I.) Was the district courts denial of Petitioners Rule 6 motion to unseal documents a denial of Petitioners due process rights?

II.) Was counsel constitutionally ineffective for advising Petitioner to enter a "straight up guilty plea" while failing to investigate the facts of his case; failing to object to losses and enhancements at sentencing: failing to raise guideline amendments on appeal?

III.) Did the courts commit reversible err denying petitioner's 2255 motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing to resolve the factual disputes?

Was the district court's denial of Petitioner's Rule 6 motion to unseal documents a denial of Petitioner's due-process rights?