| 24-947 |
Chanel Wiley v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2025-03-04 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
constitutional-rights court-precedent criminal-procedure jury-prejudice ninth-circuit physical-restraints |
Whether a criminal defendant whose government imposed restraint is perceptible to a jury must show actual prejudice, as the decision below held, or wh… |
| 22-7685 |
Satish Kartan v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-06-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
compelled-testimony-withdrawal court-precedent due-process forced-labor griffin-v-california prosecutor-comments right-to-testify rock-v-arkansas sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation |
I. whether the district court violated Kartan's Might to testify and the subsequent prosecitor's comments, "These defendants don't like answering ques… |
| 22-7581 |
Michael D. Beiter, Jr. v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2023-05-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-records chilling-effect court-precedent due-process government-action grand-jury legal-relief legal-rights penalization procedural-limitation prosecutorial-misconduct selective-prosecution |
Whether, under Borderkircher v. Hayes, 434 U.S. 357, 358-59 (1978); North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969); Chaffin v. Stynchcombe, 412 U.S. 17… |
| 22-6508 |
Joseph M. Evans v. Amy Helene Zubrensky |
District of Columbia |
2023-01-10 |
Denied |
IFP |
4th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-law court-precedent due-process judicial-review legal-interpretation search-and-seizure standing statutory-interpretation surveillance |
Question not identified. |
| 22-5728 |
Glenn Spradley v. Pat Frank, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-09-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
cause-of-action circuit-court civil-procedure civil-rights court-precedent due-process municipal-liability precedent standing venue-selection |
1. Whether a complaint's conclusory allegations of municipal liability state a cause of action, according to this Court's prior precedent.
2. Whether… |
| 22-157 |
The Key Finance, Inc., et al. v. DJ Koon |
Oklahoma |
2022-08-18 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
arbitration-agreements attorneys-fees civil-procedure court-precedent dispute-resolution federal-arbitration-act judicial-enforcement standing |
Whether the decisions below violated the Federal Arbitration Act and decades of Court precedent by failing to enforce the express terms of the parties… |
| 21-251 |
Oklahoma v. William Clayton Brown |
Oklahoma |
2021-08-20 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (4) |
court-precedent criminal-appeal criminal-jurisdiction federal-indian-law indian-law judicial-review mcgirt-precedent oklahoma-jurisdiction stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
| 21-5245 |
Jamie Patrick Hahn v. Georgia |
Georgia |
2021-07-29 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
case-record constitutional-rights court-precedent criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection judicial-review legal-denial procedural-challenge prosecutorial-misconduct vindictive-prosecution |
1. Will this Court review the fact of the Respondent's vindictive prosecution? The record of the case shows the vindictiveness and the lower courts de… |
| 20-1818 |
Ashlee R. Hull, Individually and in Her Capacity as Co-Executrix of the Estate of John Edward Hull, Sr., et al. v. Muhammed Samar Nasher-Alneam, et al. |
West Virginia |
2021-06-30 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
14th-amendment civil-rights court-precedent due-process motion-to-dismiss standing suicide suicide-litigation wrongful-death |
1. Whether the denial of a person's right to pursue litigation based solely on the fact that the person died via suicide is a violation of the 14th Am… |
| 20-586 |
James T. Gersky v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2020-11-03 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
5th-amendment court-precedent criminal-procedure defendant-testimony due-process estelle-v-smith judicial-guidance mitchell-v-united-states sentencing |
I.
Should this Court provide guidance to district
courts regarding the forced testimony of
defendants at sentencing, in accordance with
this Court's p… |
| 20-5256 |
Travis Jackson Marron, aka Abdul Mu'min v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections |
Fourth Circuit |
2020-08-04 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights court-precedent due-process judicial-ruling judicial-rulings jurisdiction legislative-law legislative-laws standing subject-matter-jurisdiction virginia-supreme-court |
"Marron " prays this Honorable Court will hear his extraordinary case about
the errors of the lower courts when they violated Appellants ' Constitutio… |
| 20-5033 |
Travis Jackson Marron, aka Abdul Mu'Min v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections |
Fourth Circuit |
2020-07-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights court-precedent due-process judicial-ruling judicial-rulings jurisdiction legislative-law legislative-laws standing subject-matter-jurisdiction virginia-supreme-court |
"Marron " prays this Honorable Court will hear his extraordinary case about the
errors of the lower courts when they violated Appellants ' Constitutio… |
| 18-385 |
Jakks Pacific, Inc. v. Accasvek LLC |
District of Columbia |
2018-09-25 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure court-precedent diversity diversity-jurisdiction espinosa-v-united-student-aid-funds finality-of-judgments judicial-interpretation jurisdiction procedural-dismissal public-policy standing subject-matter-jurisdiction united-student-aid-funds-v-espinosa |
Did the lower courts disregard this Court's judgment in United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa, 559 U.S. 260 (2010), and thereby defeat the public… |
| 18-303 |
Henryk Oleksy v. General Electric Company |
Federal Circuit |
2018-09-12 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-procedure civil-procedure counterclaim-dismissal court-precedent due-process federal-circuit finality finality-of-judgment judgment-finality patent patent-law precedent supervisory-power |
1. Whether this Court should exercise its supervisory power to assure that precedents are followed and reverse a decision that the district court judg… |