| 25-6948 |
Kurnicus Hayes v. Arnold Patrick |
Fifth Circuit |
2026-03-03 |
Pending |
IFP |
extraordinary-circumstances habeas-corpus injustice judicial-access procedural-bar rule-60(b)(6) |
In Gonzalez v. Crosby, this Court held that in order to obtain Rule 60(b)(6) relief extraordinary circumstances must be present. In determining whethe… |
| 25A765 |
Karen L. MacElroy Zopatti v. Superior Court of California, San Diego County, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2026-01-02 |
Denied |
|
ada disability-rights due-process judicial-access reasonable-accommodation title-ii |
Whether the state trial court violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title II by denying reasonable accommodations and effective communica… |
| 24-7485 |
Christopher Langdon v. Sun Lake Multi-Family Holdings, LLC, et al. |
Florida |
2025-06-25 |
Denied |
IFP |
court-procedure due-process equal-protection judicial-access legal-standards pro-se-litigation |
(1) Do the courts in Florida deny: due process of law; equal protection under the law; and meaningful access to the courts, to pro se, non-prisoner, l… |
| 24-5478 |
Rifat Shafique v. Equity Residential Management, LLC |
District of Columbia |
2024-09-06 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-death constitutional-rights due-process ejectment-dispute judicial-access property-rights |
1 Given forced removal from a residence imbues significant deprivation of access to the courts through denial of address, mail, and standing, and ther… |
| 24-5081 |
Larry Edward Webster, Jr. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of Colorado, et al. |
Colorado |
2024-07-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts administrative-law administrative-review appellate-procedure civil-procedure colorado-constitution constitutional-rights due-process judicial-access workers-compensation |
1. Whether 8-43-307, C.R.S. (1994 Supp) and 8-74-107, C.R.S. (1986 1994 Supp) and C.A.R. 46.4 and 46.7 unconstitutionally deny workers compensation pa… |
| 23-1247 |
Duncan Abraham Goldberg v. Missouri, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2024-05-28 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
access-to-courts brain-injury brain-injury-accommodation civil-rights civil-rights-violation constitutional-rights disability-discrimination due-process federal-law-violation federal-laws judicial-access |
1.) On what grounds does Missouri continue
to deny the fundamental civil rights of a whole class
of people, namely people living with Brain Injury, wh… |
| 23-7454 |
Jennifer L. M. Sendzul v. Jay C. Hoag, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-05-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts appeals-court civil-rights covid-19 district-court due-process indigent-rights judicial-access judicial-discretion remote-proceedings writ-of-certiorari |
1. Whether a writ of certiorari is appropriate when a district court denies any other form of meaningful access other than in-person for scheduled hea… |
| 23-528 |
Michael S. Barth v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2023-11-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
appeal appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process intervention-rights judicial-access media-representation procedural-due-process recusal standing |
I. Whether Petitioner is entitled to intervene as
of right and permissively in this litigation; and
denial of the general public's right of access to
… |
| 23-5957 |
Khadijah Bronson v. District of Columbia Department of Buildings |
District of Columbia |
2023-11-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
access-to-judicial-process administrative-review civil-procedure court-dismissal default-judgments due-process judicial-access notice-of-infractions procedural-deficiency service-of-process |
The central issue at hand pertains to the appropriateness of a court dismissing an appeal petition due to procedural deficiencies, despite the present… |
| 23-5530 |
Matthew Jones v. Maine State Police Troop E |
Maine |
2023-09-06 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-justice civil-procedure court-fees due-process fee-waiver indigency indigent-status judicial-access legal-standing procedural-rights standing |
Who qualifies for fee waivers in the United States Court system? |
| 23-5082 |
William Richter v. Charles Truitt, Warden |
Seventh Circuit |
2023-07-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
access-to-courts civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process habeas judicial-access post-conviction-relief prisoner-rights pro-se-petition standing |
I. Whether The Seventh Circuit Denial of Certiorari of Appellate, ity And Subsequent Rehearing To Remand The Enormous Denial of Habeas Relief had Post… |
| 22-791 |
Haisam Elsharkawi v. United States, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-02-22 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
airport-security civil-rights concrete-plans due-process judicial-access pandemic prospective-relief standing travel travel-restrictions |
Plaintiffs across the United States turn to the courts to challenge treatment they endure while traveling and the lack of due process available for th… |
| 22-6239 |
Nicholas Stewart Hines v. Denny Kaemingk, Secretary, South Dakota Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2022-12-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts access-to-legal-documents civil-rights constitutional-violations due-process equal-protection first-amendment judicial-access prisoners-rights retaliation |
1 IS t\ PPvISoneks'm&ht to (vccess a county^ CowTtost A#1D P>U6Ut ,ftttoMS _ UWDlLF,lHt FiH^TAio
fo«PvTEENT|-tM^OfAEAlT5 DiFfERT/IT TW K RegULPT <L\Tt… |
| 20-8163 |
David Patkins v. Rebecca Piantini |
California |
2021-05-27 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-rights discretionary-review due-process indigent-litigants judicial-access meaningful-access non-article-iii-proceedings prisoner-rights |
PURSUANT FEOERAL (AND STATE) CONSTITUTION DUE PROCESS/PETITION
CHL OLSNIN JO 8 3HE NO S3NE
COURTS :
(1)
ON NON-FRIVOLOUS ACTIONS, D.OES THE RIGHT OF M… |
| 20-7222 |
Ian Lamonte Cormier v. Riverside County District Attorney, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-02-23 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-procedure dismissal due-process equal-protection federal-jurisdiction judicial-access judicial-review standing |
How Can (Witness Case Be Dismissed from Proper Remedy If This Court Look at Response to the Central District's Dismissal (Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6)) (… |
| 20-5608 |
Michael Jonathon Besoyan v. Jimmy Yee, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-09-08 |
Denied |
IFP |
8th-amendment civil-rights due-process equal-protection judicial-access jury-trial pro-se-litigant void-orders |
Whether any court or tribunal should be allowed to deny or deprive any citizen of basic rights listed in the Bill of Rights and the 14th Amendment eve… |
| 19-6388 |
Cary VanDerMeulen v. Charles L. Ryan, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-10-24 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-claim due-process equal-protection judicial-access judicial-review legal-standing procedural-due-process remedies rights-enforcement standing |
Why is a citizen not allowed to bring a valid claim (claims) for civil rights violations before the court and have them heard?
