| 25-945 |
Rod Warren, et al. v. Nucor Corporation |
Eighth Circuit |
2026-02-09 |
Pending |
|
circuit-precedent mcdonnell-douglas procedural-impasse race-discrimination stare-decisis summary-judgment |
1. Whether the District Court's and the Eighth Circuit's focus on the isolated components of the McDonnell Douglas framework eviscerated the required … |
| 25-6595 |
Hugo Ivan Macias-Ordonez v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2026-01-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
apprendi-rule constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure prior-convictions sixth-amendment stare-decisis |
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right "to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation." U.S. Const. amend. VI. "[F]act[s] that increase[]… |
| 25-6155 |
Christopher J. Rahaim v. Bruce Bartlett, Individually and in His Official Capacity as State Attorney for the Sixth Judicial Circuit of Florida, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2025-11-19 |
Granted |
IFP |
constitutional-rights due-process evidence-suppression habeas-corpus judicial-misconduct stare-decisis |
1. Should the unsettled issue in Heck v. Humphrey and Spencer v. Kenma^where this court has not definitively ruled that criminal defendants may use a … |
| 25-587 |
Julio Licinio v. New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2025-11-18 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
burden-shifting case-law employment-discrimination judicial-framework mcdonnell-douglas stare-decisis |
Whether McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), should be overruled. |
| 25-6097 |
Shanna M. Glynn v. Marquette City Police Department, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2025-11-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
constitutional-rights due-process judicial-review stare-decisis state-accountability victim-rights |
Can stare decisis deny a victim of violent crime, their right to due process and full and fair review?
Does Hans v. Louisiana remove the requirement … |
| 25-6089 |
Curtis Solomon v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2025-11-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure circuit-precedent due-process panel-rule stare-decisis statutory-right |
Whether the Eleventh Circuit's recent iteration of its "prior panel precedent rule"—which requires rigid adherence to prior circuit precedent, even if… |
| 25-5604 |
Christopher J. Rahaim v. Nancy M. Ley, former Judge, Sixth Judicial Circuit of Florida, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2025-09-11 |
Granted |
IFP |
civil-prisoner-litigation due-process habeas-corpus judicial-immunity section-1983 stare-decisis |
1. Is the deprivation of due process rights, in underlying state criminal litigation, exempt from the civil prisoner litigation clause 28 U.S.C. § 191… |
| 24-1311 |
Kevin T. Lavery v. Pursuant Health, Inc. |
Sixth Circuit |
2025-06-25 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
circuit-split contract-interpretation patent-law patent-misuse royalty-agreement stare-decisis |
Whether the Court should overrule Brulotte and Kimble or at least clarify that an agreement containing a post-expiration royalty is not per se patent … |
| 24-7468 |
Donald Perry v. U.S. Bank Trust N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust |
Massachusetts |
2025-06-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
asset-transfer fdic-transfer judicial-scrutiny mortgage-assignment operation-of-law stare-decisis |
1. Whether the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's (FDIC) transfer of Washington Mutual Bank (WaMu) to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. in 2008 constitut… |
| 24-7431 |
Keisha Reynolds v. HNS Management Co., Inc., dba CTTransit, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2025-06-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
court-appointed-attorney law-of-the-case second-circuit stare-decisis summary-judgment vested-right |
1. Whether Hodge v. Police Officers , 802 F.2d 58, 60 (2d Cir. 1986) creates a vested right when petitioner has previously benefited from a court appo… |
| 24-1250 |
Art Bullock, et al. v. R-Ranch Property Owners' Association, et al. |
California |
2025-06-06 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-rules constitutional-authority due-process fourteenth-amendment judicial-review stare-decisis |
California's 1928 Constitutional Amendment withdrew au
thority for California Supreme Court (CSC) to adopt appel
late rules, after giving that author… |
| 24-7374 |
Chayce Aaron Anderson v. Colorado |
Colorado |
2025-06-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
constitutional-rights fourth-amendment particularity-clause search-and-seizure stare-decisis warrantless-search |
What weight is due to considerations of stare decisis in evaluating the constitutional rights or protections against warrantless or unconstitutional s… |
| 24-7354 |
Seth Stewart v. City of American Fork, Utah |
Utah |
2025-06-04 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
constitutional-interpretation constitutional-rights due-process judicial-precedent jury-trial stare-decisis |
In Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. 83 (2020), this Court held:
"stare decisis has never been treated as "an inexorable command. " And the
doctrine is "a… |
| 24-1121 |
Robert S. Carlborg v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2025-04-30 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
due-process fifth-amendment judicial-procedure military-retirement property-interest stare-decisis |
1. Whether petitioner was deprived of the property interest right in his military retirement under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment when … |
| 24-1103 |
Caleb D. Glick v. American Bar Association |
Fifth Circuit |
2025-04-24 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
antitrust-statutes constitutional-law contract-interpretation stare-decisis state-immunity supremacy-clause |
1. Whether the U.S. Constitution, and the laws derived from it, and the Texas Constitution, and the laws derived from it, are binding contracts betwee… |
| 24-6902 |
In Re Sefe A. Almedom |
|
2025-03-31 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-law federal-supremacy fraud-upon-court judicial-authority stare-decisis state-supreme-court |
1. According to Federal Law, the U.S. Constitution And State Statutory Laws. Does The State Supreme Court Of Ohio have More Power And Autnority than T… |
| 24-6267 |
Robert Moore v. New York |
New York |
2025-01-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review court-of-appeals judicial-precedent legal-doctrine stare-decisis supervisory-power |
Should this Court exercise its supervisory power to clearly establish what is meant by "stare decisis", where the New York State Court of Appeals sanc… |
| 24-595 |
William L. Harris v. City of Kent, Washington, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-12-03 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-review civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process fourth-amendment stare-decisis |
With clear precedents having been established by federal Appellate Courts, the U.S. Supreme Court, and the U.S. Constitution regarding when a 4th Amen… |
| 24-491 |
Bernice Rutland v. Robinson Property Group, L.L.C., et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-10-31 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
conclusory-allegations evidentiary-standard federal-civil-procedure fifth-circuit stare-decisis summary-judgment |
1. Whether the Fifth Circuits ruling conflicts with this Court's ruling on case law and Summary Judgement, F.R.C.P. 56(a).
2. Whether a District Cour… |
| 24-5255 |
Benjamin Burciaga-Herrera v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-08-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure certiorari constitutional-interpretation criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-precedent sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court supreme-court-review |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 23-1322 |
James W. Tindall v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue |
District of Columbia |
2024-06-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
administrative-record agency-record discovery judicial-precedent standard-of-review stare-decisis subject-matter-jurisdiction tax-court tax-court-review whistleblower whistleblower-claim |
1.) Whether this dispute is even ripe for review by the Supreme Court of the United States ("this Court") when Respondent's agency administrative reco… |
| 23-7639 |
Louis C. Bouie v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections |
Pennsylvania |
2024-06-05 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
drug-treatment-program due-process ex-post-facto executive-branch judicial-review sentencing-discretion separation-of-powers stare-decisis statutory-construction |
Did the Pennsylvania High Court unconstitutionally permit the statutory construct at 61 Pa.C.S.A. § 4105 to grant the executive branch carte blanche s… |
| 23-7646 |
Rogaciano Demetrio-Jimenez v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-06-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
almendarez-torres case-precedent criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit judicial-review jury-trial sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 23-7610 |
David K. Horsley v. Ohio |
Ohio |
2024-05-31 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
6th-amendment anders-review appellate-procedure constitutional-violation due-process procedural-safeguards right-to-counsel sixth-amendment stare-decisis time-limit |
Does Ohio's App. R. 26 (B)(1) violate the 6th Amendment of the United States Constitution by applying a time limit to when an applicant can file to re… |
| 23-7338 |
Damon Sean Bellis v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2024-04-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law agency-deference agency-interpretation circuit-split judicial-deference regulatory-ambiguity sentencing-guidelines stare-decisis statutory-interpretation |
The Court held in Kisor v. Wilkie, 139 S. Ct. 2400 (2019),
that before a court may defer to an agency's interpretation of its
regulation, the court mu… |
| 23-7307 |
Silvano Marroquin-Bravo v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-04-25 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-review criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit judicial-precedent jury-trial legal-challenge sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 23-1136 |
P. Koichi Yagi, aka Peter Yagi v. Estate of Robert C. Cannon |
Washington |
2024-04-19 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
circuit-conflict civil-procedure due-process federal-question judicial-precedent legal-authority standing stare-decisis venue venue-selection |
