| 24-997 |
James Doyle, dba Rocky Mountain Ventures, dba Environmental Land Technologies, Ltd. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2025-03-19 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
administrative-exhaustion federal-circuit property-rights regulatory-action ripeness-doctrine takings-claim |
Under Knick v. Township of Scott, 588 U.S. 180 (2019), a regulatory takings claim is ripe for adjudication in federal court when the government reache… |
| 24-736 |
Village Communities, LLC, et al. v. San Diego County, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2025-01-13 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
fifth-amendment inverse-condemnation land-use-permit property-rights takings-claim unconstitutional-conditions |
1. Whether the Ninth Circuit's holding that a land use permit applicant/landowner must show the government's permit condition would coerce the applica… |
| 23-1260 |
Douglas Bruce v. Ogden City Corporation, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2024-06-03 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
14th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process municipal-action property-rights section-1983 standing statute-of-limitations takings takings-claim |
Whether the statute of limitations for a Section 1983 takings claim for the unconstitutional deprivation of private property (specifically real estate… |
| 23A886 |
PPI Enterprises, LLC v. Town of Windham |
New Hampshire |
2024-04-05 |
Presumed Complete |
|
development-denial inverse-condemnation property-rights site-plan takings-claim zoning-ordinance |
Question not identified. |
| 23-1045 |
835 Hinesburg Road, LLC v. City of South Burlington, Vermont, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2024-03-21 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
or whether a property owner is required to submit development-restrictions due-process exhaustion final-decision land-use land-use-permit property-rights regulatory-taking ripeness ripeness-doctrine takings takings-claim |
Whether a takings claim is ripe when a city makes a final decision under existing ordinances denying a land use permit, or whether a property owner is… |
| 23-468 |
Matthew Haney, as Trustee of the Gooseberry Island Trust v. Town of Mashpee, Massachusetts, et al. |
First Circuit |
2023-11-02 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure constitutional-property-rights due-process government-permit judicial-review prudential-ripeness ripeness standing takings takings-claim variance variance-request |
Can the government evade adjudication of constitutional takings claims on prudential ripeness grounds—after it has twice definitively denied necessary… |
| 22-1224 |
Randy Ralston, et al. v. San Mateo County, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-06-21 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights coastal-development due-process government-action land-use-regulation pleading-standards property-rights ripeness ripeness-doctrine takings takings-claim |
Randy Ralston and Linda Mendiola (Ralstons) wish to build a retirement home on their residentially zoned land in San Mateo County, California. However… |
| 22-872 |
Evans Creek, LLC v. City of Reno, Nevada |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-03-13 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
constitutional-law constitutional-property due-process land-use-regulation penn-central penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings takings takings-claim |
Whether a property owner states a valid takings claim by alleging that a regulation substantially deprives the owner of the right to use property, or … |
| 22-228 |
In Re Urvashi Bhagat |
|
2022-09-12 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-law agency-immunity bad-faith damages federal-jurisdiction judicial-discretion mandamus patent-examination patent-rights takings takings-claim |
1. Whether the District Court abused discretion and obstructed justice in denying the existence of arguments and facts recited in the complaint refusi… |
| 22-229 |
In Re Brian D. Swanson |
|
2022-09-12 |
Denied |
|
17th-amendment administrative-law article-5 article-five
22-228" article-five-consent constitutional-interpretation constitutional-ratification equal-suffrage federal-question-jurisdiction georgia judicial-discretion patent-rights popular-elections senate-elections senate-representation seventeenth-amendment state-consent subject-matter-jurisdiction takings-claim Whether the District Court abused discretion in di |
1. Does the Seventeenth Amendment deprive the
State of Georgia of its equal suffrage in the
Senate, requiring its consent under Article 5 of
the Co… |
| 21-1478 |
Nicholas Honchariw v. County of Stanislaus, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-05-24 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
constitutional-interpretation due-process finality-requirement finality-ripeness knick pakdel ripeness-doctrine supreme-court-precedent takings takings-claim williamson-county |
Whether Knick v. Township of Scott, 139 S.Ct. 2162
(2019) and Pakdel v. City and Cty. of San Francisco,
141 S.Ct. 2226 (2021) have sanctioned a pervas… |
| 21-70 |
Gary E. Albright, et al. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2021-07-19 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
certification constitutional-federalism erie-doctrine fifth-amendment railroad-deed state-law state-law-interpretation takings-claim takings-clause |
Does constitutional federalism require a federal court that confronts an outcome-determinative and unresolved State law issue that is particularly wit… |
| 20-1235 |
Burgoyne, LLC v. Chicago Terminal Railroad Company, et al. |
Illinois |
2021-03-08 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
due-process easement-termination national-trails-system-act property-rights state-court-split state-courts surface-transportation-board takings takings-claim |
Petitioner owns a parcel of land in Chicago, Illinois . Chicago Terminal Railroad formerly had the right to operate a portion of rail line subject to … |
| 20-1212 |
Peyman Pakdel, et ux. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-03-03 |
GVR |
Amici (3)Relisted (4) |
42-usc-1983 administrative-remedies exhaustion-of-remedies finality-requirement land-use-regulation property-rights regulatory-takings takings-claim unconstitutional-conditions williamson-county |
Planning for their retirement home, Petitioners (the Pakdels) purchased a tenancy-in-common interest in a six-unit building in San Francisco, which ga… |
| 19-150 |
Lynn Lumbard, et al. v. City of Ann Arbor, Michigan |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-08-01 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
42-usc-1983 5th-amendment federal-court-review fifth-amendment just-compensation loretto-v-teleprompter permanent-physical-occupation physical-occupation san-remo-hotel state-court-exhaustion takings takings-claim takings-clause |
In Knick v. Township of Scott, 588 U.S. __, 139 S. Ct. 2162, 2019 U.S. LEXIS 4197 (U.S., J une 2 1, 2 019), this Court expressly overruled the state c… |