1 IS t\ PPvISoneks'm&ht to (vccess a county^ CowTtost A#1D P>U6Ut ,ftttoMS _ UWDlLF,lHt FiH^TAio
fo«PvTEENT|-tM^OfAEAlT5 DiFfERT/IT TW K RegULPT <L\TtT&i\J ,

2,. C AvKj f\ Y^wKToiNi Coumt Vf 3uD(rts\sS0E ft V
'|\DV\SErv\EMr"To 31-1E V/wKloH Coumt v/ CLERK OF Courts
TO OMiy CON\fAUfJi cate With A PKlSOfvltKS L/uwTC
AMO Ne'JER the PRisojUCRjWmiour Violating - A
PR\Sa*J&£V;:R|(rHTTo Access the Courts , RtGMT To Aae5S
JuOtcmL OocuMgA/TS) KlGHT to due PROCESS , Aa/D
IUgHT To EQUAL pRgTEmo/U 6P LAW uwcer the FirtST
And U^T ecth A^FI/PMI aT^^

3» DID THE V^sOKlOfT CouMTVj CLERK oF Court V(qLATc THE
Petitioner 's Due Process Rights and SD CL 23A-31- 1
(FEP ■ SUCm.P, (a)D or SDCL Z3A - 31-1 (/eq.R, (RffA.
ft 2>0 vheh sue Chwged the Petitioner 's
WwiioHj l rAowms After the paim^sa
During Hi s Direct /TPfcfT > vi\th&ut Notice, a wo
TuDlCvAL TolVOLVCrAE./fT ?TTn.'mUfl
WAS SfcwTI?tfC6D>
Without AMY
M.PI D THe Petitioners Oe privateof Fits rightt & Access
kuc Records uwpgR the R»t mo fewm Amh/voments v By the
CooRTS M0 Dot^ ts™u^ i wa Lifce!!iTyteK UAuzkiJiEiV ' siQ u.s, is4] ,1'ti
%ECA0SL THE RKrHT IsW- EsTAiLUSH^

5, -SOCL fWlHOP>\ 2.E Yl^iJ^TorJ CqumT\
the Petitioner for pre-sentence comfi^ememt
or BuOicmu iMi/ouvEmewT , OR Does THIS Prmuie Violate
the pEtnibNWLs Due Process Rights under HudSoM v. Paime(L
us. sn, sbb Cush)I To CHARGE
Wiuiour Noi

Whether a prisoner's right to access a county courthouse and public records is different than a regular citizen