No. 23-6948
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure due-process evidence judicial-bias jurisdiction legal-standards state-court vagueness-doctrine
Latest Conference:
2024-05-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
peKWcwv) pqpse U*cl&r Uk?er4 i'w-k^pre^fi o<^S
LrVrcj<=tVe5
W OtovJ' ot U)v4+ ^of VUW:> V- Ker^iev; 404 U*s 513 (b7^)
+U16 fW'Ko.o +Ui5 (WV Vo Chfevoh
0f CMio^fi 'P&r ^
(5uol'<li4
9^k\k\o^f ctawfcd clu£ process of Wu) -k) \Lt -fnV\
^ia^t UM wt \AToU^ of "Ka^ U'S Co»a^.
. CoaSV. a4- U 47«\w
A\M£vsc|S.>&Wt bt«*$>£e5 Ota
wxiv; c4
tVicW.00 ia^s ivASiififdcJ^ 4o Oo*\j\ck -tW p&Wff< lo^er.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified
Docket Entries
2024-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2023-06-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 10, 2024)
Attorneys
Erick Wanjiku
Erick Wanjiku — Petitioner