| 25-776 |
Youth 71Five Ministries v. Charlene Williams, Individually and as Director of Oregon Department of Education, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2026-01-02 |
Pending |
Amici (6)Response RequestedResponse Waived |
constitutional-rights employment-discrimination first-amendment government-action grant-funding religious-autonomy |
For years, Petitioner Youth 71Five Ministries received grant funds from Oregon's Youth Community Investment Grants program. One year, 71Five even had … |
| 25-6348 |
Mounir Mrabet v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2025-12-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
consent fourth-amendment government-action probable-cause search-and-seizure warrantless-search |
Can 4L. G&vermen4 <^o iw+o mu ZCclo^J Accent
om4 m j consent -4han ase -iKd' cxaatnst m
v^^rr^n |
| 25-284 |
Leila Green Little, et al. v. Llano County, Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2025-09-11 |
Denied |
Amici (7) |
book-censorship first-amendment free-speech government-action library-access viewpoint-discrimination |
Whether those book-removal decisions are subject to scrutiny under the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. |
| 25A228 |
United States v. Darby Development Company, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2025-08-28 |
Presumed Complete |
|
administrative-agency fifth-amendment government-action regulatory-taking statutory-authority takings-clause |
Question not identified. |
| 24-1236 |
Louis Farrakhan, et al. v. Anti-Defamation League, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2025-06-04 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
42-USC-1983 article-III-standing first-amendment government-action quasi-governmental-actor representational-standing |
1. Whether the Second Circuit failed to follow this
Court's precedent when it held that representational
standing does not exist in claims alleging … |
| 24-1095 |
Chelsea Koetter v. Manistee County Treasurer, et al. |
Michigan |
2025-04-21 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (5) |
constitutional-law due-process government-action just-compensation property-rights takings-clause |
The Manistee County Treasurer foreclosed and sold Chelsea Koetter's home for $106,000 to collect $3,863.40 in taxes, interest, and fees. The Takings C… |
| 24-844 |
Joseph Srour v. City of New York, New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2025-02-07 |
Denied |
|
constitutional-challenge facial-unconstitutionality government-action judicial-review mootness vacatur |
Whether vacatur is proper where the government's voluntary conduct causes the case to become moot in the context of the review of a successful facial … |
| 24-755 |
Mollie Slaybaugh, et vir v. Rutherford County, Tennessee, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2025-01-16 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
fifth-amendment government-action just-compensation police-power property-rights takings-clause |
"Does a common law privilege to access property categorically absolve the government's duty of just compensation for property it physically destroys?" |
| 24-291 |
Apache Stronghold v. United States, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-09-13 |
Denied |
Amici (15)Relisted (18) |
free-exercise-clause government-action native-american-rights religious-exercise religious-freedom-restoration-act sacred-site |
Whether the government "substantially burdens" religious exercise under RFRA, or must satisfy heightened scrutiny under the Free Exercise Clause, when… |
| 23-1363 |
Vicki Baker v. City of McKinney, Texas |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-07-02 |
Denied |
Amici (5)Relisted (4) |
constitutional-law eminent-domain government-action just-compensation police-power property-rights public-use takings-clause |
When the government acquires private property for a public use, the Takings Clause requires the government to provide the owner with "just compensatio… |
| 23-1277 |
PPI Enterprises, LLC v. Town of Windham, New Hampshire |
New Hampshire |
2024-06-05 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
administrative-procedure civil-rights due-process final-decision government-action land-development land-use permit-denial property-rights regulatory-takings ripeness-doctrine takings |
Are two final denials of development applications sufficient to ripen a regulatory takings claim, where the government asserts that it might grant a t… |
| 23A1080 |
Larry R. Steele v. United States Postal Service, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-06-03 |
Presumed Complete |
|
civil-liberties constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment freedom-of-expression government-action |
Question not identified. |
| 23-7201 |
Wayne Phillip Vance v. Glen Engstrom, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2024-04-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights community-welfare compensation due-process government-action individual-rights liberty property standing takings |
1. Does THE U.S GOVERNMENT HAVE TRE RIGHT TO PLACE CITIZENS ANDO OTHER PEOPLE IN HELLISH GIRCUOMSTANCES OR CONDITIONS WITHOUT NO REGARDS FOROURWEALTH,… |
| 23A753 |
United States v. Ideker Farms, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2024-02-15 |
Presumed Complete |
|
endangered-species fifth-amendment flood-control government-action missouri-river takings-clause |
1. a. This case presents Fifth Amendment takings claims based on flooding on hundreds of properties in the Missouri River's historical floodplains.
