| 25A896 |
Homewood Associates Inc., et al. v. Unified Government of Athens-Clarke County, Georgia |
Georgia |
2026-02-06 |
Application |
|
constitutional-challenge land-use-restriction municipal-ordinance property-rights regulatory-taking takings-clause |
Question not identified. |
| 25-523 |
United Water Conservation District v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2025-10-29 |
Pending |
Amici (7) |
fifth-amendment government-appropriation physical-taking property-rights regulatory-taking water-rights |
Whether the government's appropriation of water that a person had a property right to use is analyzed as a physical taking, rather than a regulatory t… |
| 25-414 |
The Sunshine Group, LLC v. City of Dana Point, California, et al. |
California |
2025-10-06 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
constitutional-violation due-process ex-parte notice-requirement property-rights regulatory-taking |
The City of Dana Point "red tagged" Petitioner's motel and then had a receiver appointed to oversee its rehabilitation without ever providing notice o… |
| 25A228 |
United States v. Darby Development Company, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2025-08-28 |
Presumed Complete |
|
administrative-agency fifth-amendment government-action regulatory-taking statutory-authority takings-clause |
Question not identified. |
| 24-1276 |
California Association for the Preservation of Gamefowl v. Stanislaus County, California |
Ninth Circuit |
2025-06-16 |
Denied |
|
constitutional-challenge due-process facial-challenge property-rights regulatory-taking statute-of-limitations |
1. Whether a statute of limitations for facial constitutional challenges begins to run solely from the date of enactment, or whether each day of conti… |
| 24-1055 |
William Becker, et al. v. City of Hillsboro, Missouri |
Eighth Circuit |
2025-04-07 |
Denied |
|
appellate-review constitutional-law land-use-regulation property-rights regulatory-taking takings-clause |
1. Whether the Court of Appeals declined to follow this Court's opinion in Yee v. City of Escondido, 503 U.S. 519 (1992) by holding that Petitioners h… |
| 24-908 |
Fane Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, Florida |
Eleventh Circuit |
2025-02-24 |
Denied |
Amici (4) |
economic-use land-use-restrictions lucas-doctrine property-rights regulatory-taking ripeness |
1. Whether a claim that a local ordinance effected a regulatory taking upon enactment remains unripe until the landowner asks the local government for… |
| 24A746 |
Kingston Kohr, LLC v. City of Irvine, California |
California |
2025-01-30 |
Presumed Complete |
|
constitutional-scrutiny demolition eminent-domain fifth-amendment property-rights regulatory-taking |
Question not identified. |
| 24A435 |
Mount Clemens Recreational Bowl, Inc., et al. v. Elizabeth Hertel, Director, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, et al. |
Michigan |
2024-10-31 |
Presumed Complete |
|
economic-impact fifth-amendment investment-backed-expectations just-compensation penn-central-test regulatory-taking |
Question not identified. |
| 24-487 |
James G. Collins v. Monterey County, California |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-10-31 |
Denied |
|
economic-deprivation government-regulation lucas-doctrine penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-taking |
Does a taking analyzed under Lucas v. S.C. Coastal Council require that the affected property be left with no value even if the regulation in question… |
| 24A418 |
The Gym 24/7 Fitness, LLC, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Michigan |
Michigan |
2024-10-30 |
Presumed Complete |
|
fifth-amendment investment-expectations just-compensation penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-taking |
Question not identified. |
| 24A150 |
GHP Management Corporation, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-08-08 |
Presumed Complete |
|
covid-19 eviction-moratorium fifth-amendment municipal-code regulatory-taking takings-clause |
Question not identified. |
| 23-1337 |
Baldwin County, Alabama, et al. v. Mike Bordelon, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2024-06-25 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
due-process economic-use fair-market-value fifth-amendment just-compensation penn-central property-rights regulatory-taking takings temporary-prohibition temporary-taking |
In First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. Los Angeles County, Cal., the Court held that the Fifth Amendment requires "just compensat… |
| 23A1004 |
Lemon Bay Cove, LLC v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2024-05-10 |
Presumed Complete |
|
federal-claims fifth-amendment government-interference property-rights regulatory-taking tucker-act |
Question not identified. |
| 23-1199 |
Joanne Moskovic v. City of New Buffalo, Michigan |
Sixth Circuit |
