| 25-265 |
Alexander Gallo v. District of Columbia |
District of Columbia |
2025-09-09 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
contracts-clause eviction-moratorium lucas-test penn-central-test property-rights takings-clause |
1. Whether an eviction moratorium is a physical taking or appropriation of property?
2. Whether Petitioner's challenge to the District's eviction mor… |
| 24-757 |
The Gym 24/7 Fitness, LLC v. Michigan |
Michigan |
2025-01-16 |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
fifth-amendment government-control penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-takings time-element |
In this Fifth Amendment regulatory takings case, Michigan's Executive Order took dominion and control of the use of Petitioner's commercial property. … |
| 24-754 |
Mount Clemens Recreational Bowl, Inc., et al. v. Elizabeth Hertel, Director, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, et al. |
Michigan |
2025-01-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
economic-impact fifth-amendment investment-backed-expectations penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-takings |
Whether Penn Central Transp. Co. v. City of New York, 438 U.S. 104 (1978), should be clarified or overruled? |
| 24A435 |
Mount Clemens Recreational Bowl, Inc., et al. v. Elizabeth Hertel, Director, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, et al. |
Michigan |
2024-10-31 |
Presumed Complete |
|
economic-impact fifth-amendment investment-backed-expectations just-compensation penn-central-test regulatory-taking |
Question not identified. |
| 24-487 |
James G. Collins v. Monterey County, California |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-10-31 |
Denied |
|
economic-deprivation government-regulation lucas-doctrine penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-taking |
Does a taking analyzed under Lucas v. S.C. Coastal Council require that the affected property be left with no value even if the regulation in question… |
| 24A418 |
The Gym 24/7 Fitness, LLC, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Michigan |
Michigan |
2024-10-30 |
Presumed Complete |
|
fifth-amendment investment-expectations just-compensation penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-taking |
Question not identified. |
| 23-1148 |
G-Max Management, Inc., et al. v. New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2024-04-23 |
Denied |
Amici (5)Relisted (5) |
due-process land-use-regulation landlord-tenant penn-central penn-central-test physical-taking property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings rent-regulation takings |
New York's Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019 transforms a temporary rent-regulation system into a permanent expropriation of vast sw… |
| 23-330 |
Ani Creation, Inc., dba Rasta, et al. v. City of Myrtle Beach Board of Zoning Appeals, et al. |
South Carolina |
2023-09-28 |
Denied |
|
amortization board-of-zoning-appeals business-rights civil-rights constitutional-claims due-process penn-central-test takings takings-clause zoning zoning-ordinance |
The City of Myrtle Beach enacted a new zoning Ordinance in 2018 which outlawed the sale of legal consumer goods being sold by Petitioners for the past… |
| 22-872 |
Evans Creek, LLC v. City of Reno, Nevada |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-03-13 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
constitutional-law constitutional-property due-process land-use-regulation penn-central penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings takings takings-claim |
Whether a property owner states a valid takings claim by alleging that a regulation substantially deprives the owner of the right to use property, or … |
| 21-244 |
Taylor & Sons, Inc., et al. v. United States, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-08-18 |
Denied |
|
5th-amendment economic-impact fifth-amendment just-compensation penn-central penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-taking takings |
At the time the Government required Petitioners to cease doing business under their Chrysler dealer franchises, which are compensable property interes… |
| 21-217 |
Marcy Britton v. Tim Keller, Mayor of the City of Albuquerque, New Mexico, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2021-08-16 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights due-process inverse-condemnation penn-central-test property-rights qualified-immunity regulatory-taking regulatory-takings takings takings-clause |
As a threshold matter, did the lower courts err in light of this Court's recent ruling in of Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid , 141 S. Ct. 2063, (2021) t… |
| 20-335 |
Maryland Reclamation Associates, Inc. v. Harford County, Maryland |
Maryland |
2020-09-14 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-variance due-process fifth-amendment just-compensation penn-central penn-central-test property-rights takings-clause |
After a quarter century of continued litigation and a 2018 adjudication on the merits, a Maryland jury awarded petitioner $45,420,076. in damages for … |
| 19-1074 |
Celgene Corporation v. Laura A. Peter, Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director, Patent and Trademark Office |
Federal Circuit |
2020-03-02 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
administrative-review america-invents-act fifth-amendment inter-partes-review lucas-test patent-rights patent-rights-takings patent-trial-and-appeal-board patents penn-central-test property-rights takings takings-clause |
Whether retroactive application of inter partes review to patents issued before passage of the America Invents Act violates the Takings Clause of the … |
| 19-318 |
Francis A. Bottini, Jr., et al. v. City of San Diego, California, et al. |
California |
2019-09-09 |
Denied |
Amici (2)Response Waived |
due-process first-english first-english-precedent investment-backed-expectations penn-central penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings single-family-housing takings takings-clause temporary-takings |
1. Should the test of Penn Central be construed to totally bar recovery whenever the purchaser of a single-family lot is unable to learn, at the time … |
| 19-223 |
Janice Smyth v. Conservation Commission of Falmouth, et al. |
Massachusetts |
2019-08-20 |
Denied |
Amici (4)Relisted (3) |
character-of-government-action character-of-governmental-action economic-impact investment-backed-expectations investment-expectations land-use-regulation penn-central penn-central-test property-rights property-value regulatory-taking regulatory-takings takings-clause-5th-amendment |
1. Whether the loss of all developmental use of property and a 91.5% decline in its value is a sufficient "economic impact" to support a regulatory ta… |
| 18-573 |
Colony Cove Properties, LLC v. City of Carson, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-11-01 |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
appellate-review character-of-regulatory-action city-of-monterey-v-del-monte-dunes economic-impact investment-backed-expectations investment-expectations jury-trial jury-trial-7th-amendment penn-central penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-takings seventh-amendment standard-of-review takings-clause-5th-amendment |
This Court held in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York, 438 U.S. 104 (1978), that determining whether regulatory action constitutes a … |
| 18-394 |
Denis P. Kelleher, et ux. v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation |
New York |
2018-09-27 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
discretionary-land-use-permit discretionary-permit investment-backed-expectations land-use-restriction palazzolo-v-rhode-island penn-central penn-central-test property-rights real-estate-market regulatory-taking regulatory-takings regulatory-takings-test |
1. Whether a property owner may be deemed to lack investment-backed expectations, and thus be barred from challenging a land use restriction as a regu… |