b… |
| 23-626 |
Elon Musk v. Securities and Exchange Commission |
Second Circuit |
2023-12-11 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-rights constitutional-rights first-amendment free-speech government-action sec-enforcement settlement settlement-agreement standing unconstitutional-conditions |
Whether a party's acceptance of a benefit prevents that party from contending that the government violated the unconstitutional conditions doctrine in… |
| 23-169 |
CraneVeyor Corp. v. City of Rancho Cucamonga, California |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-08-22 |
Denied |
|
due-process economic-impact government-action investment-backed-expectations lucas-v-south-carolina penn-central property-rights regulatory-takings takings zoning-regulation |
1. Should this Court overrule in its entirety, or reconsider parts of, Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York, 438 U.S. 104 (1978)?
2. D… |
| 23-5106 |
John B. Freitas v. Superior Court of California, Alameda County, et al. |
California |
2023-07-14 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-protection due-process equity equity-theft fifth-amendment government-action homeowner-rights just-compensation property-rights takings-clause |
1. The conduct of the Justices of the SCOTUS and the judges of the inferior courts merits impeachment and removal for knowingly and intentionally part… |
| 23-5033 |
Rick John Morales, Jr. v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-07-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure due-diligence expert-witness government-action speedy-trial trial-procedure trial-scheduling witness-appearance |
Whether sending an email asking if there is a "better" date for an expert witness qualifies as the Government's requirement to act with "due diligence… |
| 22-1224 |
Randy Ralston, et al. v. San Mateo County, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-06-21 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights coastal-development due-process government-action land-use-regulation pleading-standards property-rights ripeness ripeness-doctrine takings takings-claim |
Randy Ralston and Linda Mendiola (Ralstons) wish to build a retirement home on their residentially zoned land in San Mateo County, California. However… |
| 22-7581 |
Michael D. Beiter, Jr. v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2023-05-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-records chilling-effect court-precedent due-process government-action grand-jury legal-relief legal-rights penalization procedural-limitation prosecutorial-misconduct selective-prosecution |
Whether, under Borderkircher v. Hayes, 434 U.S. 357, 358-59 (1978); North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969); Chaffin v. Stynchcombe, 412 U.S. 17… |
| 22-1100 |
Palani Karupaiyan v. Township of Woodbridge, New Jersey, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2023-05-10 |
Denied |
|
14th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process government-action property-rights section-1982 standing takings writ-of-mandamus |
Petitioner's prayed reliefs were National importance of having the US Supreme Court decide or conflict with USSC ruling, or importance of similarly si… |
| 22-7390 |
Robert James Turner, aka Robert James Branham v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2023-04-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
assimilative-crimes-act civil-rights criminal-procedure district-court due-process federal-jurisdiction government-action jurisdictional-dispute legal-review ninth-circuit stipulation |
relied almost exclusively on Torver's jurisdictional "stipulation" iNvolving the Lortons Facility, Can this stipulatiow legally Torner's case?
