THE CONSTITUTION of THE UNITED STATES AND PETITIONERS Rights thereof For the state to CONCEAL EVIDENCE IN FILES THAT ARE INVISIBLE TO THE JUDICIAL ACCESS.

2.) PETITIONER QUESTIONS THE FACT OF WHETHER EVIDENCE AND STATEMENTS, WARRANTS AND AFFIDAVITS CAN BE CONCEALED FROM THE JUDICIAL PROCESS WITHOUT WRITTEN REASON, NOTICE OR HEARING BEFORE PARTIES TO THE CASE.

3.) PETITIONER QUESTIONS THE FACT OF WHETHER EVIDENCE FOUND TO BE CONCEALED BY THE PARTIES TO THE CASE HAVE A RIGHT TO SEE AND QUESTION IT IF IT CONCERNS AN ISSUE OF MATERIAL FACT, SUCH AS A PROBABLE CAUSE DETERMINATION, AND IF NOT TO PROVIDE A WRITTEN REASON WHY NOT OWN RULES AND REGULATIONS AS DETERMINED BY THE STATE.

4.) AN ABUSE OF DISCRETION BY CONTINUING TO KEEP EVIDENCE THAT IS EXCULPATORY, INCULPATORY OR IMPEACHING IMPOUNDED WITHOUT REASON EVEN PUT FORWARD AS TO WHY ITS IMPOUNDED NOR HELD A HEARING WITH THE PARTIES. AFTER TRIAL AND AFFIRMED CONVICTION.

5.) PETITIONER QUESTIONS THE CORRECTNESS OF HIS MANDAMUS TO FORCE THE STATE TO FOLLOW THEIR OWN RULES AND THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.

6.) PETITIONER QUESTIONS THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE USE OF MISCELLANEOUS REMEDY FILES IN

Whether the state violated the Constitution and deprived petitioner of due process rights by concealing exculpatory evidence and witness statements from the judicial process