| 25-1018 |
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. Sean O'Day, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services |
Ninth Circuit |
2026-02-24 |
Pending |
|
compelled-disclosure first-amendment intermediate-scrutiny regulatory-takings takings-clause trade-secrets |
1. Whether a government reporting requirement is subject to intermediate First Amendment scrutiny, and satisfies such scrutiny, so long as it aims to … |
| 24-757 |
The Gym 24/7 Fitness, LLC v. Michigan |
Michigan |
2025-01-16 |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
fifth-amendment government-control penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-takings time-element |
In this Fifth Amendment regulatory takings case, Michigan's Executive Order took dominion and control of the use of Petitioner's commercial property. … |
| 24-754 |
Mount Clemens Recreational Bowl, Inc., et al. v. Elizabeth Hertel, Director, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, et al. |
Michigan |
2025-01-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
economic-impact fifth-amendment investment-backed-expectations penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-takings |
Whether Penn Central Transp. Co. v. City of New York, 438 U.S. 104 (1978), should be clarified or overruled? |
| 24A546 |
Fane Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, Florida |
Eleventh Circuit |
2024-12-04 |
Presumed Complete |
|
final-decision land-use-restrictions lucas-claim property-rights regulatory-takings ripeness-doctrine |
Question not identified. |
| 24-134 |
Lemon Bay Cove, LLC v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2024-08-06 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
army-corps-of-engineers economic-viability finality just-compensation lucas-doctrine lucas-v-south-carolina permitting property-rights regulatory-takings ripeness takings-clause |
The question presented is whether a regulatory takings claim seeking just compensation under Lucas may be defeated by the mere possibility that a perm… |
| 23-1277 |
PPI Enterprises, LLC v. Town of Windham, New Hampshire |
New Hampshire |
2024-06-05 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
administrative-procedure civil-rights due-process final-decision government-action land-development land-use permit-denial property-rights regulatory-takings ripeness-doctrine takings |
Are two final denials of development applications sufficient to ripen a regulatory takings claim, where the government asserts that it might grant a t… |
| 23-1199 |
Joanne Moskovic v. City of New Buffalo, Michigan |
Sixth Circuit |
2024-05-07 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights due-process michigan-zoning-enabling-act property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings short-term-rental substantive-due-process zoning zoning-ordinance |
Whether the Appellate Court erred in finding that Petitioner's use of her home, located in a residential zoning district, as a rental for one month or… |
| 23-1148 |
G-Max Management, Inc., et al. v. New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2024-04-23 |
Denied |
Amici (5)Relisted (5) |
due-process land-use-regulation landlord-tenant penn-central penn-central-test physical-taking property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings rent-regulation takings |
New York's Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019 transforms a temporary rent-regulation system into a permanent expropriation of vast sw… |
| 23-6898 |
Jose G. Castillo v. Jean Harper, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-03-05 |
Denied |
IFP |
due-process fifth-amendment jurisdiction land-use-regulation legal-document petition property-rights regulatory-takings scotus takings-clause writ-of-certiorari |
Question not identified. |
| 23-935 |
Gene Gonzales, et al. v. Jay Inslee, Governor of Washington, et al. |
Washington |
2024-02-27 |
Denied |
Amici (13)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
constitutional-property due-process exclusionary-rights landlord-tenant landlord-tenant-relationship physical-taking physical-takings property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings takings |
Whether an ordinance that compels the possession of property by an unwelcome occupant is a categorical physical taking, as the Eighth Circuit held in … |
| 23-6437 |
In Re Tony Weems |
|
2024-01-08 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
fifth-amendment just-compensation private-property public-access regulatory-takings takings-clause |
Question not identified. |
| 23A524 |
835 Hinesburg Road, LLC v. City of South Burlington, Vermont, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2023-12-11 |
Presumed Complete |
|
as-applied-claim fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment land-use regulatory-takings ripeness |
Question not identified. |
| 23-169 |
CraneVeyor Corp. v. City of Rancho Cucamonga, California |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-08-22 |
Denied |
|
due-process economic-impact government-action investment-backed-expectations lucas-v-south-carolina penn-central property-rights regulatory-takings takings zoning-regulation |
1. Should this Court overrule in its entirety, or reconsider parts of, Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York, 438 U.S. 104 (1978)?
