No. 18-303
Henryk Oleksy v. General Electric Company
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-procedure counterclaim-dismissal court-precedent due-process federal-circuit finality finality-of-judgment judgment-finality patent patent-law precedent supervisory-power
Key Terms:
DueProcess Patent
DueProcess Patent
Latest Conference:
2018-10-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether this Court should exercise its supervisory power to assure that precedents are followed and reverse a decision that the district court judgment was not final because a counterclaim was not EXPRESSLY dismissed even though this counterclaim was effectively and necessarily dismissed by the district court?
2. Whether Due Process Rights of the Petitioner Were Violated When the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Without Opinion District Court's Decision That Was Clearly Inconsistent with Precedents?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether district court judgment was final despite lack of express dismissal of invalidity counterclaim
Docket Entries
2018-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.
2018-09-18
Waiver of right of respondent General Electric Company to respond filed.
2018-09-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 12, 2018)
Attorneys
General Electric Company
Marla Butler — Robins Kaplan LLP, Respondent
Henryk Oleksy
Slawomir Zbigniew Szczepanski — Szczepanski Law Firm, Petitioner