| 24-1055 |
William Becker, et al. v. City of Hillsboro, Missouri |
Eighth Circuit |
2025-04-07 |
Denied |
|
appellate-review constitutional-law land-use-regulation property-rights regulatory-taking takings-clause |
1. Whether the Court of Appeals declined to follow this Court's opinion in Yee v. City of Escondido, 503 U.S. 519 (1992) by holding that Petitioners h… |
| 23-1148 |
G-Max Management, Inc., et al. v. New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2024-04-23 |
Denied |
Amici (5)Relisted (5) |
due-process land-use-regulation landlord-tenant penn-central penn-central-test physical-taking property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings rent-regulation takings |
New York's Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019 transforms a temporary rent-regulation system into a permanent expropriation of vast sw… |
| 23-6898 |
Jose G. Castillo v. Jean Harper, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-03-05 |
Denied |
IFP |
due-process fifth-amendment jurisdiction land-use-regulation legal-document petition property-rights regulatory-takings scotus takings-clause writ-of-certiorari |
Question not identified. |
| 23-807 |
El Papel, LLC, et al. v. City of Seattle, Washington, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-01-25 |
Denied |
Amici (7)Response Waived |
5th-amendment constitutional-law due-process eighth-circuit land-use-regulation ninth-circuit physical-taking property-rights rental-property takings takings-clause |
Whether an ordinance that compels the possession of property by an unwelcome occupant is a categorical physical taking, as the Eighth Circuit held in … |
| 23-397 |
Preserve Responsible Shoreline Management, et al. v. City of Bainbridge Island, Washington |
Washington |
2023-10-16 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
civil-rights dolan-v-city-of-tigard due-process land-use-regulation legislative-exactions legislative-taking nexus-test nollan-v-california-coastal-commission property-exaction proportionality-standard takings takings-clause |
To allocate the burden of mitigating regional development impacts, a City of Bainbridge Island ordinance requires shoreline property owners to dedicat… |
| 22-1224 |
Randy Ralston, et al. v. San Mateo County, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-06-21 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights coastal-development due-process government-action land-use-regulation pleading-standards property-rights ripeness ripeness-doctrine takings takings-claim |
Randy Ralston and Linda Mendiola (Ralstons) wish to build a retirement home on their residentially zoned land in San Mateo County, California. However… |
| 22-1074 |
George Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, California |
California |
2023-05-04 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (27) |
cedar-point-nursery-v-hassid constitutional-exemption dolan-v-city-of-tigard due-process land-use-regulation legislative-exaction nollan-v-california-coastal-commission pakdel-v-city-and-county-of-san-francisco permit-condition property-rights takings takings-clause |
The question presented is whether a permit exaction is exempt from the unconstitutional-conditions doctrine as applied in Nollan and Dolan simply beca… |
| 22-872 |
Evans Creek, LLC v. City of Reno, Nevada |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-03-13 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
constitutional-law constitutional-property due-process land-use-regulation penn-central penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-taking regulatory-takings takings takings-claim |
Whether a property owner states a valid takings claim by alleging that a regulation substantially deprives the owner of the right to use property, or … |
| 22-309 |
City of Salinas, California v. New Harvest Christian Fellowship |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-09-30 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
circuit-split civil-rights equal-terms equal-terms-provision facial-challenge land-use-regulation religious-land-use rluipa zoning zoning-ordinance |
The "equal terms" provision of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA) states that "[n]o government shall impose or … |
| 20-1286 |
Sacramento County, California v. Joseph Hardesty, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-03-16 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
chosen-profession due-process executive-action executive-decisions land-use land-use-regulation legislative-decisions municipal-decision-making occupational-liberty substantive-due-process zoning-ordinance |
This case presents two questions involving efforts to expand the scope of the substantive component of the Due Process Clause.
1. Land-use regulation… |
| 20-1212 |
Peyman Pakdel, et ux. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-03-03 |
GVR |
Amici (3)Relisted (4) |
42-usc-1983 administrative-remedies exhaustion-of-remedies finality-requirement land-use-regulation property-rights regulatory-takings takings-claim unconstitutional-conditions williamson-county |
Planning for their retirement home, Petitioners (the Pakdels) purchased a tenancy-in-common interest in a six-unit building in San Francisco, which ga… |
| 19-223 |
Janice Smyth v. Conservation Commission of Falmouth, et al. |
Massachusetts |
2019-08-20 |
Denied |
Amici (4)Relisted (3) |
character-of-government-action character-of-governmental-action economic-impact investment-backed-expectations investment-expectations land-use-regulation penn-central penn-central-test property-rights property-value regulatory-taking regulatory-takings takings-clause-5th-amendment |
1. Whether the loss of all developmental use of property and a 91.5% decline in its value is a sufficient "economic impact" to support a regulatory ta… |
| 19-5418 |
Walter Lee Brown v. James Deal, Warden |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-07-31 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process fifth-amendment free-speech jurisdiction land-use-regulation property-rights regulatory-takings standing takings-clause |
RPEN FOR Q CERTiPiCATE F APPEalbiLiTy aich is CONPLiCT WITH PRiOR dECISiONS of THE $\Nra$ BORT, DNOTHER COURT oR APPGS dECISION, aNd IN JUSSTONTiUE CO… |
| 18-54 |
William A. Dabbs, Jr. v. Anne Arundel County, Maryland |
Maryland |
2018-07-10 |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
development-exaction dolan-v-city-of-tigard due-process koontz-v-st-johns-river-water-management-district land-use land-use-development land-use-regulation legislative-exactions legislative-taking monetary-exaction nollan-v-california-coastal-commission permit-conditions property-rights takings takings-clause unconstitutional-conditions |
Whether legislatively proscribed monetary exactions on land use development are subject to scrutiny under the unconstitutional conditions doctrine as … |