| 25-456 |
Capital Health Regional Medical Center, et al. v. New Jersey, et al. |
New Jersey |
2025-10-15 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
constitutional-interpretation due-process economic-burden government-regulation physical-taking property-rights |
This case presents two important questions concerning
protection of private property rights under the Fifth and
Fourteen Amendments. These questions… |
| 24-803 |
Michael Quinn Sullivan v. Texas Ethics Commission |
Texas |
2025-01-28 |
Denied |
Amici (9)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
citizen-communication first-amendment free-speech government-regulation lobbying-restrictions political-speech |
The question presented is whether —and if so, under what circumstances —the First Amendment permits the government to require ordinary citizens to reg… |
| 24A670 |
Pierre Kory, MD, et al. v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California |
Ninth Circuit |
2025-01-08 |
Denied |
|
covid-19 first-amendment government-regulation medical-speech physician-speech strict-scrutiny |
According to the district court and the Ninth Circuit, all speech between a doctor and a patient is unprotected by the First Amendment because it is a… |
| 24-487 |
James G. Collins v. Monterey County, California |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-10-31 |
Denied |
|
economic-deprivation government-regulation lucas-doctrine penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-taking |
Does a taking analyzed under Lucas v. S.C. Coastal Council require that the affected property be left with no value even if the regulation in question… |
| 23-5272 |
Grace Woodham v. Helen Hanks, Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Corrections, et al. |
New Hampshire |
2023-08-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
compelled-speech content-neutrality first-amendment free-speech government-regulation private-entities |
Question not identified. |
| 23-5160 |
Scott Eric Houston v. Louisiana |
Louisiana |
2023-07-21 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
compelled-speech content-moderation first-amendment free-speech government-regulation social-media |
00 rii.q+ri C/vjp+ ComplifiH 4Kp Lnn'ic;,nnn ^upriomP
C C\t/f>+ nprlpr 9 |
| 22-1149 |
Pacific Carlton Development Corp., et al. v. New York State Urban Development Corporation, dba Empire State Development Corporation |
New York |
2023-05-26 |
Denied |
|
certificate-of-occupancy certificates-of-occupancy due-process eminent-domain fifth-amendment government-regulation government-seizure property-rights takings |
Are government-issued attributes of private property (e.g., certificates of occupancy, building permits, business permits) entitled to constitutional … |
| 22-1095 |
Community Housing Improvement Program, et al. v. City of New York, New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2023-05-10 |
Denied |
Amici (12) |
affordable-housing civil-rights due-process government-regulation housing-law physical-taking property-rights regulatory-taking rent-control takings |
New York's Rent Stabilization Law (RSL) is the nation's most stringent rental housing regulation, governing one million New York City apartments. It a… |
| 22-1048 |
Joseph E. Blackburn, Jr., et ux. v. Dare County, North Carolina, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2023-04-28 |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (2) |
5th-amendment civil-procedure constitutional-law due-process eminent-domain fifth-amendment government-regulation property-rights regulatory-takings takings takings-clause |
Whether a governmental regulation prohibiting all physical access to a landowner's property is a "per se" taking under the Fifth Amendment of the Unit… |
| 22-842 |
National Rifle Association of America v. Maria T. Vullo |
Second Circuit |
2023-03-06 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (41)Response RequestedRelisted (7) |
1st-amendment civil-rights corporate-social-responsibility first-amendment free-speech government-intimidation government-regulation regulatory-coercion second-amendment viewpoint-discrimination |
Bantam Books v. Sullivan held that a state commission with no formal regulatory power violated the First Amendment when it "deliberately set out to ac… |
| 22-6143 |
Blake Sandlain v. C. Maruka, Warden |
Fourth Circuit |
2022-11-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
compelled-speech content-neutrality first-amendment free-speech government-regulation private-entities |
Question not identified. |
| 22-135 |
Heather Kokesch Del Castillo v. Joseph A. Ladapo, Secretary, Florida Department of Health |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-08-15 |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
circuit-split constitutional-law first-amendment free-speech government-regulation occupational-licensing occupational-regulation professional-speech speech-restriction |
Whether a government prohibition on communicating a message is exempt from First Amendment scrutiny simply because that prohibition flows from a statu… |
| 22-5315 |
Ryan Rydell Bonner v. Texas |
Texas |
2022-08-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
burden-of-proof censorship clear-and-present-danger constitutional-law first-amendment free-speech government-regulation statutory-vagueness |
-QuESTID nI I.) CoMsfifuTlO/vlAL IavJ To-\a1 it SfftTi/tfeS,, ElRST AM0\lDM0\tT
AMD STATUTORY V/AfcUENlESS :
Because ; First fcMDMQvT freedoms meed Me… |
| 21-7963 |
Steven Strong Bear Stevenson v. California |
California |
2022-05-24 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights content-neutrality free-speech government-regulation public-forum viewpoint-discrimination |
Question not identified. |
| 21-7511 |
Kevin E. Herriott v. Charles Burton, Warden |
Fourth Circuit |
2022-03-31 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights due-process equal-protection free-speech government-regulation judicial-review |
WHETHER THE SOUTH CAROLINA APPELLATE COURT RULES 2-05 (a)(4) FRG. VIOLATE CONTINUE A LEGITIMATE GOVERNMENTAL OBJECTIVE? |
| 21-7108 |
Kevin Stephen Ryan v. Minnesota |
Minnesota |
2022-02-14 |
Denied |
IFP |
1st-amendment civil-rights content-based-restriction free-speech government-regulation prior-restraint |
Question not identified. |
| 21-1120 |
Chad Thompson, et al. v. Richard Michael DeWine, Governor of Ohio, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2022-02-14 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
ballot-access civil-rights constitutional-challenge COVID-19-restrictions first-amendment free-speech government-regulation initiative-placement mootness standing |
1. Whether ever-changing and ongoing governmentissued COVID-19 restrictions moot First Amendment
challenges to ballot access restrictions.
