| 25-6434 |
Natasha T. Baskin v. Algernon M. Pitre |
District of Columbia |
2025-12-29 |
Pending |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-justice disability-rights due-process emergency-tolling equal-protection pro-se-litigants |
1. Due Process and Access to Courts
Whether the combined effect of emergency tolling restrictions, denial of disability
accommodations, and additiona… |
| 25-593 |
Gerald Scott v. Boca Landings Homeowners Association, Inc. |
Florida |
2025-11-20 |
Denied |
|
discretionary-review due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment pro-se-litigants statute-of-limitations |
1. Does a state supreme court's practice of summarily denying discretionary review of Per Curium Affirmance (PCA), involving a Statute of Limitation d… |
| 24-7363 |
Wesley-Keith Mullings v. Harriet Elaine Raghnal, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2025-06-05 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
circuit-split due-process institutional-manipulation parental-rights pro-se-litigants rooker-feldman |
1. Circuit Split: Should Rooker-Feldman bar federal review of void ab initio judgments due to jurisdictional fraud, or do Moreno/Nugent compel examina… |
| 24-6311 |
Shariff Butler, et al. v. Laurel R. Harry, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2025-01-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
court-of-appeals due-process judicial-bias precedential-decisions pro-se-litigants supreme-court-review |
Whether A Judicial Bias has Occurred By Way of Court Appeals Panel Receiving Favors and/or Bribes From Parties With Cases Before Said Judges of Which … |
| 24-69 |
Vishrut Amin, et al. v. Geico Indemnity Company, et al. |
Florida |
2024-07-22 |
Denied |
|
14th-amendment civil-procedure civil-procedure-discovery constitutional-rights discovery-process due-process judicial-authority pro-se-litigants unethical-practice |
(a) Weather Trial court abused its judicial power prior and post rendering of the order denying the motion to compel discovery and violated constituti… |
| 23-1336 |
Noel West Lane, III v. Matthew Curtis Witt, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2024-06-25 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
bankruptcy bankruptcy-procedure due-process fair-hearing fourteenth-amendment judicial-discretion manifest-fraud pro-se-litigants pro-se-litigation procedural-error |
In Summary, should the Supreme Court issue guidance to state courts on unaddressed, mandatory accommodation to judicial discretion to provide fair hea… |
| 23-7389 |
Brad Evans v. Florida |
Florida |
2024-05-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts appellate-procedure constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection first-amendment fourteenth-amendment pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigants |
WHETHER THE STATE OF FLORIDA HAS CREATED RULES OF CRIMINAL AND APPELLATE PROCEDURE THAT ARBITRARILY AND UNREASONABLY ENCROACHES UPON THE PERSONAL RIGH… |
| 23-7384 |
Javier Mandry, aka Javier E. Mandry-Mercado v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2024-05-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-rights due-process fifth-amendment implied-contract plebiscite pro-se-litigants puerto-rico-statehood statehood tucker-act |
1. Whether participation in the Congress-authorized 2017 and 2020 plebiscite
for Puerto Ricans, on statehood elections, constitutes an implied in fact… |
| 23-801 |
Richard George, et al. v. Triton Property Investments, LLC |
California |
2024-01-24 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights contract-clause due-process equal-protection judicial-bias pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigants seventh-amendment state-courts |
Whether the empirical evidence of bias against, otherwise identically situated, pro se litigants in state courts proves the judicial intent to discrim… |
| 23-6254 |
William Graves, III v. Florida |
Florida |
2023-12-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
access-to-courts appellate-procedure constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection first-amendment fourteenth-amendment pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigants |
WHETHER THE STATE OF FLORIDA HAS CREATED RULES OF CRIMINAL AND APPELLATE PROCEDURE THAT ARBITRARILY AND UNREASONABLY ENCROACHES UPON THE PERSONAL RIGH… |
| 23-5246 |
Aaron Abadi v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-07-31 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts circuit-court-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment in-forma-pauperis judicial-discretion pro-se-litigants pro-se-litigation standing |
1) The Ninth Circuit developed an automated system, where it dismisses almost ALL indigent pro se claims without an opportunity to review; 414 cases s… |
| 22-7294 |
Robert L. Tatum v. Earnell Lucas, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2023-04-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection judicial-bias pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigants sanctions summary-judgment |
Question not identified. |
| 22-6865 |
Jennifer Reinoehl v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2023-02-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure complaint-sufficiency due-process federal-rules-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure judicial-bias judicial-discretion jurisdiction pro-se-litigants pro-se-litigation standing |
1. Whether Courts have discretion to hold pro se litigants to a strictly following
Fed.R.Civ.P. while ignoring represented litigants ' late filings a… |
| 22-6295 |
Jamisi Jermaine Calloway v. M. Martel, Warden, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-12-13 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts ada-discrimination civil-rights constitutional-rights continuing-violation-doctrine disability-rights due-process indigent-prisoner-rights legal-assistance pro-se-litigants pro-se-litigation section-1983 |
1. When should a total disabled incarcerated indigent prisoner thats
under the direct care and jurisdiction of the California department
of correcti… |
| 21-8222 |
Abdur-Rashid Muhammad v. Scott R. Frakes, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2022-06-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-courts fifth-amendment judicial-discretion leave-to-amend pro-se pro-se-litigants standards-of-practice standing |
Whether federal courts from holding the Fifth Amendment prohibits
litigants to the same pro se stringent standards as attorneys.
