No. 20-5014

Darwin Josue Peralta v. North Carolina

Lower Court: North Carolina
Docketed: 2020-07-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-rights criminal-procedure cross-examination due-process evidence jury-instructions legal-standards right-to-present-defense standard-of-review
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the trial Court Violated Mr.Peralta Statutory and Constitutional Rights by Relying on Dr. Beth Hers sexual Abuse Finding because she based Her Findings Solely on DSR's "Very Clear and Concise" Statements to Scott Snider.

Whether the Trial Court Erred and Violated Mr. Peralta's Constitutional rights to present a complete Defense When it Prohibited Him from Introducing DSR's Marital and Marriage Auxiliary Testimony that Nancy Rodriquez spoke about sex in front of the children, Including SR of the Children.

Whether the trial Court committed Plain error for not Issuing D. PAp Te s Ap in their opening brief

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the trial court erred and violated Mr. Pecoraro's rights to present a complete defense by prohibiting him from introducing Doris Murillo's and Nancy Rodriguez's statements about sex abuse allegations against DSR

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 10, 2020)

Attorneys

Darwin J. Peralta
Darwin Josue Peralta — Petitioner