1. Whether the lower court erred by ignoring Petitioner's right under Court precedent to original venue.
2. Whether the Court erred by refusing to re… |
| 23-7252 |
Mychal Andra Reed v. California State Prison, Los Angeles County, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-04-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights covid-19-impact due-process judicial-bias medical-emergency medical-incapacity standing stare-decisis |
1) Can the district court lawfully dismiss petitioner's valid
Civil Rights complaint (violation) case because he failed to
appear due to "EXCEPTIONA… |
| 23-1120 |
DaBeth Manns v. U.S. Bank, N.A., as Trustee for Banc of America Funding Corporation for Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates 2007-03 |
District of Columbia |
2024-04-16 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection foreclosure-claim foreclosure-debt-claim pro-se-litigant stare-decisis |
Should the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decision be upheld in part or whole, reversed and/or the case remanded because the United States Cons… |
| 23-6962 |
Vernon D. F. Robbins v. John E. Wetzel, former Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2024-03-12 |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-remedy-exhaustion circuit-split due-process equal-protection stare-decisis administrative-exhaustion equal-protection prison-litigation-reform-act pro-se-litigation stare-decisis third-circuit-court |
1. Whether the United States fourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit has entered a
defision^tnat same United States Court of Appeals on the same decis… |
| 23-6860 |
Keyron Lamonte Binns v. American General Life and Accident Insurance Company, AIG, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-02-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abuse-of-discretion amendment contract-interpretation contract-law diversity-jurisdiction extrinsic-evidence judicial-discretion jurisdictional-standing stare-decisis |
1.) DID U.S. EASTERN DISTRICT COURT ERRED BY UTILIZING EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE TO DENY THE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE. ALTHOUGH THAT COURT FAILED… |
| 23-6845 |
Milton Martin Biester-Villeda v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-02-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-review criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit judicial-precedent legal-procedure sentencing sixth-amendment stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 23-6728 |
In Re Kimberlee Pitawanakwat |
|
2024-02-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure federal-jurisdiction general-crimes-act indian-rights major-crimes-act stare-decisis supremacy-clause treaty-interpretation treaty-of-fort-laramie |
Does it violate the Treaty of Fort Laramie (1868) and the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution to subject Indians to stand federal trial… |
| 23-6643 |
Michael Joseph Pepe v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-02-01 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
commerce-clause criminal-intent criminal-law due-process federal-jurisdiction improper-purpose interstate-travel jurisdiction round-trip-doctrine stare-decisis travel |
When a statute makes it a crime to travel in commerce or across state lines with an improper purpose or intent, can the government manufacture federal… |
| 23-691 |
Samuel Ghee v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2023-12-27 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process judicial-immunity official-liability standing stare-decisis state-law willful-misconduct |
The Georgia Constitution, section VII, paragraph VII, whether qualified or judicial immunity, does not immune willful misconduct and failure to prefor… |
| 23-6312 |
Andre Reese v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2023-12-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law agency-deference agency-interpretation judicial-deference kisor-v-wilkie precedential-interpretation sentencing-guidelines stare-decisis statutory-construction statutory-interpretation |
In Stinson v. United States, 508 U.S. 36 (1993), this Court held that the United States Sentencing Commission's commentary to the Sentencing Guideline… |
| 23-6252 |
Juan Antonio Guerrero-Lazaro v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-12-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-law constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure due-process judicial-procedure jury-trial legal-precedent precedent-overruling sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 23-6189 |
Karen Gail Brainen Kleinman v. Cynthia A. Norton, Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Eighth Circuit |
2023-12-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
bankruptcy-code bankruptcy-exemption bankruptcy-exemptions bankruptcy-procedure collateral-estoppel creditor-rights due-process judicial-immunity res-judicata stare-decisis statutory-interpretation |
1. Whether the intent of Congress in enacting 11 U.S.C. §522(1)
and Fed.R.Bankr.P. 4003(b) as interpreted by this Court 's
precedential and controll… |
| 23-6125 |
Walter Lancaster v. Beats Electronics LLC, et al. |
California |
2023-11-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
14th-amendment civil-rights due-process fraud-on-court fraud-on-the-court miscarriage-of-justice petition-for-review stare-decisis |
With herein evidenced incompetence that cannot be ascribed to any agency view or expertise coupled with Fraud on the Court in collusion spanning from … |
| 23-514 |
Kim Jackson v. Chris Dutra, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-11-16 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure civil-rights civil-rights-act constitutional-law due-process judicial-system qualified-immunity standing stare-decisis |
Whether the Court should reverse or recalibrate the doctrine of qualified immunity. |
| 23-465 |
Timothy Dolbin v. Denis R. McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs |
Federal Circuit |
2023-11-02 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-jurisdiction civil-rights class-action mootness personal-stake relation-back rule-23 stare-decisis veterans-affairs veterans-appeals |
If a n RCA under Rule 23 of the F ederal Rules of Civil Procedure is dismissed based on an erroneous interpretation of law , but not on the merits, do… |
| 23-391 |
Alexander Eugenio Moskovits v. MTGLQ Investors, L.P. |
Florida |
2023-10-13 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure due-process equal-protection foreclosure foreclosure-law judicial-precedent standing stare-decisis subject-matter-jurisdiction |
This case presents a question of public importance: whether Florida state courts can defy Stare Decisis on the jurisdictional issue of lack of plainti… |
| 23-283 |
Tri-City ValleyCats, Inc., et al. v. The Office of the Commissioner of Baseball |
Second Circuit |
2023-09-22 |
Dismissed |
Amici (8) |
antitrust antitrust-immunity baseball baseball-exemption common-law flood-v-kuhn market-competition professional-sports sherman-act stare-decisis |
Whether this Court should overrule Flood v. Kuhn, 407 U.S. 258 (1972), and its predecessors and revoke the century-old, common-law antitrust immunity … |
| 23-5632 |
Mario Rolando Cadenas v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-09-21 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-interpretation criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit-appeal judicial-precedent jury-trial precedent-overruling sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 23-223 |
Charles J. Jenkins v. TriWest Healthcare Alliance, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-09-08 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights court-procedure due-process federal-circuit federal-courts judicial-authority judicial-review rule-56 separation-of-powers stare-decisis sua-sponte |
1. Whether the triumvirate overstepped their
authority when they decided (sua sponte) to invoke,
incite, insurrect, or for the lack of a better desc… |
| 23-212 |
Amos N. Jones v. Catholic University of America |
District of Columbia |
2023-09-07 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights constitutional-law due-process equal-protection procedural-due-process procedural-fairness stare-decisis substantive-due-process tortious-interference |
Did the District of Columbia Court of Appeals err in its failure to apply its very own intervening and controlling authority as per the Full Faith and… |
| 23A179 |
Alexander Eugenio Moskovits v. MTGLQ Investors, L.P. |
Florida |
2023-08-25 |
Presumed Complete |
|
due-process equal-protection foreclosure standing stare-decisis subject-matter-jurisdiction |
Whether Florida state courts can deprive any person of property, without due process of law, or deny to any person the equal protection of the laws, b… |
| 23-5430 |
Demitri Brown, aka Timothy D. Brown v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-08-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
antitrust civil-rights constitutional-law due-process judicial-review jurisdiction legal-precedent stare-decisis vertical-restraints |
Does the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals err in refusing to honor the Supreme Court's Conception ruling, overruling the Hedgewood Opinion?
A. Are Gene… |
| 23-5352 |
Cassandra McGuire v. Highmark Holdings, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2023-08-15 |
Denied |
IFP |
abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure court-discretion default-judgment federal-rules federal-rules-of-civil-procedure procedural-rules stare-decisis summary-judgment |
Did the Defendant Point out Defects in respect to the Motion for More Definite Statement Doc 14 and 15, Case 3:19-cv-00902?