Moreov… |
| 22-843 |
J. P. Bryan, et al. v. Eleazar R. Cano, County Judge |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-03-06 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights constitutional-injury due-process government-action judicial-review public-health public-health-emergency rational-basis-test standing takings |
1. Is the rational basis test used by the Panel to ratify
respondent's COVID-19 orders closing petitioners' hotel
and removing its guests overly defer… |
| 22-6567 |
Pedro Benitez v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2023-01-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law administrative-procedure-act civil-procedure government-action judicial-review standing |
(1) When Petitioner's Attorney failed to cite Supreme Court Precedent Deon v United States (20M) in the district Court, did that failure deprive the D… |
| 22-650 |
Orlando Bar Group, LLC, et al. v. Ron DeSantis, Governor of Florida, et al. |
Florida |
2023-01-13 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
due-process eminent-domain fifth-amendment government-action just-compensation property-rights public-nuisance state-of-emergency takings |
During a state of emergency, are there constitutional safeguards, under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, that prohibit the gover… |
| 22-6523 |
Alfonzo Johnlouis v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-01-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
fourth-amendment government-action government-actor mail-carrier postal-service search-and-seizure standing unreasonable-search unreasonable-searches warrantless-search |
Is the warrantless search of a First Class sealed mail Priority package by a United States Postal Service mail carrier during the course and scope of … |
| 22-609 |
Carsten Igor Rosenow, aka Carlos Senta v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-01-04 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
circuit-split electronic-communication electronic-communications fourth-amendment government-action privacy private-search search-and-seizure statutory-interpretation |
In the context of electronic communications, a series of statutes give companies permission to access their users' private correspondence, remove impe… |
| 22-6367 |
Randall Bernard Allen v. County of Los Angeles, California, et al |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-12-21 |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-law civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process government-action individual-rights rule-of-law standing takings |
Where government, state and city administrations are regulators, can The Rule of Law, and U.S.Constitutional rights be abandoned for those administrat… |
| 22-493 |
Erica Bojicic, dba Evolve Dance Company, LLC, et al. v. Richard Michael DeWine, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the Governor of Ohio, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2022-11-23 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
constitutional-law due-process emergency-powers eminent-domain fifth-amendment government-action necessity police-power property-rights regulatory-takings takings takings-clause |
Is the government required to prove with evidence that its action taken during an emergency which intrudes on private property rights was a necessity … |
| 22-5721 |
Sealed Appellant v. United States |
First Circuit |
2022-10-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
18-usc-4245 constitutional-rights due-process government-action involuntary-transfer liberty-interest mental-health mental-health-detention statutory-procedure vitek-v-jones |
1. Whether the government violated petitioner's constitutional due process rights by involuntarily transferring him to, and holding him in, a secure m… |
| 22-253 |
Christine Chui v. Benjamin Tze-Man Chui, et al. |
California |
2022-09-19 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights due-process evidentiary-hearing government-action guardianship judicial-procedure property-rights settlement settlement-binding |
1. Whether our government can deprive real properties from parties (including wards in guardianships) on complex matters in chambers without any notic… |
| 22-97 |
Owl Creek Asia I, L.P., et al. v. United States, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2022-08-02 |
Denied |
|
collins-v-yellen conservatorship corporate-ownership federal-claims federal-housing-finance-agency government-action net-worth-sweep private-shareholders property-interest shareholders-rights takings takings-clause |
If the United States causes a company to transfer to the United States for the public benefit private shareholders' rights incident to their ownership… |
| 22-5097 |
Hidey Diaz, aka Silvio Manuel Amador, aka Celio Alvarez-Carrasco v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2022-07-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
10th-circuit circuit-court-review criminal-sentencing federal-prosecution government-action guideline-range sentencing-disparity sentencing-guidelines statutory-directive substantive-reasonableness unwarranted-disparity |
Did the Tenth Circuit err in concluding that it was barred from considering, on review for the substantive reasonableness of Mr. Diaz's sentence, the … |
| 21-8202 |
Eric Watkins v. Officer Shields, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-06-22 |
Granted |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights digital-search due-process fourth-amendment government-action probable-cause property-rights search-and-seizure takings territorial-jurisdiction warrant-authority |
