| 25A449 |
Kerry E. Silvers v. Indiana |
Indiana |
2025-10-17 |
Presumed Complete |
|
appellate-procedure criminal-procedure indiana-supreme-court legal-standards post-conviction-relief retroactive-law |
Question not identified. |
| 24-7485 |
Christopher Langdon v. Sun Lake Multi-Family Holdings, LLC, et al. |
Florida |
2025-06-25 |
Denied |
IFP |
court-procedure due-process equal-protection judicial-access legal-standards pro-se-litigation |
(1) Do the courts in Florida deny: due process of law; equal protection under the law; and meaningful access to the courts, to pro se, non-prisoner, l… |
| 24-7484 |
Christopher Langdon v. Sun Lake Multi-Family Holdings, LLC, et al. |
Florida |
2025-06-25 |
Denied |
IFP |
court-access due-process equal-protection judicial-procedure legal-standards pro-se-litigation |
(1) Do the courts in Florida deny: due process of law; equal protection under the law; and meaningful access to the courts;- to pro se, non-prisoner, … |
| 24-6819 |
Kenneth Daywitt, et al. v. Jodi Harpstead, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Human Services, in her Individual and Official Capacity, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2025-03-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-rights court-standards first-amendment free-speech judicial-duty legal-standards |
Should Court Specifically Address Whether Access to Internet and Technology-Based Speech Must Extend First Amendment Protection?
Do federal courts ha… |
| 24-6054 |
Joshua Matthew Stockton v. Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2024-12-02 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review civil-procedure court-interpretation legal-standards procedural-challenge supreme-court |
Question not identified. |
| 24A263 |
Marquice D. Robinson v. Michael Holman, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2024-09-13 |
Presumed Complete |
|
circuit-split court-of-appeals federal-jurisdiction legal-standards supervisory-power writ-of-certiorari |
The first question is whether The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals (The Eleventh Circuit) erred in holding in conflict with The Ninth Circuit Court o… |
| 24-5253 |
Rafael Arden Jones v. Ned McCormack |
Second Circuit |
2024-08-07 |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-law appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-interpretation legal-standards municipal-association |
Question not identified. |
| 24-5094 |
Kenyatta Quinn Mitchell v. Paul Bennett, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-07-16 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
11th-amendment 42-usc-1983 circuit-court-review civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process heck-v-humphrey judicial-discretion legal-standards plra procedural-due-process state-law statutory-interpretation |
Did the Ninth Circuit and Fifth District Court apply all necessary and properly applicable elements to the petitioner's 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 claim?
… |
| 23-7642 |
John A. Beatty v. Jay Forshey, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2024-06-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
case-law criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review legal-standards precedent precedent-validity standing statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent |
1. Is McCarthy V United States, 394 U.S. 459(1969); Ex Parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2(1866); Greenholtz V Nebraska Penal Inmates, 442 U.S. 1 (1979); Oregon… |
| 23-7640 |
Devin Fischer v. North Dakota |
North Dakota |
2024-06-05 |
Denied |
IFP |
abuse-of-discretion constitutional-rights criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process due-process-clause fair-trial guilty-plea judicial-discretion legal-standards |
Is a defendant denied due process when the court ignores legal standards and relies solely on their discretion?