Do they have authority to… |
| 23-5337 |
Noel Brown v. State Correctional Institution at Somerset, Administration Office, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2023-08-11 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights court-costs court-rules default-judgment due-process federal-rules inmate-accounts notice-of-appearance standing stare-decisis |
1. Does the substantial holding in case on point Commonwealth v. Spotz, No.9 MD 2008 . In which the Commonwealth Court, Senior Judge Kelly, held that … |
| 23-5261 |
Everado Joe Flores-Salcido v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-08-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
almendarez-torres case-precedent criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit judicial-review jury-trial sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez- Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 23-5210 |
Andres Zapata-Reyes v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-07-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-law certiorari constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit judicial-precedent jury-trial sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 23-72 |
Anthony Santucci v. Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth |
Tenth Circuit |
2023-07-26 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
article-iii-review civil-rights constitutional-determination due-process habeas habeas-corpus military military-tribunals standing stare-decisis |
I. Whether this Court's plurality decision in Burnes v. Wilson, 346 U.S. 137 (1953) (Article III habeas review not appropriate where Article I militar… |
| 23-74 |
Debra A. Vitagliano v. County of Westchester, New York |
Second Circuit |
2023-07-25 |
Denied |
Amici (18)Relisted (2) |
abortion abortion-clinic-protests constitutional-law content-neutrality first-amendment free-speech precedent public-forum stare-decisis |
The question presented is whether the Court should overrule Hill. |
| 23-5142 |
Joseph Counts v. Maine |
First Circuit |
2023-07-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (3)IFP |
appeals appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights court-interpretation due-process judicial-discretion legal-procedure procedural-rules standing stare-decisis |
1. Where 28Use 1455 is
is ambiguoos, what is the
proper or best way for
the lower courts to
handle the
penumbra of filings
in order to
achieve
the mos… |
| 23-41 |
Ann Marie Borges, et al. v. County of Mendocino, California |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-07-14 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
cannabis-property-rights commerce-clause constitutional-amendments due-process federal-preemption federalism gonzales-v-raich property-rights stare-decisis state-sovereignty |
On March 6, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit filed it's unpublished memorandum affirming the district court order dismis… |
| 23-5079 |
Genaro Perchez-Hernandez v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-07-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-law criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit judicial-precedent jury-trial sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 22-1174 |
Michael Erwine v. Churchill County, Nevada, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-06-05 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
due-process employment employment-discrimination ninth-circuit procedural-due-process public-employee public-employee-rights stare-decisis stigma-plus |
To state a viable "stigma-plus" claim, must a plaintiff prove as a matter of fact "effective exclusion" from a chosen profession? |
| 22-7562 |
Joseph Tetak v. Jay Forshey, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2023-05-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review constitutional-interpretation constitutional-issue deference-standard federal-habeas-corpus habeas-corpus judicial-precedent stare-decisis state-supreme-court subjective-objective-analysis |
Does the doctrine of stare decisis prevail on a state supreme
court's determination of a constitutional issue in the same manner
as this Court's deter… |
| 22-1077 |
Sheryl Pereira v. Terrial O'Neal |
Georgia |
2023-05-05 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process judicial-discretion precedent property-rights stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supervisory-powers |
Whether Supreme Court of Georgia and Court of Appeals of Georgia erred by violating their own longstanding precedent setting Case decisions and well-e… |
| 22-7420 |
Jose Angel Morquecho-Sanchez v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-05-01 |
Denied |
IFP |
case-law criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit judicial-precedent jury-trial sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez- Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 22-7316 |
Hugo Perez-Mendoza v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-04-19 |
Denied |
IFP |
criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-precedent precedent-overturning recidivism sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review |
Whether this Court should overrule its decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998). |
| 22-7319 |
Jose Manuel Salazar-Hernandez v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-04-19 |
Denied |
IFP |
case-law criminal-appeal criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit judicial-precedent jury-trial sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 22-7259 |
Jose Manuel Cejudo-Mancinas v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-04-12 |
Denied |
IFP |
case-law criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit judicial-precedent jury-trial sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 22-7209 |
Dylan Brando Ervey Macias-Torres v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-04-04 |
Denied |
IFP |
case-law criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit judicial-precedent jury-trial sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 22-7179 |
Andres Ajualip-Pablo v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-04-03 |
Denied |
IFP |
case-law court-of-appeals criminal-procedure due-process judicial-review jury-trial legal-precedent sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 22-6998 |
David Arroyo-Ramon v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-03-13 |
Denied |
IFP |
criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-precedent legal-standard precedent-overturning recidivism sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review |
Whether this Court should overrule its decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998). |
| 22-6980 |
In Re Michael Blodgett |
|
2023-03-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
amg-v-ftc coram-nobis criminal-conviction due-process frap-rule-21 judicial-error mandamus mandamus-relief restitution stare-decisis vertical-stare-decisis |
Where the record reveals uncontested facts that the Eighth Circuit ("Circuit ")
finally dismissed a Writ of Mandamus on April 7, 2022 that documented… |
| 22-6976 |
Golda D. Harris v. Credit Acceptance Corporation, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2023-03-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
arbitration-clause federal-arbitration-act judicial-bias judicial-discrimination prima-paint-corp-v-flood-conklin pro-se-litigation stare-decisis supreme-court-precedent unconscionable-claims zahid-n-quraishi |
1. Is the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit allowed to substitute its decision(s) and
overrule the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. … |
| 22-6750 |
Pascual Agustin-Basilio v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-02-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-review criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit judicial-precedent legal-procedure sentencing sixth-amendment stare-decisis supreme-court supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 22-6568 |
Duraid Hussein v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-01-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
apprendi-v-new-jersey circuit-precedent criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection procedural-due-process rehaif-v-united-states sixth-amendment stare-decisis statutory-interpretation |
1. In Rehaif v. United States , 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019), this Court clarified that the word knowingly under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) applies to both defendan… |
| 22-574 |
Tiffany Lay, et vir v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-12-21 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-review bench-trial bench-trials circuit-court-review civil-procedure federal-rules-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure findings-of-fact judicial-findings obiter-dictum standard-of-review stare-decisis |
1. Whether Federal District Court judges in conducting complex bench trials, by issuing ostensible "findings" which fail to specially and specifically… |
| 22-560 |
Nathan Mowery v. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2022-12-19 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
agency-action anti-discrimination due-process executive-deference judicial-review national-security security-clearance stare-decisis |
1. Whether this Court's decision in Dep't of the Navy v. Egan precludes any and all judicial review of agency actions involving employees with securit… |
| 22-6168 |
Jose Santos Perez-Gonzalez v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-11-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-law criminal-law criminal-procedure judicial-precedent legal-review precedent-overturning recidivism sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review |
Whether this Court should overrule its decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998). |
| 22-6105 |
Eric Malmstrom v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2022-11-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure circuit-precedent en-banc federal-courts judicial-review stare-decisis |
Must a federal court of appeals adhere to the principle of stare decisis and abide by prior circuit precedent absent an intervening decision from this… |
| 22-5981 |
Jose Refugio Nieto-Uribe v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-11-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-review constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-interpretation legal-precedent recidivism sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent |
Whether Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998)
should be overruled. |
| 22-5949 |
Oswaldo Omar Ramirez-Ortiz v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-10-31 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-law criminal-appeal criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit judicial-precedent jury-trial sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez- Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 22-5797 |
Marie C. Russo v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee on Behalf of the Holders of the Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust Mortgage Loan Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-12 |
New Mexico |
2022-10-07 |
Denied |
IFP |
due-process fair-adversarial-process jurisdiction stare-decisis constitutional-rights due-process foreclosure judicial-jurisdiction stare-decisis substantive-due-process |
Whether the Judiciary of the State of New Mexico violated my right of substantive due process pursuant to the XIVth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution… |
| 22-5668 |
Thomas Guerriero v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-09-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure appellate-review circuit-court civil-procedure due-process eleventh-circuit judicial-review legal-argument precedent prior-precedent-rule stare-decisis |
1. Whether the Eleventh Circuit's prior precedent rule, which bars consideration of arguments not raised or decided previously, should be overturned. |
| 22-5459 |
Jose Socorro Gonzalez-Ruiz v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-08-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-review constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-interpretation legal-precedent recidivism sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent |
Whether Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998)
should be overruled. |
| 22-5389 |
Antonio Molina-Rodriguez v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-08-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-case criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit legal-review precedent recidivism sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez- Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 22-5214 |
Martin Rios-Galicia v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-07-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-analysis criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-precedent precedent-overturning recidivism sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review |
Whether the Court should overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998). |
| 21-8225 |
Luis Adrian Carchi-Fernandez v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-06-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-review court-of-appeals criminal-procedure due-process judicial-procedure jury-trial legal-precedent sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 21-8158 |
Larry Jose Torrez-Gutierrez v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-06-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-law constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit judicial-precedent sentencing sixth-amendment stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 21-8163 |
Benjamin Perez-Jimenez v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-06-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-review constitutional-law court-of-appeals criminal-procedure due-process judicial-precedent legal-procedure sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez- Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 21-1561 |
Vickie Brooks v. Philadelphia Insurance Companies |
Tenth Circuit |
2022-06-14 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure diversity-jurisdiction erie-doctrine stare-decisis summary-judgment tenth-circuit |
Did The Tenth Circuit Court fail to follow stare decisis by failing to follow its own ruling in Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938) and affirm… |
| 21-8102 |
Rodrigo Jimenez-Ramirez v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-06-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
almendarez-torres certiorari constitutional-law criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit judicial-precedent sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 21-8058 |
Alejandro Pascual-Miguel v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-06-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-law criminal-case criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit judicial-review legal-precedent sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 21-7989 |
Peter Vu v. San Francisco Police Department, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-05-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure judicial-review pleading-standard prison-litigation-reform-act stare-decisis u.s-constitution |
Is the Iqbal & Twombly fact-pleading standard applied and extended in the Ninth Circuit through the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA") in Hebbe v. … |
| 21-7974 |
Omero Rojas-Leal, aka Belarmino Lopez-Lopez v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-05-25 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-law constitutional-law criminal-appeal criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit judicial-precedent sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 21-7960 |
Jesus Antonio Montoya-Balderrama v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-05-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
almendarez-torres-precedent certiorari constitutional-law criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit judicial-review jury-trial sentencing stare-decisis supreme-court-review |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 21-7813 |
Hector Cervantes-Resendiz v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-05-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-law constitutional-provisions criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit precedent-review sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 21-7791 |
Aaron Ramirez-Almader v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-05-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-law constitutional-law court-of-appeals criminal-procedure judicial-review legal-precedent recidivism sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 21-7738 |
Guillermo Mata-Valerio v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-04-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure certiorari constitutional-interpretation criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-precedent sentencing sixth-amendment stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 21-1167 |
Terry Rene Chapman v. Social Security Administration, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2022-02-23 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
binding disability-rights federal-pleading-standards final-decision judicial-precedent legislation precedent pro-se-petition stare-decisis unbinding unpublished-opinion |
How can a decision be final & be final to what; if it is unbinding
without a Precedent for Stare Decisis? Will there be a Legislation of
The Law not… |
| 21-7174 |
Inocencio Gamboa-Rivera v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-02-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-precedent constitutional-law court-of-appeals criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit legal-review sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 21-7070 |
Anderson Curtel Duke v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-02-08 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
agency-deference agency-interpretation attempt-crimes circuit-split controlled-substance controlled-substance-offense judicial-deference kisor-v-wilkie sentencing-guidelines stare-decisis stinson-v-united-states |