2024-05-07 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights due-process michigan-zoning-enabling-act property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings short-term-rental substantive-due-process zoning zoning-ordinance |
Whether the Appellate Court erred in finding that Petitioner's use of her home, located in a residential zoning district, as a rental for one month or… |
| 23-7349 |
Scott Zirus v. United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-04-30 |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-law civil-procedure constitutional-challenge due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure housing-assistance mandamus property-rights regulatory-taking standing venue-transfer |
Question not identified. |
| 23-1148 |
G-Max Management, Inc., et al. v. New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2024-04-23 |
Denied |
Amici (5)Relisted (5) |
due-process land-use-regulation landlord-tenant penn-central penn-central-test physical-taking property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings rent-regulation takings |
New York's Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019 transforms a temporary rent-regulation system into a permanent expropriation of vast sw… |
| 23-1103 |
Sawtooth Mountain Ranch, LLC, et al. v. United States Forest Service, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-04-11 |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response Waived |
constitutional-rights declaratory-relief equitable-tolling fifth-amendment just-compensation regulatory-taking statute-of-limitations |
1. Whether equitable tolling is available for
statutes of limitation, highlighting a conflict
between Boechler, P.C. v. Commissioner , 142 S. Ct.
1493… |
| 23-7070 |
Riley Thornock, et ux. v. Bedford County, Virginia |
Virginia |
2024-03-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-justice civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection governmental-overreach property-rights regulatory-taking |
Does the government's attempt to compel an individual out of their established residence or property warrant the appointment of a court-appointed atto… |
| 23-1045 |
835 Hinesburg Road, LLC v. City of South Burlington, Vermont, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2024-03-21 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
or whether a property owner is required to submit development-restrictions due-process exhaustion final-decision land-use land-use-permit property-rights regulatory-taking ripeness ripeness-doctrine takings takings-claim |
Whether a takings claim is ripe when a city makes a final decision under existing ordinances denying a land use permit, or whether a property owner is… |
| 23-935 |
Gene Gonzales, et al. v. Jay Inslee, Governor of Washington, et al. |
Washington |
2024-02-27 |
Denied |
Amici (13)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
constitutional-property due-process exclusionary-rights landlord-tenant landlord-tenant-relationship physical-taking physical-takings property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings takings |
Whether an ordinance that compels the possession of property by an unwelcome occupant is a categorical physical taking, as the Eighth Circuit held in … |
| 23A671 |
Carolyn J. Florimonte v. Borough of Dalton |
Pennsylvania |
2024-01-22 |
Presumed Complete |
|
continuing-trespass fifth-amendment government-overreach property-rights regulatory-taking storm-water-disposal |
Question not identified. |
| 23-490 |
Enrique Jevons, as a Managing Member of Jevons Properties LLC, et al. v. Jay Inslee, Governor of Washington, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-11-08 |
Denied |
Amici (2)Response Waived |
covid-19 declaratory-judgment eviction-moratoria fifth-amendment just-compensation regulatory-taking standing takings-clause |
1. Because the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment demands just compensation for governmental takings, including temporary ones, did the Ninth Circu… |
| 22-1191 |
Thomas Gearing, et al. v. City of Half Moon Bay, California |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-06-08 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
abstention civil-procedure civil-rights civil-rights-act due-process eminent-domain federal-jurisdiction fifth-amendment forum pullman-abstention regulatory-taking takings |
Thomas and Daniel Gearing are categorically prohibited from building on residentially zoned vacant land that the City of Half Moon Bay prefers as an o… |
| 22-1170 |
335-7 LLC, et al. v. City of New York, New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2023-06-02 |
Denied |
Relisted (13) |
civil-rights due-process economic-value just-compensation landlord-tenant property-rights regulatory-taking rent-control takings takings-clause |
(1) Does the RSL effect a per se physical taking by expropriating Petitioners' right to exclude?