Does the defendant suffer double jeop… |
| 23-6948 |
Erick Wanjiku v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
2024-03-11 |
Denied |
IFP |
14th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure due-process evidence judicial-bias jurisdiction legal-standards state-court vagueness-doctrine |
peKWcwv) pqpse U*cl&r Uk?er4 i'w-k^pre^fi o<^S
LrVrcj<=tVe5
W OtovJ' ot U)v4+ ^of VUW:> V- Ker^iev; 404 U*s 513 (b7^)
+U16 fW'Ko.o +Ui5 (WV Vo Chfevoh… |
| 23-6606 |
In Re Jose Alonso Jimenez |
|
2024-01-29 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
article-iii civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection judicial-interpretation jurisdictional-issue juvenile-justice legal-standards sentencing statutory-construction statutory-interpretation |
I.HOW DOES-ONE NOT HAVE A CONSTITUTIONAL
SAME FREEDOMS AS A JUVENILE WHOSE STANDARDS
-ULTS ARE LESS IN THIS GREAT COUNTRY?RIGHT TO THE
FOR ADII.WHE… |
| 23-6457 |
Peter Grigg v. Barbara Benson |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-01-11 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights constitutional-violations due-process equal-protection judicial-procedure jurisdiction legal-standards standing |
VIOLATIONS OF US CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
VIOLATIONS OF CIVIL RIGHTS
VIOLATIONS OF US COURTS JUDICIAL CANONS
VIOLATIONS OF MONTANA CODE ANNOTATED
VIO… |
| 23-563 |
Obaida Abdulky, et al., as Parents and Next Friends of Anthony Abdulky v. Lubin & Meyer, P.C., et al. |
Massachusetts |
2023-11-27 |
Denied |
|
appellate-procedure civil-procedure constitutional-law constitutional-rights due-process evidence judicial-review legal-standards notice procedural-fairness |
1. Whether by failing to allow the Petitioners an opportunity to present evidence under the new legal standards created at the appellate level, the Ap… |
| 23A456 |
Leslie Willis v. PNC Financial Services Group Inc., et al. |
Third Circuit |
2023-11-21 |
Presumed Complete |
|
certiorari jurisdiction legal-standards mandamus pro-se time-extension |
Whether the Third Circuit erred in dismissing Petitioner's appeal on jurisdictional grounds without addressing the merits of Petitioner's claims regar… |
| 23-5745 |
Zephryn (Stephanie) Hammond v. University of Vermont Medical Center |
Vermont |
2023-10-10 |
Denied |
IFP |
burden-of-proof burden-shifting employment-discrimination legal-standards mcdonnell-douglas-framework protected-characteristics retaliation retaliation-claim summary-judgment |
1. Under organizational policy when an employee makes a complaint to anyone in a position of authority in regard to a protected characteristic, should… |
| 23-181 |
Patricia L. Harrison v. South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2023-08-25 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure dismissal district-court-discretion federal-court-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure legal-standards rule-11-sanctions sanctions settlement sua-sponte-sanctions |
1. Did the district court abuse its discretion by sanctioning Petitioner sua sponte pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 11 after settlem… |
| 23-176 |
Robert Cox, et al. v. Helena Chemical Company |
Texas |
2023-08-25 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
due-process evidence evidence-exclusion expert-testimony fourteenth-amendment legal-standards property-rights state-court |
1. Whether the Due Process Clause prohibits a state court from depriving petitioners of property protected by the Fourteenth Amendment without allowin… |
| 23-5217 |
Kinley MacDonald v. Maine |
Maine |
2023-07-26 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
bail-bond-conditions child-protective-custody constitutional-rights criminal-procedure custody due-process family-reunification hearsay judicial-review legal-standards state-statute |
Question not identified. |
| 23-5052 |
Richie A. Stokes, Jr. v. New York |
New York |
2023-07-06 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-rights court-dismissal criminal-procedure due-process evidence judicial-discretion jury-tampering legal-standards prosecutorial-misconduct speedy-trial |
Question not identified. |
| 23-15 |
Springboards to Education, Inc. v. IDEA Public Schools |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-07-05 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-review circuit-split civil-procedure consumer-confusion legal-standard legal-standards summary-judgment trademark-infringement |
1. Whether the legal reasoning used to evaluate the issue of trademark infringement was subjective, incomplete, and failed to address the record and t… |
| 22-7867 |
Nelson Alexander Polk v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-06-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
5th-amendment appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-review criminal-sentencing discovery due-process evidence free-speech judicial-procedure legal-standards |
Question not identified. |
| 22-7849 |
Jensen Ken Alexander v. Joseph Ely, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2023-06-22 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure damages due-process free-speech judicial-discretion legal-standards religious-claims standing state-court-review |
Question not identified. |
| 22-780 |
Scott Meide, et al. v. Noah Centineo, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-02-22 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-review brief-requirements civil-rights court-obligations due-process judicial-discretion judicial-independence judicial-procedure judicial-review legal-standards rule-of-law separation-of-powers |
1. Do we have a government of laws and not of men?
2. Must a deciding panel in a court of appeals address all of the issues raised in the opening bri… |
| 22-6760 |
David Lassegue v. United States, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2023-02-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeals case-law-analysis circuit-court-interpretation civil-procedure civil-rights due-process judicial-review legal-standards precedent procedural-rights standing third-circuit-precedent |
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Violated Lassegue's rights when it ignored this: Courts precedent in Kwai Funwong V. Beebe 752… |
| 22-6696 |
Rudy Garcia v. Texas |
Texas |
2023-02-03 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-rights criminal-appeals due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-standards precedent prosecutorial-misconduct supreme-court-precedent trial-counsel |
Question 1:
Xnlroducbi Q A *.Ike. lex.es Couri of Crlm'tr\a.l
disbarrad Prasad^cr,- Ralph Padly s undisclosed
Iona! m 'l scon duck RalidP in 4bai Ka… |
| 22-218 |
Steven Christopher Knapp v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2022-09-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-procedure complaint-dismissal due-process judicial-bias judicial-impartiality judicial-misconduct legal-standards rule-8 standing |
1) Does a judge of the United States have an unqualified, absolute right to nullify a complaint under Rule 8 based on length alone?
