gonzales-v-raich
5 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23-123 | Ezekial Flatten, et al. v. Bruce Smith, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2023-08-09 | Denied | Response Waived | cannabis-commerce civil-rights commerce-clause constitutional-limitations due-process federal-legislative-jurisdiction gonzales-v-raich property-rights rico rico-claims state-property-rights | 1. Should this Court reverse Shulman v. Kaplan and restore property rights in cannabis to a status equal to other property rights protectable under RI… |
| 23-41 | Ann Marie Borges, et al. v. County of Mendocino, California | Ninth Circuit | 2023-07-14 | Denied | Response Waived | cannabis-property-rights commerce-clause constitutional-amendments due-process federal-preemption federalism gonzales-v-raich property-rights stare-decisis state-sovereignty | On March 6, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit filed it's unpublished memorandum affirming the district court order dismis… |
| 22-7332 | In Re Michael Paul Martin | 2023-04-20 | Denied | IFP | child-pornography commerce-clause congressional-findings constitutional-authority due-process economic-impact fair-notice federal-criminal-offense gonzales-v-raich interstate-commerce | 1. Under Title 18, U.S.C. § 2251(a), is there proper Fair Notice, as set forth by this Court in Fasulo v United States, 272 U.S. 620 (1926); that a cr… | |
| 22-7089 | In Re William Hopmeier | 2023-03-24 | Denied | IFP | aggregate-effects-doctrine child-pornography congressional-findings constitutional-authority due-process economic-impact fair-notice gonzales-v-raich interstate-commerce | 1. Under Title 18, U.S.C. § 2251(a), is there proper Fair Notice, as set forth by this Court in Fasulo v United States, 272 U.S. 620 (1926); that a cr… | |
| 21-7410 | In Re Eduardo Pineda | 2022-03-17 | Denied | Relisted (2)IFP | constitutional-liberty due-process ex-parte-watkins fifth-amendment fourth-amendment gonzales-v-raich habeas-corpus liberty marijuana marijuana-prohibition | Eduardo Pineda petitions for writ of habeas corpus from Associate Justice Clarence Thomas of the Supreme Court of the United States. "In the early day… |