2. D… |
| 23A98 |
Matthew Haney v. Town of Mashpee, Massachusetts, et al. |
First Circuit |
2023-08-02 |
Presumed Complete |
|
fifth-amendment final-decision regulatory-takings ripeness-doctrine variance-request zoning-board |
Question not identified. |
| 22-1054 |
Robert E. Bennett, et ux. v. City of Kingman, Arizona |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-05-01 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment property-rights regulatory-takings section-1983-claim takings takings-clause vested-rights |
Did the Arizona District Court and the Ninth Circuit Court Err when they Cited Penn Central v. New York City and failed to address Lucas v. South Caro… |
| 22-1048 |
Joseph E. Blackburn, Jr., et ux. v. Dare County, North Carolina, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2023-04-28 |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (2) |
5th-amendment civil-procedure constitutional-law due-process eminent-domain fifth-amendment government-regulation property-rights regulatory-takings takings takings-clause |
Whether a governmental regulation prohibiting all physical access to a landowner's property is a "per se" taking under the Fifth Amendment of the Unit… |
| 22-872 |
Evans Creek, LLC v. City of Reno, Nevada |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-03-13 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
constitutional-law constitutional-property due-process land-use-regulation penn-central penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings takings takings-claim |
Whether a property owner states a valid takings claim by alleging that a regulation substantially deprives the owner of the right to use property, or … |
| 22-6860 |
Shavelle Oscar Chavez-Nelson v. Tim Walz, Governor of Minnesota, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2023-02-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
5th-amendment due-process eminent-domain property-rights regulatory-takings takings-clause |
Question not identified. |
| 22-493 |
Erica Bojicic, dba Evolve Dance Company, LLC, et al. v. Richard Michael DeWine, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the Governor of Ohio, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2022-11-23 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
constitutional-law due-process emergency-powers eminent-domain fifth-amendment government-action necessity police-power property-rights regulatory-takings takings takings-clause |
Is the government required to prove with evidence that its action taken during an emergency which intrudes on private property rights was a necessity … |
| 21-7810 |
Michael Geoffrey Peters v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-05-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
due-process fifth-amendment land-use property-rights regulatory-takings takings-clause |
SHOULD THE FIFTH CIRCUIT BE ABLE TO OVERRULE THE NINETH CIRCUIT'S RULING STATING: ("DEPRIVATIONS OF FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS DO NOT TRIGGER STRICT SCRUT… |
| 21-6713 |
Andrew U. D. Straw v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2021-12-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure court-jurisdiction due-process fifth-amendment judicial-takings law-license property-rights regulatory-takings takings tucker-act |
Whether the rule that the Court of Federal Claims cannot review other courts' final orders is wrongly applied when the only matter is a takings and th… |
| 21-233 |
Mike Finnin Motors, Inc., et al. v. United States, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-08-17 |
Denied |
|
bankruptcy civil-procedure direct-takings due-process economic-valuation federal-defense property-rights regulatory-takings supreme-court-precedent takings takings-liability |
During the liquidity crisis of 2008-09, the United States determined the public interest required Chrysler and General Motors because they were too im… |
| 21-217 |
Marcy Britton v. Tim Keller, Mayor of the City of Albuquerque, New Mexico, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2021-08-16 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights due-process inverse-condemnation penn-central-test property-rights qualified-immunity regulatory-taking regulatory-takings takings takings-clause |
As a threshold matter, did the lower courts err in light of this Court's recent ruling in of Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid , 141 S. Ct. 2063, (2021) t… |
| 20-1212 |
Peyman Pakdel, et ux. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-03-03 |
GVR |
Amici (3)Relisted (4) |
42-usc-1983 administrative-remedies exhaustion-of-remedies finality-requirement land-use-regulation property-rights regulatory-takings takings-claim unconstitutional-conditions williamson-county |
Planning for their retirement home, Petitioners (the Pakdels) purchased a tenancy-in-common interest in a six-unit building in San Francisco, which ga… |
| 20-885 |
Next Energy, LLC v. Illinois Department of Natural Resources |
Illinois |
2021-01-04 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
due-process fifth-amendment hydraulic-fracturing mineral-rights oil-and-gas permit-moratorium property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings shale-oil shale-oil-leases takings |
Petitioner, Next Energy, LLC, commenced acquiring blocks of five-year oil leases in 2011 to drill high volume horizontal hydraulic fracturing (horizon… |
| 19-1252 |
Callan Campbell, et al. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2020-04-28 |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
final-decision government-action property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings statute-of-limitations takings tucker-act |
Does the Tucker Act's statute of limitations for a regulatory takings claim accrue when the Government makes a final decision, or when the plaintiff's… |
| 19-1175 |
John Fritz, et ux. v. Washoe County, Nevada |
Nevada |
2020-03-26 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
economic-impact economic-impairment fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment government-regulation loretto-v-teleprompter physical-invasion physical-taking property-rights regulatory-takings takings |
To constitute a taking under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, must a physical invasion also destroy or substantially impair an owner's economicall… |
| 19-1136 |
Chong Yim, et al. v. City of Seattle, Washington |
Washington |
2020-03-17 |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response Waived |
civil-rights due-process first-in-time fourteenth-amendment landlord-tenant legislative-act property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings substantive-due-process takings tenant-selection undue-oppression |
Based on its interpretation of federal law, the Washington Supreme Court overruled 68 regulatory takings and due process cases —130 years of jurisprud… |
| 19-7602 |
Joshua Neil Harrell v. Michelle Belyea, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-02-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process standing takings civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process eminent-domain jurisdiction legal-opinion procedural-grounds property-rights reasons-for-writ regulatory-takings statement-of-case takings |
