eminent-domain
77 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25-1158 | Amy Hadley v. City of South Bend, Indiana, et al. | Seventh Circuit | 2026-04-08 | Pending | eminent-domain fifth-amendment just-compensation law-enforcement-liability police-power takings-clause | 1. Whether the Takings Clause has a police power exception, making no compensation due when the government damages private property under its police p… | |
| 25-536 | Robert G. Hicks, Individually and as Trustee of the Roberta Cherry Hicks Testamentary Trust v. City of Hopkinsville, Sewerage and Water Works Commission, dba Hopkinsville Water Environment Authority | Kentucky | 2025-11-03 | Denied | Response Waived | 14th-amendment discretionary-review due-process eminent-domain jurisdiction state-court | In an eminent domain proceding in state court involving non-residents, does a failure to cite or follow that state's own clear statutory and decisiona… |
| 25-278 | Jeffrey Lance Hill, Sr. v. Suwannee River Water Management District | Florida | 2025-09-10 | Denied | Response Waived | administrative-law due-process eminent-domain government-overreach property-rights takings-clause | 1. Whether the government overextended and leveraged their permitting monopoly to take private property in violation the Takings Clause: and 2. Wheth… |
| 25-249 | Christy Poon-Atkins, et vir v. Riversprings at Alcovy Homeowners Association, Inc., et al. | Eleventh Circuit | 2025-09-03 | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (2) | constitutional-jurisdiction due-process eminent-domain inverse-condemnation private-benefit property-rights | 1. Are the Appellees ['] -Defendants ['] inverse condemnation actions without eminent domain proceedings but for "private benefit " consistent with… |
| 25-64 | Iron Bar Holdings, LLC v. Bradly H. Cape, et al. | Tenth Circuit | 2025-07-18 | Denied | Amici (3) | corner-crossing eminent-domain land-grant preemption property-rights trespass | Whether the Unlawful Inclosures Act implicitly preempts private landowners' state-law property right to exclude in an area covering millions of acres … |
| 24-815 | Franciscan Alliance, Inc., et al. v. Indiana | Indiana | 2025-01-31 | Denied | Response Waived | constitutional-law eminent-domain government-taking just-compensation land-use property-rights | When the government undisputedly takes a real property right, is a landowner entitled to just compensation from the imposition of a project as a whole… |
| 24A746 | Kingston Kohr, LLC v. City of Irvine, California | California | 2025-01-30 | Presumed Complete | constitutional-scrutiny demolition eminent-domain fifth-amendment property-rights regulatory-taking | Question not identified. | |
| 24-702 | Haywood Jackson Mizell v. City of Ozark, Alabama | Eleventh Circuit | 2025-01-02 | Denied | due-process eminent-domain just-compensation municipal-seizure property-rights taking-clause | 1. Whether or not the Supreme Court is also a Court of Equity in Taking/Compensation Complaint, which will intervene and require just compensation to … | |
| 24-670 | Bowers Development, LLC v. Oneida County Industrial Development Agency, et al. | New York | 2024-12-20 | Denied | Amici (4)Relisted (2) | eminent-domain judicial-review private-to-private-transfer property-rights public-use-clause rational-basis-review | Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2004), held that when the government uses eminent domain to take property from a private owner to give it to… |
| 24-498 | Monaghan Farms, Inc. v. City and County of Denver, Colorado | Colorado | 2024-11-01 | Denied | constitutional-taking due-process eminent-domain kelo-doctrine property-rights public-use | The City and County of Denver condemned 8,360 acres of land from Petitioner Monaghan Farms as part of its land acquisition for the creation of the Den… | |
| 24-5711 | Jesse Regalado v. Town of Trion, Georgia, et al. | Eleventh Circuit | 2024-10-07 | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | contract-rights copyright-law eminent-domain federal-rules governmental-immunity judicial-procedure | Does FR 60(b)! and FR 60(d)(3) protect petitioners from judgments that are fraudulent and filled with mistakes? 2. Does "copyright inhere in authorsh… |
| 24-331 | CBS MN Properties, LLC v. Hennepin County, Minnesota | Minnesota | 2024-09-24 | Denied | Response Waived | eminent-domain fifth-amendment government-taking just-compensation property-rights real-property | A county unquestionably used real property that denied access to private property and allowed the private property owner to restore the denied access … |
