| 18-5829 |
Arika Matelyan v. Atlantic Records WMG, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-08-29 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights copyright due-process free-speech patent privacy standing takings |
IF BARBIE BONE CAME OOT WITh A
song Dated Before
Be capng
co B.
befere bor Sect. If swiss Barb
Smokng
Gun.
ceted
copy Qiqut
A
person that was born to … |
| 18-5803 |
Matthew James Dury v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2018-08-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process jurisdiction patent standing statutory-provisions takings |
Question not identified. |
| 18-5755 |
Dwight L. Allen v. Superior Court of Georgia, Camden County |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-08-24 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process jurisdiction patent standing takings |
Deferdant to have his/herCase Rernoved to Federa/ Courtnnder
CertaiD extraordivary Cireumstarce the onsty hurdhe the Chamant
Must satisty is a Fso Pro… |
| 18-222 |
EMED Technologies Corporation v. Repro-Med Systems, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2018-08-21 |
Denied |
|
administrative-procedure claim-construction constitutional-amendment digital-claim due-process inter-partes-review patent patent-claim-construction patent-law-procedure review-procedure standard-of-review takings |
1. Given the clear error standard for reviewing factual determinations made by the PTAB1, is it error for the PTAB to not adhere to the Fhillips claim… |
| 18-5568 |
Carline Curry v. City of Mansfield, Ohio, et al. |
Ohio |
2018-08-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
bad-faith civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-provisions court-procedure due-process judicial-discretion jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge opinions-below patent procedural-defect standing summary-judgment takings |
The Ohio Supreme Court declined to accept Jurisdiction of the Appeal: The Judge closed plaintiffs Curry's cases for not being 100% perfected, and deni… |
| 18-183 |
Advanced Audio Devices, LLC v. HTC Corporation, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2018-08-09 |
Denied |
Amici (2)Response Waived |
5th-amendment aia america-invents-act constitutional-law due-process fifth-amendment inter-partes-review patent patent-law patents takings-clause |
Whether inter partes review ("IPR") of patents filed before enactment of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act ("AIA") violates the Takings Clause of th… |
| 18-5367 |
Edward David Jones, Jr. v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, former Governor of California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-07-26 |
Denied |
IFP |
1st-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process standing takings civil-rights constitutional-review criminal-procedure due-process federal-review free-speech habeas-corpus ninth-circuit patent standing state-court-conviction takings |
Question not identified. |
| 18-109 |
Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Illumina, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2018-07-24 |
Denied |
CVSGAmici (3)Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
35-usc-102 35-usc-119 disclosure federal-circuit filing-date patent patent-application patent-law patent-prior-art prior-art priority subject-matter |
Do unclaimed disclosures in a published patent application and an earlier application it relies on for priority enter the public domain and thus becom… |
| 18-88 |
Richard Gramm v. Deere & Company |
Federal Circuit |
2018-07-18 |
GVR |
|
certiorari claim-construction claim-institution federal-circuit inter-partes-review patent patent-review patent-trial-and-appeal-board ptab sas-institute-v-iancu supreme-court-procedure |
In light of SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu, 138 S. Ct. 1348 (2018), should this Court grant certiorari, vacate, and remand the Federal Circuit's decision… |
| 18-77 |
Advanced Video Technologies LLC v. HTC Corporation, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2018-07-17 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
civil-procedure federal-circuit involuntary-plaintiff joinder patent patent-law rule-19 standing supreme-court |
Did the Federal Circuit properly create an exception to Rule 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in patent law, requiring a dismissal of a case… |
| 18-5215 |
Dino Contreras Mejia v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2018-07-12 |
Denied |
IFP |
actual-innocence civil-procedure due-process exculpatory-evidence habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel patent standing statute-of-limitations statutory-interpretation takings |
Did the 5th Cir. Ct. ignore that Det. Mends inferences identified petitioner as in co-possession of recent stolen property and thus implicated petitio… |
| 18-63 |
Steve K. Wilson Briggs v. Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc., et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-07-11 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights copyright copyright-claims copyright-law court-procedure due-process free-speech intellectual-property internet-guidelines legal-precedent patent precedent standing |
Whether by failing to clarify and update internet widespread dissemination access guidelines, U.S. courts imperil the rights of U.S. intellectual prop… |
| 18-5186 |
Dominick Theresa v. Andrei Iancu, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office |
Federal Circuit |
2018-07-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure claim-limitations claim-validity due-process judicial-review legal-principles patent patent-claims patent-examination pro-se pro-se-litigation standing |
The lower courts deprived the Pro Se, Petitioner of Due Process and the disregard to address the limitations within the patent Claims as well as the v… |
| 18-5174 |
Michael Allen Griffin v. Florida |
Florida |
2018-07-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
aggravating-factors capital-murder civil-procedure civil-rights due-process ex-post-facto jury-unanimity patent retroactivity standing takings |
1. Given the elements of capital murder identified by the Florida Supreme Court in Hurst v. State are being applied in a prosecution for a 1981 homici… |
| 18-5130 |
Marlon L. Watford v. Erik Fossum, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2018-07-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection patent qualified-immunity standing takings |
da Ptionendment dup
f lo ed hen a i ut ni
61983c on fion
gound pant to FdR. Ci . Ro (
of Ro
U.S.su C q m
irmunitty?
am
the Ptione chnge ofde noica… |
| 18-5165 |
Joh-ner Taylor Wilson v. Illinois |
Illinois |
2018-07-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process eighth-amendment excessive-fines fourteenth-amendment incorporation patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 18-5116 |
Benjamin A. Gibbs v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2018-07-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure due-process jurisdiction life-sentence murder patent retroactive-application sentencing-guidelines standing takings uncharge-offense |
DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHOULD THE JUDGMENT BE VACATED IN LIGHT OF BUCK V. DAVIS, 137 SCT 759 (2017), WELCH V. UNITED STATES, 136 SCT 1… |
| 18-5120 |
Kenneth P. Nelson v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security |
First Circuit |
2018-07-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent property-rights standing takings |
whether the District court. Abused it's athority by Allowing NoN-tsating, NoN-examining consultants evidence to ALJ. clearly showed a defectine analys… |