No. 19-6654
Tremaine Bernard Johnson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-provisions criminal-extradition due-process federal-authority federalism government-action interstate-jurisdiction jurisdiction jurisdictional-dispute legal-procedure reasons-for-granting-writ state-authority statement-of-case statutory-provisions uniform-criminal-extradition-act uniform-law
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
Where NO Cece IW ELS! OF AUIWocitY
What is the coorsé of ACHON When
dhe unilorm criminal exdradean
ACY IS violated, betwee al Government
And state?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Where does federal authority end and state authority begin when the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act is violated?
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-11-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-11-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 16, 2019)
Attorneys
Tremaine Johnson
Tremaine Bernard Johnson — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent