| 25-686 |
Gary Sebastian Brown, III v. Federal Bureau of Investigation |
District of Columbia |
2025-12-12 |
Pending |
Response Waived |
confidential-source exemption-7d foia foreseeable-harm law-enforcement transparency |
I. Whether, after the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016, an agency invoking Exemption 7(D) must, in addition to establishing that the exemption applies, se… |
| 23A1175 |
Dennis M. Buckovetz v. Department of the Navy |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-07-02 |
Presumed Complete |
|
administrative-law foia government-accountability judicial-review military-records transparency |
Question not identified. |
| 23-7758 |
In Re Janice Wolk Grenadier |
|
2024-06-18 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
accountability judicial-accountability judicial-ethics judicial-integrity judicial-misconduct judicial-oversight judicial-transparency oversight public-trust transparency |
1. Judges play a crucial role in upholding justice and the rule of law within a society. However, like any position of power, judges are not immune to… |
| 23-1299 |
Ade Olumide v. Minnesota, et al. |
Minnesota |
2024-06-12 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
constitutional-rights due-process mandatory-decertification open-court open-government police-misconduct press-freedom risk-of-harm transparency |
Article IV s4, Article VI s2, 1st, 4th, 5th, 14th Amendments refer to the U.S. Constitution.
Question 1: Do incite harm tests for the US Supreme Cour… |
| 23-1159 |
Roland Huff v. BP Corporation North America, Inc. |
Tenth Circuit |
2024-04-25 |
Denied |
|
employee-benefits erisa group-life-insurance group-policy information-disclosure insurance-rates life-insurance policy-contract rate-increase transparency |
Do employees and retirees have the right under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) to obtain information and documentation from their … |
| 23-7072 |
Martin Akerman v. Lloyd J. Austin, III, Secretary of Defense, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2024-03-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
accountability administrative-law civil-rights data-integrity due-process federal-employees federal-jurisdiction judicial-review transparency whistleblower-protection |
1. Did the Fourth Circuit Court's consolidation of appeals and selective review exacerbate the case's complexity, undermining the principles of thorou… |
| 23-6516 |
Samuel T. Whatley, et al. v. City of North Charleston, South Carolina, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2024-01-18 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process election-interference federal-jurisdiction freedom-of-information governmental-immunity search-and-seizure transparency treason |
1. Are intergovernmental agencies, organizations, and or individual governmental employees immune to federal law prosecutions, lawsuits, and sanction … |
| 23-129 |
Eddie Tardy v. Corrections Corporation of America, nka CoreCivic, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2023-08-10 |
Denied |
Amici (2)Response Waived |
civil-procedure court-records first-amendment intervention judicial-records judicial-standing public-access sealed-documents standing transparency transparency-rights |
Whether an intervenor's interest in transparency is sufficient to confer standing to seek access to sealed or protected judicial records (as the First… |
| 23-57 |
Julio Yee Cabrera, et al. v. Enrique Lozano, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-07-21 |
Denied |
|
appellate-discretion attorney-fees circuit-court-procedure civil-procedure due-process judicial-discretion judicial-reasoning judicial-transparency legal-reasoning procedural-review standing transparency |
Whether a U.S. Court of Appeals panel has unfettered discretion in every matter (outside of a small number of statutory exceptions) to withhold all in… |
| 22-5901 |
William Paul Burch v. Areya Holder Aurzada |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-10-25 |
Dismissed |
IFP |
bankruptcy bankruptcy-procedure bankruptcy-transparency corruption due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment fraud judicial-ethics salaried-employees transparency |
1. Should a final report of a chapter 7 bankruptcy case be divided into five parts thus depriving the debtor of transparency so as to prevent errors, … |
| 21-78 |
GLM DFW, Inc. v. Windstream Holdings, Inc. |
Second Circuit |
2021-07-21 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-review bankruptcy bankruptcy-appeals creditor-priority critical-vendor-payments critical-vendors delegation-of-judicial-function equality equitable-mootness judicial-delegation transparency transparency-principle |
This case concerns the dismissal of bankruptcy appeals as equitably moot without evaluating the merits of the appeals.
Early in the Windstream bankru… |
| 20-7513 |
Loretta Jones v. New York City Police Department, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2021-03-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
4th-amendment accountability civil-liberties civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process institutional-racism law-enforcement-technology public-oversight public-scrutiny transparency |
Entities responsible for our country's over incarceration and institutional racism are today taxed with uses of both new and old technologies that fai… |
| 19-615 |
Elaine Ward v. City of New York, New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2019-11-13 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
42-usc-1983 constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection municipal-liability service-of-process state-court-proceedings transparency |
1. Is there a violation of due process and equal protection under the 5th and 14th amendments as related to 42 U.S.C. 1983, when a municipality, fails… |
| 19-6529 |
James Tyson, Jr. v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-11-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
2255-motion access-to-courts civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process evidentiary-hearing ineffective-assistance rule-6-motion sealing-orders standing transparency |
I.) Was the district courts denial of Petitioners Rule 6 motion to unseal documents a denial of Petitioners due process rights?
II.) Was counsel cons… |
| 19-395 |
Christina Alessio v. United Airlines, Inc. |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-09-24 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
air-quality aircraft-cabin aircraft-safety chemical-exposure chemical-substances civil-rights compliance federal-law federal-law-49-usc-5124 federal-oversight government-oversight oversight product-disclosure public-health transparency transportation-regulations |
Introduction: With great respect this case is about Life, Liberty and the pursuit for Righteousness at 30,000 feet.
Federal Law Fact: Federal Rule of… |
| 19-145 |
Vincent Mastanduno v. National Freight Industries, et al. |
North Carolina |
2019-07-31 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights compelling-state-interest constitutional-rights due-process health-information informational-privacy privacy public-disclosure public-interest state-action state-agency state-disclosure transparency |
Does a person have a constitutional right to privacy over his personal health information; and where the State publishes a person's private health inf… |
| 18-9706 |
Scott Peters v. Illinois |
Illinois |
2019-06-19 |
Dismissed |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process evidence-concealment evidence-disclosure fair-trial judicial-access judicial-procedure mandamus material-facts rules-and-regulations standing state-procedure transparency |
THE CONSTITUTION of THE UNITED STATES AND PETITIONERS Rights thereof For the state to CONCEAL EVIDENCE IN FILES THAT ARE INVISIBLE TO THE JUDICIAL ACC… |
| 18-8114 |
Anthony Boyd v. Joe D. Driver, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-02-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-action civil-procedure civil-rights due-process evidence government-transparency legal-standing material-fact standing summary-judgment transparency video-evidence |
Whether Lack Of Transparency Of Video Evidence By The
d
Fact In A Civil Action? |
| 18-896 |
Missouri Ethics Commission, et al. v. Free and Fair Election Fund, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-01-10 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
campaign-finance constitutional-law contribution-caps corruption first-amendment free-speech political-action-committee political-action-committees state-regulation transparency |
Under the First Amendment, may a state prohibit political action committees from transferring money to other political action committees? |