| 24-186 | Pamela Antosh, et al. v. Village of Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, et al. | Seventh Circuit | 2024-08-21 | Denied | colorado-river-doctrine constitutional-rights eminent-domain fifth-amendment judicial-abstention public-use-claim | Whether the court of appeals erred in affirming the district court, when the Village of Mount Pleasant admitted that it had used eminent domain to tak… | |
| 24-153 | James W. Tindall v. United States | Federal Circuit | 2024-08-12 | Denied | Response Waived | constitutional-rights due-process eminent-domain national-security subject-matter-jurisdiction takings-clause | 1.) Whether the lower courts ' orders allowing Respondent to take, possess and use Petitioner 's property for the public good without paying compens… |
| 23-1363 | Vicki Baker v. City of McKinney, Texas | Fifth Circuit | 2024-07-02 | Denied | Amici (5)Relisted (4) | constitutional-law eminent-domain government-action just-compensation police-power property-rights public-use takings-clause | When the government acquires private property for a public use, the Takings Clause requires the government to provide the owner with "just compensatio… |
| 23-7444 | In Re Carolyn J. Florimonte | 2024-05-09 | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | civil-rights constitutional-violation due-process eminent-domain flooding government-trespass just-compensation property property-rights takings takings-clause | I. Is twenty-four (24) years, enough time for Petitioner to wait for the right to control her own Property, which never comes; to wait in despair for … | |
| 23-1153 | Cesar Romero, et al. v. Li-Chuan Shih, et al. | California | 2024-04-23 | Denied | Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | 14th-amendment 5th-amendment constitutional-law due-process eminent-domain land-use private-property property-rights takings takings-clause | 1. Whether a court order that excludes landowners from their real property and allows other private parties to permanently physically invade and occup… |
| 23-864 | Robert Holton v. Robert Henon, aka Bobby Henon, et al. | Third Circuit | 2024-02-12 | Denied | Response Waived | civil-procedure civil-rights due-process eminent-domain standing takings | 1. In 1951 the City of Philadelphia was granted Home Rule by the Pennsylvania General Assembly. In 1951, Philadelphia used its eminent domain power to… |
| 23-751 | 0.12 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Washington County, Maryland, et al. v. Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC | Fourth Circuit | 2024-01-11 | Denied | Response Waived | citizen-suit eleventh-amendment eminent-domain federal-jurisdiction judicial-power natural-gas-act sovereign-immunity state-sovereign-immunity | Does the Eleventh Amendment's statement that "[t]he Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend" to suits "commenced or prose… |
| 23-5291 | Andrew J. Johnston v. United States | Seventh Circuit | 2023-08-04 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | civil-procedure due-process eminent-domain fifth-amendment property-rights takings | Question not identified. |
| 22-1191 | Thomas Gearing, et al. v. City of Half Moon Bay, California | Ninth Circuit | 2023-06-08 | Denied | Amici (1) | abstention civil-procedure civil-rights civil-rights-act due-process eminent-domain federal-jurisdiction fifth-amendment forum pullman-abstention regulatory-taking takings | Thomas and Daniel Gearing are categorically prohibited from building on residentially zoned vacant land that the City of Half Moon Bay prefers as an o… |
| 22-1149 | Pacific Carlton Development Corp., et al. v. New York State Urban Development Corporation, dba Empire State Development Corporation | New York | 2023-05-26 | Denied | certificate-of-occupancy certificates-of-occupancy due-process eminent-domain fifth-amendment government-regulation government-seizure property-rights takings | Are government-issued attributes of private property (e.g., certificates of occupancy, building permits, business permits) entitled to constitutional … | |
| 22-1133 | Hugh Martin, et al. v. Sandoval County, New Mexico, et al. | New Mexico | 2023-05-22 | Denied | due-process eminent-domain fifth-amendment inverse-condemnation just-compensation native-american-land-rights property-rights takings | Did the New Mexico Supreme Court err declining to review and rectify the decisions of the lower courts that cut Petitioner's off from obtaining just c… | |
