No. 18-9401
Daniel H. Jones v. Kentucky, et al.
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-jurisdiction appellate-review civil-procedure clearly-erroneous-findings injunctive-relief judicial-discretion jurisdictional-review legal-standards procedural-error sovereign-immunity wrong-legal-standards
Latest Conference:
2019-11-15
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
DID THE U.S. SIXTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERR IN ALLOWING THE [U.S.] DISTRICT COURT TO ABUSE ITS DISCRETION WHEN RELYING ON CLEARLY ERRONEOUS FINDINGS OF FACT AS WELL AS TO APPLY THE WRONG LEGAL STANDARDS LEADING TO A CLEAR ERROR IN JUDGMENT?
DID THE LOWER APPELLATE COURT INTERVENE WITH ACTS OF CONGRESS AS WELL AS DECISIONS OF THIS U.S. SUPREME COURT IN VOLVING AN ISSUE OF INJUNCTIVE RELIEF WHICH BARS SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY?
ARE THE U.S. APPELLATE COURTS VESTED WITH UNLIMITED POWER IN RESTORING AN ACCUSED TO HIS/HER RIGHT TO BE HEARD IN A STATE CIRCUIT OF PROPER JURISDICTION & VENUE?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals err in allowing the District Court to abuse its discretion
Docket Entries
2019-11-18
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-10-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-14
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-05-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 24, 2019)
Attorneys
Daniel Jones
Daniel Henderson Jones — Petitioner