No. 19-5418
Walter Lee Brown v. James Deal, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process fifth-amendment free-speech jurisdiction land-use-regulation property-rights regulatory-takings standing takings-clause
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
RPEN FOR Q CERTiPiCATE F APPEalbiLiTy aich is CONPLiCT WITH PRiOR dECISiONS of THE $\Nra$ BORT, DNOTHER COURT oR APPGS dECISION, aNd IN JUSSTONTiUE CONNLiCT WiTH THE
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in holding that the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment does not prohibit the government from requiring a property owner to pay a fee to obtain a permit to use their own property
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-13
Waiver of right of respondent Deal, Warden to respond filed.
2019-07-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 30, 2019)
Attorneys
Deal, Warden
Andrew Alan Pinson — Office of the Georgia Attorney General, Respondent
Walter L. Brown
Walter Lee Brown — Petitioner