Whether the Fifth Am… |
| 21-7760 |
William James Siskos v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-05-02 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-courts fraud fraud-prevention judicial-process misconduct misrepresentation pro-se-litigants |
Did the Supreme Court change the Federal Courts have the eight and the doch, Sn, Protect Aself Crore Raud miscepresembation ancl misconduct and +e eig… |
| 21-7523 |
Martin Robinson v. Ohio |
Ohio |
2022-04-01 |
Denied |
IFP |
appeals constitutional-claims criminal-justice-system criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-bias judicial-review post-conviction-relief pro-se-litigants |
Question not identified. |
| 20-1609 |
David R. Seaton v. Blake Johnson, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2021-05-19 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
constitutional-rights de-escalation electronic-evidence evidence-standards police-brutality pro-se-litigants pro-se-litigation recent-rulings summary-judgment use-of-force |
1. Should police brutality be constitutionally protected?
2. Do regulations ordering police to de-escalate confrontations instill an affirmative duty… |
| 20-976 |
David H. Penny v. Lincoln's Challenge Academy |
Seventh Circuit |
2021-01-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-civil-rules judicial-procedure pro-se pro-se-litigants standing summary-judgment |
What is the proper treatment of Pro Se litigants nationwide who make a technical error or other mistake for lack of knowledge or a misunderstanding of… |
| 19-1202 |
Thomas Taffe, et al. v. First National Bank of Alaska |
Alaska |
2020-04-08 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process jury-trial legal-standards pro-se pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigants standing summary-judgment systemic-bias |
Did a systemic bias against pro se litigants lead to the unconstitutional denial of Petitioners' right to a jury trial in this case?
Did the summary … |
| 19-6879 |
Salim Abdul-Malik v. City Government Office of Court Administration, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2019-12-06 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-rights court-accessibility due-process immigration-procedures judicial-reform pleading-standards prisoner-litigation-reform-act pro-se-litigants pro-se-litigation state-action |
1) As a first, pro se litigants have the Constitutional right to represent themselves in which this notion has its origins which stem from the Judicia… |
| 19-6694 |
Tim Sundy v. Martha C. Christian, Judge, et al. |
Georgia |
2019-11-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
access-to-court civil-rights constitutional-rights court-officer criminal-activity due-process equal-protection pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigants property-rights state-court-officers takings |
Whether pro se litigants are immune from criminal activity, undue interference
and/or transgressional acts by State of Georgia court officers, with th… |
| 19-332 |
Steven E. Davis, et al. v. Bank of America Corporation, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-09-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
28-usc-1915 civil-litigation civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process forma-pauperis judicial-access legal-costs pro-se pro-se-litigants standing |
The Pro Se Petitioners were unequivocally deprived of all their "Constitutional Rights". Seven Petitioners were wrongfully denied the right to file fo… |
| 18-8684 |
Robert E. Young v. Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-04-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
7th-amendment administrative-law burden-of-proof civil-procedure civil-rights due-process jury-trial mixed-cases pro-se-litigants pro-se-litigation rules-of-evidence standing summary-judgment |
Did the 7th District Court and the 7th Circuit Cowl in it's concurrence of the lower court's ruling, deny the Appellant the protection and benefits gr… |
| 18-6506 |
Guy Boudreaux, Jr. v. Timothy Hooper, Warden |
Fifth Circuit |
2018-10-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts access-to-justice civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-counsel judicial-procedure legal-education legal-mail legal-representation pro-se pro-se-litigants pro-se-litigation procedural-error right-of-access-to-courts |
Is our system of justice truly just when it requires an attorney to attend six years of college prior to being permitted to practice law, but requires… |
| 18-6043 |
Patrick Wayne Manning, II v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
2018-09-19 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-court civil-rights claim-construction court-access discrimination due-process equal-protection prisoner-rights pro-se pro-se-claims pro-se-litigants recharacterization-of-claims |
Names v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520, 92 S. -Ct. 594, 30 L. Ed. 2d 652 (1972), allows a court unfettered authority to construe pro se prisoner claims. S… |
| 18-334 |
Amor Medina Del Rosario, et ux. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-09-14 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure constitutional-protections dismissal due-process fed-r-civ-p-60 federal-rules-of-civil-procedure notice notice-requirements pro-se pro-se-litigants public-policy rules-of-procedure service service-of-pleading |
Amor Medina Del Rosario and Elvie Canlas Del Rosario, the Petitioners, request this Petition for Writ of Certiorari be granted given the salient issue… |