| 25A443 |
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. Illinois, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2025-10-17 |
Denied |
Amici (23) |
executive-power federal-law-enforcement immigration-enforcement national-guard presidential-authority state-preemption |
Question not identified. |
| 23A593 |
Martin Akerman v. United States |
Armed Forces |
2023-12-28 |
Presumed Complete |
|
due-process federal-service habeas-corpus military-suspension national-guard statutory-protection |
Should a civilian alleging to have been unlawfully and secretly tried, by a member of the national guard called into federal service under 10 U.S. Cod… |
| 23A489 |
Martin Akerman v. General Daniel Hokanson, Chief, National Guard Bureau,et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2023-11-30 |
Denied |
|
administrative-law bivens-claim constitutional-violations federal-employment government-officials national-guard |
Question not identified. |
| 23A181 |
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al. v. Greg Abbott, Governor of Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-08-28 |
Presumed Complete |
|
constitutional-separation-of-powers covid-19-vaccination federal-authority militia-clauses national-guard state-militia-capacity |
Question not identified. |
| 21-1134 |
Bryan Adams v. Department of Homeland Security |
Federal Circuit |
2022-02-16 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
active-duty cross-reference differential-pay federal-employees military-reserves national-guard statutory-interpretation |
Whether 10 U.S.C. § 12301(d) is "a provision of law referred to in section 101(a)(13)(B) of title 10." |
| 20-480 |
David Bryon Babcock v. Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security |
Sixth Circuit |
2020-10-14 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (1)Relisted (2) |
civil-service-pension dual-status-military-technician military-technician national-guard social-security-act statutory-interpretation uniformed-service |
Is a civil-service pension payment based on dual-status military technician service to the National Guard a payment based wholly on service as a membe… |
| 19-690 |
Tina Neville v. Janet Dhillon, Chair, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-11-29 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
32-U.S.C.-§-709 civil-rights conflict-of-interest dual-status-technician due-process eeoc EEOC-access feres-doctrine incident-to-service military-civilian-employment military-function national-guard title-vii workplace workplace-discrimination |
1. Contrary to Congress' clear intent, does the Feres Doctrine invalidate all remedies under Title VII for workplace discrimination experienced by a d… |