1. Should courts defer to Sentencing Guidelines commentary when there is no ambiguity in the underlying text?
2. Has the Commission impermissibly exp… |
| 21-1054 |
Shaoming Song v. Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2022-01-28 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
18-U.S.C.-1001 29-U.S.C.-633(a) age-discrimination but-for-causation civil-procedure discovery-rule federal-government fraud plausibility-pleading stare-decisis statute-of-limitations |
1. Whether, or under what circumstance, a six-year concealed fraud in a federal agency's official personnel action allegedly violated the Age Discrimi… |
| 21-985 |
Oklahoma v. Gage Christopher J. Shriver |
Oklahoma |
2022-01-11 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-jurisdiction indian-law jurisdictional-challenge McGirt-precedent native-american-rights oklahoma-sovereignty stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-961 |
Oklahoma v. Patrick Wayne Olive |
Oklahoma |
2021-12-30 |
Denied |
|
criminal-law criminal-procedure federalism jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law oklahoma-sovereignty stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-6613 |
DeAndre Russell, et ux. v. United States, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-12-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law civil-rights class-action constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection federal-rules-of-civil-procedure judicial-act pro-se standing stare-decisis |
Whether Rule 5.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures which wato in part; *A jnfiy Ik afewsd to "fife m Cpwptett, ffer Sa^ssstssme fs^Ssif ifaw^ i… |
| 21-868 |
Oklahoma v. Kevin Tyler Foster |
Oklahoma |
2021-12-10 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
criminal-appellate-review criminal-jurisdiction federal-indian-law indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-sovereignty oklahoma-criminal-law stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-805 |
Douglas Norberg v. Nevada Center for Dermatology, et al. |
Nevada |
2021-12-01 |
Denied |
|
appellate-procedure civil-rights common-law court-rules due-process judicial-precedent precedent stare-decisis unpublished-opinions |
1. Is Nevada Supreme Court Rule 36 allowing appellate decisions to be unpublished and unable to the cited as precedent a violation of the rule of star… |
| 21-798 |
Oklahoma v. Stephen Tanner Vineyard |
Oklahoma |
2021-11-30 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
criminal-appellate-review criminal-law federal-jurisdiction indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-rights oklahoma-criminal-law stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-773 |
Oklahoma v. Harold Denton McCurtain |
Oklahoma |
2021-11-24 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
criminal-appellate-review criminal-law federal-indian-law jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-criminal-law stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-734 |
Oklahoma v. Justin Dale Little |
Oklahoma |
2021-11-17 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
criminal-appellate-review criminal-procedure federal-indian-law federalism jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-rights native-american-sovereignty oklahoma-criminal-law stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-704 |
Oklahoma v. Samantha Ann Perales |
Oklahoma |
2021-11-15 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (2) |
140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020) should be overruled criminal-appellate-review criminal-law federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-criminal-law oklahoma-sovereignty overruling-precedent precedent-review stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-644 |
Oklahoma v. Floyd Joseph Ball, Jr. |
Oklahoma |
2021-11-02 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
criminal-appellate-review criminal-law federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-state-law stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma , 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020) , should be over ruled. |
| 21-645 |
Oklahoma v. Chandler Kyle Ned |
Oklahoma |
2021-11-02 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
appellate-review criminal-law federal-jurisdiction indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-rights oklahoma-criminal-law stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-646 |
Oklahoma v. Dameon Lamar Leathers |
Oklahoma |
2021-11-02 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020) should be overruled court-of-criminal-appeals criminal-appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process federalism jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-criminal-law oklahoma-jurisdiction precedent-challenge stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-608 |
Oklahoma v. Laurie Jean Martin |
Oklahoma |
2021-10-26 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
appellate-review criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-jurisdiction mcgirt-precedent native-american-law oklahoma-sovereignty stare-decisis state-sovereignty statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-582 |
Mark Lee Dickson v. Whole Woman's Health, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-10-21 |
Denied |
|
abortion abortion-rights civil-rights constitutional-law due-process judicial-review reproductive-rights severability standing stare-decisis state-law supreme-court-precedent |
1. Should the Court overrule Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992)?
2. Should th… |
| 21-583 |
Stephen Brint Carlton, et al. v. Whole Woman's Health, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-10-21 |
Denied |
|
abortion abortion-rights civil-rights constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law due-process judicial-precedent judicial-review reproductive-rights stare-decisis supreme-court-precedent texas-law |
Whether the Court should overrule Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). |
| 21-587 |
Penny Clarkston v. Whole Woman's Health, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-10-21 |
Denied |
|
abortion abortion-rights civil-rights constitutional-law due-process judicial-precedent judicial-review reproductive-rights stare-decisis supreme-court-precedent |
Whether the Court should overrule Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). |
| 21-6001 |
Terence Tramaine Andrus v. Texas |
Texas |
2021-10-19 |
Denied |
Amici (8)Relisted (17)IFP |
capital-case criminal-procedure death-penalty effective-assistance-of-counsel habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance sixth-amendment stare-decisis strickland-v-washington vertical-stare-decisis |
I. On remand, did the Texas court reject this Court's conclusions in Andrus v. Texas, 140 S.Ct. 1875 (2020), which were amply supported by the habeas … |
| 21-5970 |
Fredrick Devone Flemming v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2021-10-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
alleyne-v-united-states apprendi-v-new-jersey constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process juvenile-delinquency prior-conviction sentencing-factor sentencing-factors sixth-amendment stare-decisis |
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), this Court held that the fact of a prior conviction was a "sentencing factor," not an "ele… |
| 21-502 |
Oklahoma v. Terrance Lucas Cottingham |
Oklahoma |
2021-10-05 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law oklahoma-sovereignty overruling-precedent stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452
(2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-486 |
Oklahoma v. Dakota James Alleyn Shriver |
Oklahoma |
2021-10-01 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020) should be overruled appellate-review criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-jurisdiction indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-jurisdiction native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-law oklahoma-sovereignty precedent-review stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-487 |
Oklahoma v. David Deval Martin |
Oklahoma |
2021-10-01 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-jurisdiction criminal-law federal-indian-law jurisdictional-boundaries native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-law overruling-precedent stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-488 |
Oklahoma v. Dakota Shay Fox |
Oklahoma |
2021-10-01 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020) should be overruled appellate-review criminal-jurisdiction criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-indian-law jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law oklahoma-sovereignty oklahoma-statehood stare-decisis tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-5625 |
Phillip Shawn Horton v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-09-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-law criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process judicial-interpretation legal-conflict procedural-review remand remand-order sentencing stare-decisis supreme-court-precedent |
I. Should this Court should grant review to determine whether the opinion of the court below conflicts with this Court's decisions in Witte v. United … |
| 21-369 |
Oklahoma v. Bea Ann Epperson |
Oklahoma |
2021-09-08 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-appellate-review criminal-procedure federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-criminal-law overruling-precedent stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-371 |
Oklahoma v. Jeffery Arch Jones |
Oklahoma |
2021-09-08 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process federalism judicial-review McGirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-sovereignty stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-372 |
Oklahoma v. Charles Michael Cooper |
Oklahoma |
2021-09-08 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-appellate-review criminal-law federal-jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-sovereignty oklahoma-criminal-law stare-decisis state-sovereignty statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-373 |
Oklahoma v. Joses Ric-E Beck |
Oklahoma |
2021-09-08 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-indian-law jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge McGirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-sovereignty stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-5570 |
Richard Boyle v. United States |
Third Circuit |
2021-09-02 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-court due-process evidence-admission federal-rules-of-evidence prior-convictions stare-decisis undue-prejudice witness-testimony |
Whether the federal courts are free to withdraw the protection from undue prejudice which emanates from the required four-step process as set forth in… |
| 21-319 |
Oklahoma v. Nacole Ryan Bain |
Oklahoma |
2021-09-01 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law oklahoma-law stare-decisis state-sovereignty statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-320 |
Oklahoma v. Robert William Perry, II |
Oklahoma |
2021-09-01 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-appellate-review criminal-procedure federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-sovereignty oklahoma-criminal-law overruling-precedent stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-321 |
Oklahoma v. Ryan Cortlan Johnson |
Oklahoma |
2021-09-01 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020) should be overruled criminal-appellate-review criminal-law federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-sovereignty oklahoma-criminal-law overruling-precedent stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-322 |