Question not identified. |
| 21-1532 |
Brian Davison v. Deborah Rose, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2022-06-07 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-scrutiny due-process first-amendment free-speech government-action government-speech public-forum speech-restriction standing viewpoint-discrimination |
1. Whether a forum and scrutiny analysis are required when considering First Amendment infringement claims involving the government barring citizen sp… |
| 21-1511 |
Joy Garner, Individually and on Behalf of The Control Group, et al. v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-06-02 |
Denied |
Amici (5)Relisted (2) |
civil-rights constitutional-rights control-group due-process fifth-amendment government-action mandatory-vaccination scientific-evidence scientific-method standing standing-doctrine vaccine-mandate |
Without a control group to establish a cause-and-effect relationship, 'science' is not science; it is guesswork. True science requires control groups.… |
| 21-7747 |
Michael G. Peters v. Kenneth M. Hoyt, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-04-28 |
Denied |
IFP |
citizen-rights civil-rights constitutional-violation corporate-cover-up due-process evidence-suppression free-speech government-action legal-dispute petition-clause standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 21-933 |
Vdare Foundation v. City of Colorado Springs, Colorado |
Tenth Circuit |
2021-12-23 |
Denied |
|
42-usc-1983 civil-rights first-amendment free-speech government-action hate-speech municipal-services retaliation retaliation-claim section-1983 |
Whether a complaint based on a local government's public announcement that the plaintiff's speech may be illegal "hate speech" and that, therefore, th… |
| 21-6626 |
Ronald Dean Ehinger v. Michigan |
Michigan |
2021-12-15 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights due-process free-speech government-action standing takings |
Question not identified. |
| 21-854 |
Rachel Maniscalco, et al. v. New York City Department of Education, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2021-12-09 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-rights covid-19-mandate due-process employment employment-rights executive-order government-action professional-restriction public-health public-sector substantive-due-process vaccination |
Respondents through an Executive Order demanded COVID-19 vaccinations for all public school employees, including teachers. Those who did not comply ha… |
| 21-6302 |
Juan Alvarado-Gonzalez v. Illinois |
Illinois |
2021-11-16 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection first-amendment free-speech government-action immigration language-access public-officials retaliation |
p4! on prom m a(c\ Ce<">-br?( /lic<\.
/Mo*Vv'oo 4~o WN-V^d^awl G^i'lV Pi#**- Q^d
\Mca4eJ 4h* Q,>ecau^
On K°ow/^ "Hios'f
q^J PuLl^c &et*«J'eh ytyf^W c… |
| 21-148 |
California Restaurant Association, Inc. v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, et al. |
California |
2021-08-03 |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
constitutional-law due-process government-action jacobson-v-massachusetts property-rights public-health rational-basis takings takings-clause |
Is due process satisfied, consistent with the decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), where a public health department acts based o… |
| 20-1751 |
Susan Fischer, et al. v. Phil Murphy, Governor of New Jersey, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2021-06-16 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-rights constitutional-rights employee-rights first-amendment government-action public-employee standing union-dues union-speech waiver waiver-doctrine |
In 2018, the Court in Janus v. AFSCME, Council 31 held that public employees have a First Amendment right not to subsidize union speech. 138 S. Ct. 24… |
| 20-7684 |
Richard S. Glenn, Jr. v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2021-04-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law burden-of-proof civil-rights constitutional-law due-process federal-jurisdiction government-action judicial-review legal-precedent standing |
Whether the Lower Court applied too high a standard or a burden of proof as a matter of law, petitioner argues. |
| 20-7593 |
Fernando Clarke v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2021-03-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-2252 child-pornography criminal-law file-sharing government-action peer-to-peer peer-to-peer-network statutory-interpretation transportation-statute |
Fernando Clarke was charged with, inter alia, two counts of transporting child pornography. At trial, the government witnesses testified that Mr. Clar… |
| 20-7335 |
Raymond E. Carr v. Ed Gonzalez, Sheriff, Harris County, Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-03-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process free-speech government-action habeas-corpus retaliation standing |
Question not identified. |
| 20-1203 |
Moose Jooce, et al. v. Food and Drug Administration, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2021-03-03 |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
administrative-procedure-act agency agency-law appointments-clause due-process government-action ratification ratification-doctrine rulemaking-authority standing |
Whether a government official has the power to validate the unauthorized actions of other officials is presumptively determined by the law of agency, … |
| 20-889 |
The Sherwin-Williams Company v. Delaware County, Pennsylvania, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2021-01-05 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
