| 25A680 |
MFN Partners, LP, et al. v. New York State Teamsters Conference and Retirement Fund, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2025-12-09 |
Application |
|
agency-overreach erisa multiemployer-pension-plans pension-benefit-guaranty-corporation statutory-interpretation withdrawal-liability |
This document is an application for an extension of time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari, not a petition for certiorari itself. It does no… |
| 24A724 |
Johnny Copper, LLC v. Food and Drug Administration, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2025-01-23 |
Denied |
|
administrative-law agency-overreach fda-regulation procedural-due-process regulatory-burden statutory-interpretation |
Question not identified. |
| 23-608 |
In Re Joseph Gothard, et al. |
|
2023-12-06 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-law agency-overreach civil-rights due-process equal-protection injunctive-relief mandamus property-rights standing |
1. Whether the Supreme Court of United States grants certiorari for extraordinary writ considering the major questions of national significance to pre… |
| 18-9702 |
Cathrin Funk-Vaughn v. Tennessee Department of Children's Services |
Tennessee |
2019-06-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
agency-overreach child-custody child-jurisdiction child-removal diversion-plea document-fraud due-process evidence-suppression federal-funding first-amendment food-recall free-speech interstate-custody jurisdiction kidnapping law-enforcement parental-rights rescission unreasonable-search |
[III] Douse the Department of Children Services "AGENCY "haveany legal right to
e a child from the parent / legal garden well the parent / legal garde… |
| 18-388 |
Nigel Parker, et al. v. Andrei Iancu, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, Patent and Trademark Office |
Federal Circuit |
2018-09-26 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
5-usc-706(2)(e) administrative-law administrative-procedure agency-action agency-overreach arbitrary-and-capricious patent patent-law patent-office patent-office-rejection publication publication-standard publication-under-35-usc-102(b) record-evidence substantial-evidence |
In Dickinson v. Zurko, 527 U.S. 150 (1999), this Court held that The United States Patent Office must support rejection with substantial evidence. See… |