2) Did the Distri… |
| 22-5375 |
Nathaniel Waugh v. A. Ralph, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-08-17 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-principles court-procedure due-process evidence-application judicial-review legal-standards miscarriage-of-justice standing |
Court proceeded (l auordt^ -}o Justice" Or deprived p^frfioner o-f0) whiMitr lower
'■S^Ws-farrtW rights?
CX) k ^editr
Congress J * ^ o4^ [auf Conducte… |
| 22-5171 |
Rebekah Werth v. Stuart Police Department, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-07-25 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-justice civil-rights court-procedure due-process equal-access in-forma-pauperis indigent-plaintiff legal-standards pro-se standing sua-sponte-dismissal |
1. Do the sua sponte dismissals by the lower courts under the in forma pauperis statute 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e) (2) (B), in which the reviewing court mer… |
| 22-5056 |
Rosa Serrano v. United States District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-07-08 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
appellate-review case-dismissal civil-procedure court-record disclosure due-process first-amendment judicial-procedure legal-standards procedural-dismissal public-records standing |
Question not identified. |
| 22-5014 |
Willie Johnson v. Bryan P. Stirling, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2022-07-01 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
case-law civil-rights constitution constitutional-interpretation dismissal district-court due-process election federal-courts judicial-procedure legal-standards standing |
ud A
DisErict of Socoth
The
Distrnt Coyst dshe
t
uManibest 9 bobelle Disoeserd ofthe/ews
Exrol1ny
Bx Setern8 9 Mobios for BeliNsex, nssban bo
Wis MEsi… |
| 21-7947 |
Cedric Greene v. Harbor Police, et al. |
California |
2022-05-24 |
Denied |
IFP |
amendment-interpretation case-records civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-violation due-process judicial-immunity legal-standards punitive-damages rights-protection standing vexatious-litigant |
To thee attention of how things are meant to be governed. When a series of Judicial standards known as judges speak for the blind scale of justice. Wh… |
| 21-6764 |
In Re Eric Denorris Kennedy |
|
2022-01-05 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review brady-rule civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jurisdictional-issues legal-standards procedural-rights standing |
Question not identified. |
| 21-6515 |
Chadd A. Morris v. Jerry Worley, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2021-12-03 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
4th-amendment case-dismissal civil-procedure civil-rights court-recusal due-process judicial-misconduct legal-standards precedential-law procedural-error property-rights standing |
Question not identified. |
| 21-55 |
Genet McCann v. Ward E. Taleff, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-07-15 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights court-integrity due-process fraud judicial-integrity judicial-misconduct legal-standards ninth-circuit rule-11 rule-of-law standing vexatious-litigant |
1. Whether the Ninth Circuit 's departure from "the settled course of
antecedent principles " in disregard of this Court 's and its own well-establis… |
| 20-1710 |
Zafar Bakhramovich Yadigarov v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-06-11 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
abuse-of-writ appellate-procedure coram-nobis delay due-process judicial-discretion legal-diligence legal-standards procedural-standard sound-reasons writ-of-error |
As petitions for writs of error corum nobis are not subject to any formal deadlines nor any statutes of limitations, the nation's courts generally den… |
| 20-7046 |
Paul A. Bilzerian v. Securities Exchange Commission |
District of Columbia |
2021-02-04 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
change-in-circumstances civil-procedure court-access equitable-relief judicial-discretion legal-standards motion-to-terminate permanent-injunction rule-65 standing |
1. Whether a district court has the discretion to deny an unopposed motion to terminate a 20-year-old permanent injunction prohibiting access to any s… |
| 20-822 |
Solon Phillips v. Maryland Board of Law Examiners, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2020-12-17 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
