federal-employees
15 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25-698 | Noris Babb v. Douglas A. Collins, Secretary of Veterans Affairs | Eleventh Circuit | 2025-12-17 | Denied | Response Waived | age-discrimination employment-discrimination federal-employees sex-discrimination summary-judgment title-vii | Whether federal District Court jury instructions and decisions on motions for summary judgment must be consistent with Babb v. Wilkie's statutory fram… |
| 25-6277 | Sonal N. Desai v. David Steiner, Postmaster General | Fourth Circuit | 2025-12-03 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | civil-rights eeo-claim employment-discrimination federal-employees postal-service workplace-harassment | Question not identified. |
| 24-495 | Lebene Konan v. United States Postal Service, et al. | Fifth Circuit | 2024-10-31 | Denied | Relisted (2) | circuit-split equal-protection federal-employees intracorporate-conspiracy ku-klux-klan-act section-1985-3 | The Ku Klux Klan Act provides a federal cause of action against "two or more persons" who "conspire," as relevant here, to deprive "any person or clas… |
| 23-7072 | Martin Akerman v. Lloyd J. Austin, III, Secretary of Defense, et al. | Fourth Circuit | 2024-03-26 | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | accountability administrative-law civil-rights data-integrity due-process federal-employees federal-jurisdiction judicial-review transparency whistleblower-protection | 1. Did the Fourth Circuit Court's consolidation of appeals and selective review exacerbate the case's complexity, undermining the principles of thorou… |
| 23-6736 | Christopher R. Chin-Young v. Department of the Army | Federal Circuit | 2024-02-13 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | administrative-law civil-rights due-process employment-at-will federal-employees federal-employment mspb reassignment whistle-blower | Whether covered Federal employees under employment-at-will have an absolute right to constitutionally sound due process procedures under MSPB administ… |
| 23-343 | Donald Martin, Jr., et al. v. United States | Federal Circuit | 2023-10-02 | Denied | Relisted (2) | anti-deficiency-act fair-labor-standards-act federal-employees government-employee-fair-treatment-act minimum-wage overtime overtime-compensation wage-obligations | Do either the Anti-Deficiency Act or the Government Employee Fair Treatment Act displace, modify or require a special narrower interpretation of the o… |
| 23-256 | Suleiman Abdu Ibrahim v. Department of the Interior | Fifth Circuit | 2023-09-18 | Denied | Response Waived | administrative-law administrative-procedure agency-action civil-procedure civil-rights due-process employment-discrimination federal-employee-rights federal-employees summary-judgment title-vii | Federal employees ' rights are determined under statues which require that 'all personnel actions effecting employees or applicants for employment. … |
| 22-1193 | Jeffry Thul v. Deb Haaland, Secretary of the Interior, et al. | Sixth Circuit | 2023-06-09 | Denied | Response Waived | civil-rights discrimination due-process equal-protection expedited-proceedings federal-employees federal-employment post-traumatic-stress-disorder service-of-process | Whether service of process is relevant in a psycho logical disability case when the equal protection component of the Due Process Clause confers on al… |
| 22-1118 | Cody Adams, et al. v. United States | Federal Circuit | 2023-05-16 | Denied | Amici (1)Relisted (2) | civil-rights due-process federal-employees federal-employment hazardous-duty-pay proximity-exposure regulatory-interpretation statutory-entitlement statutory-interpretation virulent-biologicals | Under the regulation requiring hazardous duty pay for federal employees who work "with or in close proximity to" virulent biologicals, are federal emp… |
| 22-786 | Michael Faris v. Department of the Air Force | Federal Circuit | 2023-02-21 | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (2) | burden-of-proof comparability federal-employees leave-of-absence pension-benefits reframing-contentions uniformed-services userra | 1. Are federal employees considered a "person " for the purposes of USERRA and thereby entitled to the Rights and Benefits guaranteed to "any person "… |
| 21-7399 | Rosalind A. Clayton v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, et al. | Eighth Circuit | 2022-03-17 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | age-discrimination civil-rights due-process eeoc-administrative-remedies employment-discrimination equal-protection exhaustion-of-administrative-remedies federal-employees subject-matter-jurisdiction title-vii | Where the Courts decision egregiously conflicts with Supreme Court Fort Bend County, Texas v. Davis 18-525 and 29 C.F.R. 1613.513, as amend. Was petit… |
| 21-1134 | Bryan Adams v. Department of Homeland Security | Federal Circuit | 2022-02-16 | Denied | Amici (1) | active-duty cross-reference differential-pay federal-employees military-reserves national-guard statutory-interpretation | Whether 10 U.S.C. § 12301(d) is "a provision of law referred to in section 101(a)(13)(B) of title 10." |
| 21-6821 | Francis Schaeffer Cox v. United States | Ninth Circuit | 2022-01-11 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | conspiracy-liability contingent-conspiracy criminal-intent federal-employees federal-jurisdiction feola-test martial-law stalinesque-martial-law subjective-belief sufficiency-challenge | 1. Whether a contingent conspiracy may be based on a condition outside the conspirators' control that they subjectively believed was likely to occur, … |
| 21-777 | Blake Edward Halfacre v. United States | Tenth Circuit | 2021-11-29 | Denied | Response Waived | administrative-law employment-rights exclusive-provisions federal-employees federal-employment-compensation-act federal-tort-claims-act light-duty-job light-duty-job-offer united-states-court-of-appeals workers-compensation | Are the "exclusive provisions" in the FECA (Federal Employment Compensation Act) applicable, or available to Federal Employees who also have no formal… |
| 19-71 | FNU Tanzin, et al. v. Muhammad Tanvir, et al. | Second Circuit | 2019-07-12 | Judgment Issued | Amici (15)Relisted (2) | administrative-law civil-rights constitutional-rights damages damages-liability due-process federal-employees free-speech religious-freedom rfra standing statutory-interpretation | Whether the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, 42 U.S.C 2000bb et seq., permits suits seeking money damages against individual federal employe… |