No. 20-1489

Russell Baldwin v. Suzanne Seida, et al.

Lower Court: Oregon
Docketed: 2021-04-23
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: attorney-fees civil-procedure constitutional-taking due-process eminent-domain lien lien-foreclosure state-court-procedure takings
Latest Conference: 2021-06-10
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did the state circuit court effectuate a "taking" for purposes of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution when it dismissed petitioner's lawsuit without exercising its judgment to disburse his fee from such court's bank account?

Did the state appellate court effectuate a "taking" as above when affirming such judgment of dismissal?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the state courts effectuate a taking of petitioner's attorney fees under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments?

Docket Entries

2021-06-14
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.
2021-05-12
Waiver of right of respondent Suzanne Sida, et al. to respond filed.
2021-04-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 24, 2021)

Attorneys

Russell Baldwin
Russell L. BaldwinAttorney at Law, Petitioner
Suzanne Sida, et al.
David H. BowserJordan Ramis, PC, Respondent