When one cannot exerci… |
| 19-6047 |
Happy Stompingbear v. Sergeant Brown, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-09-25 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts amendment civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights court-procedure due-process judicial-access legal-remedy legal-work petition-review standing takings |
1s Was the taking of my kead work a violation of my access to the courts? |
| 19-332 |
Steven E. Davis, et al. v. Bank of America Corporation, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-09-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
28-usc-1915 civil-litigation civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process forma-pauperis judicial-access legal-costs pro-se pro-se-litigants standing |
The Pro Se Petitioners were unequivocally deprived of all their "Constitutional Rights". Seven Petitioners were wrongfully denied the right to file fo… |
| 19-5453 |
Juan Pablo Revelo Salcedo v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-08-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
affidavit appointment-of-counsel civil-procedure criminal-procedure declaration financial-disclosure in-forma-pauperis ineffective-assistance judicial-access motion motion-to-substitute-counsel poverty poverty-affidavit pro-se-litigation redress right-to-counsel sixth-amendment |
Question not identified. |
| 18-9706 |
Scott Peters v. Illinois |
Illinois |
2019-06-19 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process evidence-concealment evidence-disclosure fair-trial judicial-access judicial-procedure mandamus material-facts rules-and-regulations standing state-procedure transparency |
THE CONSTITUTION of THE UNITED STATES AND PETITIONERS Rights thereof For the state to CONCEAL EVIDENCE IN FILES THAT ARE INVISIBLE TO THE JUDICIAL ACC… |
| 18-9389 |
Antonia Shields v. Juda Klein |
Second Circuit |
2019-05-23 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-action civil-rights constitutional-review court-fees due-process fees-and-costs fifth-amendment in-forma-pauperis judicial-access standing unconstitutional |
Is 28 U.S.C. § 1915 unconstitutional, discriminatory, based on a person's ability to pay fees and costs and/or to give security for fees and costs for… |
| 18-8697 |
Frederick H. Banks v. Pennymac Holdings, LLC, fka Pennymac Mortgage Investment Trust Holdings I, LLC |
Pennsylvania |
2019-04-04 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure document-submission due-process electronic-filing fifth-amendment immigration institutional-barriers judicial-access land-use pacer prisoner-litigation privacy privacy-policy property-rights regulatory-takings social-security takings |
Question not identified. |
| 18-8671 |
Glynndeavin Von Fox v. South Carolina |
South Carolina |
2019-04-02 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-interpretation federal-consent federal-preemption federal-questions international-law judicial-access judicial-review medical-access senate-ratification separation-of-powers sovereign-immunity sovereign-immunity-doctrine state-court-jurisdiction treaty-power us-constitution |
Can a State Court answer federal questions of an International Country in Japan, regarding judicial access to documents, or medical access to document… |
| 18-7384 |
Michael Deuschel v. USC Faculty Dental Practice, et al. |
California |
2019-01-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
ada-accommodation ada-requests-for-accommodation court-reporter disabilities disability-rights due-process equal-protection in-forma-pauperis judicial-access multiple-disabilities pro-se pro-se-litigant pro-se-petitioner record-on-appeal |
Whether the trial court denials of ADA requests for accommodation from in forma pauperis pro se Petitioner with multiple disabilities, receiving multi… |
| 18-637 |
Donald C. Marro v. Caesar's Entertainment Operating Company |
Seventh Circuit |
2018-11-16 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
28-usc-158 access bankruptcy-court-clerk bankruptcy-procedure constitutional-deprivations" due-process equal-protection equal-protection-and-access frbp judicial-access mail-filing-rules pro-se-litigation pro-se-status property-deprivation USPS-mail-filings |
Does it violate equal protection and access, is it a property deprivation (i.e., the civil action for damages) and FRBP and 28 Usc 158 violation when … |
| 25A897 |
Kendrick Simpson v. Christe Quick, Warden, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
|
Denied |
|
due-process eleventh-amendment equal-protection execution-stay judicial-access rooker-feldman |
Question not identified. |