No. 21-251
Oklahoma v. William Clayton Brown
Tags: court-precedent criminal-appeal criminal-jurisdiction federal-indian-law indian-law judicial-review mcgirt-precedent oklahoma-jurisdiction stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-sovereignty
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
(distributed 4 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma should be overruled
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2022-01-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-04
Reply of petitioner Oklahoma filed.
2021-10-22
Brief amicus curiae of Muscogee (Creek) Nation filed.
2021-10-22
Brief of respondent William Clayton Brown in opposition filed.
2021-10-22
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent William Clayton Brown.
2021-09-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021.
2021-09-29
Response Requested. (Due October 29, 2021)
2021-09-22
Letter from counsel for petitioner filed.
2021-09-16
Waiver of right of respondent William Clayton Brown to respond filed.
2021-08-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 20, 2021)
Attorneys
Muscogee (Creek) Nation
Riyaz Amir Kanji — Kanji & Kantzen, PLLC, Amicus
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Petitioner
William Clayton Brown
Zachary Charles Schauf — Jenner & Block, LLP, Respondent
Virginia Sanders — Oklahoma Indigent Defense System, Respondent