bar-admission character-and-fitness character-fitness-test constitutional-vagueness due-process legal-standards moral-character opportunity-to-be-heard unexplained-delay vagueness |
(1) Is the Maryland character fitness test unconstitutionally vague
because it leaves the triers of fact free to decide, without any legally
fixed sta… |
| 20-5745 |
Bradley William Monical v. Christina Towers, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-09-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process government-employees governmental-powers judicial-review legal-standards park-county-orders qualified-immunity statutory-provisions |
Question not identified. |
| 20-5369 |
Don Farmer v. Bernard Booker, Warden |
Fourth Circuit |
2020-08-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
confrontation-clause court-procedure crawford-vs-washington due-process evidence-testimonial ineffective-assistance legal-standards professional-norms sixth-amendment testimonial-evidence verbal-testimony witness-testimony |
1.) Whether the evidence supplied through verbal testimony of a witness is considered testimonial (where statements must be functionally identical to … |
| 20-5014 |
Darwin Josue Peralta v. North Carolina |
North Carolina |
2020-07-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review civil-rights criminal-procedure cross-examination due-process evidence jury-instructions legal-standards right-to-present-defense standard-of-review |
Whether the trial Court Violated Mr.Peralta Statutory and Constitutional Rights by Relying on Dr. Beth Hers sexual Abuse Finding because she based Her… |
| 19-8584 |
Christopher Raynard Kidd v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-06-02 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-defense due-process evidence-review ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-representation legal-standards prejudice sixth-amendment strickland-v-washington trial-counsel |
Whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to review all the evidence with Mr. Kidd prior to trial? |
| 19-1202 |
Thomas Taffe, et al. v. First National Bank of Alaska |
Alaska |
2020-04-08 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process jury-trial legal-standards pro-se pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigants standing summary-judgment systemic-bias |
Did a systemic bias against pro se litigants lead to the unconstitutional denial of Petitioners' right to a jury trial in this case?
Did the summary … |
| 19-1197 |
GwanJun Kim v. City of Ionia, Michigan, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2020-04-04 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
aiding-and-abetting civil-procedure collateral-review exclusive-possession false-claims-act federal-cause-of-action legal-standards pleading-standards retroactivity rule-9b section-10b securities-fraud |
In this case THE PETITION for that "a United States court of appeals has entered a decision in conflict with the decision of' "Complaint in this actio… |
| 19-7875 |
Byron Gay v. Scott Daffenbach, Warden, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2020-03-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure court-procedure dna-testing evidence evidentiary-rules judicial-admission judicial-admissions legal-standards scientific-evidence standards |
1. THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT HAS NOT ESTABLISHED
IN THE FEDERAL COURTS OR THE STATE COURTS ANY CASE
LAW INSTRUCTING JUDGES THAT THEY MUST EMPH… |
| 19-7871 |
In Re Antonio Damarcus Woodson |
|
2020-03-04 |
Dismissed |
IFP |
access-to-courts appellate-review civil-procedure civil-procedure-jurisdiction civil-procedure-standing-jurisdiction-federal-rule civil-rights district-court due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure final-judgment jurisdiction legal-standards procedural-due-process retroactive-law standing |
WHETHER OR NOT THE JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS UNDER ZBUSCS
Z284)U, 2D72 (FEROUP.-7))C), 8CA), 9CO)-) THE PLANTIFFHAD A RIGHT
HANE
TBOTHE AETIONS F A … |
| 19-7511 |
Frank Deville, et ux. v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, et al. |
California |
2020-01-31 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure concealing-material-facts conflict-of-law constitutional-rights due-process federal-law fraud-particularity hearsay-evidence judicial-procedure legal-standards liberal-amendment material-facts standing |
iaSSEsSsSHSSSt
iS thaUegal?^ ^ there should be liberal ability to amend (Roland v.
