I. Whte oe lprcisnmnt to "malicousness" Under the PLRR, 28 U.SC8 1915te (2), whereit is prisoner conplaint fom, enrelted to ony any chaim agoinst the defendants and is dexoid of any intent to manipulade, vex,

2. is forma pauperis under the PiR, bod severctheless direct he applicent pay oppellate tes?

3. Whoter the disic cour may ipose o shikendthe PURR

4. Whoher the disticd cort's conclusion that Phintif's epeo wosd tokein goo athoit deilofhi motono leore to proced in formo pouperis on oppeal could be challenged

5. Wheter theRule Me) Jed.R.Cin.P., delerminaton conicted with relerand decisrons a thes Coort?

Whether the PLRA's 'three strikes' provision, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), which bars prisoners from proceeding in forma pauperis if they have had three prior dismissals, violates due process