(2) Does the RSL effect a confiscatory taking by dep… |
| 22-1130 |
74 Pinehurst LLC, et al. v. New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2023-05-19 |
Denied |
Amici (6)Relisted (13) |
civil-rights due-process landlord-tenant lease-renewal physical-taking property-rights regulatory-taking rent-control rent-stabilization takings tenant-protection |
Petitioners own small apartment buildings in New York City that are subject to New York's Rent Stabilization Law ("RSL"). Once an owner leases a unit … |
| 22-1095 |
Community Housing Improvement Program, et al. v. City of New York, New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2023-05-10 |
Denied |
Amici (12) |
affordable-housing civil-rights due-process government-regulation housing-law physical-taking property-rights regulatory-taking rent-control takings |
New York's Rent Stabilization Law (RSL) is the nation's most stringent rental housing regulation, governing one million New York City apartments. It a… |
| 22-872 |
Evans Creek, LLC v. City of Reno, Nevada |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-03-13 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
constitutional-law constitutional-property due-process land-use-regulation penn-central penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings takings takings-claim |
Whether a property owner states a valid takings claim by alleging that a regulation substantially deprives the owner of the right to use property, or … |
| 21-8246 |
Richard D. Bostwick v. 44 Chestnut Street, Wakefield, Massachusetts, et al. |
Massachusetts |
2022-06-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts americans-with-disabilities-act civil-rights due-process equal-protection judicial-immunity reasonable-accommodation regulatory-taking standing substantive-due-process |
Whether the Remedies, Procedures and Rights set forth in (a) the Americans with Disabilities Act (Title 42 c. 126 U.S.C. ^ 12101) generally and Enforc… |
| 21-719 |
Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2021-11-16 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights communications-act confiscatory-rates due-process federal-circuit federal-communications-commission rate-regulation regulatory-taking takings |
Whether the lower court's holding that a regulatory taking claim based on confiscatory rates must be made at the Federal Communications Commission "wi… |
| 21-244 |
Taylor & Sons, Inc., et al. v. United States, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-08-18 |
Denied |
|
5th-amendment economic-impact fifth-amendment just-compensation penn-central penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-taking takings |
At the time the Government required Petitioners to cease doing business under their Chrysler dealer franchises, which are compensable property interes… |
| 21-217 |
Marcy Britton v. Tim Keller, Mayor of the City of Albuquerque, New Mexico, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2021-08-16 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights due-process inverse-condemnation penn-central-test property-rights qualified-immunity regulatory-taking regulatory-takings takings takings-clause |
As a threshold matter, did the lower courts err in light of this Court's recent ruling in of Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid , 141 S. Ct. 2063, (2021) t… |
| 20-885 |
Next Energy, LLC v. Illinois Department of Natural Resources |
Illinois |
2021-01-04 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
due-process fifth-amendment hydraulic-fracturing mineral-rights oil-and-gas permit-moratorium property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings shale-oil shale-oil-leases takings |
Petitioner, Next Energy, LLC, commenced acquiring blocks of five-year oil leases in 2011 to drill high volume horizontal hydraulic fracturing (horizon… |
| 20-323 |
John S. Barth v. City of Peabody, Massachusetts |
First Circuit |
2020-09-11 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights compensation due-process equal-protection fifth-amendment municipal-ordinance property property-rights regulatory-taking takings |
1. Did municipal denial of permission to rebuild a home effect a taking of private property, where an ex post facto ordinance prohibited all other eco… |
| 20-54 |
Bridge Aina Le'a, LLC v. Hawaii Land Use Commission |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-07-22 |
Denied |
Amici (4)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (5) |
7th-amendment civil-rights due-process economic-impact lucas-standard lucas-v-south-carolina penn-central penn-central-factors property-rights regulatory-taking takings temporary-taking |
The State of Hawaii zoned for agricultural use land that it knew was not viable or appropriate for such use. At the property owner's request, it rezon… |
| 19-1252 |
