1. Is there a violation of due process and equal protection under the 5th and 14th amendments as related to 42 U.S.C. 1983, when a municipality, fails to comply with the appropriate local statutes, for purposes of transparency, the public interest, and the Constitutional rights of the individual(s) who have a protected interest at stake in a matter, at the time of transferring that matter from and between the trial court and the appellate court, to the highest court of the state, which creates a right to be heard in federal court that is independent of the state court?

2. Is there a violation of due process and equal protection of the law under the Constitution when a federal appellate court sets aside appellant's motions that object to the defendants' attorneys' violation of service by their use of commercial metering machines in the proceedings, as a U.S. post office substitute that prejudice appellant's time to answer, as well as defendants' attorneys' failure to comply with the rules for citing summary orders with respect to unrepresented litigants?

Is there a violation of due process and equal protection under the 5th and 14th amendments as related to 42 U.S.C. 1983, when a municipality fails to comply with the appropriate local statutes, for purposes of transparency, the public interest, and the Constitutional rights of the individual(s) who have a protected interest at stake in a matter, at the time of transferring that matter from and between the trial court and the appellate court, to the highest court of the state, which creates a right to be heard in federal court that is independent of the state court?