No. 23-5957
Khadijah Bronson v. District of Columbia Department of Buildings
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: access-to-judicial-process administrative-review civil-procedure court-dismissal default-judgments due-process judicial-access notice-of-infractions procedural-deficiency service-of-process
Latest Conference:
2024-02-23
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
The central issue at hand pertains to the appropriateness of a court dismissing an appeal petition due to procedural deficiencies, despite the presentation of substantial and factually valid merits of the case. Such dismissal, which results in the denial of an individual's fundamental right to access the judicial process.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
appropriateness-of-dismissing-appeal-petition
Docket Entries
2024-02-26
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/23/2024.
2023-12-26
Petitioner complied with order of December 11, 2023.
2023-12-11
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until January 2, 2024, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2023-11-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-17
Waiver of right of respondent D.C. Department of Buildings to respond filed.
2023-10-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 4, 2023)
Attorneys
D.C. Department of Buildings
Thais-Lyn Trayer — D.C. Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Khadijah Bronson
Khadijah Bronson — Petitioner