2. Whether… |
| 21-5464 |
Steven Eric Walker v. United States, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-08-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (3)IFP |
2nd-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process government-regulation individual-liberty second-amendment self-defense standing supremacy-clause |
In District of Columbia v. Heller, this Court acknowledged that the Second Amendment protects a pre-existing fundamental right to armed self-defense w… |
| 20-893 |
Duane Ronald Belanus v. Lynn Guyer, Warden |
Montana |
2021-01-05 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
compelled-speech content-neutrality free-speech government-regulation private-entities public-forum |
Question not identified. |
| 20-6008 |
Brian Evans v. Kaiali'i Kahele |
Hawaii |
2020-10-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
compelled-speech content-neutrality first-amendment free-speech government-regulation private-entities |
1. During an Objection to an Election, if a candidate is duly served and fails to Answer the
Complaint or otherwise appear, is he in Default and shou… |
| 20-306 |
Robert Olan and Theodore Huber v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2020-09-09 |
GVR |
Amici (2) |
conversion criminal-procedure dirks-v-sec fraud fraud-statute government-regulation insider-trading personal-benefit property-rights securities-law |
1. Whether information about a proposed government regulation is "property" or a "thing of value" belonging to a federal, state, or local regulator su… |
| 19-1175 |
John Fritz, et ux. v. Washoe County, Nevada |
Nevada |
2020-03-26 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
economic-impact economic-impairment fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment government-regulation loretto-v-teleprompter physical-invasion physical-taking property-rights regulatory-takings takings |
To constitute a taking under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, must a physical invasion also destroy or substantially impair an owner's economicall… |
| 19-1091 |
Steve Ray Evans v. Sandy City, Utah, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2020-03-05 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
expressive-conduct first-amendment free-speech government-burden government-regulation less-restrictive-alternatives public-forum roadway-medians speech-restriction traffic-safety |
1. Whether a governme nt may ban expressive
conduc t without first trying to advance its interests
using less speech -restrictive measures , as the … |
| 19-6432 |
Michael Anthony Thibodeaux v. Drew Evans, Superintendent, Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension |
Minnesota |
2019-10-29 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-law constitutional-rights due-process government-regulation liberty-interest predatory-offender-registration procedural-due-process procedural-safeguards sex-offender-registration split-authority |
The Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution provides that the government may not infringe upon a person's protectable liberty interest wi… |
| 19-439 |
CTIA - The Wireless Association v. City of Berkeley, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-10-02 |
Denied |
Amici (6) |
commercial-speech compelled-disclosure compelled-speech consumer-protection disclosure-requirements first-amendment government-regulation intermediate-scrutiny zauderer zauderer-standard |
In Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Supreme Court of Ohio, 471 U.S. 626 (1985), this Court held that, although government regulation of c… |
| 18-9605 |
Don Ferguson v. Florida |
Florida |
2019-06-11 |
Denied |
IFP |
7th-amendment compelled-speech content-neutrality criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection fair-trial first-amendment free-speech government-regulation jury-instructions private-entities |
Whether A Great Public Importance Exists Of Florida Courts' Denied Pro Se Petitioner's Representing Himself At Jury Trial, Of His (7th) Amendment Cons… |
| 18-9582 |
In Re E. Edward Zimmermann |
|
2019-06-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (3)IFP |
civil-rights due-process employment-conditions federal-preemption federalism government-regulation labor-law labor-relations labor-rights national-labor-relations-act statutory-interpretation workplace-governance |
Are "terms and conditions of employment and working conditions" as defined by The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), subject matter left to free peo… |
| 18-1502 |
Brian Mark Burmaster v. Eli Lilly and Company |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-06-03 |
Denied |
|
6th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights drug-marketing due-process free-speech government-action government-intervention government-overreach government-regulation medical-ethics pharmaceutical pharmaceutical-liability pharmaceutical-litigation sixth-amendment |
If a company's manufactured and marketed product, such as Eli Lilly's Zyprexa is cited by the US Government Quack (called a medical doctor?) as the mi… |
| 18-1192 |
The Little Sisters of the Poor Jeanne Jugan Residence v. California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-03-13 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-procedure administrative-procedure-act constitutional-rights contraceptive-coverage contraceptive-mandate government-mandate government-regulation health-care health-plans healthcare-coverage healthcare-law interim-final-rules national-importance religious-exemption religious-exemptions religious-freedom-restoration-act religious-objection standing |
Since 2011, the federal courts have repeatedly considered whether forcing religious objectors to provide health plans that include contraceptive cover… |
| 18-7931 |
Michael Keith Henley v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-02-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure compelled-speech content-neutrality due-process fraudulent-plea-agreement free-speech government-regulation ineffective-assistance-of-counsel miscarriage-of-justice private-property public-forum standing |
1). Whether, the United States Appeal Court and District Court incorrectly decide the facts? (YES) What Facts?
Qa))Whether the U.S Appeal Court and D… |
| 18-6942 |
Monserrate Zapata v. PECO Energy Company |
Third Circuit |
2018-12-06 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
administrative-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction federal-regulatory-commission government-regulation pleading-standards property-rights smart-meter standing state-actor utility-regulation utility-service utility-shut-off |
Whether judges may make findings of fact at the pleading stage in dismissing claims for "failure to state a claim."
Whether the District Court erred … |