I. Is lacked not or delived i firs hin 0 when the wo ua neget ras the day? e a Riht to Poredurad dhe Process?
Pfectias Pettioners We ai d the atif Fo… |
| 19-7031 |
Allen James Hancock v. Texas |
Texas |
2019-12-20 |
Denied |
IFP |
5th-amendment administrative-law civil-procedure due-process equal-protection land-use property-rights regulatory-takings standing statutory-interpretation takings-clause |
Question not identified. |
| 19-318 |
Francis A. Bottini, Jr., et al. v. City of San Diego, California, et al. |
California |
2019-09-09 |
Denied |
Amici (2)Response Waived |
due-process first-english first-english-precedent investment-backed-expectations penn-central penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings single-family-housing takings takings-clause temporary-takings |
1. Should the test of Penn Central be construed to totally bar recovery whenever the purchaser of a single-family lot is unable to learn, at the time … |
| 19-223 |
Janice Smyth v. Conservation Commission of Falmouth, et al. |
Massachusetts |
2019-08-20 |
Denied |
Amici (4)Relisted (3) |
character-of-government-action character-of-governmental-action economic-impact investment-backed-expectations investment-expectations land-use-regulation penn-central penn-central-test property-rights property-value regulatory-taking regulatory-takings takings-clause-5th-amendment |
1. Whether the loss of all developmental use of property and a 91.5% decline in its value is a sufficient "economic impact" to support a regulatory ta… |
| 19-5418 |
Walter Lee Brown v. James Deal, Warden |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-07-31 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process fifth-amendment free-speech jurisdiction land-use-regulation property-rights regulatory-takings standing takings-clause |
RPEN FOR Q CERTiPiCATE F APPEalbiLiTy aich is CONPLiCT WITH PRiOR dECISiONS of THE $\Nra$ BORT, DNOTHER COURT oR APPGS dECISION, aNd IN JUSSTONTiUE CO… |
| 18-8697 |
Frederick H. Banks v. Pennymac Holdings, LLC, fka Pennymac Mortgage Investment Trust Holdings I, LLC |
Pennsylvania |
2019-04-04 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure document-submission due-process electronic-filing fifth-amendment immigration institutional-barriers judicial-access land-use pacer prisoner-litigation privacy privacy-policy property-rights regulatory-takings social-security takings |
Question not identified. |
| 18-573 |
Colony Cove Properties, LLC v. City of Carson, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-11-01 |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
appellate-review character-of-regulatory-action city-of-monterey-v-del-monte-dunes economic-impact investment-backed-expectations investment-expectations jury-trial jury-trial-7th-amendment penn-central penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-takings seventh-amendment standard-of-review takings-clause-5th-amendment |
This Court held in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York, 438 U.S. 104 (1978), that determining whether regulatory action constitutes a … |
| 18-394 |
Denis P. Kelleher, et ux. v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation |
New York |
2018-09-27 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
discretionary-land-use-permit discretionary-permit investment-backed-expectations land-use-restriction palazzolo-v-rhode-island penn-central penn-central-test property-rights real-estate-market regulatory-taking regulatory-takings regulatory-takings-test |
1. Whether a property owner may be deemed to lack investment-backed expectations, and thus be barred from challenging a land use restriction as a regu… |
| 18-324 |
Douglas Leone, et ux., as Trustees Under That Certain Unrecorded Leone-Perkins Family Trust Dated August 26, 1999, as Amended v. Maui County, Hawaii, et al. |
Hawaii |
2018-09-13 |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
14th-amendment 5th-amendment economic-benefit economically-beneficial-use fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment investment-use just-compensation land-use lucas-v-south-carolina-coastal-council natural-state property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings takings-clause |
Whether holding undeveloped property as an "investment" or using it as a "park" in its natural state constitutes economically beneficial or productive… |
| 18-5941 |
Robert Earl Tippens, Jr. v. Virginia |
Virginia |
2018-09-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process fifth-amendment free-speech just-compensation property-rights regulatory-takings standing takings takings-clause |
1. Was it improper for trial court to amend the offense found by the grand jury contrary to Petitioner's criminal intent that had the effect of amendi… |