Oklahoma v. Joseph Harjo |
Oklahoma |
2021-09-01 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-appellate-review criminal-law federal-jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-criminal-law stare-decisis state-sovereignty statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-323 |
Oklahoma v. Michael Eugene Spears |
Oklahoma |
2021-09-01 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020) should be overruled criminal-appellate-review criminal-procedure federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights native-american-sovereignty oklahoma-criminal-law oklahoma-sovereignty stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-324 |
Oklahoma v. Kadetrix Devon Grayson |
Oklahoma |
2021-09-01 |
Denied |
Relisted (3) |
criminal-appellate-review criminal-law federal-jurisdiction indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-sovereignty oklahoma-criminal-law stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-325 |
Oklahoma v. Matthew Steven Janson |
Oklahoma |
2021-09-01 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-appellate-procedure criminal-law due-process federalism mcgirt-precedent native-american-law oklahoma-criminal-law stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-326 |
Oklahoma v. Devin Warren Sizemore |
Oklahoma |
2021-09-01 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge McGirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-sovereignty stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-327 |
Oklahoma v. Floyd Joseph Ball, Jr. |
Oklahoma |
2021-09-01 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process federalism jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-sovereignty oklahoma-criminal-law stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-257 |
Oklahoma v. Jimmie Dewayne Starr |
Oklahoma |
2021-08-23 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020) should be overruled criminal-appellate-procedure criminal-procedure federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-criminal-law oklahoma-sovereignty stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-258 |
Oklahoma v. Donta Keith Davis |
Oklahoma |
2021-08-23 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (4) |
criminal-procedure due-process federalism mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-criminal-law stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-259 |
Oklahoma v. Arnold Dean Howell |
Oklahoma |
2021-08-23 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-jurisdiction indian-law judicial-review McGirt-precedent native-american-rights oklahoma-sovereignty stare-decisis state-jurisdiction statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452
(2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-251 |
Oklahoma v. William Clayton Brown |
Oklahoma |
2021-08-20 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (4) |
court-precedent criminal-appeal criminal-jurisdiction federal-indian-law indian-law judicial-review mcgirt-precedent oklahoma-jurisdiction stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-252 |
Oklahoma v. Shannon James Kepler |
Oklahoma |
2021-08-20 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
court-of-criminal-appeals criminal-case criminal-law federal-indian-law legal-precedent mcgirt-precedent native-american-law oklahoma-jurisdiction stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452
(2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-254 |
Oklahoma v. Jordan Batice Mitchell |
Oklahoma |
2021-08-20 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-procedure federalism judicial-review McGirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-sovereignty stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-255 |
Oklahoma v. Grant N. Jackson, IV |
Oklahoma |
2021-08-20 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-jurisdiction criminal-procedure federal-indian-law federalism McGirt-precedent native-american-rights oklahoma-sovereignty stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-5317 |
Mauricio Melendez v. Renee Baker, Warden |
Nevada |
2021-08-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
attorney-concession criminal-autonomy criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel right-to-counsel right-to-defense stare-decisis supreme-court-precedent |
In 2018, this Court decided McCoy v. Louisiana, 138 S.Ct. 1500 (2018), recognizing a criminal defendant's right to secured autonomy over his defense. … |
| 21-5241 |
Jose Lazaro Venancio Mendoza-Batres v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-07-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-review criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit judicial-procedure jury-trial legal-precedent sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 21-5158 |
Miguel Angel Berdeja-Medina v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-07-21 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-review criminal-appeal criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit judicial-precedent sentencing sixth-amendment stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez- Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 21-5043 |
Carlos Amador Saragoza-Botello v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-07-08 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-review constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit judicial-precedent legal-challenge sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 20-8325 |
Francisco Javier Bermudez-Chavez v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-06-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-law criminal-appeal criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit judicial-precedent sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 20-1659 |
50509 Marine LLC, et al. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-05-27 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
chicago-title corporate-dissolution erisa erisa-interpretation federal-common-law stare-decisis state-corporate-law tenth-amendment |
Whether under Chicago Title & Tr. Co. v. Forty-One Thirty-Six Wilcox Bldg. Corp., 302 U.S. 120 (1937) and the Tenth Amendment to the United States Con… |
| 20-1591 |
Ashwin Khobragade v. Covidien LP |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-05-17 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process employment employment-law federal-rules fraud qualified-immunity rico stare-decisis white-collar-litigation |
1. Is the Defendant Covidien LP entitled to the
absolute qualified immunity? Which is luring,
hiding, lying, cheating, stealing, RICO and
committing f… |
| 20-1344 |
Jeffrey T. Maehr v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2021-03-24 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
16th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process income-definition irs standing stare-decisis supreme-court-precedent tax-law taxation |
1. Can the IRS/United States government/Respondent and lower courts consistently call U.S. Supreme Court standing case precedent (stare decisis ) on t… |
| 20-1243 |
Staci Burk v. Doug Ducey, Governor of Arizona, et al. |
Arizona |
2021-03-10 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
case-or-controversy civil-procedure civil-rights due-process election-challenge equal-protection federal-jurisdiction first-amendment standing stare-decisis voter-registration |
1. Did the Arizona Supreme Court violate Petitioner's right to Equal Protection when it denied remand for an evidentiary hearing of Petitioner's const… |
| 20-7128 |
Teodoro Reynosa-Denova v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-02-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-review constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit judicial-precedent jury-trial legal-procedure sentencing stare-decisis supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 20-1112 |
In Re Lakshmi Arunachalam |
|
2021-02-12 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-law appointments-clause constitutional-law contract-clause due-process equal-protection government-contracts patent patent-law separation-of-powers stare-decisis |
1. Whether Justice Barrett, as the last standing
Justice with original jurisdiction, with the same
duty and oath as the lower courts to enforce the … |
| 20-7011 |
Hemmingway Mukora Saisi v. Carolyn Murray, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2021-02-02 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights deliberate-indifference due-process equal-protection protection-claim self-defense stare-decisis state-criminal-procedure state-officials |
A. Were my conshene} wighks do the &
pr ok echion clayse Vielahed, r " aval
Rs Were ny Due Process sjahks VialakeSu wh
~ Bet enblonk by Het en A) OMI… |
| 20-7004 |
Camille T. Mata v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination |
Massachusetts |
2021-02-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
administrative-procedure civil-rights discrimination due-process judicial-review standing stare-decisis state-agency |
1. Can the Massachusetts Appeals Court deny Petitioner judicial review of Respondent state agency's lack of probable cause ("LOPC") disposition on a c… |
| 20-6904 |
Billy S. Jeffries v. Justice and Public Safety Cabinet, et al. |
Kentucky |
2021-01-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-challenge due-process ex-post-facto juvenile juvenile-offender sex-offender-registration stare-decisis statutory-scheme |
In Smith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 84, 105 (2003), this Court found that Alaska's sex offender registration statute was a "civil regulatory scheme" which was "… |
| 20-958 |
Rickey Leon Scott v. Eric Arnold, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-01-14 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
aedpa civil-rights due-process judicial-interpretation precedent stare-decisis |
1 When a Justice contributes the necessary fifth vote to a majority opinion but also writes a concurrence interpreting that opinion , should lower cou… |
| 20-932 |
Bobby L. Franklin v. D. J. Laughlin, et al. |
Nevada |
2021-01-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
14th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process judicial-fraud patent patent-rights quiet-title standing stare-decisis takings |
Has Petitioner Franklin's existing stare decisis patent rights that is published in his certified First Title on the described 80 acres ever been addr… |
| 20-6699 |
Juan David Pineda-Rodriguez v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-12-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-review criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit judicial-precedent jury-trial legal-procedure sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez- Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 20-6694 |
Gerardo Flores-Riojas v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-12-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-law constitutional-law court-of-appeals criminal-procedure due-process judicial-review legal-precedent sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 20-6614 |
Derek Jarvis v. Isiah Leggett, et al. |
Maryland |
2020-12-11 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights county-liability due-process government-liability legal-precedent malicious-conduct malicious-prosecution official-immunity qualified-immunity stare-decisis venue-transfer |
1- Md. Gen. Provision, 1-104, is not authority, nor based
on precedent within the rule of 'stare decisis', nor persuasive
authority. Maryland General … |
| 20-498 |
Sonia Garcia, et vir v. Wesley Blevins, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-10-16 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
