| 25-5768 |
Lorene Chittenden v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2025-09-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
court-interpretation fourth-circuit intervening-change legal-deadline restitution-statute timely-appeal |
In People v. Weeks 498 P. 142, 2021 CO 75, the court interpreted the restitution statute, 18-1.3-603, C.R.S. (2021). The court concluded that the rest… |
| 24-6054 |
Joshua Matthew Stockton v. Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2024-12-02 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review civil-procedure court-interpretation legal-standards procedural-challenge supreme-court |
Question not identified. |
| 23-1319 |
B. B. v. Florida Department of Children and Families, et al. |
Florida |
2024-06-18 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights constitutional-challenge court-interpretation due-process fourteenth-amendment standing statutory-interpretation supremacy-clause |
1. Whether Florida courts are refusing to consider that their interpretation of Statute § 39.8155 is unconstitutional as- applied when it contradicts … |
| 23-7405 |
In Re Patrick Christian |
|
2024-05-07 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights civil-rights-conspiracy completed-sentence court-interpretation double-jeopardy legal-precedent lower-court-errors probation recidivism retroactive-punishment sentencing |
1. In the eyes of the Court when is Punishment Retroactive?
2. Is the Legal Definition of Double Jeopardy described here?
3. In considering the reco… |
| 23-5837 |
Spencer Wallace v. Bobbi Jo Salamon, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Rockview, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2023-10-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-rights court-interpretation due-process francis-v-franklin judicial-review jury-instructions legal-precedent precedent statutory-provisions trial-court-instructions |
DID THE LOWER COURT ERR WHEN IT HELD THAT THE TRIAL COURT INSTRUCTION
DID NOT VIOLATE WALLACE'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS?
DID THE LOWER C… |
| 23-5142 |
Joseph Counts v. Maine |
First Circuit |
2023-07-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (3)IFP |
appeals appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights court-interpretation due-process judicial-discretion legal-procedure procedural-rules standing stare-decisis |
1. Where 28Use 1455 is
is ambiguoos, what is the
proper or best way for
the lower courts to
handle the
penumbra of filings
in order to
achieve
the mos… |
| 21-1320 |
Robert Campo, et al. v. Department of Justice, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2022-04-04 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
constitutional-precedent court-interpretation evidence-rules federal-rules-of-evidence federal-rules-of-procedure freedom-of-information-act judicial-discretion judicial-review procedural-rules supreme-court-precedent u.s-constitution |
Whether, in adjudications under the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), federal judges are free to flout and knowingly violate FOIA, federal rules of… |
| 21-5436 |
William D. Dickerson v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
2021-08-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-analysis civil-rights conspiracy constitutional-review court-interpretation criminal-procedure due-process judicial-standard legal-procedure procedural-error sentencing statutory-interpretation |
The OCR text provided is too degraded and illegible to accurately extract the "Question(s) Presented" section. While a "QUESTION(S) PRESENTED" header … |
| 20-7455 |
Jeromey Glenn Jones v. Montana |
Montana |
2021-03-15 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-assistance court-interpretation criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review legal-protection procedural-due-process right-to-counsel right-to-participate sixth-amendment statutory-provisions |
Question not identified. |
| 19-8812 |
Alfonso Pineda-Hernandez v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
2020-06-25 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-question constitutional-rights court-interpretation criminal-procedure defendant-rights due-process fair-trial interpretation translation translation-rights |
Under what circumstances does a live, in-court translation violate a criminal defendant's due process rights? |
| 19-924 |
Indiana v. Ernesto Ruiz |
Indiana |
2020-01-23 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
7th-circuit court-interpretation custodial-interrogation interview-context miranda-rights miranda-v-arizona police-station security-features station-layout |
When analyzing whether a station-house interview is a custodial interrogation under Miranda, do the ordinary security features and layout of a police … |
| 18-7446 |
Anthony Jujuan Hopkins v. Warden, Ventress Correctional Facility |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-01-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment 6th-amendment appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-challenge court-interpretation criminal-procedure due-process jurisdiction legal-proceeding ninth-circuit petition-for-review sentencing standing |
I.
IS THE UNitEd dTATES ApPEALy COURt FOR THE EleVENth CiRCUit iN
ERROR, beCAUSE it DENIES PETITiONERg C.O.A, WhEN PETiTIONERS
CLAiMg ARE JURiSSICTION… |
| 18-7364 |
Brandon M. Chambers v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-01-10 |
Denied |
IFP |
court-interpretation grammar grammatical-construction judicial-deference judicial-discretion legislative-intent punctuation state-court statutory-analysis statutory-construction statutory-interpretation |
That responsibility/power does a State District court have in interpreting a provision of a statute, and when interpreting a statute to determine legi… |
| 18-213 |
H. Richard Austin v. Hanover Insurance Company, aka Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company |
Eighth Circuit |
2018-08-17 |
Denied |
|
appellate-procedure circuit-split civil-procedure collateral-estoppel court-interpretation daubert daubert-standard en-banc-review fraud-on-court fraud-on-the-court homeowners-insurance judicial-interpretation judicial-procedure motion-for-summary-judgment res-judicata sanctions summary-order |
1)111 the federal court system, is an initial, appellate "Summary Order" (without en banc review) the definitive source regarding the subject matter c… |