article-iii-standing chilled-speech civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment free-speech government-action standing |
Fundamental in this Court's Article III jurisprudence is the principle that the federal courts are open to hear federal claims for declaratory and inj… |
| 20-806 |
Mary Swartzlander v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2020-12-14 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
accrual erosion flooding flooding-event government-action government-taking land-erosion limitations-period property-rights statute-of-limitations takings |
When does a taking claim accrue against the government based on erosion caused by government action, where the erosion for many years was present only… |
| 20-768 |
Gerardo Serrano v. United States Customs and Border Protection, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-12-04 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
appropriate-case civil-forfeiture due-process federal-law government-action legal-detention post-seizure-hearing split-in-circuits vehicle-seizure |
When the government seizes a vehicle for civil forfeiture, does due process require a prompt post-seizure hearing to test the legality of the seizure … |
| 20-5823 |
Michael R. Spengler v. Los Angeles County District Attorney |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-09-28 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights collateral-estoppel constitutional-rights contempt-trial double-jeopardy due-process government-action habeas-corpus judicial-procedure pretrial-proceedings |
1 pUrSUANT to 28 USC 2241, A pretrial petitioner MAY ChAlleNGe his custodt THAT S IN VIOIAHION OF the consttumon its laws and trenties. COgNIzAble ClA… |
| 19-1252 |
Callan Campbell, et al. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2020-04-28 |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
final-decision government-action property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings statute-of-limitations takings tucker-act |
Does the Tucker Act's statute of limitations for a regulatory takings claim accrue when the Government makes a final decision, or when the plaintiff's… |
| 19-986 |
Mary Lou Vosburgh, et al. v. Burnt Hills-Ballston Lake Central School District, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2020-02-06 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights due-process government-action liberty-interest mandamus name-clearing procedural-rights reputation reputation-harm |
When a government actor deprives an individual of his liberty interest in his reputation, is a state court proceeding in the nature of mandamus to com… |
| 19-948 |
Gene Rechtzigel v. Minnesota |
Minnesota |
2020-01-29 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights due-process eighth-amendment fifth-amendment first-amendment fourth-amendment government-action petition-clause sixth-amendment standing |
I. Did the Government deprive Petitioner the First Amendment Right "to petition the Government for a redress of grievances?"
II. Did the Government d… |
| 19-6930 |
Richard Knider Jackson v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-12-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights disability due-process government-action rehabilitation-act standing transcript |
Question not identified. |
| 19-6786 |
Carol Johnene Morris v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-11-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process government-action habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review property sentencing standing takings |
Whether the Western District of Texas' District Courts lawfully uses Carol Johnene Morris, C# 57931, 1988 for conviction to try granted home confineme… |
| 19-6654 |
Tremaine Bernard Johnson v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-11-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-provisions criminal-extradition due-process federal-authority federalism government-action interstate-jurisdiction jurisdiction jurisdictional-dispute legal-procedure reasons-for-granting-writ state-authority statement-of-case statutory-provisions uniform-criminal-extradition-act uniform-law |
Where NO Cece IW ELS! OF AUIWocitY
What is the coorsé of ACHON When
dhe unilorm criminal exdradean
ACY IS violated, betwee al Government
And state? |
| 19-383 |
Joseph Raimondo v. Denise Page Hood, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-09-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection first-amendment free-speech government-action political-affiliation political-discrimination taxation |
Question 1. Can the United States Federal Government signal out citizens and demand taxation and then deprive the citizens, Constitutional Equal Prote… |
| 19-258 |
Richard Lewis Katzin, et al. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2019-08-28 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
5th-amendment deed-dispute due-process fifth-amendment government-action government-taking just-compensation land-ownership property-rights remand takings takings-clause title-claim unsalable-property |
1. Whether the Government can claim title to privately owned land and actively work to make that property unsaleable, without triggering the Fifth Ame… |
| 18-9814 |
Robert Wazney v. Sharon Wazney |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-06-26 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process government-action jurisdiction standing takings |
HAS GOVERNMENT ACTION RESTRICTED THE CONTENT OF MY SPEECH IN VIOLATION OF THE U.S. CONST. AMEND. 1?