4th-amendment civil-rights clearly-established-law constitutional-rights deadly-force fourth-amendment qualified-immunity stare-decisis unpublished-decisions unpublished-opinions |
1. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted qualified immunity reasoning facts demonstrating that a person shot and killed by … |
| 20-5831 |
Rafael Cezar Danam v. Arizona Board of Education |
Arizona |
2020-09-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-hearing bill-of-rights constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment freedom-of-speech redress-of-grievances stare-decisis |
From the founding of the United States of America, the "inalienable " right of "Freedom of Speech " and the right of "Redress of Grievances " has been… |
| 20-394 |
David Alan Schum v. Fortress Value Recovery Fund I, L.L.C., et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-09-25 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure fraud-on-court fraud-on-the-court judicial-precedent officers-of-the-court rule-60 stare-decisis time-bar |
1. Whether a claim brought under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 60(d)(3) as a result of fraud on the court by attorneys who are sworn officers … |
| 20-5782 |
Harold Warren v. Indiana |
Indiana |
2020-09-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
due-process fair-trial ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prejudice-prong sixth-amendment standard-of-review stare-decisis strickland-standard strickland-v-washington |
Whether the Indiana Court of Appeals' precedent published in Warren v. State, 2020 Ind. App. LEXIS 143 (Ind. Ct. App. 2020) addressing Warren's Ineffe… |
| 20-5751 |
Pedro Fernandez-de Campa v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-09-21 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-law certiorari-petition criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-reconsideration precedent precedent-review sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review |
Whether Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), should be overruled. |
| 20-324 |
Peter J. Barclay v. Oregon Department of Justice, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-09-11 |
Denied |
|
constitutional-sovereignty federal-preemption judicial-accountability judicial-immunity stare-decisis state-sovereignty statutory-injunction statutory-injunctions supervisory-powers |
Will this Court exercise its supervisory powers against lower court judgments which expressly hold the stare decisis of this Court "irrelevant" and wh… |
| 20-5152 |
Joel Arredondo-Moreno v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-07-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure due-process sentencing sixth-amendment stare-decisis supreme-court |
Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? |
| 20-5029 |
Richard Charles Lussy v. Henry Paumie Lussy |
Montana |
2020-07-10 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process federal-constitution free-speech hearsay-impeachment jury-verdict ministerial-oath standing stare-decisis |
Whether to apply Federal Constitution: XAl bad behavior-after-petitioned speech to impeach hearsay -stare decisis with particularized legislated Monta… |
| 20-5028 |
Richard Charles Lussy v. Wade J. Dahood |
Montana |
2020-07-10 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process free-speech jury-trial legal-procedure ministerial-oath oath-of-office standing stare-decisis |
Whether to apply Federal Constitution: [A] bad behavior-after-petitioned speech to impeach hearsay-stare decisis with particularized legislated Montan… |
| 20-5018 |
Roy Howard Middleton v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-07-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review circuit-court-interpretation criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process federal-law-application habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review legal-precedent stare-decisis supreme-court-precedent |
I. Petitioner asks did the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit and the District Court for the Northern District of Florida apply f… |
| 19-1461 |
Mitche A. Dalberiste v. GLE Associates, Inc. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-07-07 |
Denied |
Amici (5)Relisted (13) |
civil-rights employment-discrimination minority-religions religious-accommodation stare-decisis statutory-interpretation title-vii undue-hardship |
Whether the Court should reconsider Hardison and set a proper legal standard for determining what constitutes an "undue hardship" under Title VII, 42 … |
| 19-8891 |
Jeffery L. Howard v. Management and Training Corp., et al. |
Ohio |
2020-07-02 |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-exhaustion due-process equal-protection first-amendment free-speech grievance-forms retaliation stare-decisis state-courts |
1) is PETITIONER'S first amendment rights violated when
PRIVATE FOR PROFIT CORPORATION AND ITS AGENTS DENY
ACCESS TO THE PAPER NOTIFICATION of GRIEV… |
| 19-8750 |
Lakshmi Arunachalam v. SAP America, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-06-19 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitution-of-the-united-states constitutional-impairment contract-clause due-process equal-protection impairment-of-contract judicial-malfeasance patent-contract patent-contract-grant stare-decisis |
1. Whether the inventor 's government-issued patent contract grant is protected
by the Constitution of the United States. If so,
2. Whether the inve… |
| 19-8708 |
Lakshmi Arunachalam v. Presidio Bank |
Federal Circuit |
2020-06-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
2nd-amendment brown-vs-board civil-rights due-process equal-protection free-speech judicial-ethics patent patent-rights stare-decisis supreme-court-precedent |
1. Whether this Court's duty to enforce its Governing Precedents as declared by Chief Justice J. Marshall in Fletcher v. Peck (1810) and Trustees of D… |
| 19-8654 |
Richard Senese, Jr. v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-06-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
article-iii article-three due-process equal-protection exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment good-faith-exception judicial-precedent panel-rule stare-decisis |
I. Rather than applying this Court's precedents, the Eleventh Circuit held that its "prior panel rule" precluded it from reaching appellant's argument… |
| 19-8538 |
Jeffrey W. Smiles v. Berks County, Pennsylvania, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2020-05-26 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
administrative-taking civil-rights constitutional-authority due-process eminent-domain property-rights standing stare-decisis takings |
1. Can a political subdivision of a state, through its employees, administratively take private property from the people they work for and give/sell t… |
| 19-7987 |
Ashley R. Hambright v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-03-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure driving-while-intoxicated due-process dui evidence evidence-sufficiency federal-appeals intoxication magistrate-review military-jurisdiction stare-decisis sufficiency-of-evidence |
Petitioner, ASHLEYR. HAMBRIGHT, appealed her twelve months of supervised probation
for driving while intoxicated ("DWI") on the grounds of a military … |
| 19-7955 |
Philip Berryman v. Randall Haas, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2020-03-11 |
Denied |
IFP |
circuit-conflict circuit-split constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection exhaustion exhaustion-doctrine exhaustion-of-remedies grievance-process precedent prison-litigation sixth-circuit stare-decisis |
In this case, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals holds that an essentiak part of the
MDOC's Grievance Process will only benefit a very few litigants … |
| 19-7515 |
Andy Nguyen v. California |
California |
2020-01-31 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
alleyne-v-united-states apprendi-rule apprendi-v-new-jersey consecutive-sentences consecutive-sentencing criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing judicial-fact-finding preponderance-of-evidence sentencing stare-decisis |
Should the Court reconsider its majority opinion in Oregon v. Ice, 555 U.S. 160, 167-168, 173-177, 129 S.Ct. 711, 172 L.Ed.2d 517 (2009) (Ice) which p… |
| 19-7014 |
Geoffrey Scott Gaffney v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-12-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeals constitutional-provisions district-court due-process eighth-circuit evidentiary-hearing habeas-corpus procunier-v-atchley stare-decisis |
SHOULD THIS COURT GRANT THIS PETITION TO ADDRESS THE OBVIOUS FAILURE OF THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS TO REQUIRE A DISTRICT COURT TO CONDUCT AN … |
| 19-6955 |
Shondell J. Paul v. New York |
New York |
2019-12-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment appellate-procedure appellate-review constitutional-question due-process federal-constitutional-law fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel precedent stare-decisis state-court state-court-precedent state-court-procedure |
Does the Fourteenth Amendment place an obligation on the New York Court of Appeals to address a federal constitutional question when its prior precede… |
| 19-6822 |
Guy Cozzi v. American Stock Exchange, et al. |
New York |
2019-12-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abuse-of-discretion administrative-law article-8-a due-process equal-protection judicial-review rb-89 separation-of-powers stare-decisis workers-compensation |
1. Were the Workers ' Compensation Board (WCB) rulings denying my Article 8-A claim
and RB-89 rehearing request, arbitrary, capricious and an abuse o… |
| 19-6594 |
David Ingraham v. Florida |
Florida |
2019-11-13 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
violate the principals of due-process constitutional-fairness due-process eight-amendment eighth-amendment judicial-integrity juvenile-offenders parole stare-decisis supreme-court-precedent |
(1). Does the decision of the Florida Supreme Court in overturning its previous
decision deciding a Federal Constitutional question, violate the prin… |
| 19-538 |
Albert S. N. Hee v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-10-24 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
circuit-court-precedent constitutional-rights criminal-prosecution due-process fabricated-evidence habeas-corpus stare-decisis substantive-constitutional-rights |
It is fundamental that the constitutional right of due process is violated when the Principal Government Agent lies by fabricating evidence in order t… |
| 19-6319 |
Antonio Bogan v. Jeffrey German, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-10-21 |
Denied |
IFP |
4th-amendment civil-rights due-process fourth-amendment law-enforcement owner-knowledge probable-cause stare-decisis vehicle-seizure warrantless-search |
Whether probable Cause to effect a laarrantless Seizure, of a vehicle is equivalent to officers Wnaoledge of an arrestee, being its Oujner ?Respondent… |
| 19-412 |
Peggy A. Cianchette, et al. v. Tucker J. Cianchette, et al. |
Maine |
2019-09-26 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-procedure civil-procedure constitutional-law due-process ex-post-facto fair-notice judicial-review judicial-rules legal-precedent punitive-damages remand-standard stare-decisis tort-law |
Whether, when an appellate court overturns its own controlling precedent, constitutional guarantees of due process require remand to the trial court f… |
| 19-402 |
Howard L. Baldwin, et ux. v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-09-25 |
Denied |
Amici (6)Relisted (4) |
administrative-law agency-deference brand-x-doctrine common-law common-law-mailbox-rule stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tax tax-refund |
(1) Should Brand X be overruled?