| 22-7445 | Kalavathi Shunmugam v. Redevelopment Authority of the City of Bethlehem, Pennsylvania | Pennsylvania | 2023-05-02 | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | blighted-list breach-of-agreement court-transcript due-process eminent-domain fifth-amendment property-rights racial-discrimination takings takings-clause | Kalavahi Shunmugam, the Petitioner, request this Petition for Writ of Certiorari be granted because the personnel action violated her constitutional r… |
| 22-1048 | Joseph E. Blackburn, Jr., et ux. v. Dare County, North Carolina, et al. | Fourth Circuit | 2023-04-28 | Denied | Response RequestedRelisted (2) | 5th-amendment civil-procedure constitutional-law due-process eminent-domain fifth-amendment government-regulation property-rights regulatory-takings takings takings-clause | Whether a governmental regulation prohibiting all physical access to a landowner's property is a "per se" taking under the Fifth Amendment of the Unit… |
| 22-7387 | Daniel Aiello v. Brian Collier, et al. | Texas | 2023-04-28 | Denied | IFP | 5th-amendment due-process eminent-domain just-compensation private-property takings | Question not identified. |
| 22-898 | Ronald I. Paul v. South Carolina Department of Transportation, et al. | South Carolina | 2023-03-16 | Denied | declaratory-relief eminent-domain fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment just-compensation property-rights settlement-agreement | Whether a settlement agreement in an eminent domain case with three parties and two of the parties agreed to a settlement between them, that did not i… | |
| 22-6860 | Shavelle Oscar Chavez-Nelson v. Tim Walz, Governor of Minnesota, et al. | Eighth Circuit | 2023-02-24 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | 5th-amendment due-process eminent-domain property-rights regulatory-takings takings-clause | Question not identified. |
| 22-739 | David Kagan, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, California, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2023-02-07 | Denied | Amici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) | constitutional-law due-process eminent-domain eviction physical-occupation physical-taking property-rights rent-control rent-stabilization takings tenant-protection | Whether a law that bars termination of a tenancy, and compels the occupation of property by an unwanted tenant, amounts to a per se, physical taking, … |
| 22-673 | Robert G. Hicks v. City of Hopkinsville, Sewerage and Water Works Commission, dba Hopkinsville Water Environment Authority | Kentucky | 2023-01-20 | Denied | Response Waived | 14th-amendment default-judgment due-process eminent-domain jurisdictional-statute non-residents service-of-process supremacy-clause | In an eminent domain proceeding in state court involving non-residents, does a failure to cite in any pleadings preceding essentially a default judgme… |
| 22-650 | Orlando Bar Group, LLC, et al. v. Ron DeSantis, Governor of Florida, et al. | Florida | 2023-01-13 | Denied | Response Waived | due-process eminent-domain fifth-amendment government-action just-compensation property-rights public-nuisance state-of-emergency takings | During a state of emergency, are there constitutional safeguards, under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, that prohibit the gover… |
| 22-493 | Erica Bojicic, dba Evolve Dance Company, LLC, et al. v. Richard Michael DeWine, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the Governor of Ohio, et al. | Sixth Circuit | 2022-11-23 | Denied | Response Waived | constitutional-law due-process emergency-powers eminent-domain fifth-amendment government-action necessity police-power property-rights regulatory-takings takings takings-clause | Is the government required to prove with evidence that its action taken during an emergency which intrudes on private property rights was a necessity … |
| 22-442 | Tatana Spicakova Romero, et vir v. Li-Chuan Shih, et al. | California | 2022-11-10 | Denied | 14th-amendment 5th-amendment due-process eminent-domain fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment land-use private-property property-rights takings | 1. Whether a court order that excludes land owners from their real property and allows other private parties to physically invade and occupy the owner… | |
| 22-256 | Cletus Woodrow Bohon, et al. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, et al. | District of Columbia | 2022-09-19 | GVR | Amici (1)Relisted (2) | delegation district-court eminent-domain ferc non-delegation private-parties | Whether a facial challenge to Congress's delegation of eminent domain power to private parties is properly filed in district court, as this Court held… |
