Is the Clerk is requiring I file. A complete photo ovi by refusing -lo fltcepd my mofion for leM b-f'ik, ptoch Mold resolve, all issues presented vitoouf -nudity procedures (.to toiS pato'evlar case) normally attendta§ pef'fon -fdi/^,3

Is •ito Prisoner LtogaUon Reform Acl CPL&A) S-stoito ruk, £% DSC- uneontofu-b'on&l, stare, if cNIU a prisoners ri^W- to PiU meritorious 'close, call claims Attooof reprisal la violafion of tot. Is* Amend miAf^

Is PUUK's 3-ctoike. cult . uinconstotofiomli sUct sf/ihes, rtsvlhng m loss of m fvm parpen's leave., are. imposed UjitooiA affording "s owe, hearing prior to impos'd lor) as doe. process I toe M* kmtndmu rf Ctyoires ?

)n 1011, all clams to toe. underlying Cases Met allowed -fo proceed id form*, paoperis as paA of a Single 6&st\ U <2.016, 3 PL&A s-i-rfe&s irJttt issued agamA- P&fifion&r] An<) ir> £01% tot disfrief ruled flat stable cases claims Were misjoined, splfl fhem into stparak cases, bui denied id form* paoperis leave despito toe loll ruling -- DM toe disfrief cou A- err in (e.* screening severed claims and denying id forma paoperis leave. <

The loWer CouAs mtonfionallyavoided Argumenk challenging toe ooAsfifiAio nalfy of PLfch's 3'&2Wk law, denying fair hearing I Goes to is arbitrary refusal to fairly hear my claim metf toe ConsfikiAional mini moms under tot i^(\mcndmeto h Consfitok a "redressof<grie\/ances ',andmeeAducprocess reyuisiks f

Whether the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) 3-strike rule is unconstitutional