Whether, under Borderkircher v. Hayes, 434 U.S. 357, 358-59 (1978); North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969); Chaffin v. Stynchcombe, 412 U.S. 17 (1973); and United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570 (1969), a person is precluded to do what the law plainly allows him to do, as for the government to pursue a course of action whose objective is to penalize a person's legal reliance on his rights?

Whether, under Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NW, 441 U.S. 211 (1979) and United States v. Baggot, 463 U.S. 476 (1983), a person is precluded from having access to grand jury material even after having met every prong in each of the above tests?

Whether a person is precluded from doing what the law plainly allows them to do, as the government pursues a course of action to penalize a person's reliance on their legal rights