| 22-217 | Grant S. Kim v. Superior Court of California, County of Riverside | Ninth Circuit | 2022-09-09 | Denied | Relisted (2) | civil-rights default-judgment due-process eleventh-amendment eleventh-amendment-immunity eminent-domain jurisdictional-challenge military-service-protection servicemembers-civil-relief-act standing | Re: 14 Days — MEMORANDUM Filed date June 29, 2022. US Postal stamp date July 12, 2022. (Tuesday). I received date July 15, 2022 (Friday), already pass… |
| 22-5409 | Jamal A. Bowman v. Michigan | Michigan | 2022-08-19 | Denied | IFP | constitutional-law due-process eminent-domain fifth-amendment property-rights takings | WHETHER THE STATE COURT OF MICHIGAN GAVE DUE RECOGNITION TO PETITIONER'S FEDERAL CLAIM AFTER A JURY FOUND PETITIONER ACTUAL INNOCENT |
| 22-52 | Ariyan Incorporated, dba Discount Corner, et al. v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, et al. | Fifth Circuit | 2022-07-20 | Denied | Amici (5)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | 14th-amendment 5th-amendment due-process eminent-domain fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment government-taking inverse-condemnation just-compensation property-rights takings | A fundamental element of just compensation is "certain payment of the compensation without unreasonable delay." Bragg v. Weaver, 251 U.S. 57, 62 (1919… |
| 21-7818 | Kenneth Jay Moore v. Washington | Washington | 2022-05-10 | Denied | IFP | eminent-domain fifth-amendment just-compensation property-rights public-use takings-clause | Will this Court ereate a structural reversable error precedent thereby reversing my convictions in favor of a new trial that requires lower Courts and… |
| 21-808 | Kimberley Ann Gunnarson, et al. v. Texas | Texas | 2021-12-01 | Denied | Response Waived | 14th-amendment billboard constitutional-law due-process eminent-domain fifth-amendment just-compensation property-code takings takings-clause | Does Chapter 21 of the Texas Property Code violate the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution by failing to require adequate compensation t… |
| 21-5794 | Fred M. Carrington v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections | Fourth Circuit | 2021-09-27 | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | civil-procedure civil-rights due-process eminent-domain property-rights takings | Question not identified. |
| 21-5344 | Edith Woodberry v. City of Detroit, Michigan | Sixth Circuit | 2021-08-11 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | bankruptcy bankruptcy-court constitutional-obligation due-process eminent-domain fifth-amendment just-compensation public-policy takings | 1. It is against public policy and the United States Constitution to permit the bankruptcy court to discharge in bankruptcy the City of Detroit's mand… |
| 20-1750 | Danesh Rahimi v. Troy Kohler | Utah | 2021-06-16 | Denied | Response Waived | civil-procedure due-process eminent-domain fifth-amendment group-quiet-title judicial-taking property-rights real-property standing state-courts takings | To Resolve Matters of First Impression for The Supreme Court of the United States: Among the present legal doctrines without definitive resolution for… |
| 20-1489 | Russell Baldwin v. Suzanne Seida, et al. | Oregon | 2021-04-23 | Denied | Response Waived | attorney-fees civil-procedure constitutional-taking due-process eminent-domain lien lien-foreclosure state-court-procedure takings | Did the state circuit court effectuate a "taking" for purposes of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution when it dismis… |
| 20-1476 | Lavern Behm v. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. | North Dakota | 2021-04-21 | Denied | Response Waived | due-process eminent-domain kelo-v-new-london private-corporation private-property property-rights public-use taking-clause | Montana Dakota Utility (hereinafter MDU), a private corporation, employed the power of eminent domain to procure an easement on Vern Behm's farmland i… |
| 20-7710 | Bertram Mann v. Volusia County Sheriff's Department | Florida | 2021-04-12 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | civil-procedure due-process eminent-domain property-rights public-trust takings | Question not identified. |
