zoning-ordinance
8 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23-1199 | Joanne Moskovic v. City of New Buffalo, Michigan | Sixth Circuit | 2024-05-07 | Denied | Response Waived | civil-rights due-process michigan-zoning-enabling-act property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings short-term-rental substantive-due-process zoning zoning-ordinance | Whether the Appellate Court erred in finding that Petitioner's use of her home, located in a residential zoning district, as a rental for one month or… |
| 23A886 | PPI Enterprises, LLC v. Town of Windham | New Hampshire | 2024-04-05 | Presumed Complete | development-denial inverse-condemnation property-rights site-plan takings-claim zoning-ordinance | Question not identified. | |
| 23-330 | Ani Creation, Inc., dba Rasta, et al. v. City of Myrtle Beach Board of Zoning Appeals, et al. | South Carolina | 2023-09-28 | Denied | amortization board-of-zoning-appeals business-rights civil-rights constitutional-claims due-process penn-central-test takings takings-clause zoning zoning-ordinance | The City of Myrtle Beach enacted a new zoning Ordinance in 2018 which outlawed the sale of legal consumer goods being sold by Petitioners for the past… | |
| 22-1196 | GEFT Outdoor, L.L.C. v. Monroe County, Indiana, et al. | Seventh Circuit | 2023-06-09 | Denied | Response Waived | 42-usc-1983 civil-rights content-based-regulation first-amendment free-speech prior-restraint procedural-safeguards speech-licensing zoning-ordinance | 1. Can a governmental entity escape 42 U.S.C. § 1983 liability for failing to have procedural safeguards in its speech licensing scheme by—only after … |
| 22-309 | City of Salinas, California v. New Harvest Christian Fellowship | Ninth Circuit | 2022-09-30 | Denied | Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | circuit-split civil-rights equal-terms equal-terms-provision facial-challenge land-use-regulation religious-land-use rluipa zoning zoning-ordinance | The "equal terms" provision of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA) states that "[n]o government shall impose or … |
| 21-113 | UJ-Eighty Corporation v. City of Bloomington Board of Zoning Appeals | Indiana | 2021-07-27 | Denied | Amici (2)Response Waived | constitutional-law due-process economic-self-interest municipal-regulation regulatory-power rivals self-interested-entity standing zoning zoning-ordinance | The question presented is whether the Due Process Clause prohibits the government from vesting an economically self-interested entity with regulatory … |
| 20-1286 | Sacramento County, California v. Joseph Hardesty, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2021-03-16 | Denied | Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | chosen-profession due-process executive-action executive-decisions land-use land-use-regulation legislative-decisions municipal-decision-making occupational-liberty substantive-due-process zoning-ordinance | This case presents two questions involving efforts to expand the scope of the substantive component of the Due Process Clause. 1. Land-use regulation… |
| 20-403 | Jose Edward Valentin, et al. v. California | California | 2020-09-28 | Denied | 14th-amendment 5th-amendment constitutional-challenge criminal-law due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment municipal-code vagueness zoning zoning-ordinance | 1. Whether Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 9.51.020 (A)(1)(e), which prohibits Group Residential use, is unconstitutional under the Fifth and Four… |