1. Did the Fourth Circuit Court's consolidation of appeals and selective review exacerbate the case's complexity, undermining the principles of thorough judicial review and deviating from the federal judiciary's "virtually unflagging" obligation to thoroughly adjudicate cases within its jurisdiction?

2. Did the District Court's dismissal of key claims and oversight of crucial evidence, particularly from a pro se plaintiff against a non-appearing defendant, combined with the dismissal of the plaintiffs case with prejudice on jurisdictional grounds, undermine the Fourth Circuit's ability to conduct a thorough adjudication?

Did the Fourth Circuit Court's consolidation of appeals and selective review exacerbate the case's complexity, undermining the principles of thorough judicial review and deviating from the federal judiciary's 'virtually unflagging' obligation to thoroughly adjudicate cases within its jurisdiction?