Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Should the test of Penn Central be construed to totally bar recovery whenever the purchaser of a single-family lot is unable to learn, at the time of purchase, the exact path of allowable development under local law?
2. Should the "normal delay" exception to the total temporary takings rule of First English be construed so broadly as to allow for indefinite and calculated delays to bar recovery of any compensation?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should the investment-backed-expectations test of Penn Central be construed to totally bar recovery whenever the purchaser of a single-family lot is unable to learn, at the time of purchase, the exact path of allowable development under local law?
2019-10-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-10-09
Waiver of right of respondent City of San Diego, et al. to respond filed.
2019-10-08
Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.
2019-10-04
Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed.
2019-09-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 9, 2019)
2019-08-07
Application (19A1) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until September 5, 2019.
2019-08-02
Application (19A1) to extend further the time from August 8, 2019 to September 5, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.
2019-06-28
Application (19A1) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 8, 2019.
2019-06-25
Application (19A1) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 9, 2019 to August 8, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.