No. 19-332
Steven E. Davis, et al. v. Bank of America Corporation, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: 28-usc-1915 civil-litigation civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process forma-pauperis judicial-access legal-costs pro-se pro-se-litigants standing
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
The Pro Se Petitioners were unequivocally deprived of all their "Constitutional Rights". Seven Petitioners were wrongfully denied the right to file forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Congress enacted 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) to Enable Plaintiffs who could not afford the costs of litigation to bring civil lawsuits.
The questioned asked? Do pro se litigants have any "CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS"
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Do pro se litigants have any 'CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS'
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-12-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-09
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-15
Waiver of right of respondents Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. to respond filed.
2019-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 15, 2019)
Attorneys
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and MERSCORP Holdings, Inc.
Andrew C. Glass — K&L Gates LLP, Respondent
Steven E. Davis, et al.
Steven E. Davis — Petitioner