prisoner-litigation-reform-act
3 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20-7719 | Robert L. Tatum v. Thomas Trettin, et al. | Seventh Circuit | 2021-04-12 | Denied | IFP | civil-rights constitutional-challenge constitutional-law due-process free-speech in-forma-pauperis prison-litigation prisoner-litigation-reform-act standing three-strikes-rule | Is the Clerk is requiring I file. A complete photo ovi by refusing -lo fltcepd my mofion for leM b-f'ik, ptoch Mold resolve, all issues presented vito… |
| 19-6879 | Salim Abdul-Malik v. City Government Office of Court Administration, et al. | Second Circuit | 2019-12-06 | Denied | IFP | access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-rights court-accessibility due-process immigration-procedures judicial-reform pleading-standards prisoner-litigation-reform-act pro-se-litigants pro-se-litigation state-action | 1) As a first, pro se litigants have the Constitutional right to represent themselves in which this notion has its origins which stem from the Judicia… |
| 18-7006 | Gordon C. Reid v. Warden, et al. | Eleventh Circuit | 2018-12-13 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | appeals civil-procedure civil-rights due-process in-forma-pauperis plra prisoner-litigation-reform-act standing three-strikes | I. Whte oe lprcisnmnt to "malicousness" Under the PLRR, 28 U.SC8 1915te (2), whereit is prisoner conplaint fom, enrelted to ony any chaim agoinst the … |