| 20-7559 | Lora Kay Oxendine-Taylor v. Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, Council | Fourth Circuit | 2021-03-25 | Denied | IFP | civil-procedure civil-rights due-process eminent-domain property-rights takings | Question not identified. |
| 20-7546 | Reginald L. Shumpert v. United States | Eighth Circuit | 2021-03-24 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | 5th-amendment civil-procedure due-process eminent-domain property-rights takings | Question not identified. |
| 20-1214 | Fred J. Eychaner v. City of Chicago, Illinois | Illinois | 2021-03-03 | Denied | Amici (5)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (4) | blight due-process eminent-domain future-blight kelo-precedent kelo-v-city-of-new-london pretext property-rights public-use public-use-clause takings takings-clause | 1. Is the possibility of futwre blight a permissible basis for a government to take property in an unblighted area and give it to a private party for … |
| 20-6667 | Ronald Douglas v. Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General of Missouri, et al. | Eighth Circuit | 2020-12-21 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | administrative-procedure civil-rights communications-act constitutional-challenge due-process eminent-domain government-owned-stations human-rights-violations jurisdiction property-rights takings | The trustee and/or Ronald Douglas (the Debtor) in possession hereby serves this notice and partitions the Court to order, judge or decree: declaratory… |
| 20-687 | Walter L. Allen v. United States | Federal Circuit | 2020-11-18 | Denied | Response Waived | appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-law due-process eminent-domain federal-court legal-procedure property-rights standing takings | TL PespecHuly Eguest PRae Walter Blea Lo mUlAMtS gag We trast oad i gS Skea of Clans, at ei Oc ge, ee Cetchacke of Rater Rilo. gf ae vlusclicHan Olus"… |
| 20-107 | Cedar Point Nursery, et al. v. Victoria Hassid, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2020-08-03 | Judgment Issued | Amici (40)Relisted (2) | agricultural agricultural-access civil-rights due-process eminent-domain fifth-amendment labor-regulation labor-relations property property-rights takings takings-clause | California law forces agricultural businesses to allow labor organizers onto their property three times a day for 120 days each year. The regulation p… |
| 20-72 | Janet L. Himsel, et al. v. 4/9 Livestock, LLC, et al. | Indiana | 2020-07-24 | Denied | Amici (1) | due-process eminent-domain environmental-regulation nuisance nuisance-law property-rights takings-clause trespass | Does a state statute violate the Takings Clause of the United States Constitution when it provides complete immunity from nuisance and trespass liabil… |
| 19-8857 | Joseph Lee Jones v. Douglas County Jail | Tenth Circuit | 2020-06-29 | Denied | IFP | civil-rights due-process eminent-domain property-rights standing takings | Question not identified. |
| 19-8538 | Jeffrey W. Smiles v. Berks County, Pennsylvania, et al. | Third Circuit | 2020-05-26 | Denied | Relisted (2)IFP | administrative-taking civil-rights constitutional-authority due-process eminent-domain property-rights standing stare-decisis takings | 1. Can a political subdivision of a state, through its employees, administratively take private property from the people they work for and give/sell t… |
| 19-1308 | Bernard Morello, et al. v. Seaway Crude Pipeline Company, LLC | Texas | 2020-05-21 | Denied | Response Waived | civil-procedure constitutional-limitations contract contract-circumvention contract-clause due-process eminent-domain highest-and-best-use judicial-authority judicial-review just-compensation legislative-limitations property-rights takings | Whether eminent domain can be used to as mere pretext to rewrite the parties' own prior bargains, or otherwise circumvent existing obligations in a pr… |
| 19-1123 | Leo Lech, et al. v. Chief John A. Jackson, et al. | Tenth Circuit | 2020-03-16 | Denied | Amici (3) | 5th-amendment civil-rights due-process eminent-domain fifth-amendment government-taking just-compensation police-power property-rights takings | Using explosives and a battering ram attached to an armored personnel carrier, the Greenwood Village Police Department intentionally destroyed Petitio… |
| 19-1039 | PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC v. New Jersey, et al. | Third Circuit | 2020-02-20 | Judgment Issued | CVSGAmici (21)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) | certificate-of-public-convenience constitutional-law eminent-domain federal-power ferc interstate-pipeline natural-gas-act state-property | Whether the NGA delegates to FERC certificate holders the authority to exercise the federal government's eminent domain power to condemn land in which… |