Christian, 69 Cal. 2d 108, 112) . ■ ,not what we believe it to be. … |
| 19-6737 |
Leonard L. Little, Jr. v. Florida |
Florida |
2019-11-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
4th-amendment appellate-review carpenter-v-united-states constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure due-process evidence federal-law fourth-amendment-search-and-seizure jurisdiction legal-standards privacy search-and-seizure sixth-amendment-confrontation-clause standing supreme-court-precedent |
I. Petitioner asks did the Second District Court of Appeal apply federal law issued by the
United States Supreme Court in a way that frustrates and u… |
| 19-6102 |
Roosevelt Brian Moore v. Debbie Asuncion, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-10-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-challenge court-review due-process graham-v-florida habeas-corpus juvenile-offenders legal-standards prisoner-rights resentencing sentencing sentencing-procedure standing state-court-decision |
GRANTED PETITSONER A CERTI FICATE of APPEAlAbIty PORSUANT TO MILlER -EL V.COCKER, 537 U.S.3a2 ON. QUESTIONS OF HIS THE U.S. CONSTITUIONAl RIGHTS? PERT… |
| 19-306 |
Cushman & Wakefield, Inc. v. Yury Rinsky |
First Circuit |
2019-09-05 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure diversity-jurisdiction erie-doctrine federal-courts legal-standards punitive-damages standard-of-proof state-courts state-law state-law-certification subject-matter-jurisdiction |
This diversity case involves state-law claims of age discrimination in employment. Petitioner disputed the applicability of the New York City Human Ri… |
| 19-5442 |
Shanta G. Phillips-Berry v. Kenner Police Department, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-08-06 |
Denied |
IFP |
abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-due-process due-process evidentiary-requirements fair-trial judicial-discretion jury jury-trial legal-standards standing trial-procedure |
1. What if district court abused its discretion by not relying on the erroneous legal premise that a citizen(s) of the state of Louisiana and this gre… |
| 19-2 |
Jackie Hosang Lawson v. FMR LLC, dba Fidelity Investments, et al. |
First Circuit |
2019-06-28 |
Denied |
|
attorney-fees civil-procedure civil-rights due-process expert-witness-testimony federal-securities-law federal-securities-laws fraud fraud-allegations jury-instruction jury-instructions legal-standards sarbanes-oxley-act securities |
Is the jury verdict just and proper on the two deciding questions whether "Fidelity's conduct could constitute violation of Federal law relating to fr… |
| 18-9401 |
Daniel H. Jones v. Kentucky, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-05-23 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
abuse-of-discretion appellate-jurisdiction appellate-review civil-procedure clearly-erroneous-findings injunctive-relief judicial-discretion jurisdictional-review legal-standards procedural-error sovereign-immunity wrong-legal-standards |
DID THE U.S. SIXTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERR IN ALLOWING THE [U.S.] DISTRICT COURT TO ABUSE ITS DISCRETION WHEN RELYING ON CLEARLY ERRONEOUS FINDIN… |
| 18-9384 |
In Re Freya Pearson |
|
2019-05-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus ineffective-counsel legal-standards mandamus pro-se standing takings writ-of-relief |
1. Whether the Petitioner's Direct Appeal, warrants the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to compel action by the Court.
2. Whether the Petitioner shoul… |
| 18-8589 |
Demetrius S. Rankin v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-03-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
anders-brief appellate-procedure appellate-review circuit-split constitutional-law court-appointed-counsel criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit ineffective-assistance legal-ethics legal-standards procedural-review right-to-counsel |
Whether the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals misapplied and ignored the procedural pronouncements made in Anders v. California, 386 US 738(1967)?
Wheth… |
| 18-7626 |
Gregory Haynes v. Illinois |
Illinois |
2019-01-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
burden-of-proof constitutional-rights due-process fair-trial legal-standards miscarriage-of-justice second-degree-murder self-defense trial-court-error |
Whether the Petitioner was denied his constitutional rights to due process and a fair trial when the trial court made multiple comments that reflected… |
| 18-7551 |
Joel Gomez v. Mary Berghuis, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-01-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law civil-procedure contract-formation contract-interpretation contract-law contract-validity due-process equal-protection legal-standards standing state-law statutory-interpretation |
DID THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ERR IN DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY? |
| 18-6643 |
Sobhy Fahmy Amin Iskander v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-11-08 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process judicial-competence judicial-discretion judicial-ethics judicial-independence judicial-interpretation judicial-review legal-standards rule-of-law state-court-decision |
Sobhy Iskander, a state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis r extraordinary circumstance moves this motion on a writ of certi- orari that a state co… |
| 18-6020 |
Stefan Rodgers v. Darrell Miller, Warden |
Fourth Circuit |
2018-09-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure consideration due-process fair-trial judicial-review legal-standards rule-10 standing supreme-court-procedure tribunal-fairness tribunals |
Each and every point is stated within the petition for writ of certiorari. Did each of the tribunals rule fairly within the Consideration of Rule 10 (… |
| 18-250 |
Tu Ying Chen v. Suffolk County Community College, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2018-08-28 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights court-judgment defendant-actions due-process evidence false-evidence judicial-procedure legal-review legal-standards misconduct plaintiff-claims standing wrongful-probation wrongful-termination |
Was there misconduct by and false evidence submitted by the Defendants?
Why were the facts provided by the Plaintiff not used in the court judgment? |
| 18-5737 |
Richard Delain Kyles v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2018-08-24 |
Denied |
IFP |
circuit-principle discretionary-rules due-process ex-post-facto judicial-review legal-standards parole parole-board-policy parole-eligibility parole-suitability retroactive-statute statutory-interpretation |
The Court of Appeals has adopted and applied a "Fifth Circuit Principle" that "changes in the discretionary. ules, affecting. parole suitability canno… |