| 25A574 |
Peyman Roshan v. Christine M. Searle, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2025-11-17 |
Application |
|
constitutional-taking federal-jurisdiction foreclosure-dispute intervention-rights rooker-feldman state-court-judgment |
Question not identified. |
| 24A499 |
Kari Beeman, et al. v. Muskegon County Treasurer |
Michigan |
2024-11-20 |
Presumed Complete |
|
constitutional-taking due-process property-rights surplus-proceeds takings-clause tax-foreclosure |
Question not identified. |
| 24-498 |
Monaghan Farms, Inc. v. City and County of Denver, Colorado |
Colorado |
2024-11-01 |
Denied |
|
constitutional-taking due-process eminent-domain kelo-doctrine property-rights public-use |
The City and County of Denver condemned 8,360 acres of land from Petitioner Monaghan Farms as part of its land acquisition for the creation of the Den… |
| 23-1167 |
Dennis O'Connor v. Rachel Eubanks, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2024-04-30 |
Denied |
Amici (2)Relisted (2) |
42-U.S.C.-§-1983 42-usc-1983 constitutional-history constitutional-taking federal-conflict personal-capacity personal-capacity-suit property-rights sovereign-immunity takings-clause |
1. Whether a state's constitutional obligation to
pay just compensation when taking property waives
its sovereign immunity from a claim seeking damage… |
| 23-328 |
Williams Alaska Petroleum, Inc., et al. v. Alaska, et al. |
Alaska |
2023-09-28 |
Denied |
|
constitutional-taking due-process environmental-regulation fair-notice hazardous-substance strict-liability takings water-system |
1. Whether the Alaska Supreme Court's imposition
of strict liability violated petitioners' right to due process,
when the State had taken the position… |
| 22-784 |
Aaron G. Filler v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-02-21 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
amendment-rights casualty-loss civil-rights constitutional-taking due-process patent patent-protection patent-seizure standing state-liability takings tax-deduction |
When a State (herein California) knowingly intentionally and with malice aforethought seizes and commences producing goods clearly protected by a U.S.… |
| 21-1582 |
In Re Jack R. Finnegan |
|
2022-06-23 |
Denied |
|
28-usc-455 bankruptcy-procedure bias-and-prejudice constitution-questions-and-federal-laws constitutional-taking due-process federal-jurisdiction inferior-officer judicial-bias liteky-v-united-states rule-22(a) |
Why is the Inferior Officer who was disqualified in June, 2018, for Bias and Prejudice, allowed to be in defiance to the order of the United States Su… |
| 20-1489 |
Russell Baldwin v. Suzanne Seida, et al. |
Oregon |
2021-04-23 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
attorney-fees civil-procedure constitutional-taking due-process eminent-domain lien lien-foreclosure state-court-procedure takings |
Did the state circuit court effectuate a "taking" for purposes of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution when it dismis… |
| 20-987 |
Spielbauer Law Office v. Midland Funding, LLC, et al. |
California |
2021-01-25 |
Denied |
|
appeal civil-procedure constitutional-taking due-process entry-of-judgment judicial-discretion notice-of-appeal procedural-rights statutory-interpretation takings |
1. If a statute appears to reasonably permit the
filing of a notice of appeal upon entry of order or
entry of judgment, is it a denial of due process … |
| 18-359 |
St. Bernard Parish, et al. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2018-09-19 |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
catastrophic-flooding categorical-exemption causation constitutional-taking due-process flood-control flood-damage government-action government-inaction government-liability property-rights takings takings-clause takings-liability |
In Arkansas Game, this Court admonished the Federal Circuit to eschew "blanket exclusionary rules" immunizing the Government from liability in takings… |