HAS GOVERNMENT ACTION RESTRICTED MY RIGHT TO PETI… |
| 18A1328 |
Richard Lewis Katzin, et al. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2019-06-18 |
Presumed Complete |
|
fifth-amendment government-action just-compensation land-ownership property-rights taking |
Whether the Government's unfounded assertions of title to private land rendering it unsaleable and valueless constitute a taking of property without j… |
| 18-1502 |
Brian Mark Burmaster v. Eli Lilly and Company |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-06-03 |
Denied |
|
6th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights drug-marketing due-process free-speech government-action government-intervention government-overreach government-regulation medical-ethics pharmaceutical pharmaceutical-liability pharmaceutical-litigation sixth-amendment |
If a company's manufactured and marketed product, such as Eli Lilly's Zyprexa is cited by the US Government Quack (called a medical doctor?) as the mi… |
| 18-1417 |
Yankton County, South Dakota v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2019-05-13 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
accrual-suspension accrual-suspension-rule fifth-amendment fifth-amendment-taking government-action gradual-physical-process inverse-condemnation property-rights stabilization-doctrine takings takings-clause united-states-v-dickinson |
In an inverse condemnation case in which the taking arose out of a gradual and continuous physical process put in motion by the Government, may the cl… |
| 18-1373 |
Gene Rechtzigel v. City of Apple Valley, Minnesota |
Minnesota |
2019-05-01 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process eminent-domain government-action liberty property property-rights standing takings trial-by-jury |
I. Did the Government deprive Petitioner of Liberty, without Due Process of Law?
II. Did the Government deprive Petitioner of Property, without Due P… |
| 18-1112 |
Alvin S. Kanofsky v. Bethlehem Area School District |
Pennsylvania |
2019-02-26 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
article-v bill-of-rights civil-liberties civil-rights constitutional-rights discrimination due-process equal-protection freedom-of-speech government-action religion religious-discrimination takings taxation taxation-dispute |
Was Kanofsky denied Due Process, as required in Article V of the Bill of Rights?
Was Kanofsky being discriminated against in the legal proceedings be… |
| 18-7592 |
Zane Hubbard v. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-01-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law court-procedure due-process fair-procedure government-action judicial-review legal-interpretation standing statutory-interpretation |
(1). In CoNTROVERSIEs /NVOLVING TRENSON AND LEVy By
The UiiTeo SnTEs GovernmeNT AwD WiTuiN One STiE WiTH
SoTE GoreRnMieNT AGAiNsT One Orr MoRE OF lres… |
| 18-963 |
Terrence Hill v. City of Jackson, Michigan, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-01-25 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
demolition demolition-notice due-process government-action government-policy municipal-liability notice opportunity-for-hearing parratt-v-taylor procedural-fairness property-rights |
1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank requires the government provide the owner "notice and opportunity for hearing appropriate to the nature of the case… |
| 18-7026 |
Bryan Coats v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2018-12-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appeals civil-procedure civil-rights court-of-appeals due-process federal-courts government-action jurisdiction jurisdiction-filing legal-procedure order-denying-rehearing petition-for-rehearing rehearing standing takings timeliness united-states |
Question not identified. |
| 18-359 |
St. Bernard Parish, et al. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2018-09-19 |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
catastrophic-flooding categorical-exemption causation constitutional-taking due-process flood-control flood-damage government-action government-inaction government-liability property-rights takings takings-clause takings-liability |
In Arkansas Game, this Court admonished the Federal Circuit to eschew "blanket exclusionary rules" immunizing the Government from liability in takings… |