| 19-7602 | Joshua Neil Harrell v. Michelle Belyea, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2020-02-10 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | 14th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process standing takings civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process eminent-domain jurisdiction legal-opinion procedural-grounds property-rights reasons-for-writ regulatory-takings statement-of-case takings | I. Is lacked not or delived i firs hin 0 when the wo ua neget ras the day? e a Riht to Poredurad dhe Process? Pfectias Pettioners We ai d the atif Fo… |
| 19-925 | Kebreab Zere v. District of Columbia | District of Columbia | 2020-01-24 | Denied | Response Waived | compensation constitutional-rights due-process eminent-domain fourteenth-amendment prescriptive-easement public-prescriptive-easement taking-clause takings tax-sale | 1. Whether the due process law of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was violated when the District invoked D.C. Code § 47-1382(a)3 for… |
| 19-7023 | Michael P. Cotton v. Scott Eckstein, Warden | Seventh Circuit | 2019-12-19 | Denied | Relisted (2)IFP | civil-procedure constitutional-provisions due-process eminent-domain jurisdiction property-rights standing statutes-and-regulations takings | I. With all due respect, if it pleases the Court, was I denied due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Wisconsin Constitut… |
| 19-6986 | Jarvis H. Neely v. John R. Baldwin, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections, et al. | Seventh Circuit | 2019-12-18 | Denied | IFP | 5th-amendment circuit-court-review civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process eminent-domain federal-jurisdiction free-speech judicial-review jurisdiction pension-regulations property-rights standing statutory-analysis takings | Whether sua sponte dismissal of the complaint lacking grounds frivolous harmful and a basis in reality proper was under 28 U.S.C. 1915. |
| 19-607 | Woodcrest Homes, Inc. v. Carousel Farms Metropolitan District | Colorado | 2019-11-12 | Denied | Amici (1) | 5th-amendment constitutional-interpretation due-process eminent-domain fifth-amendment government-taking private-benefit property-rights public-use takings | Is the Fifth Amendment's restriction of eminent domain to "public use[s]" satisfied even if a condemnation is undertaken "for the purpose of conferrin… |
| 19-502 | Richard Baatz, et al. v. Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC | Sixth Circuit | 2019-10-18 | Denied | certificate-of-public-convenience due-process eminent-domain federal-energy-regulatory-commission land-use natural-gas-act property-rights regulatory-authority takings | Whether the Natural Gas Act requires the holder of a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to obtain by easement, contract, or eminent domai… | |
| 19-447 | Keith Puntenney, et al. v. Iowa Utilities Board, et al. | Iowa | 2019-10-03 | Denied | Response Waived | common-carrier eminent-domain fifth-amendment incidental-benefits kelo-precedent kelo-v-city-of-new-london public-purpose public-use takings takings-clause | Does a state's exercise of eminent domain satisfy the "public use" requirement of the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause if the only benefits experience… |
| 19-197 | Lavern Behm v. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. | North Dakota | 2019-08-15 | Denied | Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | due-process eminent-domain kelo-v-new-london private-corporation property-rights public-use taking-clause | 1. Is it a violation of due process and the taking clause for the state – as a matter of law – to allow a private corporation to take private property… |
| 19-54 | Karolyn Givens, et al. v. Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC | Fourth Circuit | 2019-07-09 | Denied | Amici (4) | condemnation condemnation-proceeding eminent-domain federal-judicial-power judicial-power just-compensation natural-gas-act preliminary-injunction property-rights | Through the Natural Gas Act ("NGA"), 15 U.S.C. § 717 et seq., Congress delegates the federal power of eminent domain to private pipeline companies to … |
