| 24A153 |
Arthur Lopez v. Superior Court of California, Orange County, et al. |
California |
2024-08-08 |
Presumed Complete |
|
appellate-review california-courts final-judgment habeas-corpus petition-for-review supreme-court |
Question not identified. |
| 24A127 |
Arthur Lopez v. Perla Elias |
California |
2024-08-05 |
Presumed Complete |
|
appellate-jurisdiction final-judgment judicial-finality petition-for-review state-court-procedure supreme-court-review |
Question not identified. |
| 23-7816 |
In Re William H. Wright, Jr. |
|
2024-06-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure constitutional-provisions due-process emergency-motion jurisdiction jurisdictional-review petition-for-review standing |
In the cost of appeal erred for failure to grant Wright's emergency motion for certificate of appealability for. Because lack of jurisdiction |
| 23-1270 |
Pierre Yassue Nashun Riley v. Pamela Bondi, Attorney General |
Fourth Circuit |
2024-06-04 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (13)Relisted (2) |
board-of-immigration-appeals convention-against-torture immigration-law jurisdictional-deadline petition-for-review removal-proceedings |
Petitioner Pierre Riley, ineligible for cancellation of removal or discretionary relief from removal, sought deferral in withholding-only proceedings,… |
| 23A940 |
Norma Ortiz Fernandez v. La Clinica |
California |
2024-04-19 |
Presumed Complete |
|
appellate-review due-process legal-extension miscarriage-of-justice petition-for-review pro-per |
Question not identified. |
| 23-1059 |
Peter Williams v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2024-03-27 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-petition administrative-procedure administrative-procedure-act clean-air-act due-process environmental-protection-agency epa-action petition-for-review standing statutory-interpretation timeliness |
1. Whether Williams could have petitioned for review using non-record rebuttal evidence within 60 days of EPA's initial action.
2. Whether the Act re… |
| 23A681 |
Arthur Lopez v. MUFG Holding Corporation, et al. |
California |
2024-01-24 |
Presumed Complete |
|
appellate-procedure court-filing forma-pauperis jurisdictional-challenge petition-for-review pro-se |
Question not identified. |
| 23-6168 |
Samreen Riaz v. Superior Court of California, Tulare County, et al. |
California |
2023-12-06 |
Denied |
IFP |
abuse-of-discretion civil-rights court-procedure due-process judicial-bias judicial-disqualification judicial-misconduct petition-for-review public-trust recusal standing |
.Did the Supreme Court of California (S281800)deniai of petition of review
on Sept 27 23 ieft an existence of an unresolved conflict legal issue) in
… |
| 23-6125 |
Walter Lancaster v. Beats Electronics LLC, et al. |
California |
2023-11-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
14th-amendment civil-rights due-process fraud-on-court fraud-on-the-court miscarriage-of-justice petition-for-review stare-decisis |
With herein evidenced incompetence that cannot be ascribed to any agency view or expertise coupled with Fraud on the Court in collusion spanning from … |
| 23-5854 |
In Re Terrance A. McCauley |
|
2023-10-20 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights color-of-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection free-speech judicial-review petition-for-review sovereign-immunity standing |
Whales The _pdquedt oF comndiion aggd Tecconce. N ao.
So . DMCarhey, wren, sengosedd \purdens oF Dre Shake a
won URSConsiA, UREN @ ciraen oF Ye Nooa… |
| 21-7372 |
Aaron Abadi v. Department of Transportation |
Second Circuit |
2022-03-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-procedure-act agency-action agency-discretion discrimination-laws failure-to-act judicial-review mandamus petition-for-review standing unreasonable-withholding |
1) The 2nd and DC Circuits refuse to accept a petition for review for a
failure to act. They will only accept it as a writ of mandamus,
treating it as… |
| 21-1115 |
In Re Wanda Bowling |
|
2022-02-11 |
Denied |
|
abuse-of-discretion appellate-court appellate-procedure civil-procedure court-mandate due-process fifth-circuit judicial-review jurisdiction mandamus petition-for-review |
Is the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal's deliberate refusal to adjudicate appealed issues, willfully denying a second request, a failure to execute its … |
| 21-425 |
Riccardo Green v. Washington State Employment Security Department |
Washington |
2021-09-21 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection motion-for-reconsideration petition-for-review sanctions state-supreme-court us-constitution washington-state-constitution |
1. Whether or not the Washington State Supreme Court erred in judgement & abused discretion when it failed/refused to grant the Petition for Review un… |
| 20-8095 |
Pasqual Lozano v. Robert Legrand, Warden, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-05-20 |
Denied |
IFP |
confrontation-clause due-process fair-trial federal-prisoners habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel ninth-circuit petition-for-review prosecutorial-misconduct sentencing |
Question not identified. |
| 20-7298 |
Andrew Watson Bunn v. Wisconsin |
Wisconsin |
2021-03-02 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review capital-case civil-procedure constitutional-law constitutional-provisions due-process judicial-procedure jurisdiction legal-jurisdiction petition-for-review right-to-appeal standing |
Whether a right to appeal is preserved when the questions presented remain unanswered. |
| 20-458 |
Michael B. Brown v. Department of Labor |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-10-08 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
administrative-law civil-procedure deposition-modification evidence factual-finding federal-rules-of-civil-procedure petition-for-review regulatory-compliance sarbanes-oxley whistleblower-protection |
Whether a judge's change of a party's transcribed deposition is an appropriate factual finding, conclusion, and decision defined by Sarbanes-Oxley's 2… |
| 20-5863 |
Andrew Newson v. Wisconsin |
Wisconsin |
2020-10-01 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure court-procedure due-process equal-protection mailing-error parental-rights petition-for-review statutory-interpretation termination-of-parental-rights timeliness |
Question not identified. |
| 20-5803 |
Raymond Brown v. Pennsylvania |
Pennsylvania |
2020-09-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection federalism fourteenth-amendment petition-for-review standing state-court supreme-court-rules |
Did the State Courts of Pennsylvania violate petitioner's due process under the United States Constitution where they quash Petitioner's appeal? |
| 18-7446 |
Anthony Jujuan Hopkins v. Warden, Ventress Correctional Facility |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-01-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment 6th-amendment appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-challenge court-interpretation criminal-procedure due-process jurisdiction legal-proceeding ninth-circuit petition-for-review sentencing standing |
I.
IS THE UNitEd dTATES ApPEALy COURt FOR THE EleVENth CiRCUit iN
ERROR, beCAUSE it DENIES PETITiONERg C.O.A, WhEN PETiTIONERS
CLAiMg ARE JURiSSICTION… |