| 24-754 |
Mount Clemens Recreational Bowl, Inc., et al. v. Elizabeth Hertel, Director, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, et al. |
Michigan |
2025-01-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
economic-impact fifth-amendment investment-backed-expectations penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-takings |
Whether Penn Central Transp. Co. v. City of New York, 438 U.S. 104 (1978), should be clarified or overruled? |
| 24A435 |
Mount Clemens Recreational Bowl, Inc., et al. v. Elizabeth Hertel, Director, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, et al. |
Michigan |
2024-10-31 |
Presumed Complete |
|
economic-impact fifth-amendment investment-backed-expectations just-compensation penn-central-test regulatory-taking |
Question not identified. |
| 23-169 |
CraneVeyor Corp. v. City of Rancho Cucamonga, California |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-08-22 |
Denied |
|
due-process economic-impact government-action investment-backed-expectations lucas-v-south-carolina penn-central property-rights regulatory-takings takings zoning-regulation |
1. Should this Court overrule in its entirety, or reconsider parts of, Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York, 438 U.S. 104 (1978)?
2. D… |
| 22-7332 |
In Re Michael Paul Martin |
|
2023-04-20 |
Denied |
IFP |
child-pornography commerce-clause congressional-findings constitutional-authority due-process economic-impact fair-notice federal-criminal-offense gonzales-v-raich interstate-commerce |
1. Under Title 18, U.S.C. § 2251(a), is there proper Fair Notice, as set forth by this Court in Fasulo v United States, 272 U.S. 620 (1926); that a cr… |
| 22-7089 |
In Re William Hopmeier |
|
2023-03-24 |
Denied |
IFP |
aggregate-effects-doctrine child-pornography congressional-findings constitutional-authority due-process economic-impact fair-notice gonzales-v-raich interstate-commerce |
1. Under Title 18, U.S.C. § 2251(a), is there proper Fair Notice, as set forth by this Court in Fasulo v United States, 272 U.S. 620 (1926); that a cr… |
| 21-244 |
Taylor & Sons, Inc., et al. v. United States, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-08-18 |
Denied |
|
5th-amendment economic-impact fifth-amendment just-compensation penn-central penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-taking takings |
At the time the Government required Petitioners to cease doing business under their Chrysler dealer franchises, which are compensable property interes… |
| 20-54 |
Bridge Aina Le'a, LLC v. Hawaii Land Use Commission |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-07-22 |
Denied |
Amici (4)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (5) |
7th-amendment civil-rights due-process economic-impact lucas-standard lucas-v-south-carolina penn-central penn-central-factors property-rights regulatory-taking takings temporary-taking |
The State of Hawaii zoned for agricultural use land that it knew was not viable or appropriate for such use. At the property owner's request, it rezon… |
| 19-1175 |
John Fritz, et ux. v. Washoe County, Nevada |
Nevada |
2020-03-26 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
economic-impact economic-impairment fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment government-regulation loretto-v-teleprompter physical-invasion physical-taking property-rights regulatory-takings takings |
To constitute a taking under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, must a physical invasion also destroy or substantially impair an owner's economicall… |
| 19-223 |
Janice Smyth v. Conservation Commission of Falmouth, et al. |
Massachusetts |
2019-08-20 |
Denied |
Amici (4)Relisted (3) |
character-of-government-action character-of-governmental-action economic-impact investment-backed-expectations investment-expectations land-use-regulation penn-central penn-central-test property-rights property-value regulatory-taking regulatory-takings takings-clause-5th-amendment |
1. Whether the loss of all developmental use of property and a 91.5% decline in its value is a sufficient "economic impact" to support a regulatory ta… |
| 18-1062 |
Love Terminal Partners, L.P., et al. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2019-02-13 |
Denied |
Amici (8) |
civil-rights due-process economic-impact fair-market-value federal-law investment-backed-expectations investment-expectations just-compensation property-rights property-taking regulatory-environment regulatory-taking takings |
1. In assessing whether the government has effected a compensable taking, may courts treat real property as worthless simply because the owner was not… |
| 18-573 |
Colony Cove Properties, LLC v. City of Carson, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-11-01 |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
appellate-review character-of-regulatory-action city-of-monterey-v-del-monte-dunes economic-impact investment-backed-expectations investment-expectations jury-trial jury-trial-7th-amendment penn-central penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-takings seventh-amendment standard-of-review takings-clause-5th-amendment |
This Court held in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York, 438 U.S. 104 (1978), that determining whether regulatory action constitutes a … |