| 19-5029 | Frederick Tyrone Calhoun v. United States | Eleventh Circuit | 2019-07-01 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | 5th-amendment administrative-law civil-procedure due-process eminent-domain equal-protection just-compensation private-property standing statutory-interpretation takings | The Constitution requires the federal government to obtain an indictment and jury verdict before imprisoning a person. While on federal supervised rel… |
| 18A1211 | Karolyn Givens, et al. v. Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC | Fourth Circuit | 2019-05-22 | Presumed Complete | condemnation eminent-domain fourth-circuit land-use pipeline-easement property-rights | Question not identified. | |
| 18-1373 | Gene Rechtzigel v. City of Apple Valley, Minnesota | Minnesota | 2019-05-01 | Denied | Response Waived | civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process eminent-domain government-action liberty property property-rights standing takings trial-by-jury | I. Did the Government deprive Petitioner of Liberty, without Due Process of Law? II. Did the Government deprive Petitioner of Property, without Due P… |
| 18-1324 | Moses Watts, Sr., et ux. v. Entergy Arkansas, Inc. | Arkansas | 2019-04-19 | Denied | Response Waived | due-process eminent-domain equal-protection ex-parte ex-parte-order judicial-procedure pro-se property-rights severance-damages takings | 1. Whether petitioners were denied due process of law by an ex parte Circuit Court order enabling an electric utility to seize, without service of not… |
| 18-1206 | Lynda Like, et al. v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC | Third Circuit | 2019-03-18 | Denied | Amici (2) | civil-procedure condemnation eminent-domain federal-jurisdiction immediate-possession judicial-power land-condemnation natural-gas-act preliminary-injunction private-companies private-property-rights takings | The Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. § 717f(h)) delegates to certain private companies the ordinary eminent domain power: that is, the power to bring a cond… |
| 18-1174 | Ian Goldenberg, et al. v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC | Eleventh Circuit | 2019-03-11 | Denied | Response Waived | eminent-domain equity judicial-taking just-compensation just-compensation-clause natural-gas-act preliminary-injunction property-rights separation-of-powers takings | The Court has long emphasized the strict construction of condemnation statutes, especially as against corporate delegatees of this sovereign power. By… |
| 18-1163 | Richard Hutchings, et al. v. Ameren Transmission Company of Illinois | Illinois | 2019-03-07 | Denied | Amici (2)Response Waived | administrative-hearing administrative-procedure civil-rights due-process eminent-domain fourteenth-amendment notice property-rights public-use quasi-judicial takings utility-siting | Where an evidentiary hearing to evaluate specified criteria under a power line siting statute results in orders approving a specific route for a line,… |
| 18-1149 | George A. Gallenthin, III v. Borough of Paulsboro, et al. | New Jersey | 2019-03-05 | Denied | 14th-amendment 5th-amendment civil-rights due-process eminent-domain Fifth-Amendment Fourteenth-Amendment just-compensation procedural-due-process property property-rights state-action takings | What protection do citizens of the United States enjoy under the Fifth Amendment's just compensation requirement in conjunction with the Fourteenth Am… | |
| 18-874 | Houston Auto M. Imports Greenway, Limited, dba Mercedes-Benz of Houston Greenway v. Mark Zastrow, et al. | Fifth Circuit | 2019-01-08 | Denied | Response Waived | 5th-amendment certificate-of-compliance declaration-under-penalty-of-perjury due-process eminent-domain land-use property-rights supreme-court-rule-33.1(d) supreme-court-rule-33.1(h) takings word-count | Question not identified. |
| 18-295 | Alexander Alimanestianu, et al. v. United States | Federal Circuit | 2018-09-07 | Denied | due-process eminent-domain espousal fifth-amendment foreign-affairs foreign-state international-law just-compensation property-rights takings | Horne v. Dep't of Agriculture, 135 S. Ct. 2419 (2015), holds that the Fifth Amendment imposes a categorical duty upon the government to pay just compe… | |
| 18-5069 | William M. Uschock v. Pennsylvania | Third Circuit | 2018-07-02 | Denied | IFP | civil-procedure due-process eminent-domain fifth-amendment just-compensation mineral-rights natural-gas property-rights takings takings-clause | contendts thot willtam M. Uschock which the Dunhim Rule in Pennsylvanla thaturel bas is not considorrd statesi wulike all mineral in Pennsyloomis e ot… |