(2) What, if any, deference should a federal agency's statutory construction receive when it contradicts a court's p… |
| 19-6031 |
In Re Keith E. Doyle |
|
2019-09-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-intent due-process habeas-corpus judicial-recusal montana-constitution preliminary-hearing recusal stare-decisis state-constitution unlawful-conviction |
In the Montana Constitution it clearly states that the Writ of
Habeas Corpus shall never be suspended; the Convention Notes of
the Great Writ shall th… |
| 19-338 |
In Re Peter Appel, et al. |
|
2019-09-13 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
24th-amendment 26th-amendment all-writs-act all-writs-act-28-usc-1651a congressional-certification congressional-jurisdiction constitutional-review electoral-certification electoral-college justiciability presidential-election standing stare-decisis voter-disenfranchisement voter-injury |
1. Whether this Court has the "other jurisdiction"
(pursuant to Rule 20 of Part 4 of the Supreme Court
rules) to grant the within petition for an ap… |
| 19-5850 |
Yurie Yamano v. Hawaii State Judiciary, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-09-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
article-vi civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law court-rules due-process judicial-misconduct procedural-irregularity rules-of-court separation-of-powers standing stare-decisis |
1. Whether the Court should resolve the
following questions for which the five judges on the State of Hawaii Supreme Court
bench are exhibiting and c… |
| 19-5723 |
Melvin Bernard Thompson v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-08-28 |
Denied |
IFP |
Almendarez-Torres Apprendi-v-New-Jersey criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus judicial-discretion sentencing sentencing-guidelines sixth-amendment stare-decisis |
1. Can a Florida Law permit a trial court to exercise judicial discretion to make
new findings of fact of an escalating pattern of criminal conduct b… |
| 19-5630 |
Roosevelt Stolden v. California |
California |
2019-08-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
alleyne-v-united-states apprendi-rule apprendi-v-new-jersey consecutive-sentencing criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process judicial-fact-finding preponderance-of-evidence sentencing sentencing-guidelines stare-decisis |
Should the Court reconsider its majority opinion in Oregon v. Ice, 555 U.S. 160, 167-168, 173-177, 129 S.Ct. 711, 172 L.Ed.2d 517 (2009) (Ice) which p… |
| 19-5331 |
Michael Lee v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-07-25 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
armed-career-criminal-act circuit-split due-process flawed-precedent prior-panel-precedent-rule stare-decisis statutory-right statutory-right-to-appeal supreme-court-precedent violent-felony |
Does the Eleventh Circuit too rigidly apply its "prior panel precedent rule" – effectively denying Eleventh Circuit defendants their statutory right t… |
| 19-66 |
George Q. Ricks v. Idaho Contractors Board, et al. |
Idaho |
2019-07-12 |
Denied |
Amici (5)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (8) |
civil-rights constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law employment-division-v-smith first-amendment free-exercise free-exercise-clause generally-applicable neutral-law neutral-laws religious-exemption religious-exemptions religious-freedom stare-decisis |
Whether the Court should revisit its holding in Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), that the Free Exercise Clause generally requires no… |
| 19-5157 |
Ronald Ray Horner v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2019-07-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
article-i-section-8 circuit-court-jurisdiction constitutional-amendment due-process enrolled-bill-rule enumerated-powers expansion-of-legislative-power house-concurrent-resolution-219 legislative-power standing stare-decisis |
1) Usss-ues concerning Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution of
the United States of America:
a) Can Congress pass legislation that broadens and … |
| 19-5151 |
Jeffrey T. Maehr v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2019-07-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
16th-amendment due-process findings-of-fact grand-jury-access income-definition irs-actions standing standing-precedent stare-decisis tax-assessment tax-assessments tax-levies |
1. Can the IRS/United States government Respondent and lower courts consistently call U.S. Supreme Court standing case precedent (stare decisis) on th… |
| 18-1571 |
Steve Kelly Moyer v. Kansas |
Kansas |
2019-06-24 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
automatic-reversal chapman-v-california constitutional-error constitutional-errors credibility-assessment due-process harmless-error ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel neder-v-united-states overwhelming-evidence stare-decisis strickland-standard strickland-v-washington |
Whether the Kansas Supreme Court Who Affirmed the Remand Court's Analysis and Findings on Moyer'sCounsel's Effectiveness under Strickland v. Washingto… |
| 18-1305 |
Timothy O'Neill v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-04-16 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure erroneous-interpretation hoover-precedent job-description judicial-review long-term-disability plan-administrator sixth-circuit social-security-disability stare-decisis stare-decisis,civil-procedure,due-process,appeals, |
Did the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS for the SIXTH CIRCUIT wrongfully and grievously apply the doctrine of STARE DECISIS in upholding the decision o… |
| 18-8599 |
Antwon D. Jenkins v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-03-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
bail bail-reform-act due-process habeas-corpus liberty-interest post-verdict-bail resentencing sentencing stare-decisis statutory-right statutory-rights |
DOES A PETITIONER, AFTER BEING FOUND GUILTY BY A JURY, HAVE A STATUTORY DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO POST-VERDICT BAIL, AND TO BE TREATED AS A DEFENDANT BEING… |
| 18-1216 |
R. C. "Rick" Lussy v. Florida Elections Commission, et al. |
Florida |
2019-03-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
anti-trust civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process election-dispute elections emolument emolument-manipulation free-speech judicial-ethics judicial-misconduct pro-se-litigation property-appraisal standing stare-decisis |
Question not identified. |
| 18-8336 |
London Ettione Dunbar v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-03-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability constitutional-interpretation due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review miller-el-precedent miller-el-v-cockrell standard-of-review stare-decisis |
SHOULD THIS COURT GRANT THIS PETITION TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE LOWER COURT'S REFUSAL TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS AT CONFLICT WITH THIS … |
| 18-8267 |
Vincent Green v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-03-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
ACCA acca-offender armed-career-criminal-act categorical-approach criminal-law criminal-procedure enumerated-offense o.c.g.a.-16-7-1 sentencing sentencing-enhancement stare-decisis statutory-interpretation |
PETITIONER'S SENTENCE AS AN ACCA OFFENDER MUST BE SET ASIDE, WHEREAS O.C.G.A. § 16-7-1 IS NOT A VIABLE ENUMERATED OFFENSE PREDICATE, BASED UPON THIS C… |
| 18-8237 |
Harry Eugene Briscoe v. LaShann Eppinger, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-03-04 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-court-conflict civil-procedure-jurisdiction due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus pro-se-petition stare-decisis subject-matter-jurisdiction void-judgment |
Whether this U.S.S. Ct. will certify the conflict of the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, not only with itself concerning its ruling that subject-matter … |
| 18-8162 |
Eric V. Bartoli v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-02-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-split ex-post-facto ineffective-assistance ineffective-counsel judicial-recusal mandate-recall sentencing stare-decisis |
1) Did the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals go against Supreme Court precedent (Peugh v. U.S., 569 US 530; Class v. U.S., 2018 LEXIS 1378; Calderon v. Tho… |
| 18-1105 |
Samuel Pierce v. Yale University, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2019-02-22 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
affirmative-action civil-rights constitutional-law due-process equal-protection higher-education race-based-discrimination stare-decisis university-admissions |
Whether the Court should overrule its holdings
in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
and Grutter v. Bollinger that professional school
a… |
| 18-7891 |
Leslie Ann Haymond v. Helmand Investment, LLC |
Virginia |
2019-02-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure due-process equal-protection jurisdiction parrish-v-federal-nat-mortg-association pro-se-litigation standing stare-decisis subject-matter-jurisdiction unlawful-detainer |
Did the Court error when disregarding the maxim of stare decisis et non quieta movere: "to stand by decisions and not disturb the undisturbed." when t… |
| 18-7773 |
Jose Jorge Espinoza-Mendoza v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-02-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
alien-smuggling appellate-review criminal-appeal criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit-review guidelines-interpretation immigration risk-assessment sentencing-enhancement standard-of-review stare-decisis statutory-interpretation |
Petitioner, Jose Jorge Espinoza-Mendoza, pleaded guilty to, and was convicted of, the federal offense of conspiring to harbor undocumented aliens. The… |
| 18-7628 |
Anthony Brian Bevan v. Florida |
Florida |
2019-01-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment governmental-misconduct ineffective-counsel spoilage-of-evidence stare-decisis usc-242 |
Was the Petitioner denied Due Process, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause, and/or in violation of U.S.0 Code # 242. and/or in… |
| 18-7630 |
In Re William W. Frey |
|
2019-01-29 |
Denied |
IFP |
appeals-review civil-rights court-duty due-process fraud-upon-the-court judicial-fraud perjury procedural-misconduct standing stare-decisis tainted-testimony testimony-integrity |
1.) Can a conviction or civil judment stand on Tainted/Perjury Testimony?
