I.
IS THE UNitEd dTATES ApPEALy COURt FOR THE EleVENth CiRCUit iN
ERROR, beCAUSE it DENIES PETITiONERg C.O.A, WhEN PETiTIONERS
CLAiMg ARE JURiSSICTIONAL ISSUES thAT CAN tAKE JURiSDICTIONAL
NoTice At Any time, Which MeaNg thAt PetitioNeRs SENtEncez
ARE illEgAl Sue to the JuRisdictiONAl ISSues hAViNg No
JuRizdictiON to ReNdeR thE ConvictiON dnd impose the
SENteNCE?

I. I& THE U.S. APPEAIS COURt FOR THE ElEVENth CiRCUit isS ERROR,
because it Deried PetitioNers C.O.A, Wher PEtitioNers ClAimg
WAg NeveR insdependestly And Jusicially Reviewed by Any of The
OF THE RESpONSE FROM THE LOWER COURTS , WhO'S CLAiMS shOW
A SERiOOS QUESTiON OF U.2. SONSTiTUTiONAL LAW?

I. IS THE U.3. APPEAIS COURT FOR THE EleVENth liRCUiT Is ERROR.
beCAUe it DENiEd PEtitiONERS C.O.A, WheN PEtiTIONER WAS
deNied the OPPORtONity to RESpoNd ANd WAS ClEARly dENiES AN
EridertiaRy HEARing Which is in CoNflict With U.S. LoNgtitotiONAL
LAW?

N
Is THE U.S. APpEAIS LOURT FOR THE ElEVENth CiRCUiT ir CEROR, beCAUSE
it DENIEd PETiTiONERS C.O.A : WhEN PETiTiONER WAS DENIES HIS
Lixth AmeNdmeNt RighT to Effective CouNsel BuaRANtEed by THE
CONSTITUTION OF THE U.S.LAW?

I. I THE U.2. APPEAIS COURT FOR THE EleVENSTh CiRCUiiN ERROR, bECAUSE
it DENIES PEtiFiONERS C.O.A, WhEN PETiTiONER WA DENIEd HiS
LiXth AmeNdMeNt, RighT to A FAiR TRiAl by AN ImpARTiAl JURY
GUARANTEES bY THE CONSTitUtiON OF U.S. FeDeRAl LAW?

A
i+ DeNES PETiTiONER C.O.A, WheN PetiTiONER WA DENiE Hig
FOURtEENth (14

Whether the U.S. Appeals Court for the Eleventh Circuit erred in denying petitioners' COA, when petitioners raise jurisdictional issues that can be raised at any time, resulting in illegal sentences