Callan Campbell, et al. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2020-04-28 |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
final-decision government-action property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings statute-of-limitations takings tucker-act |
Does the Tucker Act's statute of limitations for a regulatory takings claim accrue when the Government makes a final decision, or when the plaintiff's… |
| 19-1136 |
Chong Yim, et al. v. City of Seattle, Washington |
Washington |
2020-03-17 |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response Waived |
civil-rights due-process first-in-time fourteenth-amendment landlord-tenant legislative-act property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings substantive-due-process takings tenant-selection undue-oppression |
Based on its interpretation of federal law, the Washington Supreme Court overruled 68 regulatory takings and due process cases —130 years of jurisprud… |
| 19-318 |
Francis A. Bottini, Jr., et al. v. City of San Diego, California, et al. |
California |
2019-09-09 |
Denied |
Amici (2)Response Waived |
due-process first-english first-english-precedent investment-backed-expectations penn-central penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings single-family-housing takings takings-clause temporary-takings |
1. Should the test of Penn Central be construed to totally bar recovery whenever the purchaser of a single-family lot is unable to learn, at the time … |
| 19-223 |
Janice Smyth v. Conservation Commission of Falmouth, et al. |
Massachusetts |
2019-08-20 |
Denied |
Amici (4)Relisted (3) |
character-of-government-action character-of-governmental-action economic-impact investment-backed-expectations investment-expectations land-use-regulation penn-central penn-central-test property-rights property-value regulatory-taking regulatory-takings takings-clause-5th-amendment |
1. Whether the loss of all developmental use of property and a 91.5% decline in its value is a sufficient "economic impact" to support a regulatory ta… |
| 18-8305 |
Nausheen Zainulabeddin v. University of South Florida Board of Trustees |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-03-06 |
Denied |
IFP |
commerce-clause disability-discrimination diversity-jurisdiction due-process federal-preemption fourteenth-amendment property-rights regulatory-taking sovereign-immunity |
Did the lower court violate Commerce Clause of the constitution of Article 1, section 8, Clause 3; when it denied principal's interest to maintain uni… |
| 18-1101 |
Classic Cab, Inc. v. District of Columbia, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2019-02-22 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
14th-amendment 5th-amendment constitutional-rights dormant-commerce-clause emergency-rulemaking mootness preexisting-contracts regulatory-taking res-judicata statutory-requirement |
I. Is the use of illegal emergency rulemakings in the absence of any objectively
cognizable emergency resulting in the complete elimination of an indu… |
| 18-1062 |
Love Terminal Partners, L.P., et al. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2019-02-13 |
Denied |
Amici (8) |
civil-rights due-process economic-impact fair-market-value federal-law investment-backed-expectations investment-expectations just-compensation property-rights property-taking regulatory-environment regulatory-taking takings |
1. In assessing whether the government has effected a compensable taking, may courts treat real property as worthless simply because the owner was not… |
| 18-394 |
Denis P. Kelleher, et ux. v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation |
New York |
2018-09-27 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
discretionary-land-use-permit discretionary-permit investment-backed-expectations land-use-restriction palazzolo-v-rhode-island penn-central penn-central-test property-rights real-estate-market regulatory-taking regulatory-takings regulatory-takings-test |
1. Whether a property owner may be deemed to lack investment-backed expectations, and thus be barred from challenging a land use restriction as a regu… |
| 18-324 |
Douglas Leone, et ux., as Trustees Under That Certain Unrecorded Leone-Perkins Family Trust Dated August 26, 1999, as Amended v. Maui County, Hawaii, et al. |
Hawaii |
2018-09-13 |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
14th-amendment 5th-amendment economic-benefit economically-beneficial-use fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment investment-use just-compensation land-use lucas-v-south-carolina-coastal-council natural-state property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings takings-clause |
Whether holding undeveloped property as an "investment" or using it as a "park" in its natural state constitutes economically beneficial or productive… |