Does the Court have a duty, too correct tainted testimony?
Does tainted te… |
| 18-977 |
John A. Anderson v. John F. Walrath, Warden |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-01-28 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-review certificate-of-appealability habeas-petition judicial-precedent judicial-proceedings stare-decisis supervisory-power supreme-court-rule supreme-court-rule-10(a) |
Where the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia concluded that reasonable jurists could disagree on the fundamental legal … |
| 18-7393 |
Rodrigo Roman v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-01-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review burden-of-proof criminal-procedure drug-offense due-process firearm-enhancement firearm-possession guidelines-interpretation sentencing-enhancement sentencing-guidelines sentencing-guidelines-enhancement stare-decisis |
Petitioner, RODRIGO ROMAN, appealed his ten-year statutory minimum sentence imposed after he pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to di… |
| 18-7185 |
Santos Orlando Diaz-Martinez v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2018-12-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
almendarez-torres-precedent constitutional-law criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-review precedent-reconsideration recidivism sentencing sentencing-enhancement stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent supreme-court-review |
Whether the Court should overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), which holds that a prior conviction that increases the maxi… |
| 18-7141 |
Luis Rey Gonzalez v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2018-12-21 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-analysis constitutional-law criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-review legal-precedent overruling precedent recidivism sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent |
Should this Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998)? |
| 18-7129 |
Brennan Christian, aka Twin, aka Trey v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2018-12-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
carpenter-precedent carpenter-v-united-states cell-phone-records cell-site-records circuit-split constitutional-rights district-court-discretion fourth-amendment fourth-circuit pro-se-petition stare-decisis |
Has the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals misapplied this Court's ruling in Carpenter v. United States (138 S.Ct. 2206, 2217, 2220 (2018)) regarding cel… |
| 18-747 |
Sonja Ritter v. Lois Brady, Chapter 7 Trustee |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-12-11 |
Denied |
Amici (4) |
bankruptcy-code bankruptcy-code-chapter-7 bankruptcy-trustee chapter-7 chapter-7-liquidation judicial-precedent lien-stripping lien-valuation secured-claims stare-decisis statutory-interpretation unsecured-claims |
The question presented is whether Dewsnup v. Timm , 502 U.S. 410 (1992), should be overruled . |
| 18-6969 |
Brandon Bivins v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-12-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeal appellate-procedure constitutional-rights due-process eleventh-circuit judicial-review prior-panel-precedent prior-panel-precedent-rule stare-decisis statutory-right statutory-right-to-appeal three-judge-panels |
Does the Eleventh Circuit too rigidly apply its "prior panel precedent rule" —
effectively denying Eleventh Circuit defendants their statutory right t… |
| 18-6566 |
Jara Meotta Ishon Flowers v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2018-11-06 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response WaivedIFP |
bribery case-overturning civil-rights criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process extortion judicial-discretion judicial-review legal-precedent precedent racketeering stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent |
In Ocasio v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 1423 (2016), separate opinions by Justice Thomas and Justice Breyer questioned whether Euans v. United States, … |
| 18-460 |
Walter Daniel, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Rebekah Daniel v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-10-11 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (7) |
federal-tort-claims-act feres-doctrine medical-malpractice military-discipline military-exigencies service-member service-members stare-decisis statutory-interpretation |
In Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135 (1950), and its companion medical malpractice cases, Jefferson v. United States, and United States v. Griggs, … |
| 18-6121 |
Benjamin Vega-Garcia, aka Carlos Moreno Molina v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2018-09-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
certiorari-standard constitutional-interpretation criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-precedent precedent precedent-overruling recidivism sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court supreme-court-review |
Whether the Court should overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), which holds that a prior conviction qualifying an enhanced … |
| 18-6100 |
Hugo Pliego-Hernandez v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
2018-09-25 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-16 administrative-law attempted-robbery circuit-court-review criminal-law criminal-sentencing due-process federal-jurisdiction guideline-commentary sentencing-guidelines seventh-circuit stare-decisis statutory-interpretation stinson-v-united-states |
The district court enhanced Pliego-Hernandez' sentencing guideline range on the strength of a prior conviction for attempted robbery. Nothing in the t… |
| 18-6099 |
In Re Terry Margheim |
|
2018-09-25 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2255 due-process judicial-administration judicial-integrity judicial-process stare-decisis supervisory-authority |
When the courts below violate due process by denying a meaningful opportunity to be heard in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding, will the United States Sup… |
| 18-5924 |
Evangelisto Ramos v. Louisiana |
Louisiana |
2018-09-11 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (12)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (8)IFP |
14th-amendment 6th-amendment constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment incorporation incorporation-doctrine racial-discrimination sixth-amendment stare-decisis unanimous-jury unanimous-verdict |
Whether the Fourteenth Amendment fully incorporates the Sixth Amendment guarantee of a unanimous verdict? |
| 18-5448 |
Ellen Elizabeth Packenham Stanley v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security |
Eighth Circuit |
2018-08-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
42-usc-405(h) administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process jurisdiction pro-se pro-se-appellant social-security-administration standing stare-decisis tort tort-claim venue venue-jurisdiction |
Is the U.S. Federal District Court of Minnesota the appropriate venue and jurisdiction to present an Appeal for a suit Sounding in Tort against the So… |
| 18-152 |
Gregory Garmong v. Supreme Court of Nevada, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-08-06 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
42-usc-1983 civil-rights civil-rights-complaint due-process exxon-mobil-precedent exxon-mobil-v-saudi-basic federal-jurisdiction judicial-review ninth-circuit rooker-feldman rooker-feldman-doctrine section-1983-complaint standing stare-decisis state-court-judgments |
Whether the Ninth Circuit may ignore and refuse to follow this Court's precedent in application of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, which requires that th… |
| 18-5404 |
Craig Cooper v. Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, et al. |
California |
2018-07-31 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process habeas-corpus heck-v-humphrey stare-decisis |
(1.) UNDER ThE DOCtRINE Of STARE dECISS All TRIbUNAl EXERCISINg
iNFERIOR juRiSdiCTiON ARE REQUIiREd tO fOLlOW dECISION of
COURTS EXERCISINg SUpERIOR j… |
| 18-5328 |
Muffin Anderson v. Susan A. Larsen |
Washington |
2018-07-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
americans-with-disabilities-act civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process fair-hearing jury-trial mental-capacity mental-disability physical-capacity procedural-fairness stare-decisis summary-judgment |
If a significant question of law under the constitution of the state of Washington or of the United States is involved.
Did the trial court violate t… |
| 18-5243 |
Curumulathu Jacob v. Virginia |
Virginia |
2018-07-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment jurisdiction notice-clause sixth-amendment stare-decisis void-ab-initio |
Can a state maintain a judgment which was entered absent jurisdiction under its own stare decisis ruling and which is a violation of the Sixth Amendme… |
| 24A414 |
Frederick Foster v. Joel H. Slomsky, et al. |
Third Circuit |
|
Denied |
|
en-banc-review federal-procedural-law legal-precedent postal-service sovereign-immunity stare-decisis |
"Whether, in accordance with the doctrine of "stare decisis", the Panel upon which review is sought is required to adhere to the binding precedents ma… |