No. 21-113
UJ-Eighty Corporation v. City of Bloomington Board of Zoning Appeals
Tags: constitutional-law due-process economic-self-interest municipal-regulation regulatory-power rivals self-interested-entity standing zoning zoning-ordinance
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
The question presented is whether the Due Process Clause prohibits the government from vesting an economically self-interested entity with regulatory power over its rivals, as the D.C. Circuit has held, or whether it does not, as the Delaware Supreme Court and now the Indiana Supreme Court have held.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Due Process Clause prohibits the government from vesting an economically self-interested entity with regulatory power over its rivals
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-26
Brief amici curiae of North American Interfraternity Conference, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2021-08-26
Brief amici curiae of Fraternity Forward Coalition, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2021-08-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-11
Waiver of right of respondent City of Bloomington Board of Zoning Appeals to respond filed.
2021-07-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 26, 2021)
Attorneys
City of Bloomington Board of Zoning Appeals
Philippa M. Guthrie — City of Bloomington Legal Dept., Respondent
Fraternity Forward Coalition and Fraternal Housing Association
Daniel James McCarthy — McCarthy Law Office, Amicus
North American Interfraternity Conference and National Panhellenic Conference
Alexander Volokh — Emory Law School, Amicus
UJ-Eighty Corporation
Robert Stanton Jones — Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Petitioner